Artcow Jason Yungbluth / IamDeathRay / DeathRayGraphics / Wrathofporkins

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
You know what the definition of a "faggot" is? A guy who calls himself a "free speech absolutist" one second before he ejects you from a debate while you are delivering your closing remarks.
Did you know that a stream/channel can be taken down/demonized by people reporting said channel for such speech? If not why did you keep doing it when they told you not to?
 
Hilarious?! Would it have also been hilarious if Van Sciver had sent such a picture to Robbi rather than the other way around?

There is no justification for doing that sort of thing, man.
You just don't understand the Yungbluth philosophy of dual ethics (i.e. double standards) yet.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you ComicsGate.
It doesn't change the fact that you made that comic.

Also, nobody in this thread say anything that @Death Ray can take out of context for Twitterverse wokeness points.

Not that he won't try to anyway, but still.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Adamska and damian
You know what the definition of a "faggot" is? A guy who calls himself a "free speech absolutist" one second before he ejects you from a debate while you are delivering your closing remarks.
I don't think it's inconsistent for someone to agree with the concept of free speech in terms of allowing people to share opinions without fear of repercussion while still disapproving of particular words which are just used to instigate trouble. I don't think Rekieta was out of bounds to prohibit words which might get him in trouble with YouTube.

At any rate, you just used "faggot" as a slur against someone.

Ladies and gentlemen, I give you ComicsGate.

Yes, I'm entirely sure @eldri was earnest in their post and not joking at all.

I think pictures of Ethan's pie-crusted asshole would probably trigger Homeland Security.

You have dodged the question again. I ask again; if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Van Sciver posting pictures of his anus on his public Twitter timeline, would you still have considered it a hilarious prank? Judging by your previous discourse here, I think I know the answer.
 
If ComicsGate had not fashioned itself after GamerGate (with a dose of the philosophy of the Rabid Puppies thrown in), then perhaps, PERHAPS, it would have the dignity necessary to succeed in making such an argument.
Gamergate? You mean that time a bunch of journalists blindly defended an abuser and shamed her victim? Then enabled her to further abuse people using her fake anti-abuse organization? That gamergate?
 
Did you really need to use the toilet each time their was a superchat read on rackets stream or were you running from the opposition? If you really did, you might have diabeetus.

If ComicsGate had not fashioned itself after GamerGate (with a dose of the philosophy of the Rabid Puppies thrown in), then perhaps, PERHAPS, it would have the dignity necessary to succeed in making such an argument.
Funny you mention Quinn, maybe you should read her (and Bat Wu's) thread and to see how full of shit they were regarding GG (much like the Anti-CG ''harrassment'')
 
You have dodged the question again. I ask again; if the shoe was on the other foot and it was Van Sciver posting pictures of his anus on his public Twitter timeline, would you still have considered it a hilarious prank? Judging by your previous discourse here, I think I know the answer.

I really don't think a lot about people's assholes, Least.
 
Did you really need to use the toilet each time their was a superchat read on rackets stream or were you running from the opposition? If you really did, you might have diabeetus.

A bunch of chuds paying five, ten, twenty dollars to try and own me? Sounds like the perfect time to take a piss.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: JohnDoe
If ComicsGate had not fashioned itself after GamerGate (with a dose of the philosophy of the Rabid Puppies thrown in), then perhaps, PERHAPS, it would have the dignity necessary to succeed in making such an argument.
What argument? Sending pictures of your anus to someone is not an argument. And since nobody in CG ever did that, they are of greater dignity than anyone in Anti-CG by far.
 
Back