Another company publicly distances themselves:
View attachment 2211179
archived 28 May 2021 22:48:13 UTC
archive.ph
Meanwhile, I find this concerning
View attachment 2211182
archived 28 May 2021 22:55:29 UTC
archive.ph
How can this dog be looked after when yaniv claims he can't walk any great distance, can't stand for long, has "seizures" etc bearing in mind this is the same bloke who uses his car to visit his mother. Is slap happy miriam going to be responsible for its well-being/exercising the dog? For someone who can't pay waiver fees and is in dire debt, I find it incredible that he is wanting to take on another financial commitment.
In general, this unemployed bloke owns his own property, eats out regularly, appears to have a ready flow of booze, flits across the country willy nilly all financed on state benefits. How many hard-working taxpayers can afford the same? Something wrong somewhere when an idle oaf has a seemingly better lifestyle than someone who works/pays their way through life.
On a happier note someone's been busy
View attachment 2211226 View attachment 2211234 View attachment 2211236
archived 28 May 2021 23:16:24 UTC
archive.ph
Still no sign of yaniv filing in the Supreme Court I see.