Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

BC has some “progressive” laws about service animals specifically, Jon is taking advantage of this.

It looks like amendments to existing bylaws were just tacked on without editing other statutes.
 
BC has some “progressive” laws about service animals specifically, Jon is taking advantage of this.

It looks like amendments to existing bylaws were just tacked on without editing other statutes.
But yaniv hasn't got a service dog. He has an undisciplined pet dog (from the bits I've watched). Therefore, service dog laws don't apply to him.

If anything yaniv is taking advantage of the lax court system over there which allows him to file any old retarded shite when he feels like it and people being too polite to either tell him to feck off or loosen his teeth.
 
It’s really confusing…
Some parts read like if passenger/driver safety is at risk, they can be kicked off, but others read like that isn’t the case, but only for certified animals which they can’t ask for proof of

In BC you are not allowed to have large animal on transit unless they are in a carrier or in some type of bag. If you are on a small bus (one that you call and book a pickup time) they might be cool about it because they see the same people everyday but the regular busses they need the animal to be in a carrier, and if you claim it is a service dog it is up to the bus drivers discretion. Since yanivs dog is a hellion and doesn't behave the bus driver can legally ask for its id/papers, this also goes for private businesses as well.
 
Re: The care service. That's a nurses/caretaker service, not a maid service. I don't know why he expected the person to do heavy housework. At best they will do light tidying up. It's not a government-provided service.

Re: service dogs. At one point I read every case I could find on this in BC. The laws tend to be interpreted liberally when it comes to having an animal in your residence. If your condo association has a no pets policy, and you have a pet that makes you less anxious that you keep in your condo, and the pet doesn't cause drama, you'll generally get away with it. If you want to bring your pet into a business, it seems to be interpreted more narrowly. BC Transit and Translink (Translink serves the Greater Vancouver Regional District and BC Transit the rest of the province) are entirely different. They're crown corporations with rights that they guard jealously, including having fought off a challenge previously to be able to exclude dogs at will. That was in 2016. Translink has so much influence that if someone got the court to rule that they were required to take dogs, they could get the legislature to change the law so they didn't have to anymore.

The door-to-door service is called HandyDart. He mentioned it once. It sucks. Using it if you could drive would be insane.

The reason he's calling Translink isn't because he isn't able to drive. It's because SFU made him purchase a U-Pass. That's an agreement the universities have with Translink. When you become a student at a local university, you are automatically charged about $120 as a transit fee, and as a result your student card functions as a transit pass. It's a pretty great deal if you actually use transit, and if you don't it's just another university/college-related fee. He's saying it's unfair that he has to purchase it because he can't use it, because his dog isn't welcome. This is unlikely to be successful as an argument. Everyone gets charged for the U-Pass.

Yaniv used to use the Skytrain pretty regularly when he was going into downtown, but seems to have stopped.
 
Translink has so much influence that if someone got the court to rule that they were required to take dogs, they could get the legislature to change the law so they didn't have to anymore.
Has anyone pointed out the irony of it being named "Translink" yet?

because all I can picture mentally now is a double-decker clown bus full of troons
 
Ummmm guys…
4B392BF0-5FBA-4822-B9B6-7A3BF8233277.jpeg
24AF3D3C-98FF-4660-8ED3-4040EF48BA85.jpeg
 
Yaniv used to use the Skytrain pretty regularly when he was going into downtown, but seems to have stopped.
He was riding the skytrain back in the scootypuff days.

If you live where he lives you pretty much resign yourself to never really visiting the downtown core. It is like 2 hours by transit and a hour by car to get to the popular beaches/areas. He is also looking at a 45 minute transit ride to his new campus, I can't wait to see how he copes about being on campus without his scootypuff.
 
He is also looking at a 45 minute transit ride to his new campus, I can't wait to see how he copes about being on campus without his scootypuff.
He either
  • takes his chances driving, with his pet, in wintry conditions
  • uses TransLink with his pet in a carrier, as others have to
  • or stays at home and misses one day (possibly 2 max) a week of Uni
he has a choice.
 
WTF is this shit?
Yaniv providing condoms to anyone is just proof that disinfectant spray really needs to be applied to anyone that chooses to have sex with it.

Her full name is Natasha Manmeet Brar ... I can't even!
Instead of meeting a man, you’ll meet a shell of a “man” like Yaniv.
Ummmm guys…
View attachment 3610945
View attachment 3610941
Yaniv really needs to get rid of the 5 o’clock shadow. It’s not looking good for his double chin as it is.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ummmm guys…
View attachment 3610945
View attachment 3610941
Not Yaniv since it only mentions sex and not him wanting to talk about menstruation or tampons.
Still though, it is a phantom picture but with some generous squinting sideways, it kind of looks a little bit like his fat pedo face.

