Artcow Jonathan Wojcik / Bogleech / Scythemantis

I highly doubt he's schizophrenic. I talked to him several times at tabletop gaming events. Bogleech just has a way of making people out to be crazy or evil.

I don't know why I'm still responding to this junk. Everyone needs to just stop taking Bogleech and Beetledrink seriously. They're predatory trolls who've caused a lot of suffering to a lot of people and will keep doing so as long as they're enabled.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Fromtheblackdepths
I highly doubt he's schizophrenic.

His long letter tried to warn me of something like a shadow government involving demon-like subterranean aliens and had no return address or name on it because he thought they would use it to hunt him down. Maybe you just didn't know and he never told you these things, whatever, you'll feign ignorance either way.

And even if your side of stuff were true how the hell would it make beetle a "predator" to just not want a piss stalker and pin it on the wrong guy? What does that "prey upon?"

:story: You're saying this like it's a bad thing. Piss man should just have done that when he signed up here, sounds like he'd have fit right in.

See, I thought the people here just highlighted what they think is harmful or negative behavior, or the really fuckin gross stuff like pony cum jar guy, but then there's the ones like you who say you just plain find mental illness or human suffering funny, and most people would consider that almost exactly as embarrassing or generally unlovable as a pony cum jar guy. What's the dividing line?
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Fromtheblackdepths
And even if your side of stuff were true how the hell would it make beetle a "predator" to just not want a piss stalker and pin it on the wrong guy? What does that "prey upon?"

Beetledrink is obsessed with causing ongoing harm to Noah and to the people who came to his aid. When I was combing their blogs in an attempt to understand this conflict I saw a lot of unrelated arguments and tirades. It's highly apparent that Beetledrink either enjoys fighting, enjoys watching people suffer, or both. There's also the distinct possibility that they cooked up this whole drama from scratch. It stretches believability that someone would stalk Beetledrink incessantly for a year without being seen by anyone else or leaving any trace of their existence and that Beetledrink would keep completely quiet about constant harassment for a year. I want to end their campaign in a way that ensures the misinformation will not continue to spread to the detriment of innocent people.

As for the old man, I'd like to cease the discussion completely. I wasn't even supposed to admit that I knew him, but I broke that promise for what I thought was a good cause (clearing up a potentially harmful misunderstanding).
 
Last edited:
See, I thought the people here just highlighted what they think is harmful or negative behavior, or the really fuckin gross stuff like pony cum jar guy, but then there's the ones like you who say you just plain find mental illness or human suffering funny, and most people would consider that almost exactly as embarrassing or generally unlovable as a pony cum jar guy. What's the dividing line?
I'm not sure where you got that impression, considering the origin of this website lies in, as you put it, gawking at the mental illness of a by and large innocuous person for entertainment. Nor is it news to anyone that this place is vilified by "most people", at least among those aware of it - there's a thread in General dedicated to just that. Popular opinion is only what you make of it.

This comment feels just weird to me coming from someone who's known for liking things that "most people", again, consider repulsive. By that metric, what's the difference between you and those who enjoy laughing at people doing foolish things, or that pony cum jar guy, whoever that is?
 
Everyone needs to just stop taking Bogleech and Beetledrink seriously
And why we should take you seriously? You just done some t;:dr rambling about the evil of bogleech and beetledrink without any kind of clear evidence. Also the link you show don't count because they were never mention of noah natt just people who complain about an anon with piss fetish that pester them.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fromtheblackdepths
I highly doubt he's schizophrenic. I talked to him several times at tabletop gaming events. Bogleech just has a way of making people out to be crazy or evil.
People with schizo disorders aren't always obvious. They can appear normal most of the time, even hold down jobs until something sets them off.
 
I'm not sure where you got that impression, considering the origin of this website lies in, as you put it, gawking at the mental illness of a by and large innocuous person for entertainment. Nor is it news to anyone that this place is vilified by "most people", at least among those aware of it - there's a thread in General dedicated to just that. Popular opinion is only what you make of it.

This comment feels just weird to me coming from someone who's known for liking things that "most people", again, consider repulsive. By that metric, what's the difference between you and those who enjoy laughing at people doing foolish things, or that pony cum jar guy, whoever that is?
Or to put it bluntly.

This site site is to laugh at speds;lol calm down.
 
And why we should take you seriously? You just done some t;:dr rambling about the evil of bogleech and beetledrink without any kind of clear evidence. Also the link you show don't count because they were never mention of noah natt just people who complain about an anon with piss fetish that pester them.

I've posted a dozen screen captures. Every piece of evidence supports my side and none support the other side. I thought you would've noticed the pattern by now.

To reiterate an important point, Beetledrink clearly accused Noah. They reblogged one of his messages tagged with one of his monikers when they posted the claim that "one specific person" was constantly sexually harassing them for a year. I don't know how this could be unclear.

