Joshua Robert Barnes / Preggo Apple Bloom / PAB / PreggoBloom / Barnphene / McDaddy Weebus - Fetish video maker, attention whore, proud pedo

[AnOminous]

Not necessarily. I've been able to file DMCA's without having to input my full name/address/phone. The only thing I had to submit was my email, a link to the infringing content, and the name I used to publish said content (which is not my birth name) as well as a link to the original/copyrighted content where it was legally available. The infringing content was taken down without requiring any dox on my part.

They're technically deficient without that information. The recipient could choose to ignore them or demand a fully compliant notice.

 

[Meatman]

Hey, remember when PAB stole Jai's content and uploaded it to their official bandcamp for a dollar [archive]? Now they are offering it as a free download.

Because PAB's reupload postdates Jai's content and is obviously identical, it seems logical that a DMCA takedown request filed by Jai should resolve in his favor, right?

But wait! Let's take a closer look at Bandcamp's intellectual property policy. Bandcamp states, "Note that a copy of your legal notice will be forwarded to the party responsible for providing the alleged infringing content."

Presumably, this would include, "Information reasonably sufficient to permit us to contact you, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which you may be contacted."

@Preggo Apple , what a rotten trick you've tried to play on Jai!

For shame.

just sue them

 

[CalmMyTits]

They're technically deficient without that information. The recipient could choose to ignore them or demand a fully compliant notice.

Oh, I forgot to also mention that you also must put in your DMCA 'I state in good faith and under penalty of perjury that I am the creator/copyright holder of this work' yada yads. A couple of the sites I filed DMCA with stated in their FAQ that they needed dox-type information, but still responded to my DMCA and removed my stuff from their site. Asking nicely really does go a long way, I would add 'please' and 'thank you' to the DMCA's and be polite, and it generally garnered positive results for me.

 

[Meatman]

Fun Fact: Onision and Josh both have a violent pregnancy fetish.
They both want to lower the age of consent.
They're both grown men who's wives are just above the age of consent.
BROTHERS?

 

[Jaiman]

Fun Fact: Onision and Josh both have a violent pregnancy fetish.
They both want to lower the age of consent.
They're both grown men who's wives are just above the age of consent.
BROTHERS?

Josh is an Onision fan, which doesn't surprise me since they're really similar with their immaturity and general bullshit.

 

[Meatman]

Josh is an Onision fan, which doesn't surprise me since they're really similar with their immaturity, paedophillia and general bullshit.

FTFY

 

[DuckbilledPlaty]

I find this guys targeting of underage characters super disturbing. He thinks "if it's a cartoon its legal" but that actually goes by state. Some states have rulings where animated or implied sexual content in animation is recognized by the state or commonwealth under all tense and current purposes as "totes fucking illegal". He might be getting to meet some FBI agents in the near future for realsies.

 

[Meatman]

I find this guys targeting of underage characters super disturbing. He thinks "if it's a cartoon its legal" but that actually goes by state. Some states have rulings where animated or implied sexual content in animation is recognized by the state or commonwealth under all tense and current purposes as "totes fucking illegal". He might be getting to meet some FBI agents in the near future for realsies.

Judging by the info we have, Josh lives in Mississippi. If any !LawKiwis could check if the state has the law, I'm sure we'd all be very, very happy.

 

[Len Kagamoney]

Judging by the info we have, Josh lives in Mississippi. If any !LawKiwis could check if the state has the law, I'm sure we'd all be very, very happy.

I found this on a Mississippi news site

"Possessing the video alone isn't illegal, but what is how you get it, and how you use the video."

"Offenders collect the material, they expose children to it that they want to molest, it lowers the child's inhibitions and it normalizes sex acts. That's what it's used for and therefore, isn't a victimless crime," said Camille Cooper of the National Association to Protect Children.

Since PAB is harrassing children, he very well could be violating the law

 

[Meatman]

I found this on a Mississippi news site

"Possessing the video alone isn't illegal, but what is how you get it, and how you use the video."

"Offenders collect the material, they expose children to it that they want to molest, it lowers the child's inhibitions and it normalizes sex acts. That's what it's used for and therefore, isn't a victimless crime," said Camille Cooper of the National Association to Protect Children.

Since PAB is harrassing children, he very well could be violating the law

Excellent.

 

[Meatman]

BILL COSBY?

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

BILL COSBY?

So edgy and relevant!

...kill me.

 

[Rin]

Note to PAB: something might be legal, but that doesn't mean it's not creepy as fuck, or immune to criticism. Also, the whole Bill Cosby thing seems really racist.

 

[From The Uncanny Valley]

Note to PAB: something might be legal, but that doesn't mean it's not creepy as fuck, or immune to criticism. Also, the whole Bill Cosby thing seems really racist.

Plus it's with Zecora, the only pony in MLP who's confirmed African. So, double racist.

 

[Durable Mike Malloy]

Our friend Joshua Robert Barnes of Ripley, MS likes to claim, "it's only racist if you think it's racist."

Spoiler: No, it is racist.

[linked comment]

In the ensuing comments, other users argue over whether Josh Barnes - who twice dropped out of Pine Grove High School in Tippah County, Mississippi and never actually graduated - is really stupid, or an edgy failtroll. But really, this seems like a case of both/and, not either/or.

 

[Jaiman]

BILL COSBY?

Incoming racist and rapist jokes.

 

[AnOminous]

Judging by the info we have, Josh lives in Mississippi. If any !LawKiwis could check if the state has the law, I'm sure we'd all be very, very happy.

The state law's language doesn't really matter if it has been effectively overruled by Ashcroft. Most Internet-related things are going to be federal anyway.

And there, the law is 18 U.S.C. § 1466A, which explicitly excludes pure simulations that don't contain or refer to any actual person.

There have been cases like Dale Whorley's where someone was convicted of stuff like this, but generally, they also had other real CP and so the issue of simulated CP wasn't reached by the court, since the perp would be locked up for other reasons anyway.

This guy's case is pretty relevant, though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Handley

In this case, applying CP laws to cartoon depictions of fictional minors was found unconstitutional, but they still went after Handley on a general obscenity theory, as I discussed in the previous post. He pled guilty on that.

I.e. just because something may not be classified as CP does not mean it is necessarily protected under the First Amendment and it might still be obscene.

In this case, I'd think not, because although the materials are gross and creepy, they don't, at least that I've seen, depict genitals or actual explicit sex acts. They're just creepy.

But I've only seen the shit on YouTube and similar locations where they apparently keep it cleaner than they might elsewhere.

 

[The Lizard Queen]

I find it disgusting how he's sexualizing 13 year olds, harassing people and yet blames our hate on his fetish.
It's not your fucking fetish, it's your behavior Josh.

No... it's his fetish too.

 

[Meatman]

No... it's his fetish too.

We just overall hate Josh.

 

[Jaiman]

Oh Christ.