Jonathan Yaniv / Jessica Yaniv / @trustednerd / trustednerd.com / JY Knows It / JY British Columbia - Canada's Best Argument Against Transgender Self-Identification

Come on, now. If there's one thing Yaniv is good at, it's knowing how close he can get to the line without crossing it. No way is that a real tweet.

And he thought "would it be weird to ask a 10-year-old girl for a tampon" and "have you ever seen a tampon string hanging out of a girl's thing" wasn't over the line?

If he were that good at toeing the line without crossing it we wouldn't be talking about him now.
 
Come on, now. If there's one thing Yaniv is good at, it's knowing how close he can get to the line without crossing it. No way is that a real tweet.

Well ... this, sort of ...

I mean, he's a fucking idiot, but I'd have to agree that he kind of seems to have walking dangerously close to the abyss but never quite falling down to an art form.

And he thought "would it be weird to ask a 10-year-old girl for a tampon" and "have you ever seen a tampon string hanging out of a girl's thing" wasn't over the line?

If he were that good at toeing the line without crossing it we wouldn't be talking about him now.

Yes, but ...

a) he's always maintained those were fake (despite all the evidence to the contrary) and, more importantly, ...
b) when he was saying that, it was always in situations which he regarded as being private and wouldn't expect to get public. Also, ...
c) I may be misremembering this because, at this point, it might literally be easier to compile a list of companies that haven't blatantly discriminated against our brave and stunning Nobel Prize winner in spe ... but, wasn't Starbucks on the transphobic no-no list at some point?

I'm honestly sceptical about this one. Not about him THINKING it, mind, but about him posting it.
 
Consider this: the timestamp is two minutes before this tweet, which also mentions Starbucks Canada and Frappucinos, and also includes the #LGBTQ and #LGBTQtakeover hashtags. So in theory, after writing the pedo tweet, he had two minutes to write another lengthy tweet covering essentially the same ground minus the pedo shit, attach a selfie to it, and post it from his iPhone. I suppose it's possible to do that in under two minutes on a phone, but that's cutting it pretty close.

On the other hand, although I am loathe to cite Yaniv as an authority on anything, he's right when he points out that it's trivially easy to edit the contents of a page element in any modern desktop browser and screenshot the result. So what seems to me to be the most logical explanation by far is that some very, very clever boy or girl thought it would be absolutely riotously funny to edit Yaniv's existing tweet to delete the selfie, add pedo shit, change the timestamp by two minutes (because no one will ever see through that subterfuge! It's the perfect crime!), screenshot it, and send it to poor Donald Smith, who will believe anything and can be counted on to immediately broadcast it to his legions of followers, some of whom even exist outside the confines of his own mind.

And if that very, very clever boy or girl happens to be reading these words, let me extend this request: please, knock it the fuck off. We want to see Yaniv get hoist by his own petard. When you make shit up, it creates deniability for him and makes it easier for him to continue his reign of terror amongst the waxing salons and New York Fries franchises of Lower Mainland British Columbia. Knock it off.
 
On the other hand, although I am loathe to cite Yaniv as an authority on anything, he's right when he points out that it's trivially easy to edit the contents of a page element in any modern desktop browser and screenshot the result.

Yes, this too! I happen to have a technical background, but I'm really relegated to "designated management overhead" at this point. Happy to supply screenshots of Greta Thunberg plugging British Airways and Trump posting a rallying cry for the communist revolution.

I mean, in all fairness, I'm honestly surprised his tech skills rival my mother's but he's kind of got a point there.

Can't believe I typed that last sentence, off to drink myself into stupor.
 
Consider this: the timestamp is two minutes before this tweet, which also mentions Starbucks Canada and Frappucinos, and also includes the #LGBTQ and #LGBTQtakeover hashtags. So in theory, after writing the pedo tweet, he had two minutes to write another lengthy tweet covering essentially the same ground minus the pedo shit, attach a selfie to it, and post it from his iPhone. I suppose it's possible to do that in under two minutes on a phone, but that's cutting it pretty close.