Kramerdrama01A.jpg


Kramerdrama02A.jpg
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Fromtheblackdepths
I've posted a dozen screen captures. Every piece of evidence supports my side and none support the other side. I thought you would've noticed the pattern by now.

To reiterate an important point, Beetledrink clearly accused Noah. They reblogged one of his messages tagged with one of his monikers when they posted the claim that "one specific person" was constantly sexually harassing them for a year. I don't know how this could be unclear.

View attachment 1763496

View attachment 1763497
Ok you are the only one who have atomically assumed that this anonymous guy=Noah and told everyone that the pee fetish anon is noah natt. Your screenshot only prove further my point that they never mentioned ''Noah'' real name and your just a delusional mofo that smeared shit on himself in blind panic
 
I've posted a dozen screen captures. Every piece of evidence supports my side and none support the other side. I thought you would've noticed the pattern by now.

To reiterate an important point, Beetledrink clearly accused Noah. They reblogged one of his messages tagged with one of his monikers when they posted the claim that "one specific person" was constantly sexually harassing them for a year. I don't know how this could be unclear.

View attachment 1763496

View attachment 1763497
They're all mentioning a specific person, but how is that Noah?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Just wandering
Ok you are the only one who have atomically assumed that this anonymous guy=Noah and told everyone that the pee fetish anon is noah natt. Your screenshot only prove further my point that they never mentioned ''Noah'' real name and your just a delusional mofo that smeared shit on himself in blind panic
Yeah I'm going to agree here, every screenshot just talks about "that anon" and the anon is weird talking about his pee fetish all the time. I haven't seen and screens of this Noah being talked about yet, or an proof that this anon is identified as Noah.
 
Yeah I'm going to agree here, every screenshot just talks about "that anon" and the anon is weird talking about his pee fetish all the time. I haven't seen and screens of this Noah being talked about yet, or an proof that this anon is identified as Noah.
It could literally be anyone,we need to see at least one message that implements this Noah character.
 
It could literally be anyone,we need to see at least one message that implements this Noah character.
I think it's weird that it isn't "Noah" that's posting all of this. You'd think if he was real he'd be the one with the years long grudge about his pee fetish being exposed. @Terrapin seems to be taking this very personally considering it didn't happen to them. :thinking:
 
I think it's weird that it isn't "Noah" that's posting all of this. You'd think if he was real he'd be the one with the years long grudge about his pee fetish being exposed. @Terrapin seems to be taking this very personally considering it didn't happen to them.

If your friend was falsely accused of sexual harassment, terrorized until he quit social media, and continually slandered on public forums for years afterward, wouldn't you defend his good name?
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Autopsy
This comment feels just weird to me coming from someone who's known for liking things that "most people", again, consider repulsive. By that metric, what's the difference between you and those who enjoy laughing at people doing foolish things, or that pony cum jar guy, whoever that is?

Not to keep derailing but that's such a strange equivalence to draw. Presumably you're referring to me gushing over fish parasites or carnivorous fungus, but I think it's unironically awesome and great that our planet is full of crazy monsters forever mutating convoluted new ways to eat each other. I'm not mocking wildlife for cringe, and even if I were, a stupid looking lizard isn't a person or capable of caring that we find it hilarious.

1606977683217.png


I might joke about people I feel are making a problem of themselves or disrespecting others unfairly, and I can see the absurdity of someone actually raging over silly shit like Sonic the Hedgehog, but what we were just talking about a second ago was someone living in paranoia and fear from uncontrollable schizophrenia symptoms, and you still felt that would be the same funnie meem fodder. I kind of always thought that kind of heartlessness was a performative thing? Like a satirical gimmick that just went a little too viral during 4chan's peak. If you know someone's not doing anything wrong, or even the only one suffering in the situation, you only feel sympathy right?

I think it's weird that it isn't "Noah" that's posting all of this. You'd think if he was real he'd be the one with the years long grudge about his pee fetish being exposed. @Terrapin seems to be taking this very personally considering it didn't happen to them. :thinking:

Yeah, precisely, and all associated IP's also trace back to the same city too; Des Moines Iowa.

But as is probably abundantly clear by now, the more anybody points out the flaws or the sheer frivolousness of the whole thing, the tighter he clings to it with infinite endurance and you'll never be rid of him as long as there's any avenue he has to communicate with you and you even remain too neutral for his liking.
 
Last edited:
Yeah, precisely, and all associated IP's also trace back to the same city too; Des Moines Iowa.

I don't live in Des Moines and I never have. Are you getting it wrong on purpose so people won't believe that you were the one who publicly posted my correct address?
 
I just can't keep the names of Iowa cities straight in my memory. But, uh, thanks for letting me know that what we have is still your real one. Everyone's just hanging onto it in case you threaten to doxx anyone else again.
 
Back