On February 7, 2025, a very surprising application was filed against
Jessica Yaniv Simpson by none other than the Provincial Health Services Authority or BC Emergency Health Services, aka BC Ambulance. This was surprising because this file, initiated by Yaniv on December 19, 2022, was dismissed on May 27, 2024, and the file, which had been sealed due to its nature, was unexpectedly unsealed at the same time. Unfortunately, there is still a publication ban on the trial details.
The extremely surprising and interesting part is that 9 months later when Yaniv has likely forgotten the huge loss and been proven a liar in court yet again, he gets hit with a brand new application for costs! The PHSA/BCEHS is asking for 10% of what they were being sued for, so that is $3,500 plus costs and disbursements incurred by their Articling Student, Sceana Richardson, at a further $999.67 for a grand total of $4,599.67. What makes this even juicier is the court rules they’ve applied to this application. BC Small Claims rule 20(5) states that the party should receive 10% of the claim when the claim had no reasonable basis for success. Will this judgement finally break the Bank of Miriam? Will she finally realize that he is a narcissistic abuser that takes advantage of her? Will she finally understand that Yaniv isn’t going to be a fancy human rights lawyer but will always be a loser that she could never boast about in church? Remember Yaniv was ordered to pay BCEHS $1,620 back in March 2022 and paid the BCCRT Strata judgement of $3,808.54 on January 2, 2025, but only because he was in danger of losing the pigloo.
The application also tells us that, as usual, legal eagle Yaniv has no bloody clue what he is doing in court. It states that “the claimant directed hostile language towards counsel for the applicant” and that “this type of behaviour is wholly inappropriate” and “worthy of rebuke”. Can we all agree that Yaniv’s catchphrase should be “worthy of rebuke”? They also state that “Ms Simpson’s claim had no real prospect of success” and was “unfounded and an inappropriate use of judicial resources and an unfair attack on the defendant and the BCEHS Paramedics involved”. Yaniv “did not put forth any evidence to support her version of events” and “in fact contradicted herself at trial and in her prior statements to Police”. That is a bold statement we have heard in a few other cases. They also said Yaniv claimed “embellished and exaggerated evidence of the event”. They mentioned Yaniv’s egregious X posts that said Yaniv had been SA’d by a serial abuser and that the other Paramedic was a reckless driver “in an attempt to “shame” the Paramedics with no evidence at all”. As usual, Yaniv attempted to use criminal law in a civil law court. How many times does Yaniv need to be told this by Judges? Best of all they then referred to Yaniv’s “other claims of a similar nature” and stated that “she is a serial litigator who makes similar claims seeking damages against others”. Now, if only they would apply to have Yaniv declared a vexatious litigant once and for all, or is the presiding Judge able to confer this on their own and make a declaration? Lastly, they admonished Yaniv’s anonymity application, as others have also done, and said, “Ms Simpson attempted to use the anonymization process as a shield to protect her from the consequences of bringing this claim”. Honestly, at what point are the Courts complicit in allowing this to continue when it’s the same BS in every case Yaniv files?
