Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

[whitepumpkin]

To Canadian posters (or anyone familiar):

If I were to walk into a PD in say Seattle with a hard copy of the info archived here to report, I would get an incident number or report number that I could report on myself or give to a journo for verification. Are there receipts that the RCMP gives you for reporting, either online or in person?

I think it depends. In my experience, usually when you report something (either to the RCMP or a Peace Officer), an officer comes, writes down what you say, chats with you a bit, then goes on their way. If you have evidence, they usually bag it, but depending on what it is, you may not get a follow-up. Like needles, unless they know who used it, are cleaned up by another department. Even if you saw who used the needle, they might bag it, but generally that would go nowhere - Unless who used it is already under investigation for something criminal, then they're like hounds.

If it's evidence of something happening to you - like someone's stalking you - I think then you get more involved in the process. That's when emails, phone calls, recorded conversations, etc. become important. But if you walk into a Police Station with printed off evidence of this guy to warn police from the Farms, they may give you a look because it's not impacting you directly.

This could be different in other provinces, though. Your only other option would be make friends with a cop (or better yet, have one in the family), and just casually mention this to them. They'll mentally take a note, but otherwise nothing will be done unless this fuck came to you specifically and did this shit.

 

[not william stenchever]

I hope this man will be known to posterity as an albatross that the people who want to troon out children willing chained around their neck. They deserve each other. I may be wildly optimistic here but, as others have pointed out, he is the unicorn people have been hunting; a not-even-trying-to-pass pedo blatantly taking advantage of an overly trusting society and the policies enforced by the troon brigade.

He is the formula of their destruction and yet they flock around him instead of casting him out. I hope that in the fullness of time he becomes the Judas cow that leads predatory troonism into the slaughter house.

 

[a tightly clenched butt]

He isn't trans but people will pretend he is, and turn him into a martyr and poor oppressed victim in their eyes.

Well, that's the thing - the trans community has decided that there are no objective criteria for deciding who is and isn't trans. Per definition, anyone who says they are trans, are trans, and to question it is to question their "identity". And identities are holy.

 

[MW 002]

A 100% accurate artistic depiction of what happens when Yaniv asks girls if they need instructions on how to use a tampon in the girl’s change room.

 

[Von Wolf Demon]

Wow... don't have much to add to this thread, but just wanted to give a heartfelt thanks to all Kiwis who are keeping this thread alive. I agree that this is absolutely one of the worst horrorcows ever discovered. He's like Nick Bate or Tommie Tooter if they were capable of accomplishing something or enlisting powerful allies... which horrifies me just to type.

While I agree that some of this is just him flooding algorithm-driven sites with complaints, there HAS to be more going on behind the scenes. All the sites he is going after have legal shit coming into them daily by the truckload.

The speed with which ALL discussion of this creep is shut down is almost unprecedented in my experience.

Thanks again, and keep it up!

 

[illhavetwo]

I'm not sure if it means anything but the current Human Rights Tribunal schedule doesn't mention any cases that fit Jonathan Yaniv's ball waxing complaints. Back when this first started I looked at the schedule and did actually see the case that was reported already, it was written as "JY vs. Shelah Poyer" or something similar. Does this mean the complaints were withdrawn with or without the 2500$ settlement he wanted, or maybe they were concluded by the time I saw the schedule, or maybe the secrecy thing means the cases don't even show up on the schedule, I'm not sure. I'm going to try and find the previous schedules.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

I'm not sure if it means anything but the current Human Rights Tribunal schedule doesn't mention any cases that fit Jonathan Yaniv's ball waxing complaints. Back when this first started I looked at the schedule and did actually see the case that was reported already, it was written as "JY vs. Shelah Poyer" or something similar. Does this mean the complaints were withdrawn with or without the 2500$ settlement he wanted, or maybe they were concluded by the time I saw the schedule, or maybe the secrecy thing means the cases don't even show up on the schedule, I'm not sure. I'm going to try and find the previous schedules.

The case was withdrawn from the courts so I doubt Human Rights would do anything with it. I'm amazed it didn't though since Canadian Human Rights shit is a complete kangaroo court job. He could have easily have won and wouldn't have had to have any proof and it would be his lawyer against the aesthetician without any representation for herself.

Oh, and it doesn't help that he apparently has other human rights complaints against other salons.

Edit, currently sixteen to be exact
https://www.dailywire.com/news/3810...-human-rights-complaints-amanda-prestigiacomo

 

[illhavetwo]

The case was withdrawn from the courts so I doubt Human Rights would do anything with it. I'm amazed it didn't though since Canadian Human Rights shit is a complete kangaroo court job. He could have easily have won and wouldn't have had to have any proof and it would be his lawyer against the aesthetician without any representation for herself.

Oh, and it doesn't help that he apparently has other human rights complaints against other salons.

My point is that if the complaint that was withdrawn did appear on the schedule at one point, I saw it with my own eyes, then it makes sense the other 14 complaints would appear on the schedule as well. The fact they don't could mean any number of things.

 

[Marvin]

While I agree that some of this is just him flooding algorithm-driven sites with complaints, there HAS to be more going on behind the scenes. All the sites he is going after have legal shit coming into them daily by the truckload.

If you're a "social media influencer", I would bet that there are gray market ways to get your complaints bumped to the top of the list. Maybe if you specify the right keywords in your complaint, or maybe there's ways to mine emails of individual twitter admins and pester them directly. Things like that.

It's kinda like SEO. Google officially publishes a lot of tips on how to get your site to rank well, but there's still a lot of unpublished, or unorthodox ways to affect your site ranking. Like any industry, marketers have forums on discussing SEO techniques. They learn shit like this in school too. (Or at least at $50/hour online seminars.)

