- Joined
- Jan 29, 2021
What if I just wanted to buy the skin for completion purposes, but don't want my money going to a ferret peepeepoopoo dungeon?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The main problem is that they saw the casual success of Ultimate and Multiversus (before they fuck that up) and want that but no casual fan is going to drop $30 on a stream only barebone game that requires you to know the mechanics from a 24 years old smash game that none of the newer smash game have.The real tragedy of Rivals 2, is that it could have been Rivals 1 but 2 instead of "melee again", but they went the "melee again" route.
RoA 1 is a testament because it didn't play exactly like Melee, just took inspiration from it and became something new. What a fucking travesty that Dan took that, and instead of making a sequel to that, made ANOTHER sequel to Melee.
Go play Rivals 1, not even just for the workshop, but for the hyper-aggressive movement focused neutral with no ledge grabbing and free-form combos
You shouldn't be playing a furfaggot's smash bros clone to begin with.What if I just wanted to buy the skin for completion purposes, but don't want my money going to a ferret peepeepoopoo dungeon?
hypothetically you could just wait until the event is overWhat if I just wanted to buy the skin for completion purposes, but don't want my money going to a ferret peepeepoopoo dungeon?
Maldy published the game. You've already given him money. That being said the donation incentive does end in April I thinkWhat if I just wanted to buy the skin for completion purposes, but don't want my money going to a ferret peepeepoopoo dungeon?
What if I just wanted to buy the skin for completion purposes, but don't want my money going to a ferret peepeepoopoo dungeon?
Should of said someone, and not I. Because it's really more of a hypothetical. It really comes off as sleazy when someone that has their hand in the pie already as part of the publisher does something like this, is it really "okay" to run a promotional event for an in-game piece of content which the purchase of will directly go that said hand in the pie's personal ventures outside the game? It's kind of like buying a product and profits are going to support "the efforts" in [insert any place that the US is addicted to sending money to]. Can I just buy the game without my money cosmically being used to fund an ongoing conflict, for better or worse? Like I want the product, but I don't want to support things that have nothing to do with the product in a vacuum. Why should a ferret's life hinge on the financial success of a skin being sold in a game. It's fucked up.You shouldn't be playing a furfaggot's smash bros clone to begin with.
I don't know if it counts as a conflict of interest but I think they're referring to the fact that Mald is a co-owner of Offbrand games, who published the game, and is directing the game devs to funnel cash to his own private company, PirateSoftware, for unknown reasons. (perhaps he's not happy with his cut?)What’s with the “conflict of interest” narrative? It’s their own private enterprise, they can disperse funds however they want. It’s not like they’re defrauding shareholders of a publicly traded company, or a silent business partner. There’s only one interest.
What’s with the “conflict of interest” narrative? It’s their own private enterprise, they can disperse funds however they want. It’s not like they’re defrauding shareholders of a publicly traded company, or a silent business partner. There’s only one interest.
It's pretty obvious there is a conflict of interest. Maldy is in an official role at the publisher and is receiving donations from what is essentially a fundraiser ran by a developer that works with them.a situation in which a person is in a position to derive personal benefit from actions or decisions made in their official capacity
Are we really sure about that though? We always thought that Rekieta went even more retarded with his spending after his ritten/depp success (the cars,etc). We already noticed it was retarded before that (3k drawing tablet he used ONCE for a shitty shop job, 50k paintings, etc) but apparently it became even more retarded than we could even possibly thought (losing the house).Mald isn't hurting for money
I checked it out for the first time. It's for babies.View attachment 7117129
i dont even begin to understand what this is about
It's not illegal (I don't think), but is highly inappropriate. Mald "worked with them" on this and no matter who brought it up first, someone should have recognized it's a bad look for them to incentive sales via pitching it to customers as donations going to an animal rescue ran by "Pirate Software" (linking to his youtube) and leave out that MaldWhat’s with the “conflict of interest” narrative? It’s their own private enterprise, they can disperse funds however they want. It’s not like they’re defrauding shareholders of a publicly traded company, or a silent business partner. There’s only one interest.
Imagine how awful Shaye's life is
a bit off topic and very old but this ended up happening and Jerma has been streaming almost daily recently, praise God for offbrand dyingThank God. I was pissed that Jerma started streaming less and focused on his bullshit offbrand job. Hopefully this will lead to him streaming more despite what he says.
I personally couldn't find any info that he's a co-owner, only that he works there at some high level position. I'm not sure where kiwis ITT got the idea that he's a co-owner. If I missed a post I'd appreciate if someone could link it and prove me wrong.Does anyone know/remember if mald is getting paid for his role of publishing director at offbrand games? When I heard him announce that he's joining offbrand, he never mentioned being a co owner of the company...in fact I heard that fact for the first time in this donation news thing. So he's not only a publishing director but also a co owner? When I first said it was shady, I had the impression that he was only an employee so a company he works for is giving money to a company he owns. But not it looks more like a company he owns is giving money to a company he owns.
He said he didn't register as charity because he didnt want to claim tax breaks and give the impression that he's taking money out of his left pocket and putting it in his right pocket...but this sounds like exactly that.
Only way I'm willing to accept this isn't a conflict is they want to say, "He's the Director of Strategy, this is his payment." It's not hard to comprehend that someone doing work receives compensation for it; the problem is how fucking squirrely it is.