Joshua Robert Barnes / Preggo Apple Bloom / PAB / PreggoBloom / Barnphene / McDaddy Weebus - Fetish video maker, attention whore, proud pedo

Which lolcow is better and more successful?

  • PreggoAppleBloom

  • Christian Weston Chandler


Results are only viewable after voting.
It's beating a dead horse at this point, but goddamn is that creepy.

(Yet another Informative for a Horrifying.)
Saying this is creepy is just stating the obvious. Really though, it does apply to this whole thing, especially since PAB not only used (at first) an underaged horse for a pregnancy fetish but other things as well such cartoon characters from other shows along with putting in any other fetish they might have such as farts.

I wonder how Mrs. PAB feels (or in all likelihood, has been told to feel) about her husband sexually harassing other women right in front of her face.
May be an optimistic guess but she probably goes with it for whatever reason, especially when considering that she does get involved in her husband's videos
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Karen Riley
I wonder how Mrs. PAB feels (or in all likelihood, has been told to feel) about her husband sexually harassing other women right in front of her face.

Mrs. PAB mostly runs the twitter, according to them. I'm sure Mr. PAB runs it sometimes, but if this PAB Fact is really a fact, I assume they're in some kind of open relationship.
2015-10-06_00-02-31.png
 
Their Twitter title appears to be Japanese for "Round Stomach Fetish," though I don't think ラウンド is typically used in that sense of the word.

You're correct, ラウンド is used as a noun as in a round of a boxing match, not an adjective. What's really funny is that he's using the incorrect word for stomach. 胃 is generally used to refer to the stomach as an internal organ, not what would typically be referred to as the external "belly", which is 腹.

The correct way to say what he's trying to communicate would be something like 丸い腹 or 丸いお腹. I probably shouldn't post that because now he'll use it, but whatever.
 
PAB might actually think they're getting one over on ol' Jai by using words wrong. That kind of humor is a hit with their intended audience.
Pedophiles and literal children?
Yeah, seems about right. :(*sigh*(:_(
The funniest part to me was that he kept reiterating that what he was doing wasn't illegal. Like that would matter to people laughing at him.
It's neat to watch PAB's idea of damage control unfold, isn't it? Behind their screen of bluster, they've been backpedaling in a way that's not only bafflingly half-assed, but also much too late.

For example, it seems like they've reconsidered the wisdom of sharing PAB Fact #71.

This fact sparked a conversation, and despite removing the original tweet, PAB left all of their replies to this conversation fully intact. The content of the missing tweet is easily inferred:
Twitter link 1 , https://archive.is/r2kCW
Twitter link 2 , https://archive.is/LXCaE

And when you do things like name your child after a fictional character, then proceed to upload and publicly promote fetish videos featuring your child's namesake, the internet has a long memory.

KYJyq00.png
 
Last edited:
They're still going to believe our only reason for getting onto them is to make them stop making videos, though.
View attachment 52491
The fact that they're still obsessing over you "obsessing" over them is kinda hilarious and depressing.

They must lurk this topic and fume at what we say, then casually misrepresent it as us blindly, impotently raging at them on their Twitter and any of their other content.

Y'know, like how I picture them whenever they post those jabs at us.
 
Hey, remember when PAB stole Jai's content and uploaded it to their official bandcamp for a dollar [archive]? Now they are offering it as a free download.

Because PAB's reupload postdates Jai's content and is obviously identical, it seems logical that a DMCA takedown request filed by Jai should resolve in his favor, right?

But wait! Let's take a closer look at Bandcamp's intellectual property policy. Bandcamp states, "Note that a copy of your legal notice will be forwarded to the party responsible for providing the alleged infringing content."

Presumably, this would include, "Information reasonably sufficient to permit us to contact you, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which you may be contacted."

@Preggo Apple , what a rotten trick you've tried to play on Jai!

For shame.
 
Hey, remember when PAB stole Jai's content and uploaded it to their official bandcamp for a dollar [archive]? Now they are offering it as a free download.

Because PAB's reupload postdates Jai's content and is obviously identical, it seems logical that a DMCA takedown request filed by Jai should resolve in his favor, right?

But wait! Let's take a closer look at Bandcamp's intellectual property policy. Bandcamp states, "Note that a copy of your legal notice will be forwarded to the party responsible for providing the alleged infringing content."

Presumably, this would include, "Information reasonably sufficient to permit us to contact you, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which you may be contacted."

@Preggo Apple , what a rotten trick you've tried to play on Jai!

For shame.

Not necessarily. I've been able to file DMCA's without having to input my full name/address/phone. The only thing I had to submit was my email, a link to the infringing content, and the name I used to publish said content (which is not my birth name) as well as a link to the original/copyrighted content where it was legally available. The infringing content was taken down without requiring any dox on my part.
 
Back