- Joined
- Dec 10, 2018
How would Oger incorrectly mentioning meeting JY at a function be libelous or damage-worthy in itself? Oger just said that at the meeting that she may have advised JY about the BCHRT at JY's request--unless he is asserting that Morgane is responsible for the reactions from the Economist, Spectator, Times of London, diverse nests of terves and conservatives, and the Farms. Does this MLM legal scheme that he's getting the lawyer from stipulate that the lawyer has to draft x number of dumb letters? Because, and I'm bugging @Cato again for his canada-specific take, this would not normally be seen as a potentially profitable venture by any lawyer I've ever met.