UK JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law - JK Rowling described several transgender women as men on the day of the new hate crime law

Archive (live)

1711985846901.png

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

The law does not protect women as a group from hatred.

The Scottish government is expected to include this later in a separate misogyny law.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X, external on the day the new legislation came into force.

She wrote: "Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls."

She added: "It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man.

"Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal."

Ms Rowling highlighted some criminal cases, including transgender rapist Isla Bryson and Andrew Miller, who abducted and assaulted a girl in the Scottish Borders.

She described them as men in a series of posts, that also included transgender campaigners and other individuals.

Ms Rowling said: "I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment."

Police Scotland said it had not received any complaints over the posts.

1711985867892.png

The maximum penalty under the new act in Scotland is a jail sentence of seven years.

A person commits an offence if they communicate material, or behave in a manner, "that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive," with the intention of stirring up hatred based on protected characteristics.

Hatred based on race, sex and religion was already illegal in Great Britain under the Public Order Act 1986, but that will also now fall under the new act in Scotland

The bar for this offence is lower than for the other protected characteristics, as it also includes "insulting" behaviour.

In England and Wales stirring up hatred over race, religion or sexual orientation by threatening behaviour remains illegal.

1711985891501.png

In Scotland, the new act also consolidates existing laws on crimes which are "aggravated by prejudice" towards a protected characteristic.

This can be taken into account by a judge who might issue a longer sentence or a higher fine.

A protest group of around 200 people gathered outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh on the morning the new law came into effect.

The Scottish government said the Hate Crime Act would provide protection from hate and prejudice without stifling individual expression.

First Minister Humza Yousaf said it was designed to deal with what he called a "rising tide of hatred" in society.

In response to general criticism of the act, he said: "Unless your behaviour is threatening or abusive and intends to stir up hatred, then you have nothing to worry about in terms of the new offences being created."
 

JK Rowling hate law posts not criminal, police say


Archive

Social media comments made by JK Rowling challenging Scotland's new hate crime law are not being treated as criminal, Police Scotland has said.

The Harry Potter author described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

The new law creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to protected characteristics.

The force said complaints had been received but no action would be taken.

Reacting to the news, Ms Rowling posted on X: "I hope every woman in Scotland who wishes to speak up for the reality and importance of biological sex will be reassured by this announcement, and I trust that all women - irrespective of profile or financial means - will be treated equally under the law.

"If they go after any woman for simply calling a man a man, I'll repeat that woman's words and they can charge us both at once."

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021, which came into effect on Monday, makes it a criminal offence to make derogatory comments based on disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

Stirring up hatred based on race, colour, nationality or ethnicity was already illegal in Great Britain under the Public Order Act 1986 but is now included in the new law.

Prime Minister Rishi Sunak earlier backed Ms Rowling's stance stating the UK had a proud tradition of free speech.

Mr Sunak would not be drawn on whether he supported her approach, saying that it was "not right for me to comment on police matters, individual matters".

But he added: "We should not be criminalising people saying common sense things about biological sex, clearly that isn't right.

"We have a proud tradition of free speech."

Scotland's First Minister Humza Yousaf said racist graffiti, which appeared near his home, is a reminder of why Scotland must take a "zero-tolerance" approach to hate crime.

He said the law was designed to deal with what he called a "rising tide of hatred" in society.

A spokesperson for the first minister said: "The prime minister's comments ignore the fact that the right to freedom of expression is built into the Act and that it also has a high threshold for criminality.

"The legislation does not prevent people expressing controversial, challenging or offensive views, nor does it seek to stifle criticism or rigorous debate in any way."

The law states that it is a defence for a person charged with stirring up hatred to show that their actions were "reasonable."

It also references the right to freedom of expression in the European Convention on Human Rights, which includes protection for "ideas that offend, shock or disturb."


At the heart of Ms Rowling's criticism of the hate crime law is the fact that it does not include biological sex as a protected characteristic.

The Scottish government points out that it is planning a separate law to tackle hatred and harassment of women which it says will be introduced at Holyrood by the end of the parliamentary term in 2026.

'Great relief'​

Supporters of Ms Rowling welcomed Police Scotland's decision.

Susan Smith of For Women Scotland, which campaigned against recent proposed changes to gender law, told the BBC's Newscast podcast that it was "a great relief but it's only happened because she pushed it".

"Now hopefully anybody else who says something similar will know that they are protected," added Ms Smith.

Earlier, Dr Nick McKerrell, a senior law lecturer at Glasgow Caledonian University, told BBC Radio Scotland's Drivetime he thought it was unlikely that Ms Rowling would be prosecuted.

