Law Julian Assange has reached a plea deal with the U.S., allowing him to go free - The WikiLeaks founder has been held in a prison outside London for the last five years and fought extradition to the United States.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
1.png
Julian Assange, at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London in 2017, will be allowed to return to Australia .Jack Taylor / Getty Images file

WASHINGTON — WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange plans to plead guilty as part of a plea deal with the U.S. Justice Department that will allow him to go free after spending five years in a British prison, according to court documents.

Assange was charged by criminal information — which typically signifies a plea deal — with conspiracy to obtain and disclose national defense information, the court documents say.

U.S. charges against Assange stem from one of the largest publications of classified information in American history, which took place during the first term of Barack Obama's presidency. Starting in late 2009, according to the government, Assange conspired with Chelsea Manning, a military intelligence analyst, to disclose tens of thousands of activity reports about the war in Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands of reports about the war in Iraq, hundreds of thousands of State Department cables and assessment briefs of Guantanamo Bay detainees using his WikiLeaks website.

Court documents revealing Assange's plea deal were filed Monday evening in the U.S. District Court for the Northern Mariana Islands, a U.S. territory in the Pacific Ocean. Assange was expected to make an appearance in that court and to be sentenced to 62 months, with credit for time served in British prison, meaning he would be free to return to Australia, where he was born.

Assange has been held in the high-security Belmarsh Prison on the outskirts of London for five years and previously spent seven years in self-exile at the Ecuadorian Embassy in London — where he reportedly fathered two children — until his asylum was withdrawn and he was forcibly carried out of the embassy and arrested in April 2019. A superseding indictment was returned against Assange more than five years ago, in May 2019, and a second superseding indictment was returned in June 2020.

Assange has been fighting extradition to the U.S. for more than a decade. In March, the High Court in London gave him permission for a full hearing on his appeal as he sought assurances that he could rely upon the First Amendment at a trial in the United States. In May, two judges on the High Court said he could have a full hearing on whether he would be discriminated against in the U.S. because he is a foreign national. A hearing on the issue of Assange's free speech rights had been scheduled for July 9-10.

Assange's WikiLeaks also published hacked emails from the Democratic National Committee that upended the 2016 presidential race. Russian intelligence officers were subsequently indicted in connection with the hacking in 2018, in a case brought by then-special counsel Robert Mueller. At a joint news conference with then-President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin days later, Trump contradicted the indictment and the intelligence community, saying that Putin was "extremely strong and powerful in his denial" that Russians interfered in the 2016 election to help him win.

Manning was sentenced to 35 years in a military prison, but her sentence was commuted by Obama in the final days of his presidency in 2017. Manning was subsequently held in contempt of court for nearly a year after she refused to answer questions for a grand jury; she was then released after an attempted suicide.

If you or someone you know is in crisis, call or text 988 to reach the Suicide and Crisis Lifeline or chat live at 988lifeline.org. You can also visit SpeakingOfSuicide.com/resources for additional support.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.


Article Link

Archive
 
How long until skizoids say they already killed assange in prison and the man getting released is a clone or whatnot?
I mean, I hadn't considered that. But now that you bring it up...

 
Or glowie agencies were surveilling everything he did, then approached two women who voluntarily fucked him (because famous guy and woman brain) to see if they could find any legal technicality to further screw him with. "Oh, he removed the condom, you say? How interesting."

Maybe he should have forgone any pleasures of the flesh while antagonizing abusive agents of a corrupt global empire (by telling the truth), but just remember: there are so many laws on the books that we're all technically criminals, and they'll take you down if they really want to no matter who you are.
Ah yes, that lady. She went back to school, as her political career died right then, so now she's a deacon, a political scientist and ethnologist. She preaches communism in churches now.
Not even kidding.

example https://www.argument.se/forfattare-presentation/anna-ardin/
 
The subhuman kikes and their glowy pets will soon make it look like he randomly killed himself like Epstein the kike faggot and the retarded normalfaggots will auto believe it and dismiss everyone else as muh "conspiracy theorist" (glowy coined term).
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: teriyakiburns
The subhuman kikes and their glowy pets will soon make it look like he randomly killed himself like Epstein the kike faggot and the retarded normalfaggots will auto believe it and dismiss everyone else as muh "conspiracy theorist" (glowy coined term).
What will be there cover story as to why he decided to kill himself.
 
