UK JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law - JK Rowling described several transgender women as men on the day of the new hate crime law

Archive (live)

1711985846901.png

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

The law does not protect women as a group from hatred.

The Scottish government is expected to include this later in a separate misogyny law.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X, external on the day the new legislation came into force.

She wrote: "Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls."

She added: "It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man.

"Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal."

Ms Rowling highlighted some criminal cases, including transgender rapist Isla Bryson and Andrew Miller, who abducted and assaulted a girl in the Scottish Borders.

She described them as men in a series of posts, that also included transgender campaigners and other individuals.

Ms Rowling said: "I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment."

Police Scotland said it had not received any complaints over the posts.

1711985867892.png

The maximum penalty under the new act in Scotland is a jail sentence of seven years.

A person commits an offence if they communicate material, or behave in a manner, "that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive," with the intention of stirring up hatred based on protected characteristics.

Hatred based on race, sex and religion was already illegal in Great Britain under the Public Order Act 1986, but that will also now fall under the new act in Scotland

The bar for this offence is lower than for the other protected characteristics, as it also includes "insulting" behaviour.

In England and Wales stirring up hatred over race, religion or sexual orientation by threatening behaviour remains illegal.

1711985891501.png

In Scotland, the new act also consolidates existing laws on crimes which are "aggravated by prejudice" towards a protected characteristic.

This can be taken into account by a judge who might issue a longer sentence or a higher fine.

A protest group of around 200 people gathered outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh on the morning the new law came into effect.

The Scottish government said the Hate Crime Act would provide protection from hate and prejudice without stifling individual expression.

First Minister Humza Yousaf said it was designed to deal with what he called a "rising tide of hatred" in society.

In response to general criticism of the act, he said: "Unless your behaviour is threatening or abusive and intends to stir up hatred, then you have nothing to worry about in terms of the new offences being created."
 
She made an entire movie that romanticized Dumbledore and Grindelwald as a gay couple.
As I said, I don't agree with everything she does, but she's taking huge personal risks with sums of money nobody here will ever make in a lifetime.
Agreed. Good on her on having conviction with her red line. But never forget
This is the future you helped to build Rowling. I hope you are happy.
for every other progressive retarded take she was all in and actively courted the faggots and race grifters. She just happened to disagree with one point and we know how these lunatics behave if you don't agree with everything. When I see Rowling calling out paki rape gangs, how the poo in the loo menace is taking over the UK, how feminism is all about hating men or how the only thing the government seems to care about is race swapping characters in BBC historical pieces, then I will consider her "based". She's not "based", she's just an ally of convenience, never forget.

Treat her as such, a boon when it comes to trannies, but untrustworthy for anything else.
 
This bitch was happy to repeat lies and slander against PewDiePie in 2017 like a complete tool, and was happy to push for shit like this when it came to speaking ill of feminism and liberalism and gay sex back then as well. The only reason she isn't anymore is because she said no to sucking the feminine penis, and now she is the enemy.
I get your point, at the same time, nobody is going to be the perfect person who has never wanted any of this but also has the resources to do what she does. She was wrong about all that stuff. She’s right about this stuff. That’s the hand we are dealt and I can take that.
She will get nowhere going full anti gay marriage, but she will go a long way with being reasonably anti Troon.
I would be very interested to see if she’s changed her mind on any of her previously liberal views in light of what’s happened. I would hope so, and I would expect she’d never publicly say so either.

When I see Rowling calling out paki rape gangs, how the poo in the loo menace is taking over the UK, how feminism is all about hating men or how the only thing the government seems to care about is race swapping characters in BBC historical pieces, then I will consider her "based". She's not "based", she's just an ally of convenience, never forget.
I’m going to be cynical and play devils advocate. She would be wise not to. Look at what’s happened to everyone else who has done so. They’re labelled by the press as far right hate mongers. It’s much easier to label someone that when they have multiple views the establishment don’t like.
The reason she’s got so far with this is because she restricts it to very sensible stuff that no person in their right mind could oppose while still having opinions the average Reddit lib can identify with. If she went fully based they’d be able to ignore her . The left didn’t get where they are immediately, they did it by a slow chipping away - the long march through the institutions. There are two options for getting back to a middle ground. One is intense violence and the other is marching back with small victories
 