He told the programme: "On balance I think she probably won't be prosecuted because the test in the legislation states that you have to be threatening and abusive to someone with your language which essentially means that you have to cause them fear and alarm.

"I think it's close to the edge but I don't think, as it stands, those communications do that.

"Also, within the law, there is a protection for being offensive or shocking in your language and I think it could fall into that category of being offensive and shocking, but not in the realm of criminality."

The lecturer added: "There is a test for stirring up hatred, which the courts have recognised. It's quite a high level to stir up hatred.

"So any group that thinks this law is going to lower that is wrong."
 
I really wouldn’t be surprised is Rowling reversed some of the more liberal opinions she held about 5-10 years ago. She was quite tolerant of transsexuals and all she said is that there are biological differences, now these fucking loons have called for her head on a pike and tbh I’m sure its made her reevaluate her stances.

Regardless, Rowling is a queen. She gave tens of millions to a battered women’s shelter I was working for that was just days away from folding and asked us to keep the donation private. Respect.
 
Terfs, troons,
Bad goons!

Scottish cuck popo afraid of karen lol. Are they wearing skirts? It is Scotland after all!
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
Social media comments made by JK Rowling challenging Scotland's new hate crime law are not being treated as criminal, Police Scotland has said.
Can't help thinking that that if it wasn't someone with the profile and the FO money to make a prosecution as much, if not more, onerous for the prosecution as Rowling it would be a different conclusion. When they reach similar decisions on nobodies instead of prosecuting, intimidating and cancelling those who can't defend themselves I'll take this more seriously.
"If they go after any woman for simply calling a man a man, I'll repeat that woman's words and they can charge us both at once."
So close, so close. Just needed to make the statement in respect of "anyone", "that person" but she couldn't. She has a good effect in many ways but don't forget who and what she is.
 
It'd be a lovely day if mr. Yousaf, with police in tow, breaks down the doors to whichever of Joanne's mansions she's hiding in, and violently pegs her down to the floor.

"Ms. Rowling, did you put your trannyhate into the series of tubes?" Humza Yousaf asked calmly.
"N-no sir! I-I was merely stating that girls rule and boys drool... a-and also that, u-u-um, t-that transwomen aren't real women..."


Hearing her blasphemous remarks reverberate all over the British Isles, a group of muslims, clowns, gays, feminists and trannies suddenly burst into the room, with purple, humongous and hecking wholesome dildos held high in might and defiance.

"We must resist!", they chanted in unison at the top of their lungs.

As a united entity the mob approached Rowling in a seamless yet violent manner, and went to work on her already pinned down body.

"W-w-wait!", ms. Rowling pleaded. "I'm one of you! One of the good guys! Those girls were probably hecking racists who needed to get culturally enriched by brown people, r-right, muslim-chan?! W-we must resist, ehehe! We must show the patriarchy t-that they can't win, ever! That's why we must fight against the tranni-*BLURGPH*"

Suddenly, one of the purple dildos was violently thrust into Rowlings mouth. At the same time, a chocolate pie was thrown in her face for good measure, further solidifying her expulsion from the anointed. No more hate shall be uttered by the transphobic wench, Humza Yousaf thought.


I can't wait for Joanne and her ilk to get their just deserts, and for the TERFS on this site to continue seething and sneeding. I'm here for the spectacle all the way, and it will be glorious.
:story:
this super manic teehee im such a quirky kawaii totally heccin valid gorl/boi autism is why troons have been taking L after L for the last year or so
 
It'd be a lovely day if mr. Yousaf, with police in tow, breaks down the doors to whichever of Joanne's mansions she's hiding in, and violently pegs her down to the floor.

She already won, you absolute specimen. They way you fantasise about the paki abusing her, I bet you are either an autogynephile pervert or a mohammedan child molester.
 
I don't agree with everything Rowling does, but it speaks volumes that a literal billionaire is willing to stand up and risk losing her lofty station in defense of liberty.
About fucking time, I remember when this bitch advocated for the importation of niggers, but not to her gated estates goodness no.

While the trans cult is out there grooming children, JKR and I are on speaking terms. Once the 41% becomes 100%, we're going back to enemies.

She only cares for a good cause because women like her are the ones being harmed this time.
 
This is the rational stance. All alliances are temporary.
Blood of the coven. It's not that my friend Eric could do no wrong so great that I wouldn't cast him into the fires, more that he WILL NOT do those wrongs. My "allegiance" to JKR is based on happenstance. My allegiance to Eric is based on him being a kinda ok dude. He helped me move house.
 
A lot of people seem to completly forget that J.K. Rowling was a complete and total libshit for decades, and her pivot to "centrist" and "conservative" didn't have anything to do with her but with the movement around her going much farther much faster.

