(Mad on the internet rant)
I wish those of you complaining about how one party in this case gets away with blue murder realise how these things work.
This is a hooman rights tribunal under the UN Declaration of Human Rights (Peace be upon it), and various Canadian enshrinings of that declaration into law. A charter first laid down in 1948 in response to one of the greatest genocides in history.
So, if someone brings a case to the Hooman Rights Tribunal, they stand in a long line of victimhood stretching back, through the Rwandan genocide, right back to the Nazi camps. Indeed, one party in this case is the next best thing to someone who was tattooed by the Nazis and barely escaped being put into a shower room with Zyklon B. (has that party, the stunning and brave inspirational leader of the global LGBT community, not received terrifying genuine death threats from the Obergruppenfuhrer of the 100% totes genuine Nazi KKK League?)
The other party in this case who makes $500 a year and now suffers with depression on the other hand is the accuseddefendant in a human rights case. As Hitler would’ve been, had he not topped himself. A human rights violator: next best thing to Hitler and Pol Pot, right?
(INSERT ALICE THROUGH THE LOOKING GLASS QUOTE HERE)
So of course we, the humane and liberal judges of British Columbia, do not trigger the (potential) human rights victim further by asking them not to check Twitter or stop their mother storming in and out or feeding them questions via text message. To do this would be the same as forcing someone who survived Auschwitz to be cross-examined by Eichmann. The poor poor (potential) human rights victim must be treated with every kindness and lenience.
I will still bet anyone here good odds the complainant in this case wins, despite all the lunacy that has happened, and the predictions made here. What skin is it off “Cornwyll’s” (sic) woke little nose if the complainant wins? “Cornwyll” just goes on to further lucrative human rights complaints cases, either as Member or as prosecuting counsel, about the rights of troons to harass the vulnerable.
And for those who say “The troon community must disavow this one”, the troons will not do that at all. Hence why troons demand “Release all trans prisoners now!” – despite what they’ve done, trans are THE MOST OPPRESSED PEOPLE EVER and anything they’ve done is someone else’s fault (Terfs and bigots, I suppose, make you ask about teen girls’ tampons and force you to try to get into the 12 year old LGBTQ+ swimming class). Troons will not disavow this one if he wins or loses, he will always be the victim, anyone who stands in the way of his validation will always be the monsters.