Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.
Jessie posted this as a followup to the rant about AW Restaurant workers:

View attachment 809160
(Link)(Archive)

So looks like one topic will be the perilous standard of spoken English among the local customer service operatives (I'm hoping for a photo of the offending burger in the presentation).

But it looks like this will be a presentation on multiple topics - who knew there was so much wrong in the ToL?

i wonder what jonathan's reading level is? i'm guessing middle school
 
Found this exchange. This girl seems young.
View attachment 808954
https://twitter.com/briellelandman2/status/1141732749205790720
Both of those girls now follow each other and can send PM's. I wonder if she's sharing information about Jonathan with that Victoria account?
Her bio says she lives in Pennsylvania, but it looks like she spent about a week in Canada back in March... I hope she didn't have any run-ins with creepy tampon-obsessed troons.
 
The RCMP has a good track record and they “Always get their man”

LOL

I could list off dozens of scandals, controversies and examples of corruption or extreme incompetence from the RCMP, but since you focused on their investigative skills I'll just say they are sorely lacking in that department and the reasons are quite obvious. In the United States, for example, they have the FBI and other federal law enforcement and intelligence agencies where they hire people directly into complex investigative roles, and as a result in the recruitment and selection stage they actively seek people who are reasonably well educated and intelligent, and capable of performing such work. In the RCMP, by contrast, they hire everyone to start in patrol and then they promote "bros" who mindlessly follow orders and get along with their dysfunctional internal culture to such investigative roles. In other words, they end up actively selecting for people who *lack* critical thinking ability. The barely literate email from an RCMP officer that was posted in this thread is very much the norm for them, both in terms of the quality of writing and dismissive and unhelpful response.

If the RCMP are such crack investigators, explain the Highway of Tears to me.

I thought the BCHRT didn't require a lawyer to open a complaint but DOES require one to defend against an accusation. That's why Jonny uses them to extort immigrant salon operators.
It would be a shame if some Langley immigrant fast food workers turned the BCHRT into a weapon to seek redress against Yaniv's blatant racism.

Respondents aren't required to hire lawyers. They are allowed to self-represent if they so desire.

The issue is that actually filing a complaint is effortless and free, and subjects of complaint are potentially on the hook for thousands of dollars in "compensation," while the complainant faces no such consequences if they lose. Note that even when JY was ordered to pay costs, it was a pathetic $150, and even that is an extreme outcome and complainants being ordered to pay costs by the Tribunal is almost unheard of (the decision explicitly said it was being done as a punitive measure).

Basically, respondents "have" to hire lawyers in practice much of the time, because it's more expensive for them not to. Whereas that's never true for complainants.
 
Archive for the latest in the A&W saga:



Sorry, I'm too tired to take screenshots right now, here's a copy & paste:

A&W: We’re so sorry to hear this, Jessica! Please DM us with your email/phone # and the A&W you visited so we can follow up.

Amy Eileen Hamm: Google this person’s name before getting involved. Seriously.

JY: Screw off Amy, or do you want to be on a harassment file? I’m asking you to leave, if you don’t, there will be issues and I will call the cops.

I looked at Amy's twitter page and I didn't see any other instances of her mentioning JY or tweeting at him, so he seems to be under the impression that this one single tweet counts as harassment? I am super curious to know how many times he has phoned the police on people. The police station probably had to make him his own filing cabinet.
 
Archive for the latest in the A&W saga:



Sorry, I'm too tired to take screenshots right now, here's a copy & paste:



I looked at Amy's twitter page and I didn't see any other instances of her mentioning JY or tweeting at him, so he seems to be under the impression that this one single tweet counts as harassment? I am super curious to know how many times he has phoned the police on people. The police station probably had to make him his own filing cabinet.

809546


I love that he can't do anything online without total normies assblasting him. null's revenge has gone well.
 
Archive for the latest in the A&W saga:



Sorry, I'm too tired to take screenshots right now, here's a copy & paste:



I looked at Amy's twitter page and I didn't see any other instances of her mentioning JY or tweeting at him, so he seems to be under the impression that this one single tweet counts as harassment? I am super curious to know how many times he has phoned the police on people. The police station probably had to make him his own filing cabinet.
I know what he wanted to order

AW-Teen-Burger-for-3.50-450x402.jpg
 
The issue is that actually filing a complaint is effortless and free, and subjects of complaint are potentially on the hook for thousands of dollars in "compensation," while the complainant faces no such consequences if they lose.

And the act of filing brings the considerable investigative, prosecutorial and judgement weight of the BCHRT to bear on the respondents - for free. In essence, since the Commission was eliminated, the BCHRT acts as prosecuting attorney for the complainant in addition to being judge.

Respondents aren't required to hire lawyers. ...

...Basically, respondents "have" to hire lawyers in practice much of the time,

Seems like a needless splitting of hairs but okay. I'm pretty sure we are on the same page here.
"The defendant who acts as his own lawyer has a fool for a client."
 
Monday's Council Agenday is out. Jonathan is now taking on the environment. How many straws do you you go through on $1 drink day?
What do you want disabled users of plastic straws to do John, move out of the TOL? As an ~AcTiViSt~ intrepidly fighting for equality, you should know better than anyone that plastic straws are a medical necessity for many people with disabilities that don't allow them the luxury of eco-friendly alternatives. So are you ignorant or ableist?

 
Seems like a needless splitting of hairs but okay.

Not really. When discussing matters of law, precision matters, and there is a clear distinction between something being "required" and something being common and/or advisable in practice.

You're correct that we appear to be in agreement after all, but I wanted to clarify so anyone reading didn't get the wrong impression.
 
For the love of god. Seriously just this week it's been all over the news that Trudeau plans to ban single use plastics shortly. If he doesn't know this, he's an idiot. Well, he's an idiot anyway but he knows this. I'm guessing he plans to bring this to council and then when Trudeau bans it as already planned, he's going to crow all over twitter about his "victory".
 
Back