UK JK Rowling in ‘arrest me’ challenge over hate crime law - JK Rowling described several transgender women as men on the day of the new hate crime law

Archive (live)

1711985846901.png

JK Rowling has challenged Scotland's new hate crime law in a series of social media posts - inviting police to arrest her if they believe she has committed an offence.

The Harry Potter author, who lives in Edinburgh, described several transgender women as men, including convicted prisoners, trans activists and other public figures.

She said "freedom of speech and belief" was at an end if accurate description of biological sex was outlawed.

Earlier, Scotland's first minister Humza Yousaf said the new law would deal with a "rising tide of hatred".

The Hate Crime and Public Order (Scotland) Act 2021 creates a new crime of "stirring up hatred" relating to age, disability, religion, sexual orientation, transgender identity or being intersex.

The law does not protect women as a group from hatred.

The Scottish government is expected to include this later in a separate misogyny law.

Ms Rowling, who has long been a critic of some trans activism, posted on X, external on the day the new legislation came into force.

She wrote: "Scottish lawmakers seem to have placed higher value on the feelings of men performing their idea of femaleness, however misogynistically or opportunistically, than on the rights and freedoms of actual women and girls."

She added: "It is impossible to accurately describe or tackle the reality of violence and sexual violence committed against women and girls, or address the current assault on women’s and girls’ rights, unless we are allowed to call a man a man.

"Freedom of speech and belief are at an end in Scotland if the accurate description of biological sex is deemed criminal."

Ms Rowling highlighted some criminal cases, including transgender rapist Isla Bryson and Andrew Miller, who abducted and assaulted a girl in the Scottish Borders.

She described them as men in a series of posts, that also included transgender campaigners and other individuals.

Ms Rowling said: "I'm currently out of the country, but if what I've written here qualifies as an offence under the terms of the new act, I look forward to being arrested when I return to the birthplace of the Scottish Enlightenment."

Police Scotland said it had not received any complaints over the posts.

1711985867892.png

The maximum penalty under the new act in Scotland is a jail sentence of seven years.

A person commits an offence if they communicate material, or behave in a manner, "that a reasonable person would consider to be threatening or abusive," with the intention of stirring up hatred based on protected characteristics.

Hatred based on race, sex and religion was already illegal in Great Britain under the Public Order Act 1986, but that will also now fall under the new act in Scotland

The bar for this offence is lower than for the other protected characteristics, as it also includes "insulting" behaviour.

In England and Wales stirring up hatred over race, religion or sexual orientation by threatening behaviour remains illegal.

1711985891501.png

In Scotland, the new act also consolidates existing laws on crimes which are "aggravated by prejudice" towards a protected characteristic.

This can be taken into account by a judge who might issue a longer sentence or a higher fine.

A protest group of around 200 people gathered outside the Scottish Parliament in Edinburgh on the morning the new law came into effect.

The Scottish government said the Hate Crime Act would provide protection from hate and prejudice without stifling individual expression.

First Minister Humza Yousaf said it was designed to deal with what he called a "rising tide of hatred" in society.

In response to general criticism of the act, he said: "Unless your behaviour is threatening or abusive and intends to stir up hatred, then you have nothing to worry about in terms of the new offences being created."
 
She is nothing more than a ally of convenience. She has enabled this shit and is directly responsible for things getting this bad. She made her bed and is now enjoying it. If trannies went away she would return to be her obnoxious feminist self in a heartbeat without any understanding of why it led to trannies in the first place.
one document that's always useful to show normies how "reasonable" her takes on trannies are is her website diary entry titled J.K. Rowling Writes about Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues (A), dated June 2020. hidden in that document is her real motivations for speaking out against trannies

if you search for the term girl, she talks about the following: women and girl's rights, the 4,400% increase in the amount of girls being referred for transitioning treatment, sexualized scrutiny and judgement that causes girls to war against their bodies, the backlash against feminism and the amount of porn online have made things significantly worse for girls

if you search for the term boy, you get zero results

if you search for the term man/men, she talks about the following: an abusive man who composted her books, Marks & Spencer allowing any man who says they identify as a woman access to changing rooms, how men have such easy access to becoming a woman, her experience about being sexually assaulted by a man, how MS behaves differently between men and women, how "trans men" are poor little dindu nuffins

she is a typical man-hating feminist that is only angry at trannies because a predatory social fad had the gall to affect girls in a negative way. once the legal system gets off its ass and puts in laws preventing girls from harming themselves she'll go right back to blaming men for all of her problems

until that happens, though, i'll gladly laugh with her as she makes gross freaks angry
 
I mean, it's great and all that she loathes the men in dresses too, but I'd never trust her. Whilst the optimist in me hopes that her attitude has changed on her shithouse views from the past, the realist in me know this probably isn't the case, as rich celebrities have proven time and again that they learn absolutely nothing, even when exposed to hardship that should serve as a learning experience for them.
 
