Jerry Peet / Lily Orchard / Lily Peet / Valkyrstudios / Bhaalspawn / Tara Callie / "Mod Ebara" - Sociopath writer of pedophile fanfiction and cartoon reviews, faked getting raped to force a divorce, then mobbed and gaslit their ex off Tumblr, satanist neoliberal of the MovieSlob variety, also wants to fuck dogs and/or pokemon

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
This is the same jerry who says he struggles to make ends meet financially to the point his weight is fluctuating wildly. Setting up a lolsuit is no cheap feat and I'm sure @AnOminous actually knows a bit about law so he could go into detail about why this won't be. Saying you're going to sue is just a weak scare tactics because he knows people check his blog and someone will notify Josh, hoping that will either make him shut up about Jerry or make him do something dumb and suitworthy
 
This is the same jerry who says he struggles to make ends meet financially to the point his weight is fluctuating wildly. Setting up a lolsuit is no cheap feat and I'm sure @AnOminous actually knows a bit about law so he could go into detail about why this won't be. Saying you're going to sue is just a weak scare tactics because he knows people check his blog and someone will notify Josh, hoping that will either make him shut up about Jerry or make him do something dumb and suitworthy

You don't really need any kind of special education to know Jerry is full of shit.
 
Imagine this then.

GOFUNDME.COM

"HELP LILY PEET TAKE JOSHUA BURNER TO COURT"
I know you're joking, but its unlikely anyone would chip in more than a couple of hundred, which may just cover the base complaint. Defamation is the type of suit where you'd need a good (and costly!) lawyer to help prove there is malice, and if you lose you're in for one hell of a wakeup call when you need to pay off tens of thousands. Again, money Jerry transparently lacks.

The problem with this theoretical lawsuit is that Josh has:
1) Said he wanted to move on from the spat with Jerry and for a hefty period of time has actually done so (from the response in october 2016 up to now). In 8 months time if there is any "evidence" in the response video (of which theres none, see point #3) it will become completely worthless in court since there's generally only two years SoL for a defamation/libel case.
2) Retracted his claim about Jerry being aware of toons pedophillia when he was corrected. Maybe there would be a legal argument if he still kept it going, but he didn't.
3) Used actual sources on his response video- Jerry's own blog. Lots of sources in fact. archive.is includes the original URL in the top bar so its very easy to verify the legitimacy of his sources, especially since the start of the /embed standard for archiving.
4) To be in a situation where something he's said actually damaged Jerry's reputation. If you take a look at the comments made about josh on asks and on reblogs... that's not really happened. Jerry has said numerous times this has no impact on him mentally aside from wasting his time. You can't say that and then go "well actually you've damaged my reputation and I'm taking you to court now!" you dumbass

I only have about 10 minutes of googling law as experience so I could be wrong on this, (lawkiwis pls help) but on the off chance Josh gets sued and is reading this: You do have a solid defence and I'm sure that if we still have the lolsuit subboard we'll be all rooting for you. :semperfidelis::1::1::1::1:
 
I know you're joking, but its unlikely anyone would chip in more than a couple of hundred, which may just cover the base complaint. Defamation is the type of suit where you'd need a good (and costly!) lawyer to help prove there is malice, and if you lose you're in for one hell of a wakeup call when you need to pay off tens of thousands. Again, money Jerry transparently lacks.

Lawyers don't generally operate on credit especially for losers who they know aren't good for it. Jerry would either be paying up front or would have to have a good enough case to attract someone to do it on contingency. I'm sure there are some good lawyers working on that kind of basis, but most people who do defamation on contingency are low rent sleazeballs going for nuisance settlements.

So unless Josh is some millionaire who can go making $10k payoffs to make some jerkoff go away, he doesn't have enough money either to make even a shakedown worthwile.
 
Oh hey, Lily doesn't understand what forgiveness is, and thinks of it as the wishy washy "forget all wrongs" definition instead of the actual "stop feeling angry or resentful toward (someone) for an offense, flaw, or mistake" definition that Doctor Wolf was implying.

Oh hey, Lily doesn't understand that not everything has to be taken seriously, trying to compare the way people see movies to politics.

Oh hey, Lily basically screeches at Silver Quill and Doctor Wolf for giving legitimately good advice and

"I, on the other hand, I have a lot of experience with these kinds of things [abuse]."

I'm sure you do, Lily, being a perpetrator and all.

Edit: Oh hey, Lily actually shows a shot of Katara and the man who killed her mother. I'm surprised that slipped by considering that's perhaps one of the best examples of "forgiveness" in western media, since she basically decides he's not worth the revenge.
 
Last edited:
Oh hey, Lily doesn't understand what forgiveness is, and thinks of it as the wishy washy "forget all wrongs" definition instead of the actual "stop feeling angry or resentful toward (someone) for an offense, flaw, or mistake" definition that Doctor Wolf was implying.

Oh hey, Lily doesn't understand that not everything has to be taken seriously, trying to compare the way people see movies to politics.

Oh hey, Lily basically screeches at Silver Quill and Doctor Wolf for giving legitimately good advice and

"I, on the other hand, I have a lot of experience with these kinds of things [abuse]."

