Just Stop Oil - A conglomerate of unwashed, pseudoscience-pedalling, virtue-signalling, middle-class cunts.

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
teriyakiburns said:
Chris Packham should be in there with her. The man is a clown and a sociopath.
Click to expand...
"I used the time stopped in traffic to contemplate climate change."
How nice for you Chris. Meanwhile people missing funerals, births, work and more spent their time as hostages hating them and also hate you. Justifiably in both cases.
 
They should choke slam these old bitches straight to their deaths for attempting this.
1788881090104439161.png

https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1788881090104439161 (archive.ph)
https://juststopoil.org/2024/05/10/...aw-elders-break-glass-around-the-magna-carta/ (archive.ph)
 
N Space said:
Why TF did nobody stop them on their tracks? Is the Magna Carta worth so little to British cucks?
Click to expand...
It's away in a little alcove by itself, which has a relatively limited entry way. It's pretty obvious the people running this stunt were blocking access to the area. Most visitors would see a gaggle of media-looking types and assume it was some sort of TV production or news report, so they'd give it a wide berth. It's possible, by the time anyone realised what was going on, they'd already got to the shirts part.
 
God, I want to *insert fedpost here* to these old cunts.

These idiots know oil isn't just exclusively used in car petrol / gas right? There's thousands of products that use petroleum. We all know they just want to stop using ICE cars to limit the mobility of the 99%. The elites and rich can pay for carbon credits (indulgences) to "offset" their use of private jets and driving in a convoy.
 
Climate activist attempting to destroy a document enshrining individual rights and protections from the state so they can bring attention to their gay "cause" seems about par for the course.
 
clipartfan92 said:
They should choke slam these old bitches straight to their deaths for attempting this.
View attachment 5977495
View attachment 5977493
https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1788881090104439161 (archive.ph)
https://juststopoil.org/2024/05/10/...aw-elders-break-glass-around-the-magna-carta/ (archive.ph)
Click to expand...

This may just be the most Anglo thing I've ever seen. Two Anglo women trying to destroy a foundational document of British society, only to be stopped in their tracks by a certified Defender of the West, an African man. Truly representative of modern England.
 
N Space said:
Is the Magna Carta worth so little to British cucks?
Click to expand...
Literally, yes. It took the American Bar Association to erect a memorial at Runnymede, where the Magna Carta was sealed. The British don't really care—it's not like the British people care at all about freedom from the government. The document is just a piece of paper to most Brits at this point. And the "British" are going to replace all of their foundational legal documents with the Quran in the coming decades, anyways, so expect them to care even less about it in the future.
 
Screenshot 2024-05-11 031439.jpg
Yeah, these people look like they know what's going on.

I get the feeling this might be a hard sell.

Screenshot 2024-05-11 031323.jpg
 
Reminds me of the videos of Isis destroying pre-Islamic artifacts. How is this group not labeled as a terrorist group? Imagine if the Proud Boys tried to destroy the Declaration of Independence.
 
Didn't the magna carta formerly provide for a right to self defense and weapons ownership?
 
I would just want to see the security glue the rest of their limbs to whatever surface and leave them there until out of desperation they rip their own skin off.
Same with those niggers tying themselves to trees. Just cut the tree down above their head and leave them there bound in their chains.

Literally never met a person in my entire fucking life who has ever said 'Yeah, these people are making a positive change in the world'.
Why don't they just go plant a car bomb on some fossil tycoons car or something instead of constantly attacking national and or cultural heritages?
 
Lazy Drei said:
Why don't they just go plant a car bomb on some fossil tycoons car or something instead of constantly attacking national and or cultural heritages?
Click to expand...
That might lead them to read the esteemed work of Dr. Kaczynski. And then how could they reconcile what the good doctor said about oversocialized liberals with how they live their lives?
 
Ha, they didn't even get close to the Magna Carta. The glass did its job. I guess they failed to realize that the glass is likely bulletproof. A hammer and even a specialized glass breaking awl is not likely to be enough even if the guy wielding it was able to bench press 6 of those grannies put together.
 
doodoocaca said:
Didn't the magna carta formerly provide for a right to self defense and weapons ownership?
Click to expand...
Magna Carta provided very little of what people commonly attribute to it, despite the best efforts of Chartists to claim otherwise. The first Great Charter was a peace treaty between King John and a bunch of rebellious barons, largely to limit the arbitrary powers of the king and establish that he was not above the law, prevent the king imposing his will upon the church, establish rights to fair trial for all free men, and prevent the imposition of burdensome taxes on their feudal holdings. It was annulled on his death, but subsequent charters re-affirmed and expanded on its contents. The first Great Charter itself is a re-affirmation of the Charter of Liberties declared by Henry the first a century earlier.