What the fuck have YOU done, to hold her to such impossible standards?

Keep your insane sexual fantasies for yourself.
I would call you a dumb cunt but you're neither deep nor warm enough to warrant it.

She already won, you absolute specimen. They way you fantasise about the paki abusing her, I bet you are either an autogynephile pervert or a mohammedan child molester.

If you live in Canada you should look into applying for the MAiD program.
Lol calm down nigger(s)
 
Rowling is a certified, dyed in the wool limousine libtard radfem, people. Anyone thinking she's remotely going to change her socio-political stances is delusional, because she has fuck you money and can afford to keep them, the same as everyone else in her social class. Literally the only stance she has I agree with is her continued denouncement of disgusting MtF chomos and various other sex pests, and that's tempered some by her radfem stances on men, literally half the population of the entire planet. She's entirely correct about biological sex, but I disagree with her politically about everything else, and I'm by no means right wing.
I also know she keeps her anti-trans activism going not only for her pet pro-women (and mostly misandrist) causes, but also for visibility. So to me, this is not a case of the enemy of my enemy being an ally of convenience, it's about me half-ass agreeing with her on one particular topic, and nothing else. That does not make her a friend at all. I'd say the same about pretty much every radfem that denigrates troons.
 
limousine libtard radfem
It's not possible to be a libtard and a radfem. She's not a radfem, she's liberal but old. She's a completely current year, hohol-supporting, rapefugee-loving lib, she just doesn't want to see troon dick everywhere.

if you search for the term boy, you get zero results
  • A vast majority of boys troon out because of porn. If you're not interested in banning porn, choke on a stinkditch and die.
  • The remaining few get trooned out by their pedophile parents. The solution to this is have the government take them away, but this can't happen when the government is more pedophilic than the majority of parents. If you give the government more power over parents right now, they will use that power to troon out more children. Against a troon government, "parental rights" is a strong argument but "execute troons" is not. It's correct, it just doesn't work because you will go to prison and achieve nothing.
  • Bans on child grooming and mutilation protect boys and girls equally. To institute these bans, Rowling picks the more sympathetic victims (the girls who try to opt out of degeneracy, instead of the girls who fap to shota and boys who unlearn toilet training for the coom).
 
It's not possible to be a libtard and a radfem. She's not a radfem, she's liberal but old. She's a completely current year, hohol-supporting, rapefugee-loving lib, she just doesn't want to see troon dick everywhere.
  • A vast majority of boys troon out because of porn. If you're not interested in banning porn, choke on a stinkditch and die.
  • The remaining few get trooned out by their pedophile parents. The solution to this is have the government take them away, but this can't happen when the government is more pedophilic than the majority of parents. If you give the government more power over parents right now, they will use that power to troon out more children. Against a troon government, "parental rights" is a strong argument but "execute troons" is not. It's correct, it just doesn't work because you will go to prison and achieve nothing.
  • Bans on child grooming and mutilation protect boys and girls equally. To institute these bans, Rowling picks the more sympathetic victims (the girls who try to opt out of degeneracy, instead of the girls who fap to shota and boys who unlearn toilet training for the coom).
Of course it's more than possible to be a libtard and a radfem. If anything, it's most likely, you retarded cunt.

On another note, what the fuck are you on about? Your severely autistic list of degeneracy is disgusting, though I gather it says more about yourself than anything else. Troon boys? Pedophilic parents? Government intervention?
How about we don't let whores and retarded women influence society? Would that be too much for you and your whorish ilk?

Whores and their effect on society cannot be understated. We sorely need a purging led by cis-males.
 
went to work on her already pinned down body.
Nothing more dainty and female than wishing violent rape on women who say no, is there? It’s almost like troons are angry perverted men who want unfettered access to women and kids sexually and will punish those who refuse
@Stoneheart no it doesn’t. She’s rich as Croesus but that doesn’t give her access to that specific world.
 