This bitch was happy to repeat lies and slander against PewDiePie in 2017 like a complete tool, and was happy to push for shit like this when it came to speaking ill of feminism and liberalism and gay sex back then as well. The only reason she isn't anymore is because she said no to sucking the feminine penis, and now she is the enemy.

She is nothing more than a ally of convenience. She has enabled this shit and is directly responsible for things getting this bad. She made her bed and is now enjoying it. If trannies went away she would return to be her obnoxious feminist self in a heartbeat without any understanding of why it led to trannies in the first place.
People can rate this MATI (it's not in the slightest) but it's the truth. JK Rowling's world view is near identical to every other retarded leftist and she's actively helped create the nightmare world we live in. BUT SHE DOESN'T LIKE TRANNIES GUYS WHOAAAAA BASED MUCH?????????? Yeah you're retarded too if you believe this. Not liking gross men in dresses is common sense. No one deserves a trophy for it. She still supports all the same moronic policies troons do.
 
Last edited:
of course they're not going after Rowling she's got the money and status to fight back. This law was aimed at Joe and Jane Schlub only, not the rich and famous.

I hope some poor brit cuck doesn't think just because the Rowling can get away with it he can and goes to post some meme then spends 15 years in prison.
 
It'd be a lovely day if mr. Yousaf, with police in tow, breaks down the doors to whichever of Joanne's mansions she's hiding in, and violently pegs her down to the floor.

"Ms. Rowling, did you put your trannyhate into the series of tubes?" Humza Yousaf asked calmly.
"N-no sir! I-I was merely stating that girls rule and boys drool... a-and also that, u-u-um, t-that transwomen aren't real women..."


Hearing her blasphemous remarks reverberate all over the British Isles, a group of muslims, clowns, gays, feminists and trannies suddenly burst into the room, with purple, humongous and hecking wholesome dildos held high in might and defiance.

"We must resist!", they chanted in unison at the top of their lungs.

As a united entity the mob approached Rowling in a seamless yet violent manner, and went to work on her already pinned down body.

"W-w-wait!", ms. Rowling pleaded. "I'm one of you! One of the good guys! Those girls were probably hecking racists who needed to get culturally enriched by brown people, r-right, muslim-chan?! W-we must resist, ehehe! We must show the patriarchy t-that they can't win, ever! That's why we must fight against the tranni-*BLURGPH*"

Suddenly, one of the purple dildos was violently thrust into Rowlings mouth. At the same time, a chocolate pie was thrown in her face for good measure, further solidifying her expulsion from the anointed. No more hate shall be uttered by the transphobic wench, Humza Yousaf thought.


I can't wait for Joanne and her ilk to get their just deserts, and for the TERFS on this site to continue seething and sneeding. I'm here for the spectacle all the way, and it will be glorious.
:story:
If you live in Canada you should look into applying for the MAiD program.
 
Don't be a dipshit political correct degenerate, and don't actively virtue signal for the most boorish of leftist degeneracy for years on end = "impossible standards".
Topkek.
People legit acting as if "Don't openly support the pedophile movement/cult" is some sort of impossibly absurd standard, which is just lol.
 
Last edited:
People can rate this MATI (it's not in the slightest) but it's the truth. JK Rowling's world view is near identical to every other retarded leftist and she's actively helped create the nightmare world we live in. BUT SHE DOESN'T LIKE TRANNIES GUYS WHOAAAAA BASED MUCH?????????? Yeah you're retarded too if you believe this. Not liking gross men in dresses is common sense. No one deserves a trophy for it. She still supports all the same moronic policies troons do.
Yeah although it IS fun to see Doctor Frankenstein call the monster an ugly man in a dress, it's not like the monster just poofed out of the aether
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Felis Meanis
She already won, you absolute specimen. They way you fantasise about the paki abusing her, I bet you are either an autogynephile pervert or a mohammedan child molester.
I'm neither, you delightful dipshit. I'm just an average cis-male, who is apparently an incel, according to the seething and sneeding feminists on this website.

Your retarded coping about how bad things really are, and where to properly put the blame, is exquisite.

Soon, the trannies will find you, and they will cover you and whatever spawn you might have in tranny-bukkake after having beaten you all to a pulp. Indeed, it will be a glorious spectacle.
 
Yeah although it IS fun to see Doctor Frankenstein call the monster an ugly man in a dress, it's not like the monster just poofed out of the aether
I'll give JK Rowling this it's cool to see someone with such a large platform calling out troon bullshit. It's refreshing and no one else as famous as her is as vocal as she is about it.
 
Back