Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🔧 Actively working on site again.
Anyone hazard a guess as to why the ban has been lifted?

While the official rationale has been given, I have a theory on the not so public reason.

Despite all the coddling the kangaroo courts have given the deviant, he is likely wearing even their patience down, and the more shit he starts, the more attention is drawn to them, and I'm quite sure that minor sanction he got slapped with awhile back was a not so subtle warning even they couldn't cover for him forever.

I bet this is the even bigger hint his free ride is beginning to end.
 
While the official rationale has been given, I have a theory on the not so public reason.

Despite all the coddling the kangaroo courts have given the deviant, he is likely wearing even their patience down, and the more shit he starts, the more attention is drawn to them, and I'm quite sure that minor sanction he got slapped with awhile back was a not so subtle warning even they couldn't cover for him forever.

I bet this is the even bigger hint his free ride is beginning to end.
I couldn’t find the official reason, what was it?
 
Paedo boi is back responding on twitter. Can’t wait to see the reeeeeing.

He's fucking relentless. But notice how short and weak all those little replies have gotten. He definitely feels threatened a tad.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20190717-173843_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20190717-173843_Chrome.jpg
    632.5 KB · Views: 249
Last edited:


Edit to add: Times London covered it! I don't pay tho. Here is the link . Edited again to say I got too excited, that article is from May. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...n-wax-for-trans-woman-jessica-yaniv-gm7f9mltx

I have access.

A feminist journalist who has been banned from Twitter for her views on transgender rights has warned about the "risks to women" of allowing individuals to self-declare their gender.

Meghan Murphy, a Canadian blogger, will speak at the Scottish parliament this week, where she will raise concerns that "self-ID" proposals will undermine women's rights to female-only spaces, such as changing rooms, prisons and domestic violence shelters.

She received a lifetime ban from Twitter in November last year after she used a male pronoun to refer to Jessica Yaniv, a Canadian transgender woman. Yaniv had attracted Murphy's attention after attempting last year to book a series of appointments with beauticians, including for "Brazilian" waxes, which remove all pubic hair.

Murphy is due to appear at Holyrood, where the government has expressed formal support for reforms to the Gender Recognition Act that would allow anyone who does not identify with the sex they were assigned at birth to be recognised automatically as the gender they have adopted. This would mean that people could legally determine their own gender identity.

At the moment, people need a gender dysphoria diagnosis and must have lived as their adopted gender for two years to change gender officially.

Murphy, 39, said: "The risks are that we won't have womenonly spaces and female-specific services. Why does a woman need specific services, if it's not because she has a female body, or has a particular experience under patriarchy?" She said Canada now allowed anyone who self-identified as a woman to use female changing rooms and lavatories, regardless of their genitalia or whether they were receiving hormonal treatment.

"At school, if a boy says 'I'm a girl', the school is not obliged to tell the parents and they'll just start calling her 'she'. These policies have been enacted without really consulting anyone publicly," she said.

Murphy, who edits the website Feminist Current, was invited to Holyrood by Joan McAlpine, an MSP. Murphy's views are divisive: her arrival is likely to be met by protests, but she is also seen as a heroine by some radical feminists, especially after raising concerns about Yaniv online.

After being repeatedly refused appointments for beauty treatments, Yaniv filed complaints with a human rights tribunal against at least seven salons, accusing them of discrimination.

The cases led Murphy to discuss the issue on Twitter, where she referred to Yaniv as "him". Murphy said: "Some of these [beauticians] were women working out of their homes and their names were published in the papers, but [Yaniv's] anonymity was protected."

Not using the adopted pronoun for a transgender person is known as "misgendering".

Yaniv said: "Twitter is absolutely right to ban users who misgender individuals. This is known as hateful conduct." Murphy is suing Twitter for suspending her account. "Twitter has always sold itself as a free speech company, and used free speech to defend allowing people to spew hate and abuse on the site," she said. "But suddenly on this issue, they're cracking down in the weirdest way — even if you just share research that challenges the politically correct narrative." The site has attracted opprobrium from other feminists for taking such a hard line on Murphy, while repeatedly letting off other users who make rape or death threats to women.

Joanna Cherry, the SNP member for Edinburgh South West, recently questioned Twitter's head of UK public policy, Katy Minshall, at a parliamentary hearing, where Cherry spoke of violent threats that had initially been cleared by the site's moderators.

Murphy said: "I have received countless violent threats on Twitter and I don't think they've banned any of them. My tweets were not violent. I think someone at Twitter wanted to get rid of me — I was one of the most well-known women talking about this, and I wasn't apologetic. It is scary a corporation [can] start determining what we're allowed to talk about." Sophie Bridger, campaigns, policy and research manager for Stonewall Scotland, said: "Trans people are facing high levels of abuse and discrimination so it's crucial that public discussions about trans equality are respectful and informed. Finding out the facts is absolutely vital because we know a lot of fear and misinformation has spread."

Twitter, which is fighting Murphy's case, said its "hateful conduct" policy prohibited the promotion of violence or threats of attack against those in categories including sex and gender identity. @RosamundUrwin
Caption:
Murphy: heroine to some feminists

Jessica Yaniv accuses beauty salons of discrimination for refusing to see her
 


Edit to add: Times London covered it! I don't pay tho. Here is the link . Edited again to say I got too excited, that article is from May. https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/...n-wax-for-trans-woman-jessica-yaniv-gm7f9mltx

I'm pressing x as hard as I possibly can. If someone actually broke his pedocam, we would've heard the ree around the world on top of the angry tweets about getting them dang dirty trolls and the police being called.

Also, how in the hell did Cuckada accidentally make a good decision in this case?! The publication ban being lifted is something I would have dropped 🌈's all over the person daring enough to suggest it happening.
What a world :story:
 
The court will still more than likely rule in Yaniv's favor because trans uwu but you know they have to be thinking:

"If we let him win this one...there's 13 more cases of this shit."

That's the rub about this, isn't it? Even if Johnny Boy wins these cases, his name will officially be out there.

I'm kind of hoping Elsie redacts her previous reports to now include his full name. I want to see him 100% associated with the disgusting shit he's said and done to these women during these tribunal hearings and for his name to get pinged even more in Google searches.
 
That's the rub about this, isn't it? Even if Johnny Boy wins these cases, his name will officially be out there.

I'm kind of hoping Elsie redacts her previous reports to now include his full name. I want to see him 100% associated with the disgusting shit he's said and done to these women during these tribunal hearings and for his name to get pinged even more in Google searches.
Can't edit Twitter posts.
 
But she can re-report on them with names added, can't she? Or even better, compile her reports (with names added) for use on non-twitter sites, such as Null's own jessicayaniv.org.
You want the nice lady to do all that because? Edit them yourself if it's so important.

Edit: the best part of the whole thing is THE TRIBUNAL FUCKING TOLD HIM TO STFU OR THE BAN WOULD BE LIFTED.

Most judges, fake or not get really pissed when you.dont listen.
 
Back