- Joined
- Jul 16, 2019
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
He thinks he's showing empathy. It's an emotional skin suit that let's him demonstrate he's normal. It's not working. And if you turn the sound down, it looks like he's choosing a bunch of flowers.But he's not convincing anyone apart from himself and nutty mum. Yeah. it's a shitty move on his part but don't think for a second it's distracting anyone from what he is, not for a second.
Sorry, timeline was a bit heated for me: Wednesday would have been the raid/arrest/cp I think?
This kid was part of our community and this fat fuck is making a mockery of this and I’m a bit mad.
I did! I think it’s very interesting and sets up a picture of a dysfunctional guy who ends up with an equally dysfunctional wife in Miriam. I’m curious to the inside story and hearing from the children of the first marriage, but to be honest if it was me who had a half brother who was like Jonathan, there is no way in HELL I’d acknowledge any of this mess in public.I don’t know if you saw @The Ghost of ODB ’s post on Yitshak and his previous marriages, but there’s some interesting info there.
I haven't looked at the regs for Miriam's building but if someone (a child, sibling, stranger on a train, whatever) is going to purchase a property for a 55+ yo parent (whether they buy it outright or take out a mortgage) I would think the property would allow them ownership. It would be unpopular, to say the least, to allow someone to purchase property but then deny them access to the title and equity that runs with said property. And I very much doubt any 55+ community would say no to a resident's child in particular. After all, that's half the reason these people seem to have kids in the first place, to have someone to fend for them in their old age. If you blocked children from ownership, what incentive would they have to buy their parents nice cushy condos?
Rather than a clause restricting ownership I would think they would have eligibility clauses for the primary resident(s) and restrictions on guests. If it's actually Miriam's, should she shuffle off this mortal coil he would likely be eligible to inherit a property interest in the condo, but not actually take residence until he met the eligibility requirements associated with the property. I'm personally doubtful that he would own both properties just because the amount of money he would need to own both (or the credit score he would need to take out two mortgages) would be just insane for a guy who spends his life sitting on his ass.
That said, who knows. BC is a madhouse. Add in age-restricted housing and you get all sorts of crazy. Watching this clusterfuck has made my province seem straightforward and tame in comparison.
Also I'm half asleep so if this is incomprehensible let me know and I'll clarify.
Can't shake that image out of my head now.Nah Jonathan Yaniv is virginal as fuck
When Jonathan loses the BCHRT complaints (given the mess of his own testimony), I am almost certain that Jonathan's next scam will be for Miriam's "life insurance". Don't put it past the sociopath!I mean I doubt unemployed Yaniv can afford it. He's probably looking at it banking on big bchrt payouts.
Mad max is not going to be the prime minister. The PPC are not going to win seats in greater Vancouver. This is funny. Max is MEAN. If he notices her, we might get a new thread...So it appears Jonathan's crackpot mother has shifted support from the "trans-supportive" Liberal Party of Canada to the People's Party of Canada pleading with Maxime Bernier (after today's earlier response to Jonathan's period fiasco at Anderson Memorial Pool) to support shutting down Kiwi Farms. Laughable. I am not sure if she's the undereducated mother of the ALLEGED IT Technical Expert or she's truly on the verse of early onset dementia.
Also, if it's any constellation: Miriam Yaniv (Twitter: @Miriam_yaniv) is easy pickings and reacts very easily.
View attachment 888163
YEAH let's shut down that awful kiwifarm.net!! Fuck those fruit growing Japs!So it appears Jonathan's crackpot mother has shifted support from the "trans-supportive" Liberal Party of Canada to the People's Party of Canada pleading with Maxime Bernier (after today's earlier response to Jonathan's period fiasco at Anderson Memorial Pool) to support shutting down Kiwi Farms. Laughable. I am not sure if she's the undereducated mother of the ALLEGED IT Technical Expert or she's truly on the verse of early onset dementia.
Also, if it's any constellation: Miriam Yaniv (Twitter: @Miriam_yaniv) is easy pickings and reacts very easily.
View attachment 888163
So it appears Jonathan's crackpot mother has shifted support from the "trans-supportive" Liberal Party of Canada to the People's Party of Canada pleading with Maxime Bernier (after today's earlier response to Jonathan's period fiasco at Anderson Memorial Pool) to support shutting down Kiwi Farms. Laughable. I am not sure if she's the undereducated mother of the ALLEGED IT Technical Expert or she's truly on the verse of early onset dementia.
Also, if it's any constellation: Miriam Yaniv (Twitter: @Miriam_yaniv) is easy pickings and reacts very easily.
View attachment 888163
Jesus wept, is this a joke?! This fucktard is as transparent as air.
Breaking News.
This "well-known documentarian" is going to be Shane Dawson or another YouTuber isn't it? It's definitely going to be Louis Theroux. Also who wants to bet that "my agent" turns out to be Mama Yaniv?
View attachment 888306
![]()
In the small case that this isn't bullshit, please let it be Louis Theroux.
There is a 99% chance of him saying this so he can lay low and hope people forget about him, while also using it as a shield to protect his ego.
Lol, he won't shut up. Trust me.Breaking News.
This "well-known documentarian" is going to be Shane Dawson or another YouTuber isn't it? It's definitely not going to be Louis Theroux or anyone with any prestige. Also who wants to bet that "my agent" turns out to be Mama Yaniv?
View attachment 888306
![]()
Then he should delete his Twitter. It's gotten 5,000 mostly hate followers since he reopened it in March and over 1K since July, so protecting it would do nothing.
But we all know he won't do it.
If he did that then he'd have no attention at all. Plus in his view closing his Twitter would mean a "loss".Then he should delete his Twitter. It's gotten 5,000 mostly hate followers since he reopened it in March and over 1K since July, so protecting it would do nothing.
But we all know he won't do it.