Orbiter Jetrex / Jetrex56 / Logan Alan Westfall - arrested on suspicion of sexually molesting 8 year old

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Even if he did take a plea for a lesser charge by ratting out another pedo, he molested someone in his family. If/when he gets out you can bet he's not gonna be around family so group home for him. So he'll be just like his buddy Ross.

Sheeeit, he might even move in with Ross.

 

[OB 946]

The problem with that is that the victim was most likely someone from his family or within his social circle. So I doubt he really has much to share in the way of evidence against other people.

Another point is that the news articles on this case are limited and all the "journalists" simply read the police department press release to write their articles.

The problem with the police report is that it doesn't actually make a distinction of whether he was reported "by a family member" or if the child was molested "by a family member"

"The Red Bluff Police Department received a report of the molestation of an 8 year old child by a family member."


Its possible to get both of those scenarios out of the same sentence and its even plausible that if the report was made externally that it came from someone he knew on the internet.

You have to be able to read copese. The press releases are boilerplate, and how cops talk and communicate often disregard normal syntax or grammar. How it should read to make more sense is

"The Red Bluff Police Department received a report of: the molestation of an 8 year old child by a family member."

So he molested a family member.

Edit: The reason for this is mainly because certain things have very specific definitions. Like, you can't say someone is "dealing drugs" in a PCA because depending on the wording he could be in possession with intent to distribute, or if it's over a certain amount it's trafficking an illegal substance, but don't say just "trafficking" in your PCA because if it's a certain type of drug it's trafficking a controlled dangerous substance. Someone have a stolen phone on them? Don't say they just had a stolen phone, because possessing, receiving, and concealing stolen property are different charges with specific legal definitions and different statute numbers under different subsections in the criminal title of the law. Someone is swerving on the road? Is that aggravated reckless driving under the criminal title or reckless driving under the traffic title?

So what happens is cops just naturally start talking in the exact statute descriptions. "Oh he was conceal stolen property and possess with intent." Because the book description for Statute Number xxxxxxxx(2)(A) is "conceal stolen property"

Also, fun fact, the assholes in the state legislature fucked up the spelling of Marijuana in the law they passed, so whenever someone gets arrested or charged with "unlawful possession of marijuana" it legally has to be written on all official documents, including the PCA, court docket, and all official records as "unlawful possession of marihuana[sic]"

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I love how everyone who's tried to take down Ross short of Mister Metokur had it backfire on them like stabbing a Nazgûl with a pencil.

Spoiler

I like to think Metokur is actually our Tom Bombadil.

 

[neger psykolog]

You have to be able to read copese. The press releases are boilerplate, and how cops talk and communicate often disregard normal syntax or grammar. How it should read to make more sense is

"The Red Bluff Police Department received a report of: the molestation of an 8 year old child by a family member."

So he molested a family member.

Edit: The reason for this is mainly because certain things have very specific definitions. Like, you can't say someone is "dealing drugs" in a PCA because depending on the wording he could be in possession with intent to distribute, or if it's over a certain amount it's trafficking an illegal substance, but don't say just "trafficking" in your PCA because if it's a certain type of drug it's trafficking a controlled dangerous substance. Someone have a stolen phone on them? Don't say they just had a stolen phone, because possessing, receiving, and concealing stolen property are different charges with specific legal definitions and different statute numbers under different subsections in the criminal title of the law. Someone is swerving on the road? Is that aggravated reckless driving under the criminal title or reckless driving under the traffic title?

So what happens is cops just naturally start talking in the exact statute descriptions. "Oh he was conceal stolen property and possess with intent." Because the book description for Statute Number xxxxxxxx(2)(A) is "conceal stolen property"

Also, fun fact, the assholes in the state legislature fucked up the spelling of Marijuana in the law they passed, so whenever someone gets arrested or charged with "unlawful possession of marijuana" it legally has to be written on all official documents, including the PCA, court docket, and all official records as "unlawful possession of marihuana[sic]"

That's a pretty informative post.

Another curiosity is that there was supposedly an "investigation" but even that is vague. The TV news idiots made it sound like that took time, which would imply that they only found out about it because of an external report or maybe some red flag from a doctor or something.

I was going to make a joke earlier about how I guess we shouldn't expect anymore "The Saints" podcasts...

Turns out I would've been wrong to post that though:

https://twitter.com/TheSaintsGroup/status/997612830793879553
http://archive.fo/u9kQ7

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

I was going to make a joke earlier about how I guess we shouldn't expect anymore "The Saints" podcasts...

