Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • Happy Easter!
Idiot. Canadians are polite for the same reason pre-Industrial Japanese were polite: because when the smiles drop off the fucking swords come out. Canada is the reason the Geneva Convention on war-crimes fucking exists, okay? Keep it in mind.
After the weimar times comes the unfriendly bud times.
 
Yaniv needed a father with legs like logs and a sack of granite. A man who slaps people who are talking. Unfortunately, he was born in Canada.
Yitshak Yaniv was definitely that sort of man. Unfortunately Miriam Altmann-Yaniv likely engaged in covert (and possibly overt) incest with her precious son.

1573592020842-png.1007268
 
The Geneva Conventions should be something we're proud of.
And? The Geneva Conventions (depending on the protocol) protect multiple classes of people: legitimate military personnel acting on behalf of a country, prisoners of war, medical personnel, noncombatants and civilians in general.

Unprotected? Un-uniformed terrorists. They take their lives into their own hands, much like pirates on the high seas or slavers.
 
Idiot. Canadians are polite for the same reason pre-Industrial Japanese were polite: because when the smiles drop off the fucking swords come out. Canada is the reason the Geneva Convention on war-crimes fucking exists, okay? Keep it in mind.

We may over-coddle in favour of giving the shadow of the doubt and the social justice wing has ascendency for NOW, thats not lasting past the next election. Yaniv is already falling, and will continue to.
That may have been true when Canada was part of the British Empire, but these days the country is full of limp-dicked faggots and has been completely and utterly cucked with the enthusiastic support of most of the populace.
 
That may have been true when Canada was part of the British Empire, but these days the country is full of limp-dicked faggots and has been completely and utterly cucked with the enthusiastic support of most of the populace.
If you need faith in humanity, go to an oil and gas town or any blue collar city. Much less tolerance for stupidity.
 
And? The Geneva Conventions (depending on the protocol) protect multiple classes of people: legitimate military personnel acting on behalf of a country, prisoners of war, medical personnel, noncombatants and civilians in general.

Unprotected? Un-uniformed terrorists. They take their lives into their own hands, much like pirates on the high seas or slavers.

Two sides were trying to kill one another using any means possible, and one side hurt the other so badly they had to run to the international community to beg for more rules to keep things fair.

I won't condone targeting civilians, it's not smart to mistreat POWs because your own side may have prisoners in your enemies' clutches, and medical personnel should always be left alone.

But using shotguns in trenches? Smashing kraut skulls that spent the last month spraying your friends with bullets under the cover of a "truce" for Christmas? Flechette weapons?

oh no, please, stop

And Terrorists and Pirates should always be cleansed via napalm.
 
Mm update: imagine being such an utter sociopath and level stalker that you have not one ..not ten..not 100 but THOUSAND of affidavits toward a legitimate severely mentally ill man.
This is concerning level of hate boner .

Quote from the site staff:
We have been working on uploading some of the now over 1000 pages of Yaniv’s bullshit affidavits against Donald Smith. One affidavit is 435 pages long. We had hoped that taking the site offline until we had completed it would speed things up and protect the server load. Unfortunately, we were wrong and are now looking for an alternative document library solution.

Unfortunately, we used a maintenance screen but overlooked the ALT and title tag. As a result, Yaniv believed he got the site taken down and went on a rampage of boasting and threatening people with similar. So, we left it a bit longer before correcting it, and now we have a major Yaniv meltdown as he tried to remove all traces of his bullshit. So much that reports from different sources tell us he has stuck Rexy out on the balcony since then.

We are sorry, Yaniv. The internet is forever. We are sorry, readers, but it was too good an opportunity to expose him when it happened.
 
Mm update: imagine being such an utter sociopath and level stalker that you have not one ..not ten..not 100 but THOUSAND of affidavits toward a legitimate severely mentally ill man.
This is concerning level of hate boner .
It's what he does.
He tries to overwhelm his victims to get them off balance, in the hope he might get "a win" when they miss something he can seize on and wave triumphantly in court.

It's quite likely that most of the affidavit content will just be copy and pasted bullshit that he's tried to pass off before.
 
But using shotguns in trenches? Smashing kraut skulls that spent the last month spraying your friends with bullets under the cover of a "truce" for Christmas? Flechette weapons?
What do the Geneva Conventions even say about shotguns? Maybe I missed something. Pretty sure bayonets are also legal (even those triangular bayonets some people erroneously think are banned). And I'm pretty sure flechette rounds are also legal because human rights organizations are constantly asking they be banned, which I'm pretty sure they wouldn't do if they were banned.