one document that's always useful to show normies how "reasonable" her takes on trannies are is her website diary entry titled J.K. Rowling Writes about Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues (A), dated June 2020. hidden in that document is her real motivations for speaking out against trannies
Reading this shit makes me wish she gets fucked over by the goverment and becomes a martyr... better her than Joe Smchoe, she at least has clout and visibility.
  • A vast majority of boys troon out because of porn. If you're not interested in banning porn, choke on a stinkditch and die.
  • The remaining few get trooned out by their pedophile parents. The solution to this is have the government take them away, but this can't happen when the government is more pedophilic than the majority of parents. If you give the government more power over parents right now, they will use that power to troon out more children. Against a troon government, "parental rights" is a strong argument but "execute troons" is not. It's correct, it just doesn't work because you will go to prison and achieve nothing.
  • Bans on child grooming and mutilation protect boys and girls equally. To institute these bans, Rowling picks the more sympathetic victims (the girls who try to opt out of degeneracy, instead of the girls who fap to shota and boys who unlearn toilet training for the coom).
Or maybe she doesn't give a shit about boys and it's a happy accident that they benefit from those. Last time I checked, little boys are also considered something to protect, so I'm not buying that she never mentions them since it's "easier to farm simpathy with girls".
 
one document that's always useful to show normies how "reasonable" her takes on trannies are is her website diary entry titled J.K. Rowling Writes about Her Reasons for Speaking out on Sex and Gender Issues (A), dated June 2020. hidden in that document is her real motivations for speaking out against trannies

if you search for the term girl, she talks about the following: women and girl's rights, the 4,400% increase in the amount of girls being referred for transitioning treatment, sexualized scrutiny and judgement that causes girls to war against their bodies, the backlash against feminism and the amount of porn online have made things significantly worse for girls

if you search for the term boy, you get zero results

if you search for the term man/men, she talks about the following: an abusive man who composted her books, Marks & Spencer allowing any man who says they identify as a woman access to changing rooms, how men have such easy access to becoming a woman, her experience about being sexually assaulted by a man, how MS behaves differently between men and women, how "trans men" are poor little dindu nuffins

she is a typical man-hating feminist that is only angry at trannies because a predatory social fad had the gall to affect girls in a negative way. once the legal system gets off its ass and puts in laws preventing girls from harming themselves she'll go right back to blaming men for all of her problems

until that happens, though, i'll gladly laugh with her as she makes gross freaks angry
I mean, in all honesty, that's a lot of the reasons I'm against trans stuff. As a reasonably large bloke, if a male in a dress comes at me I think I've got a pretty good shot at laying him out. It's that they prey on women and children which really riles me up. I can't blame Rowling for feeling the same. And as regards showing more sympathy towards FtM trans, for the most part - that school shooter in the US notwithstanding - they're more typically hurting themselves by fucking up their bodies and by putting themselves in danger. Adolescent girls are about 11 times as prone to trooning out as boys so they really are at greater risk statistically.

I'm not saying she might not be sexist and I'm not saying dudes never suffer consequences from all this troonery either, but in this instance it really is a case of "women most affected".
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Not a bee
Consider me out of the loop but why is being a celtics fan a hate crime now?
Do you mean why there’s no Celtic fans at the ibrox match? They’re not allowed, opposite happens when they play at Celtic park. Too much fighting. Ally is the rangers boss so he’s just talking about his match, it’s not hating on Celtic, I have no idea what they’ll say but an entire ground of boozed up fans chanting transwomen are men would be simply divine
 
Do you mean why there’s no Celtic fans at the ibrox match? They’re not allowed, opposite happens when they play at Celtic park. Too much fighting. Ally is the rangers boss so he’s just talking about his match, it’s not hating on Celtic, I have no idea what they’ll say but an entire ground of boozed up fans chanting transwomen are men would be simply divine
Yep, this shit is alien to me, but if a horde of drunk hooligans go full "you will never be a woman" shit can suddenly start being very funny between "well, wizard woman is not doing a hate crime because we don't have the balls to prosecute" and "the horde of drunk dangerous hooligans aren't doing a hate crime because they scare the bobbies".
 
Yep, this shit is alien to me, but if a horde of drunk hooligans go full "you will never be a woman" shit can suddenly start being very funny between "well, wizard woman is not doing a hate crime because we don't have the balls to prosecute" and "the horde of drunk dangerous hooligans aren't doing a hate crime because they scare the bobbies".
The old firm matches are so plagued with violence that they actually ban one set of fans from the ground. Police Scotland also have dedicated domestic violence outreach programs (fairly effective too) around match days becasue so many go home and batter the wife and kids
 
Well, she could be just another worthless leftist, or she could be a leftist who has a particular talent for fucking with trannies and thus creating great Lolcow content that I come here and laugh at every day.

Given the choice, I'll take option number two.
 
Back