Jonathan Yaniv vs Fraser Health - NEW LOLSUIT 1/19/21

The million is a fine. If there is an actual breech
yaniv is claiming that FH confirmed that there were two breaches so why isn't he going hell for leather suing them, a large fine for them and, perhaps, substantial "damages" for him?

Does Canada have "No win, no fee" lawyers? I'm almost sure they would jump at the chance at blasting corporations in court and coming out with $$$ in their pockets.

Instead, we hear of a mental deficient suing corporation(s) for a serious breach of confidentiality and is willing to settle for a mere $35K ... on par with a broken physio bed.
 
That's who the original case was from...no win no pay class action...jonny's trying to cut out everyone else & be greedy.
Typical for our boy
He filed a court doc with plagiarized text, how can he say it wasn't him?
"No that's fake your honor"...just as he's done denying all his tweets

"self proclaimed activist" How can he go out in public without everyone laughing?
 
yaniv is claiming that FH confirmed that there were two breaches so why isn't he going hell for leather suing them, a large fine for them and, perhaps, substantial "damages" for him?

Does Canada have "No win, no fee" lawyers? I'm almost sure they would jump at the chance at blasting corporations in court and coming out with $$$ in their pockets.

Instead, we hear of a mental deficient suing corporation(s) for a serious breach of confidentiality and is willing to settle for a mere $35K ... on par with a broken physio bed.

Because the limit in small claims court, where Yaniv most actively lurks, is $35,000. It's also friendly, or at least more forgiving, to people who are self representing.

If Yaniv wanted the big bucks he'd need to go to BC Supreme Court, and BCSC has a history of turning down his idiotic requests, including fee waivers.

Funny part is, his case should be dead in the water anyways. Breaches of the BC privacy act can only be heard by BCSC. PCPC doesn't have jurisdiction.
 
:lit:Because the limit in small claims court, where Yaniv most actively lurks, is $35,000. It's also friendly, or at least more forgiving, to people who are self representing.

If Yaniv wanted the big bucks he'd need to go to BC Supreme Court, and BCSC has a history of turning down his idiotic requests, including fee waivers.

Funny part is, his case should be dead in the water anyways. Breaches of the BC privacy act can only be heard by BCSC. PCPC doesn't have jurisdiction.
Yeah, I get that and it's obvious he's as tight as they come but still wondering why he is satisfied to accept a mere (figuratively) $35K when there's so much more that could be had, possibly, with a lawyer representing him on a "no win, no fee" basis. It seems he'd rather be offered a few thousand in feck off money than a possible substantial payment and all for the sake of whatever. I mean there's stupidity then there's stupidity.

He regards a serious corporation breach of confidentiality on the same level as (like I said) a broken physio bed and that I find hilarious. But then again this is someone who wanted $35K and was "very, very happy" receiving $2500 which he viewed as both a successful result & a "considerable" amount.

eta: to add quote (sara fiasco)

JYS: LETS SEE! And I finished the physio lawsuit right now, successfully. I can't say anything due to confidentiality, but I'm happy with the settlement

JYS: VERY VERY HAPPY!

If I genuinely thought I was entitled to $35K damages due to physical injuries sustained I'd have been insulted and more determined to hold out if I'd been offered $2500. At the end of the day I suppose I just can't grasp his level of stupidity. <shrugs>
 
Last edited:
It seems he'd rather be offered a few thousand in feck off money than a possible substantial payment and all for the sake of whatever.

Bingo. If they actually got hooked up with a competent (and deeply unethical) lawyer, they’d make JY the named plaintiff in a class action suit, get a bunch of other class members, and go for the biiiig bucks. But small claims lets local psychotics harass people essentially for free, and that is faster and easier than the years-long process of class action lawsuits.

edit: the emphasis on an unethical lawyer is because, in some circumstances, the named plaintiff can sell out the rest of the class and fuck them over. would JY really do such a thing, though? ;)
 
Yeah, I get that and it's obvious he's as tight as they come but still wondering why he is satisfied to accept a mere (figuratively) $35K when there's so much more that could be had, possibly, with a lawyer representing him on a "no win, no fee" basis. It seems he'd rather be offered a few thousand in feck off money than a possible substantial payment and all for the sake of whatever. I mean there's stupidity then there's stupidity.

He regards a serious corporation breach of confidentiality on the same level as (like I said) a broken physio bed and that I find hilarious. But then again this is someone who wanted $35K and was "very, very happy" receiving $2500 which he viewed as both a successful result & a "considerable" amount.

eta: to add quote (sara fiasco)



If I genuinely thought I was entitled to $35K damages due to physical injuries sustained I'd have been insulted and more determined to hold out if I'd been offered $2500. At the end of the day I suppose I just can't grasp his level of stupidity. <shrugs>
Fraser Health is technically a corporation but owned by the government. Hospitals and doctors in Canada rarely have to pay money. Malpractice is capped at $300K - just more than it costs to mount a solid medical suit. The breech caused no damages. There is no case. It was one of those things where either somebody sent the wrong data file or there was a light hack.
 
Yeah, I get that and it's obvious he's as tight as they come but still wondering why he is satisfied to accept a mere (figuratively) $35K when there's so much more that could be had, possibly, with a lawyer representing him on a "no win, no fee" basis. It seems he'd rather be offered a few thousand in feck off money than a possible substantial payment and all for the sake of whatever. I mean there's stupidity then there's stupidity.