There's no indication that he has sold out anyone to the USG. Pleading guilty to the charge could set a bad precedent for others but that's it. The Biden administration agreed to a deal to throw a bone to Aussies and Assange's remaining progressive supporters.
That's one of best tells on how bad the DNCs fears trump this time. Was my first thought when I heard about the deal.
He won't kill himself. He'll be eaten by a shark. Total tragedy.
And that would be their style with of trump at the helm, no doubt.
"He was a great guy but a total traitor, sadly he got eaten by sharks when he went fishing with me last week. Total Tragedy."
 
What will be there cover story as to why he decided to kill himself.
He won't kill himself. He'll be eaten by a shark. Total tragedy.
And that would be their style with of trump at the helm, no doubt.
The subhuman kikes and their glowy pets will soon make it look like he randomly killed himself like Epstein the kike faggot and the retarded normalfaggots will auto believe it and

I'm getting tired of hearing normies making these dumbass get clinton'd references. You people are dumb as shit it's unreal.

I defy any of you tards to justify why the United States (or other powers that be) would remotely interested in some old, frail, almost deathly ill australian. You guys sound like those dumbfuck shitlibs who genuinely believe "something something Donald Trump founded wikileaks to make cliton look bad something he threw Assange under the bus or something." He isn't some insider of the government sitting on a list of Island goers, he isn't some mad scientist with atomic secrets, he isn't capable of releasing a nuclear blackmail option of an undercover investigatory media agency. He's an ill old man with fuck all power and zero influence over the website that got him into trouble in the first place. A website that has no original content, no power to investigate, and no power to blackmail. He has been sat in an oversized cage with less freedom than the worst of the worst prison colonies of the USSR (as operated today) for over a god damn decade. The only upside is the weather in britbonistan isn't as bad as the depths of russian snowhell. It takes some copious amount reddit or pol no-lifing to think "muh cliton. hes gonna get epsteined lmao"
 
Last edited:
Because he humiliated them and exposed their criminality
I mean he's right in some way: they wont kill him, they got what they wanted long ago: they robbed him of his life, his work and his dignity. He was made an example of and now he still has to make a plea deal as if he was guilty of anything so he can at least enjoy the rest of his days. They're done with him, of course nobody will actually kill him now. Don't know why @EgyptianTraveler took it so serious. But people we may have never heard about, who tried to pull an assange in between, were surely iced. His publicity saved him.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Roland TB-303
Because he humiliated them and exposed their criminality
oh noes the government was hecking exposed. some reddit post got 1.3k updoots.

As I said, he clearly isn't a threat to anything nor does this one individual have any control over what gets leaked next. The only way you could slimy in a point is if you tried to make the case of the United States would like to scare off any other would be whistleblowers, and to that extent, they already have.
Don't know why @EgyptianTraveler took it so serious.
Say some dumb shit, get called a tard. Simple as. At some point you can't hide behind "its just a meme" or "y u so serious". Especially if you're propagating a form of mindrot that makes no sense whatsoever. In this case, no, you/assange isn't that important, you can stop posting about how muh glowies are coming. I think it would be fair to say this is now an open and shut case.
 
