Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
"Dysphoria made me ask about giving tampons to little girls and seeing boobies in locker rooms!"
Yes, and now he's not holding back on his feelings on brown people.
Screen Shot 2019-05-25 at 9.03.27 PM.png
 
Yes, and now he's not holding back on his feelings on brown people.
View attachment 772511

Translation: If you're a darkie who got here legally and you refuse to #WaxMyBalls, you deserve to have your livelihood taken away from you!

Also, this whole debacle between Morgane and JY is reminding me of a certain meme right about now.
 
Okay, this is ongoing. Jonathan responses to Oger.
View attachment 772358View attachment 772359
Jonathan has already had a few more responses.
Link but its ongoing and archive it taking it's time. https://twitter.com/MorganeOgerBC/status/1132431946187849728
Link to earlier point in the conversation: https://twitter.com/trustednerd/status/1132412497342767104 (Archive: https://archive.fo/zY79x)
Yes, and now he's not holding back on his feelings on brown people.
View attachment 772511
Link: https://twitter.com/SapphicScribe/status/1132464569262022656 (Archive: https://archive.fo/Elroh)
Link: https://twitter.com/trustednerd/status/1132419037193916416 (Archive: https://archive.fo/l19Y1)
@Xenu Warrior Princess can your help with the archiving? I'm will not be by a computer for the next few days. There is a lot of content between Jonathan and Morgane.

Blaming dysphoria for all his creepy shit.
View attachment 772449
Archive: https://archive.fo/gINWU
 
an hero.jpg

looks like jon is still harassing one of the same girls years later. He is currently retweeting one of them sending suicide baiting tweets years ago to try to prove she is a liar. If anything it just shows how obsessive he is to remember something like this from 2013 and retweet it 6 years later like it matters. Probably one of the kids he called a whore.

edit: admits to a personality disorder
Bcluster.jpg
 
please let us know of any facebook updates. Looks like he's worn himself out on Twitter today.
JY won’t mix the groups. they’d never say people are bullying them anywhere because the people JY has conned into supporting them would run away the minute they saw the evidence. Although, most of these “supporters” aren’t even in Canada so I’m guessing JY found them on a forum somewhere.

Go ahead, prove me wrong JY. It’s pretty sad how pathetically you’re trying to manipulate Alicia with your fake suicide crap.
 
Well in the words of Canadian Human Rights enforcer Morgane Oger, we must say JY is a woman, he must be allowed into the women's, but his taking selfies in it violates privacy, same as if any woman did it. In the states you can refuse service to someone who happens to be in a protected class if that itself isn't the reason. Paging @Cato for clarification, but I'd think someone with his history could get kicked out by anyone as long as that was the reason--versus him just being some rando non-pedo who decided to troon out.

I apologize for taking a week to respond to this--I've been very busy IRL.

Just to clarify: I've seen quite a few posts here about JY or others "be[ing] in a protected class," but that's not how human rights legislation works. There are grounds of protection, but (legally, at least, regardless of how they tend to operate in practice) they aren't a matter of specific individuals falling under them or not. They are bases of discrimination that are disallowed--e.g. "sex" being a protected ground of discrimination doesn't only narrowly mean that one can't discriminate against women specifically. I know this is pedantic of me, but these things are often framed in a way that's technically incorrect.

Anyways, to actually answer your question, you are correct. In BC you can't discriminate against someone on the basis of "gender identity or expression," but you absolutely can deny service to a (self-proclaimed) transperson on other bases (e.g. their violating privacy, harassing people, etc).

I'll echo the comments of those that have already discussed how (criminal) background checks only return any prior convictions and such. Someone could be doing all kinds of bad stuff behind the scenes and still pass a background check if they don't have any type of conviction record.

This is wrong. In Canada, positions involving working with children require "vulnerable sector" police information checks. It's not only convictions that show up on them--charges, arrests, etc in relation to relevant offences that did not result in convictions will still be flagged.

You're correct that shady behaviour that did not result in any police contact won't show up, though.

I imagine the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms has some sort of provision for people to address the government with concerns similar to the US Constitution's First Amendment. So the council likely has to give JY the same speaking time as citizens with more legitimate issues and concerns.

The relevant section would be Section 2(b) of the Charter, which grants freedom of expression. The application to speaking before a municipal council would be complicated though, as freedom of expression usually only requires that the government refrain from interfering with one's expression, and doesn't require them to provide a platform for expression. "The traditional view, in colloquial terms, is that the freedom of expression contained in s. 2 (b) prohibits gags, but does not compel the distribution of megaphones." - Haig v Canada

The Local Government Act does, however, include a number of sections outlining duties that councilors have to their constituents, situations in which constituents must be heard, etc.

Who knows, depending on how much of a protected class troons are in CA, advertising that you can't cater to them, no matter how subtly, might be grounds for discrimination.

Expressly advertising that you won't provide services to transgender people would definitely violate the BC Human Rights Code. The situation with the waxing salons is only ambiguous because the difference in the customer's genitalia is actually relevant to the service being provided.
 
I've been following JY on and off for a little while now. I've never understood why he treats #waxmyballs as such a huge thing. Is it to try and m.ilk money out of poor small business owners, or is he really this delusional? Or is there some kind of sexual bent to all this? I know he's gross, but that's kinda what makes me even more curious. It's the classic train wreck effect. You know you shouldn't look, you know it's completely terrible, but you also can't turn away for a second.

P.S. I know this is very late, but you have to start somewhere, and this guy is interesting to me, for all the wrong reasons.
 
I've been following JY on and off for a little while now. I've never understood why he treats #waxmyballs as such a huge thing. Is it to try and m.ilk money out of poor small business owners, or is he really this delusional? Or is there some kind of sexual bent to all this? I know he's gross, but that's kinda what makes me even more curious. It's the classic train wreck effect. You know you shouldn't look, you know it's completely terrible, but you also can't turn away for a second.

Combination of sexual bent and scam effort. He is well-documented to be both a pervert and scam artist, and he did indeed get his balls waxed by a few businesses that didn't refuse him, while he offered to withdraw the complaints against those who did refuse in exchange for cash payments.

He only started his public "transgender activism" shtick after he was outed as the complainant in the Human Rights Tribunal cases, so it's an obvious, clumsy cover attempt.
 
I've been following JY on and off for a little while now. I've never understood why he treats #waxmyballs as such a huge thing. Is it to try and m.ilk money out of poor small business owners, or is he really this delusional? Or is there some kind of sexual bent to all this? I know he's gross, but that's kinda what makes me even more curious. It's the classic train wreck effect. You know you shouldn't look, you know it's completely terrible, but you also can't turn away for a second.


It's a fetish, and a source of income. He's stated he'll get rid of the lolsuits if they pay him 2 grand.
 
Back