I'm sure you do, Lily, being a perpetrator and all.

Edit: Oh hey, Lily actually shows a shot of Katara and the man who killed her mother. I'm surprised that slipped by considering that's perhaps one of the best examples of "forgiveness" in western media, since she basically decides he's not worth the revenge.

Why would he? Being exposed to hatred since he was a kid would cloud his sense of morality. To him, nobody matters other than him. His mind think revenge is the best kind of justice. Being fair is not a option for diplomacy. And disagreements are a key to burning full built bridges to keep the status quo he set himself up with.

Jerry's M.O has been built on vengeance, spite, hatred, and remorse. His brother laments everything that happened to him the last we saw from him. But even he couldn't wake Jerry up from his bubble.

I'm not wishing the guy harm, or anything. I'm just saying that he should take a step back before things lead to something else.
 
http://archive.is/u6Bd7
Screenshot-2018-02-06_10.23.20.png


http://archive.is/ACDlW

Screenshot-2018-02-06_09.42.08.png


Edit: a ask from Lizzy.
https://archive.is/pq58K
20180206_100004.png
 
Last edited:
If calling him a male means more "I'm gonna punch your fucking teeth in!!" nonsense, then by all means, Jerry's still a dude, nobody's crying about that except him lmao

Wanting to assault someone for misgendering him sure does validate the idea that he doesn't care what "Right-Wingers" have to say about his gender though. :lol::lol::lol:

Please excuse the doublepost (and my constant habit of it), and get ready for this, it's pretty autistic.

I made a couple of rather interesting discoveries on Twitter in the past week, and finally got the inspiration to post it here.

TL;DR Jerry's fans outright refuse to acknowledge Stockholm, even when it's flashed right in front of their faces, and will make shitty and extremely flimsy excuses for him.

https://twitter.com/silvereyes04/status/958669942643216384
https://archive.is/ya79C
Twit1.jpeg

twit2.jpeg

Twit3.jpeg

Jerry's fans keep making excuses for Stockholm's existence, INCLUDING "The pedophilia in this story is justified because it's meant to shock!" (not a good excuse) or "She made an honest mistake!" (nobody "accidentally" writes pedophilia), etc, along with people throwing the same "The molester is killed, so sexualization of teenagers is okay!" nonsense that Jerry keeps espousing.

Fun fact: Rainbow Dash is never actually killed in Stockholm. So these people are talking out of their ass, and just parroting what Jerry always says without supporting evidence. Which story is the one where the "molester gets tortured and killed", then?

In addition,
https://twitter.com/patchie_the_cat/status/960627533917036545
https://archive.is/gEvXK
twit4.jpeg

(This is the same Patchworkheart person from earlier)
:story: Because Jerry has a crystal-clear reputation worth keeping, yep
I'm somewhat interested as to which region of her ass she pulled that one out of.

I don't think I have to point all of the following out, but I will:
  • Stockholm was written (and published) in early 2014, well before Gamergate, and possibly well-before Molestia, so who tried to frame him?
  • It's consistent with its TV Tropes page, which, somewhat interestingly, was actually published a week before FiMFetch says Stockholm was published, by Alchorative (Tara Callie), no less. That's not necessarily incriminating (the story could have been taken down and put back up after a short while) but still noteworthy.
  • Nobody would write a nearly 200000 (two hundred thousand) word fanfiction with kid ponies having orgies and getting fucked just to frame some dude acting like a douchebag on the internet. If you think that could be happening, then you're either willfully ignorant, naive, or just simply reaching.

But let's throw those points out the window, and take a look at this right here:

http://nintendogal55.tumblr.com/post/77059577229/stockholm-google-drive
https://archive.is/1hdyD
ninten.png

(Thanks @chadmuska)

Uh-huh. So, Nintendogal, Stockholm's co-writer, endorsed the story, and reblogged a post from Jerry himself, which explicitly says that there is Ephebephilia in the story (and don't forget, Jerry believes that ephebephilia and pedophilia are a "distinction without a difference".).

So many people in those twitter threads are begging for definitive proof because apparently a FiMfetch archive "could have been written/copied from elsewhere by one of her detractors", so, here it is. A still-published post from the still-active nintendogal55 account. Granted, the MEGA links are broken, but the story contents list right there and the summary are consistent with the actual story.

I should put an image macro of this together. It's quite fascinating.
upload_2018-2-6_13-25-10.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A long ass time ago I showed this to a Jerry fanboy and pointed out how there was child porn in it. There response was something along the lines of "So, we've all written smut."
 
A long ass time ago I showed this to a Jerry fanboy and pointed out how there was child porn in it. There response was something along the lines of "So, we've all written smut."

Most people who write smut keep it to themselves, or at least write it under a different pen name, and don’t mention it to anyone.
 
A long ass time ago I showed this to a Jerry fanboy and pointed out how there was child porn in it. There response was something along the lines of "So, we've all written smut."
Exactly. Every one of Jerry's fans keep making excuses to beat around the bush, and they outright refuse to accept the stuff that's right in front of them. It's pretty sad, how far they'll go to defend a pedophile.

And the fact that Lizzy thinks everything said about Jerry is a lie doesn't help much either.
 
Back