Last edited:
I mean he's right in some way: they wont kill him, they got what they wanted long ago: they robbed him of his life, his work and his dignity. He was made an example of and now he still has to make a plea deal as if he was guilty of anything so he can at least enjoy the rest of his days. They're done with him, of course nobody will actually kill him now. Don't know why @EgyptianTraveler took it so serious. But people we may have never heard about, who tried to pull an assange in between, were surely iced. His publicity saved him.
I mean, I'm not necessarily arguing that he would be whacked. But, if he were, that would be why. The 'nobody screws with us and lives' mentality of the US criminal cabal
 
I mean, I'm not necessarily arguing that he would be whacked. But, if he were, that would be why. The 'nobody screws with us and lives' mentality of the US criminal cabal
By 'would' we're specifically talking about a -14 year time frame. In your own words, you think "because he humiliated them and exposed their criminality," they would still have a bruised ego after a decade and a half, and this is worthy of what exactly? What more do you expect? "not necessarily arguing that he would be whacked" then what? after 14 years of being a potato? Even in the framework of him being a political prisoner, it's over with. What more could you possibly be implying is coming or might've came his way?

This whole "uncle sam is coming to get him shtick?!?!?2" is really dumb. The fact of the matter is, it's over with, and he was never really that important to begin with. This is just what happens with the legal system picks a target and decides to stick with it.
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Dr J
Do you not know the US Government?

Long memories, lots of guns
Are you american? It's always cute when Americans think their insignificant history of less than 250 years, basically 3x 70 year olds stacked against each other, is worthy of some note. What does 'long memories' even mean? You're making it sound like you're a south korean with flashbacks to the US purging anybody they didn't like as "a communist", a chink with flashbacks to their friend being carried away for drawing a stick figure in front of a tank, a communist elite forced into memory holing a genocide, or some shit.

Besides, you haven't answered my question. What do you think could've happened or is going to happen next to make these speculatory comments? 'lots of guns', are you insinuating they would've shot his dog instead or what?

Furthermore, we have a frame of reference for what happens when the US govt is salty about a leak in real time. Two words. Michael Hastings. That's still nothing on 14 years of torture. That cannot be as bad as whatever you're implying they're plotting after 14 years of bruised egos. I'm just going to reiterate this.
This whole "uncle sam is coming to get him shtick?!?!?2" is really dumb. The fact of the matter is, it's over with, and he was never really that important to begin with. This is just what happens with the legal system picks a target and decides to stick with it.
 
Last edited:
  • Autistic
Reactions: Dr J
This is just what happens with the legal system picks a target and decides to stick with it.
@EgyptianTraveler I really didn't want to interfere with your discussion here but that's such a glownigger gaslighting attempt. How was entrapping him on wrong rape allegations to extradite him from sweden above board, run of the mill legal action? Those 2 chicks were glowing.
The fact of the matter is, it's over with, and he was never really that important to begin with.
They expended loads of soft power and glowniggering in trying to get him before a U.S. court. So somebody must've thought he was important at some point way back.
Holy shit, why die on that hill?
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: EgyptianTraveler
@EgyptianTraveler I really didn't want to interfere with your discussion here but that's such a glownigger gaslighting attempt. How was entrapping him on wrong rape allegations to extradite him from sweden above board, run of the mill legal action? Those 2 chicks were glowing.

They expended loads of soft power and glowniggering in trying to get him before a U.S. court. So somebody must've thought he was important at some point way back.
Holy shit, why die on that hill?
What meth have you been smoking to believe I'm gaslighting anything? What hill do you think I'm dying on? I'm describing what has happened to him. All you've done is just tacked on instance #43,234 of a woman trying to claim sexual assault on a man while he's down, as if that's somehow relevant to the US govt trying to hit him or otherwise incapacitate him more so than this past 14 years of torture.
They expended loads of soft power and glowniggering in trying to get him before a U.S. court. So somebody must've thought he was important at some point way back.
Again
By 'would' we're specifically talking about a -14 year time frame. In your own words, you think "because he humiliated them and exposed their criminality," they would still have a bruised ego after a decade and a half, and this is worthy of what exactly? What more do you expect?
 
  • Autistic
Reactions: Dr. Eldon Tyrell
Back