It is still not Yaniv in that picture, but it does add another datapoint to my idea that you actually can spot who is a pedo by just looking at a picture of them and that we should be able to train AIs to autmatically detect them and pre-emptively send the cops to their places to check them out.
 
Not Yaniv since it only mentions sex and not him wanting to talk about menstruation or tampons.
Still though, it is a phantom picture but with some generous squinting sideways, it kind of looks a little bit like his fat pedo face.

It is still not Yaniv in that picture, but it does add another datapoint to my idea that you actually can spot who is a pedo by just looking at a picture of them and that we should be able to train AIs to autmatically detect them and pre-emptively send the cops to their places to check them out.
"Fun" fact / slight PL: I actually do think this might genuinely be feasible, given a large enough set of training data.

Source: I understand AI on a somewhat basic level for professional reasons. I also happen to be a woman - although I am fully aware that plenty of men also have highly functioning "creep alerts". It exists, although people who experience it typically cannot definitively point at anything specific when asked "why?".

I'm a trained computer scientist and mathematician and would hence hypothesise that it's, at its core, some sort of a heuristic model (processed in people's heads rather than on a CPU, that is). Some sort of pattern recognition based on optics and behaviour (whereas, really, the optics part is mostly a function of behaviour, too: a perfectly well-adjusted Yaniv would still not be stunningly attractive but would arguably not trigger the same level of instinctive "dissonance between physical architecture vs presentation layer" alarm in other people.

Long story short: I happen to agree that, in theory, it'd arguably be feasible to train an AI to spot, if not paedos then "Yanivs". In practice, it's probably unrealistic for a whole variety of factors, first and foremost: the level of behavioural surveillance required to compile a meaningful data set being far beyond the pale in terms of "legal or acceptable".

It's a thoroughly interesting thought experiment, though.

</nerdout>

Yaniv providing condoms to anyone is just proof that disinfectant spray really needs to be applied to anyone that chooses to have sex with it.
With all due respect, that seems like a rather hypothetical situation ...

It's not as though anyone would choose to have sex with Yaniv. And, thankfully, operation (literally!) "Coin Slot" drastically reduced his options re. "choosing" being a non-mandatory situation.

Personally, even though I'm aware of the somewhat implausible bathroom et al. claims, I'm operating under the assumption that Yaniv is, in fact, a virgin. Nobody who's had actual sex would actually speak about sex the way Yaniv does, unless ...

Okay, on balance: it's twchnically an "indeterminable" because he's also genuinely weird AF and hence might ...
 
"Fun" fact / slight PL: I actually do think this might genuinely be feasible, given a large enough set of training data.

Source: I understand AI on a somewhat basic level for professional reasons. I also happen to be a woman - although I am fully aware that plenty of men also have highly functioning "creep alerts". It exists, although people who experience it typically cannot definitively point at anything specific when asked "why?".

I'm a trained computer scientist and mathematician and would hence hypothesise that it's, at its core, some sort of a heuristic model (processed in people's heads rather than on a CPU, that is). Some sort of pattern recognition based on optics and behaviour (whereas, really, the optics part is mostly a function of behaviour, too: a perfectly well-adjusted Yaniv would still not be stunningly attractive but would arguably not trigger the same level of instinctive "dissonance between physical architecture vs presentation layer" alarm in other people.

Long story short: I happen to agree that, in theory, it'd arguably be feasible to train an AI to spot, if not paedos then "Yanivs". In practice, it's probably unrealistic for a whole variety of factors, first and foremost: the level of behavioural surveillance required to compile a meaningful data set being far beyond the pale in terms of "legal or acceptable".

It's a thoroughly interesting thought experiment, though.

</nerdout>
Wherever would you find a dataset like that?
1660782305389.png


Oh Right
1660782348969.png
 
yaniv?
View attachment 3609239View attachment 3609110archive
No doubt whatsoever. Not content with alienating fellow trannies he's now tarnishing the, genuine, disabled (by association).
Is this a whole new case on the horizon?

Hot damn.

We need a little "Days Without Death Threats" counter here.

Also, any shuck and jive about whether or not the dog is allowed on transit is moot; this fat shithead is either going to drive or uber *if* he has to actually go to class and doesn't just do online school.
 
Back