Purity tests are for commies and children (but I repeat myself)

If you aren't capable of availing yourself of the benefits JK Rowling provides to the fight against troonery, you aren't skilled enough to win that fight
 
I’m going to be cynical and play devils advocate. She would be wise not to. Look at what’s happened to everyone else who has done so. They’re labelled by the press as far right hate mongers. It’s much easier to label someone that when they have multiple views the establishment don’t like.
The reason she’s got so far with this is because she restricts it to very sensible stuff that no person in their right mind could oppose while still having opinions the average Reddit lib can identify with. If she went fully based they’d be able to ignore her . The left didn’t get where they are immediately, they did it by a slow chipping away - the long march through the institutions. There are two options for getting back to a middle ground. One is intense violence and the other is marching back with small victories
Could be, but for example, the rape gangs is something that hits very close to her sphere of influence of women's shelters. That she decries the trannies invading them but not the rape gangs that make them a necessity tells me a lot already.
Purity tests are for commies and children (but I repeat myself)

If you aren't capable of availing yourself of the benefits JK Rowling provides to the fight against troonery, you aren't skilled enough to win that fight
Definitely, take advantage of her going all in on the antitranny, her basically going "enforce it against me faggots" is great. But don't be a retard and be surprised when the trannies are vanquished and she suddenly becomes an enemy again is what I'm warning about.
 
A lot of people seem to completly forget that J.K. Rowling was a complete and total libshit for decades, and her pivot to "centrist" and "conservative" didn't have anything to do with her but with the movement around her going much farther much faster.

This bitch was happy to repeat lies and slander against PewDiePie in 2017 like a complete tool, and was happy to push for shit like this when it came to speaking ill of feminism and liberalism and gay sex back then as well. The only reason she isn't anymore is because she said no to sucking the feminine penis, and now she is the enemy.

She is nothing more than a ally of convenience. She has enabled this shit and is directly responsible for things getting this bad. She made her bed and is now enjoying it. If trannies went away she would return to be her obnoxious feminist self in a heartbeat without any understanding of why it led to trannies in the first place.
she is an outspoken third-wave feminist.
the only reason this happened is the slippery slope of women's rights vs transwomen.
she did well by the fame & fortune standard of about 10 years (1997-harry Potter one)(beat IP lawyers for rights to become rich).
 
I smell bs here . You are telling me the troon brigade didn't blew up the phones with complaints?
What, actually get past their phone anxiety and call the police - and possibly get misgendered in doing so?

No, they'll have stuck with tweets and maybe emails, and even then they'd rather send hate right to Rowling instead of the authorities. They're probably lying, but they also probably didn't receive many complaints as the troons will just tweet their death threats directly at the source, a bit of a no-no when you're playing the victim.
 
If a pleb said this shit they'd have already arrested her and thrown her in a cell.

But JK has enough money to buy all of Scotland and turn it into TERFTopia if she so chooses. The inconvenience of dealing with someone with the means to tie you up in legal battles until the end of time just to stan for troons isn't worth it.
 
A lot of people seem to completly forget that J.K. Rowling was a complete and total libshit for decades, and her pivot to "centrist" and "conservative" didn't have anything to do with her but with the movement around her going much farther much faster.
She accused Pewdiepie for being a Nazi, she has TDS as well.

She's fighting this war because she's a feminist. Remember when the right was anti-feminism?
 
JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.
I hope they do arrest her. Either she goes to jail, in which case get fucked shitlib, or she wins and the law gets struck down and is no longer a problem.

But don't be a retard and be surprised when the trannies are vanquished and she suddenly becomes an enemy again is what I'm warning about.
This won't ever be a problem. We, at least the UK & blue America, are already past the tipping point on troons. If troons are vanquished, it'll be because the whole mess of faggorty was vanquished as well. You can't be anti-troon and pro-LGB anymore, you are just the frog being slow boiled at that point. Either you jump out completely or die in it.

pro-troon, which she isn't.
JK is pro-troon, she's said in the past she is okay with people living the lives they want to. She just isn't comfortable with them being in "women's spaces". She is literally the frog being slow boiled to death. There's a reason why a majority of harry potter fans scream TWAW.
 
Back