- Joined
- Dec 12, 2022
I hope she believes the things she’s been saying because if she’s grifting she did it wrong and blew a good chance at making a living online.The last thing anyone anywhere needs is the thoughts and feelings of Melonie Mac.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I hope she believes the things she’s been saying because if she’s grifting she did it wrong and blew a good chance at making a living online.The last thing anyone anywhere needs is the thoughts and feelings of Melonie Mac.
As much as I'd love to see her disappear altogether, her ability to sell her victimhood mentality and victimhood status to people who have similar inclinations will probably always keep her bills paid and even afford her something in the way of modest luxury. Just cause I want to see her fail does not mean she will fail. I still find it disgusting that the world doesn't just let her fail and fall into obscurity.I hope she believes the things she’s been saying because if she’s grifting she did it wrong and blew a good chance at making a living online.
He really fucking is though. I dropped off of watching him for content for ages, but checked in with him for election night. He asked whether people would subscribe if he called his mum, and when X amount of people said they would, he called his mum. Maybe it's me being a bitter old cunt, but fuck me, the guy just rubs me the wrong way with his constant grifting.It's hard to tell with Jeremy because he's in perma-grift mode. But he certainly intimated that his panel show is going away by spring.
Who gets offended over killing spiders?When his chat pushed back that killing spiders was inhumane
Of course he did. Never mind the "were you lying then or are you lying now?" aspect of things, as people do occasionally misspeak, but if he actually sets most spiders outside, the initial statement would be "dealing with spiders." If he faced a pushback for rehoming, his position would be "kill em if you want, it's your place, but I do things my way in my own place."When his chat pushed back that killing spiders was inhumane, Jeremy backpedals insisting he doesn't kill 99% of spiders but instead rehomes them, other than repeat offenders.
I was taught to treat spiders differently than other insects because they provide population control. I try to put them outside too.Who gets offended over killing spiders?
I won't go out of my way to save them, but if ones chilling up in it's web in the corner of a room, it's fine. It's not bothering me and it catches flies and shit. But on multiple occasions I've had one repel from the ceiling inches from my face and that will not be tolerated. Ironically once of those times was while playing Spider-Man. Or if it reaches a certain size it's become too big and I won't have it.I was taught to treat spiders differently than other insects because they provide population control. I try to put them outside too.
The racing stripe. Does he not wash his crusty ass? Does he not even fucking WIPE?In a discussion last week about spousal division of labor, Hambly claims that his SAHW finds "joy" in cleaning off his toilet seat and "cleaning the racing stripe" from his underwear.
He went on to claim that part of his husbandly duties include picking up dogshit, mowing the lawn and "killing spiders".
>repeat offendersWhen his chat pushed back that killing spiders was inhumane, Jeremy backpedals insisting he doesn't kill 99% of spiders but instead rehomes them, other than repeat offenders.
Added in second edit: Primary source without insufferable breadtuber with worthless commentary.
This one is astounding. If the business was floundering and is at risk of complete belly up, he could have used LLC status (assuming he applied for it?) to protect his personal assets in the event the business venture failed. Instead, he not only throws his personal assets in it, he does it at credit card rates. We can infer he's at his capacity with the banks/credit unions already. Literally all he had to do was NOT gamble his personal assets and keep using his infinite money slop glitch to keep making money off reading ten news articles a day with retarded thumbnails. Those vids have almost no base cost and *somehow* get enough views to generate big money. Instead, he buys into a bunch of side projects no one gives a shit about and loses his easy wins. I guess that's the hazard with easy money, it tends to go just as easy, as it isn't valued.- bought an 80k machine on his CC to be able to make the K-cup boxes in-house
We can infer he's at his capacity with the banks/credit unions already. Literally all he had to do was NOT gamble his personal assets and keep using his infinite money slop glitch to keep making money off reading ten news articles a day with retarded thumbnails.
Hambly also mentioned he was going back to solo streaming in May and laying off Melonie/Styx/Luke Rudkowski/Hannah Claire Brimelow/black chick I can't be bothered to look up if his Rumble deal doesn't get renewed (or he gets 4k paypigs to give him 8$/month on his website).
He seemed pretty pessimistic that Rumble was going to extend his deal, saying he isn't aware of any other Rumble talent that has been reupped.
I guess we can infer that the sum cost of the five aforementioned personalities is 32K/month or 384K/year for an average of 76.8K/year per head or 6.4K/mon per head.The 300k debt revelation also puts his threats early this month to lay off all his friends if Rumble doesn't give up the bag again in more context.
The evidence is not 100% conclusive and both the accuser and the denier have credibility issues. Most likely it is true, there is a very slim possibility that it is not. It is most certainly plausible. Rock solid proof would require digging through some bureaucratic records and it simply is not worth it. It's possible that he pivoted from drop shipping to internal production after the scandal (as his latest begging vid suggests) but no one knows with absolute certainty (or at least I don't).at the risk of alarm clocks is this still current info?