On the other hand, although I am loathe to cite Yaniv as an authority on anything, he's right when he points out that it's trivially easy to edit the contents of a page element in any modern desktop browser and screenshot the result. So what seems to me to be the most logical explanation by far is that some very, very clever boy or girl thought it would be absolutely riotously funny to edit Yaniv's existing tweet to delete the selfie, add pedo shit, change the timestamp by two minutes (because no one will ever see through that subterfuge! It's the perfect crime!), screenshot it, and send it to poor Donald Smith, who will believe anything and can be counted on to immediately broadcast it to his legions of followers, some of whom even exist outside the confines of his own mind.

And if that very, very clever boy or girl happens to be reading these words, let me extend this request: please, knock it the fuck off. We want to see Yaniv get hoist by his own petard. When you make shit up, it creates deniability for him and makes it easier for him to continue his reign of terror amongst the waxing salons and New York Fries franchises of Lower Mainland British Columbia. Knock it off.


In outing myself as the BIGGEST DUMBEST techtard on this site, which might be proved by this question, could Jonni have done that himself?
 
Come on, now. If there's one thing Yaniv is good at, it's knowing how close he can get to the line without crossing it. No way is that a real tweet.
And he thought "would it be weird to ask a 10-year-old girl for a tampon" and "have you ever seen a tampon string hanging out of a girl's thing" wasn't over the line?

If he were that good at toeing the line without crossing it we wouldn't be talking about him now.
Yeah........you both make good points here.

Assuming my longstandin suspicion of him trying some cynical yet fucktarded "bait people into taking proverbial or literal swings at me so I can sue them for everything" ploy is true, openly admitting to being a pedophile would be too risky for whatever ruse he is attempting.......but then he has already said and done so much shit comparable to this that it kinda becomes a moot point

If my other suspicion of being pathologically obsessed with negative attention for its own sake is correct, this would be more in character for him but then why would he delete and deny it? and furthermore his sickfuckery has always had the fig leaf of "oh this is all innocent guiz >:) " which makes such an explicit admission feel fairly unlikely
 
In outing myself as the BIGGEST DUMBEST techtard on this site, which might be proved by this question, could Jonni have done that himself?
Sure.

Required skill set: rudimentary knowledge of a) any modern web browser and b) HTML (version irrelevant), c) sockpuppeting or initiating contact with other human Twitter user (for "leak")

Super-conservative guesstimate of how many people have this skill set, assuming wide-spread tech illiteracy: 15-20% of all web users. I.e. millions of people, including Jon who's a) on the record for knowing about socks and b) accurately describes the tech involved in his tweet.

Now THIS, i.e. faking a malicious faker, IMHO, actually seems rather more likely than him posting this in earnest.
 
Sure.

Required skill set: rudimentary knowledge of a) any modern web browser and b) HTML (version irrelevant), c) sockpuppeting or initiating contact with other human Twitter user (for "leak")

Super-conservative guesstimate of how many people have this skill set, assuming wide-spread tech illiteracy: 15-20% of all web users. I.e. millions of people, including Jon who's a) on the record for knowing about socks and b) accurately describes the tech involved in his tweet.

Now THIS, i.e. faking a malicious faker, IMHO, actually seems rather more likely than him posting this in earnest.

It's just as possible someone else did it, but I put nothing past Yaniv. He is truly a legend in his own mind.
 
In outing myself as the BIGGEST DUMBEST techtard on this site, which might be proved by this question, could Jonni have done that himself?
Yes! And so can you!

2019-10-14.png
 
Well someone’s gonna be the next lucky guest on the sex offender registration

I'm really confused as to why this troon needs a tampon? Even the most stupid of troons realize that they don't need tampons. Plus asking for a tampon would be weird regardless whether you're a man who thinks they're a woman or an actual woman.

Also as a side note: most women who go the gym tend to go in there already in their gym clothes. This is mostly because of people like him.
Probably to stop the bleeding from his un clit
 
Well someone’s gonna be the next lucky guest on the sex offender registration


Probably to stop the bleeding from his un clit
Every once in a blue moon, it happens that a biological woman asks another biological woman for a tampon, when they are out somewhere and their period comes unexpectedly, and a drugstore is not close. I don't think tampon machines in the USA have been stocked since the 1970s. But it's rare. I think I can count five times in the past 35 years that another woman has asked me. No one, but no one is going to ask Jonny Boy. You wouldn't expect a troon to carry menstrual products because what the hell are they going to need them for in the first place?
 