Turns out I would've been wrong to post that though:
View attachment 453647
https://twitter.com/TheSaintsGroup/status/997612830793879553
http://archive.fo/u9kQ7

I can't wait for them to have threads.

 

[AnOminous]

That's a pretty informative post.

Another curiosity is that there was supposedly an "investigation" but even that is vague. The TV news idiots made it sound like that took time, which would imply that they only found out about it because of an external report or maybe some red flag from a doctor or something.

Remember it took a few months from when CPS started looking into Nick Bate before they arrested him, to the point that when CPS issued their final report, Nick was autistic enough to assume he'd won (and was arrested shortly thereafter). They made sure he was kept away from the victim during this time, though.

 

[actually]

That's a pretty informative post.

Another curiosity is that there was supposedly an "investigation" but even that is vague. The TV news idiots made it sound like that took time, which would imply that they only found out about it because of an external report or maybe some red flag from a doctor or something.

There's a pretty decent chance there was an outcry of some sort (telling a teacher, doctor, parent) followed by an investigation culminating in this arrest. If somebody is able to follow the trial, there'll probably be documentation about how the investigation was started.

 

[AnOminous]

There's a pretty decent chance there was an outcry of some sort (telling a teacher, doctor, parent) followed by an investigation culminating in this arrest. If somebody is able to follow the trial, there'll probably be documentation about how the investigation was started.

It's very likely he was already under investigation at the very time he was chimping out about Ross.

 

[James Smith]

Let's be completely honest here: if the cops found it so can people from Kiwi Farms. We'll know eventually.

 

[ThousandPointsOfLight]

Remember it took a few months from when CPS started looking into Nick Bate before they arrested him, to the point that when CPS issued their final report, Nick was autistic enough to assume he'd won (and was arrested shortly thereafter). They made sure he was kept away from the victim during this time, though.

The day the confetti fell on this site was a good day

 

[BSV]

It's to bad Jetrex didn't insult Mr. Pedo detective at some point. Bryan might actually have scored a hit.

 

[Adamska]

I love how everyone who's tried to take down Ross short of Mister Metokur had it backfire on them like stabbing a Nazgûl with a pencil.

Oh, that's because they're trying to punch down and trollshield with a very stupid motherfucker. The problem is they're as bad if not worse than he is, so it turns into hilarious failure due to them being worse.

 

[MarvinTheParanoidAndroid]

Oh, that's because they're trying to punch down and trollshield with a very stupid motherfucker. The problem is they're as bad if not worse than he is, so it turns into hilarious failure due to them being worse.

So in reality, they're punching horizontally and in some cases, such as this, punching up.

 

[Orc Girls Make Due]

I should remind you that @FunnY did admit to me in the Ross thread that they had dated a 14 yr. old and there were some other constraining factors to the group as a whole where they seemed to joke about pedophilia as a whole, reviewing the video log when I can to get clips of where and when things were said.

I think in all this whole group is full of projection and degeneration at this point.

"That was honestly a mistake at the time and she was 15 last year at the time. I'll still admit to my mistakes either way and don't care if this gets down repped."

 

[Jack Awful]

Another degenerate off the streets.
Hopefully he'll get a taste of his own medicine when he's on the inside.
Rectally.
And orally.
At the same time.

 

[Feline Darkmage]

It's always the ones who pedohunt spergrage the hardest that are hiding this kind of evil. This is why I've always said "lol gross child molesters" rather than "REEEEE THIS GUYS A PEDO LYNCH HIM"

Classic pedoshielder. Shame that Luke McKee is on a different continent, these two would have made good cellmates.

 

[CrowleysCambion95]

Wow color me shocked *sarcasm*
Dude seemed a bit fishy

 

[neger psykolog]

He was actually arrested on the 16th May.

http://inmates.tehamaso.org/inmates/ICUD0274.HTM
http://archive.fo/PECSt

• Bail increased to $4,000,000 from $2,100,000
• SEX PENETRATION BY OBJECT was dismissed
• L&L W/CHILD -14:FORCE/ETC F was added
• The charges now have X2 and X3 after them which I assume is for multiple charges or multiple victims?

http://inmates.tehamaso.org/inmates/ICUD0274.HTM
http://archive.fo/72dw6

(@AnOminous & @gobbogobb would you be able to share any insight around what the "multiple" charges would perhaps be about?)

 

[AnOminous]

(@AnOminous & @gobbogobb would you be able to share any insight around what the "multiple" charges would perhaps be about?)

Either they're charging him separately for different specific acts, or even worse, multiple victims.

 

[BSV]

Someone made me aware of this:
https://www.youtube.com/user/transformersfan123
It's his old youtube channel.