 

[illhavetwo]

I found something. Some background info for those who lost track, Jonathan Yaniv withdrew one of the 16 ball waxing complaints because the accused woman was being represented by the Justice Center for Constitutional Freedom and they filed a motion to remove the publication ban, which would allow every Canadian news outlet to report Jonathan's fondness of 10-12 year old girls and their tampons, and Jonathan obviously didn't want that. So the complaint was withdrawn but now the woman and her lawyers have requested re-opening the case. I'm still reading the document, will update more later.

 

[2nd_time_user]

So JONATHAN YANIV claimed that because he is a public figure, he should not be in the news?

On June 14, 2018, JY filed an application to limit publication of her name and to restrict access to the contents of her complaint file. The basis for the application was her assertion: “I am in the public eye and my company revolves around my name, I am heavily searched online and I don’t want this case … to appear in any search results”. The Tribunal requested further information and, in response, she explained: My name and brand revolves around my business. People know me as [name] the amazing [business] person and my name is often the top searched term ... Not only can this negatively affect my business, since not everyone is in approval of gender identity laws, it can also very much so negatively affect any of my clients and their business, things I don’t want to happen. The context of the complaint, reasonings and decisions are what should be brought forward … I have developed an extremely high social media following… I do fear retaliation.

And also, the commissioner denied costs but reopened the hearing, which it said was to determine costs. So was the denial interim or final? ETA, never mind...

(27) I am persuaded that fairness in these circumstances favours reopening the complaint to consider the application for costs.

Furthermore, it doesn't look like Yaniv is touching the screenshots' veracity at this point:

Notably, however, she does not argue now that the online material the Individual Respondents refer to are not an accurate depiction of her online persona, or that her public profile as a woman was a recent development, made after her original application for a publication ban. In fact, she does not provide any evidence to explain the apparent inconsistencies between the basis on which she sought a publication ban and her public profile on the internet.

 

[illhavetwo]

And also, the commissioner denied costs but reopened the hearing, which it said was to determine costs. So was the denial interim or final? ETA, never mind...

(27) I am persuaded that fairness in these circumstances favours reopening the complaint to consider the application for costs.

Furthermore, it doesn't look like Yaniv is touching the screenshots' veracity at this point:

I just finished reading it. From what I understand the judge re-opened the case just long enough to decide if costs should be awarded, but in the end decided they should not be awarded. So I guess it's done now, not sure.

 

[Munchingonfish]

Rate me really optimistic but i can't wait for the pendulum to swing back and for a while for sanity to rule again, it started to happen in oter country so hopefully Canada will follow that trend too

I don't see trans supremacist laws being revoked anytime soon. They will harass any politician daring to suggest that. YOU ARE LITERALLY ERASING OUR HUMAN RIGHTS 193 MILLION CANADIAN TRANS WOMEN OF COLOR ARE GOING TO BE MURDERED BECAUSE OF THIS

 

[2nd_time_user]

I just finished reading it. From what I understand the judge re-opened the case just long enough to decide if costs should be awarded, but in the end decided they should not be awarded. So I guess it's done now, not sure.

The document indicates that the commissioner declined to award punitive costs but is re-opening the hearing as the dismissal happened too fast for the sides to discuss costs, e.g. Poyer's lawyer's travel time and expenses in getting to a hearing canceled by JY without notice to the lawyer.

Reopening implies, however, a possibility that this will go forward to a hearing stage that could also incur fines for Poyer, that could mean lifting of the "publication ban" for Yaniv, and that would be guidance for the other cases Yaniv has pending. I've wondered what would be in it for Poyer, and I think the answer is sheer rage for justice. Poyer has avoided advertising since JY insisted that he come to her home (where she works) for a testicle wax repeatedly, incenting Poyer's BF to tell JY to stop contacting her, leading to JY filing against them both.

The woman's business is wrecked and she's publicly identified because she declined to personally handle Jonathan (just want privacy) Yaniv's penis.

I don't blame Poyer or her BF for wanting to take this further, not at all.

 

[waxmykiwis]

Does anyone else sometimes wonder if these women whose homes he was trying to blackmail his way into have children? Daughters aged 10-12 maybe?

I hope not. I hope he was just trying to bully them and scam money.

That Tribunal ruling is infuriating to read in many ways, but on reflection there is one good thing about it. Yaniv has now admitted that he is openly trans (he claims he wasn't when he first filed the complaint.) Therefore the grounds on which he was originally granted anonymity no longer apply, by his own admission. So he presumably won't be able to proceed with his other complaints without his identity being openly revealed.

 

[EmpireOfTheClouds]

Why do these powerful people always have to be both stupid and sick fucks?

Pretty sure you just answered your own question. They have basically absolute power over others and don't care how much harm it causes.

 

[diophantines]

Does anyone else sometimes wonder if these women whose homes he was trying to blackmail his way into have children? Daughters aged 10-12 maybe?

I hope not, I hope he was just trying to bully them and scam money.

I remember the woman who got talked to for the GenderTrender article, the one whose case got dropped, has a toddler she keeps in the room with her while she works, hence why she didn't want Yaniv there.

 

[QWXXP Surprise!]

I'm beginning to wonder if there's more fun stuff that could be dug up on our troony trio here. Ogre persistently defending Jonathan 'Jessica' Yaniv, Haley Heartbreak (totes a normal woman's name guys) using his connections to get shit pulled off social media...

Really gets the wheels turning- why do they want to die on this hill so badly?

 

[diophantines]

Where's Jesse Singal when you need him

 

[2nd_time_user]

WrongToy returned to Reddit and posted links within Reddit citing Yaniv:

https://www.reddit.com/r/GenderCrit...lo_all_i_am_back_with_background_and_news_on/

Archive here: http://archive.is/bu282

Reddit is in the process now of removing the live links in the top-post.