Which is a long-winded way of saying no, it didn't strictly address those topics. They were assumed as rights by legal precedent. The Great Charters established the legal frameworks that would eventually lead to the English conceptualisation of civil liberties and rights, which finds its most obvious expression in the US constitution.
 
clipartfan92 said:
They should choke slam these old bitches straight to their deaths for attempting this.
View attachment 5977495
View attachment 5977493
https://twitter.com/JustStop_Oil/status/1788881090104439161 (archive.ph)
https://juststopoil.org/2024/05/10/...aw-elders-break-glass-around-the-magna-carta/ (archive.ph)
Click to expand...
Forgive the brief power level.

For a year and a bit, I studied archaeology at a UK University before dropping out, however during our first year we learned about museum management and how artefacts in museums get preserved and displayed.

Neither of them got anywhere near the actual Magna Carta because its an 800 year old document. The real one is in an archive, likely on-site, kept away from the public eye because preserving documents that old requires a lot of special preservation methods. This includes adjusting light exposure, humidity, temperature, etc.

In heritage and artefact management there is the agents of deterioration, which are 10 primary threats that affect all artefacts. One of those 10 includes thieves and vandals, just like those old ladies; I can assure everyone on this forum that the museum they went to went through those agents, took into account the potential for someone to attempt to steal/vandalise the magna carta, and put measures in place to ensure the real magna carta was at no risk. What they attempted to vandalise was a replica meant for the general public.

To spoil the magic for a moment, if you've been to any museum holding any very significant or important archaeological discovery, and it seems barely protected by anything more than just glass, then unfortunately what you're looking at probably if not certainly isn't the real thing and is a replica commissioned by the museum for the general public, i.e. not archaeologists, as unless you know what to look for its very difficult to distinguish between the real thing and a very good replica. You can ask to see their archive and see the real thing, but don't expect to be able to unless you're qualified to work with artefacts and/or archives.

So in conclusion not only did Just Stop Oil convince two old women to commit multiple serious crimes, it was all performative bullshit that would have no difference to the actual magna carta. Just like Just Stop Oil, their actions changed nothing and only affected the general public.
 
Are Britons just incapable of fighting now? Have they really become so weak that they won't put these hags on the ground?
 
Dickie Greenleaf said:
Neither of them got anywhere near the actual Magna Carta because its an 800 year old document. The real one is in an archive, likely on-site, kept away from the public eye because preserving documents that old requires a lot of special preservation methods. This includes adjusting light exposure, humidity, temperature, etc.
Click to expand...
While it's slightly disappointing to realize I probably didn't see the real Domesday Book, that's probably a really good idea. I imagine even a replica is costly to produce though.
 
AnOminous said:
While it's slightly disappointing to realize I probably didn't see the real Domesday Book, that's probably a really good idea. I imagine even a replica is costly to produce though.
Click to expand...
They're certainly not cheap, but when many museums are able to bring in tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands yearly it becomes a minor cost that brings in a lot of money in the long run. They're mostly done for artefacts that are, comparatively speaking, more delicate than others, like the magna carta and the domesday book unfortunately. Most old literature, documentation, and written work in museums are going to be kept in their on-site archives with replicas used so the general public can get the enjoyment of seeing what it looks like in-person, whilst preserving the actual artefacts safely. Some may also extend this to pottery & ceramics, but it varies and is unlikely.

When you learn about it, it does become quite disappointing and spoils a bit of going to the museum. Its actually one of those big "secrets" that museums specifically don't tell people about because of that tourism element that is inherently deteriorated when people realise its just a replica. But, not everything is a replica, and most that do go on display that are real. A small number of finds in museums require that extended protection and preservation and are desirable to put on display, as museums can have huge archives of artefacts that don't get put in exhibits either because they need to manage their exhibitions space carefully, thus needing to only display the most important artefacts, or because (such as in the magna carta's case) they need specific conditions to prevent deterioration. Many old paintings need it, so if you see paintings in a museum (which admittedly is rare since we have galleries for a reason) then they're also likely going to be replicas. And weapons, especially if they're firearms, because its just irresponsible to put a live and working musket on display in a glass case.

They're essential evils required in balancing the public's perception of archaeology and actually preserving those artefacts. There have been suggestions of using technology like VR to allow for digital museum experiences, tours around archaeological sites of interest (i.e. Pompeii, inside of pyramids, etc.) and to allow for greater views of the artefacts of the world, like those stored in the British Museum's databanks & archives, though naturally it isn't the same as being there.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom