Okay. You will die in agony and your parents will cry, then bury you with your real name. I conducted this study scientifically with a council of my peers. Who include the renowned physicist Rosey Palms and her five sisters.
View attachment 2064218
Nice projection, vidiot who is almost certain to die violently. how many times do you need to be told that I AM NOT A TRANSSEXUAL? I have no intention of modifying my body at all besides trying to drop about 50 pounds of fat.
Show me a gender. Physically show me one. Measure one for me objectively.
You can't, becuase it's a 'social construct.' I.E. It doesn't exist.
I don't need a "peer reviewed" paper for that. I can reason all by myself.
Die stupid then. We're done here. You're a waste of bandwidth; nothing more than another transphobic talking turd to ignore.
More like "abused children and their abusers."
If you were actually properly informed about the dynamic between transgender children, their parents and their physicians, you would understand that forcing transgender children into cisgender roles is child abuse, but you're not. We are witnessing the first generation of happy transgender children in the history of western civilization. Why do you want to take their happiness away? How does a person's gender expression have any impact on you that you should be so hostile toward transgender children's parents?
Well I thought my very first post was kinda respectful but I guess I was wrong. I asked about JK rowling because of the thread title, but you now have changed the story saying shes insignificant which i would agree, she really hasnt done anything against transpeople but just specify there is a difference between sex and gender which I would think most people would agree with. I would also like to know who is committing genocide against "queers" because if this in indeed happening no one is talking about it and as you are very big on providing proof I would be very interested to see it.
It was respectful enough, but you got stuck on stupid on several points. I'm not the only one who dares call it genocide either.
Anybody who supports the anti-trans legislation is complicit in a genocidal agenda. Trans people are being killed for being transgender and in some countries it's open season on them. In Brazil, the police kill them pretty regularly. Some 3/4 of all transgender people in the US report being assaulted for being transgender at least once in their lives. All five conditions of the UN definition of genocide apply to the gender non-conforming community, which has representatives in ever other demographic.
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such:
- Killing members of the group;
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
Elements of the crime
The
Genocide Convention establishes in Article I that the crime of genocide may take place in the context of an armed conflict, international or non-international, but also in the context of a peaceful situation. The latter is less common but still possible. The same article establishes the obligation of the contracting parties to prevent and to punish the crime of genocide.
The popular understanding of what constitutes genocide tends to be broader than the content of the norm under international law. Article II of the
Genocide Convention contains a narrow definition of the crime of genocide, which includes two main elements:
- A mental element: the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such"; and
- A physical element, which includes the following five acts, enumerated exhaustively:
- Killing members of the group
- Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group
- Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part
- Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group
- Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group
The intent is the most difficult element to determine. To constitute genocide, there must be a proven intent on the part of perpetrators to physically destroy a national, ethnical, racial or religious group. Cultural destruction does not suffice, nor does an intention to simply disperse a group. It is this special intent, or
dolus specialis, that makes the crime of genocide so unique. In addition, case law has associated intent with the existence of a State or organizational plan or policy, even if the definition of genocide in international law does not include that element.
Importantly, the victims of genocide are deliberately targeted - not randomly – because of their real or perceived membership of one of the four groups protected under the Convention (which excludes political groups, for example). This means that the target of destruction must be the group, as such, and not its members as individuals. Genocide can also be committed against only a part of the group, as long as that part is identifiable (including within a geographically limited area) and “substantial.”