I sort of think it used to happen a lot more a long time ago, like in the Mama Yaniv era.

I remember my mother and aunts preparing me with advice on exactly the situation in which you find yourself without a pad/tampon (menstrual cycles vary a lot more in length when you first start so it can catch you by surprise for the first year or two), and you should find a kind-looking woman, but not an old one because they wouldn't have anything for it. I remember thinking "I would sooner die, I'll use toilet paper, thanks." My mom also told me that it's basically the women's equivalent of the Bro Code that if another woman asks for a tampon and you have 2 in your purse, you must give her the other one, no excuses, that's just basic human decency in the women's room.

I wonder if somehow part of Jonathan's deeply-entrenched fantasy is that he heard a very, very similar lecture being delivered to perhaps a female relative (cousin?) at a formative age. I think most women in my generation think the way I do, and would rather "make do" with TP for a little while in most circumstances, but Jonathan would have no way to know that. Between the associations of vaginal blood and virginity, and maybe some sexual feelings toward the relative who was the intended listener of the lecture he overheard, you end up with a fixation that won't die. No matter how many people tell him this isn't the way real women behave, he insists it is.

Why? With a mama's boy, there's only one reason: mama told him so, and that bitch is always right. Even while they resent their mothers, mama's boys fundamentally believe their word as gospel.
 
So the font styles (particularly the font "Jessica Yaniv" is written in) immediately stood out to me as fake. I don't think I've ever seen a name listed in that font on Twitter -- if there's a difference between settings/apps/users thing that I'm missing please correct me. But I looked at a ton of twitter screenshots and could not find that font. It is similar to fonts that "tweet generator" apps use, though. Just look at the fake "MAP" screenshot next to any other Yaniv twitter post in this thread.

Also, Yaniv almost immediately started tweeting about how easy it would have been to fake which almost makes me think he created it himself so he could have a "real fake" to point to? Knowing his logic he probably thinks "if I have a verifiably fake tweet I can point to, they'll never be able to prove those facebook conversations are real!"

Not to mention that his predatory content doesn't read like this, nor has he ever explicitly admitted to being attracted to minors -- let alone said he's proud of it. He's definitely bold but in an insidious, creepy "uwu ur 2 young to fuck tho im a sad elmo" way, not in a "yeah, I'm an adult and I wanna fuck children" way.

Sorry for the sperg, it just seems so obviously fake and with the number of people who want to believe Yaniv is some kind of political plant there's no need to start taking dubious tweets as gospel. There is plenty of evidence that shows he wants to put tampons in young girls without him needing to explicitly state he is a pedophile.
 
Last edited:
I sort of think it used to happen a lot more a long time ago, like in the Mama Yaniv era.

I remember my mother and aunts preparing me with advice on exactly the situation in which you find yourself without a pad/tampon (menstrual cycles vary a lot more in length when you first start so it can catch you by surprise for the first year or two), and you should find a kind-looking woman, but not an old one because they wouldn't have anything for it. I remember thinking "I would sooner die, I'll use toilet paper, thanks." My mom also told me that it's basically the women's equivalent of the Bro Code that if another woman asks for a tampon and you have 2 in your purse, you must give her the other one, no excuses, that's just basic human decency in the women's room.

I wonder if somehow part of Jonathan's deeply-entrenched fantasy is that he heard a very, very similar lecture being delivered to perhaps a female relative (cousin?) at a formative age. I think most women in my generation think the way I do, and would rather "make do" with TP for a little while in most circumstances, but Jonathan would have no way to know that. Between the associations of vaginal blood and virginity, and maybe some sexual feelings toward the relative who was the intended listener of the lecture he overheard, you end up with a fixation that won't die. No matter how many people tell him this isn't the way real women behave, he insists it is.

Why? With a mama's boy, there's only one reason: mama told him so, and that bitch is always right. Even while they resent their mothers, mama's boys fundamentally believe their word as gospel.

Another lolcow who, like Yaniv, is more into the menstrual products themselves than "true" menophilia:

Community Watch thread on menophiles:
 
Back