Since the 1860s, States have agreed to prohibitions or limitations of certain weapons owing to their actual or potential human cost. These include prohibition on exploding or expanding bullets (1868), expanding bullets (1899), poison and asphyxiating gases (1925), biological weapons (1972), chemical weapons (1993), munitions using undetectable fragments (1980), blinding laser weapons (1995), anti-personnel mines (1997), cluster munitions (2008), nuclear weapons (2017), as well as limitations on the use of incendiary weapons (1980), anti-personnel- and anti-vehicle landmines, booby-traps and other devices (1980 & 1996), and obligations related to explosive remnants of war (2003).

Some countries argue that other weapons not explicitly listed are covered under more general prohibitions, but in general, the reality is that parties use things that arguably violate the Conventions all the time, and unless explicitly prohibited, the main reason countries adhere to the customarily accepted prohibitions is fear of retaliation and, to a lesser extent, reputation loss.
 
What do the Geneva Conventions even say about shotguns? Maybe I missed something. Pretty sure bayonets are also legal (even those triangular bayonets some people erroneously think are banned). And I'm pretty sure flechette rounds are also legal because human rights organizations are constantly asking they be banned, which I'm pretty sure they wouldn't do if they were banned.



Some countries argue that other weapons not explicitly listed are covered under more general prohibitions, but in general, the reality is that parties use things that arguably violate the Conventions all the time, and unless explicitly prohibited, the main reason countries adhere to the customarily accepted prohibitions is fear of retaliation and, to a lesser extent, reputation loss.
The Germans did try to argue that America's use of shotguns in the trenches in WWI was a violation of the "unnecessary suffering" article of the Hague Convention (the predecessor to Geneva) and threatened to shoot any American captured with one. The US government just said "cool, we'll respond in kind", which apparently scared the Germans enough not to follow through, and the doughboys kept using their trench brooms to kill Huns for the last few months of the war. Dickish? Sure. Effective? Definitely. A war crime? Dubious at best. A shotgun probably wasn't going to cause any more unnecessary suffering than high-velocity airburst shrapnel, a lungful of phosgene, a .303 machine gun round, or slowly drowning because a U-boat blew your ship out of the water. It's generally believed that the Germans only complained because shotguns were just that effective at trench clearance and scared the shit out of the frontschweine.

Anyway, fuck Yaniv.
 
The Germans did try to argue that America's use of shotguns in the trenches in WWI was a violation of the "unnecessary suffering" article of the Hague Convention (the predecessor to Geneva) and threatened to shoot any American captured with one. The US government just said "cool, we'll respond in kind", which apparently scared the Germans enough not to follow through, and the doughboys kept using their trench brooms to kill Huns for the last few months of the war. Dickish? Sure. Effective? Definitely. A war crime? Dubious at best. A shotgun probably wasn't going to cause any more unnecessary suffering than high-velocity airburst shrapnel, a lungful of phosgene, a .303 machine gun round, or slowly drowning because a U-boat blew your ship out of the water. It's generally believed that the Germans only complained because shotguns were just that effective at trench clearance and scared the shit out of the frontschweine.

Anyway, fuck Yaniv.

Don't forget that Germany was the first country to use chemical agents on a large scale. They killed 7k people with chlorine gas. France was the first to use chemical agents with tear gas. Big difference between tear and chlorine. They had no issues using chemical agents to kill 7k, but God forbid we use a slam fire trench gun.
 
Don't forget that Germany was the first country to use chemical agents on a large scale. They killed 7k people with chlorine gas. France was the first to use chemical agents with tear gas. Big difference between tear and chlorine. They had no issues using chemical agents to kill 7k, but God forbid we use a slam fire trench gun.
They also invented sarin and manufactured rather alarming amounts of it, but the effective balance of terror prevented them from ever deploying it, since they knew the Allies had similar agents.
 
Yitshak Yaniv was definitely that sort of man. Unfortunately Miriam Altmann-Yaniv likely engaged in covert (and possibly overt) incest with her precious son.

1573592020842-png.1007268
It's as if they knew even back then that he would end up a fat bastard. Usually when you buy clothes a bit big for kids to grow in to it's because you expect that they'll get a bit taller. That's the first kid I've seen wearing clothes that they can eat their way to a better fit.
 
It's quite likely that most of the affidavit content will just be copy and pasted bullshit that he's tried to pass off before.
it's pages and pages of AI generated gibberish
the reality is that parties use things that arguably violate the Conventions all the time,
as long as .50 caliber bullets exist, the Geneva conventions are a joke
 
it's pages and pages of AI generated gibberish

as long as .50 caliber bullets exist, the Geneva conventions are a joke
The Conventions aren't there to stop people from killing each other, just to put a sort of Marquess of Queensberry rules aspect into it to prevent the absolute worst things that nobody really wants to see deployed, like nerve agents.
 
Back