No half-decent lawyer is going to take a case on a speculative (AKA “no win no fee”) basis unless it’s solid. Fatty’s case smells like a dead dog - as I imagine he does.
 
How much is this lardass eating to go through $950/mo in food for one person? Even considering that's nearly worthless canuckistani dollars that's a lot, especially for someone with $500/mo in income.
80% of the U.S. dollar is hardly nearly worthless, and it wasn't that long ago $cdn was valued higher then $usd so let's not be stupid and taking ignorant shots. JY has plenty about himself to insult without insulting the nation he lives in.

That said HOLY FUCK how can 1 person have a $950 monthly food expense? Is he counting liquor in that? It's the only way I can conceive of a 1 person household spending that much. Fuck's sake, I fed a family of 4 on $500-600/mo. not long ago including household supplies.
 
There is no way Jonny boy isn't getting the CRB (Tru-dough of $900 every 2 weeks). It is a very low threshold for qualification. He seems to boast about his riches when it suits him and cry poverty when he needs to appear poor. I don't think there are any consequences for lying on these forms even though it is technically perjury.
 
80% of the U.S. dollar is hardly nearly worthless, and it wasn't that long ago $cdn was valued higher then $usd so let's not be stupid and taking ignorant shots. JY has plenty about himself to insult without insulting the nation he lives in.

That said HOLY FUCK how can 1 person have a $950 monthly food expense? Is he counting liquor in that? It's the only way I can conceive of a 1 person household spending that much. Fuck's sake, I fed a family of 4 on $500-600/mo. not long ago including household supplies.

From the food pics I've seen him post it's not as if he is living off decent food to warrant that $950 as in fine cuisine.

PL: I spend roughly half of what he does ($1000CAN = £600 approx) - cigs included & sometimes the occasional household item. Pals of mine have ravenous young and older kids and they generally spend a little more than I do (and they don't have my tobacco charges). His fairly recent "stepdaughter" mercy dash pics certainly prove he's shovelling copious amounts of something down his throat, perhaps you're right and that figure includes booze.

Obese git whatever crap he's guzzling.

------
On court documents for waivers are people obliged to put in all money coming in or just actual earned/employment income?

I ask because in the UK if you are on certain benefits (eg some disability payments) they are excluded when totalling up incoming financials*....is that what could be happening here? - he claimed not so long back that he was receiving payments from WCB, ICBC and MoJ, "lots of money".

*Generally have to declare it but the £ amount is ignored when getting to a final income figure.

When applying for anything to do with the Govt/legal etc proof of income is usually required (and not just the current/previous month either) and verified...amazes me that the courts in Canada don't do that...almost as though you can throw a random figure out there willy nilly and it's readily accepted.
 
Last edited:
80% of the U.S. dollar is hardly nearly worthless, and it wasn't that long ago $cdn was valued higher then $usd so let's not be stupid and taking ignorant shots.
For like 10 minutes during a major financial crisis, duder. Otherwise you have to build a time machine and go back to the oil crisis in the 70s to see a strong $CA. Don't forget, not that long ago it was barely over 60%.

I'm sorry you're so insecure about your currency and someone making a joke gives you the sads.
 
Why doesn’t the court call him out on this bullshit? He should have to provide payslips, receipts, and an explanation about where all the excess money comes from. Freeloading assholes like this push legal fees up for everyone else.
 
Why doesn’t the court call him out on this bullshit? He should have to provide payslips, receipts, and an explanation about where all the excess money comes from. Freeloading assholes like this push legal fees up for everyone else.
Our courts have a lot of their priorities mixed up imo. They coddle people who are far worse than JY in an attempt to facilitate rehabilitation and restorative justice, but in reality nobody knows what the fuck any of that means or actually entails so you end up with a low quality and inefficient product.
 
Su
Our courts have a lot of their priorities mixed up imo. They coddle people who are far worse than JY in an attempt to facilitate rehabilitation and restorative justice, but in reality nobody knows what the fuck any of that means or actually entails so you end up with a low quality and inefficient product.
Sure, but maybe they prefer this man:

 
  • Like
Reactions: Allakazam223
For like 10 minutes during a major financial crisis, duder. Otherwise you have to build a time machine and go back to the oil crisis in the 70s to see a strong $CA. Don't forget, not that long ago it was barely over 60%.

I'm sorry you're so insecure about your currency and someone making a joke gives you the sads.
It's more that it's #1 unfunny #2 inappropriate #3 incorrect.

If you want to bag on Canada, there's a whole thread for you right in this very forum. Let's keep the focus on JY's lolsuit vs Fraser Health, shall we?
 
Fraser Health is technically a corporation but owned by the government. Hospitals and doctors in Canada rarely have to pay money. Malpractice is capped at $300K - just more than it costs to mount a solid medical suit. The breech caused no damages. There is no case. It was one of those things where either somebody sent the wrong data file or there was a light hack.
Looking at records outside your circle of care is a pretty big deal.

 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: pr3nt177
That doesn’t mean there’s money in it for Fatty though.
There's probably feck off money though, he's gotta get that food & booze money from somewhere

Where I live, government authorities have strict policies on not paying fuck off money. Anybody know Canada’s position on this?

I am hoping for twin costs orders in favour of Langley and Fraser. That would be beautiful.

Hard to be optimistic when you see the incessant pathetic reasons behind the filings, more so with him being given a license to do it on the backs of hard-working taxpayers.

Even a few hundred $$$ is hailed a victory and spurs him on. He has no deterrent and is too deranged to stop.
 
Last edited:
Back