Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg has died at 87. - 🦀

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Ilhan Omar Comin' said:
View attachment 1612280View attachment 1612284View attachment 1612286
I wonder how many of these we could dredge up.
Click to expand...
It's a bit of a roundabout, but this should suffice, a wayback machine snapshot of his main twitter page on Sept 1st 2016:

It lacks images unfortunately, however you might also find this useful, big ups to Null and John Flynt for making me aware of this:
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Granola Grenadine, Nguyen Van Phuoc, Super-Chevy454 and 3 others
HarblMcDavid said:
It's a bit of a roundabout, but this should suffice, a wayback machine snapshot of his main twitter page on Sept 1st 2016:

It lacks images unfortunately, however you might also find this useful, big ups to Null and John Flynt for making me aware of this:
Click to expand...
https://web.archive.org/web/20160908042224/https://twitter.com/BarackObama/status/771070737624866816

the direct tweet from archive.org

Obama's tweet is still live btw
https://archive.vn/ogoRw
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Zero Day Defense, Super-Chevy454 and 1 other person
You guys might have to do a triple take on this

www.theblaze.com

Chris Matthews calls Trump 'presidential' for his response to Ginsburg death, and liberals are melting down online

'You're such a pathetic suck-up!'
www.theblaze.com www.theblaze.com

Also, more peaceful protests here

www.foxnews.com

Protests over Supreme Court vacancy target homes of top GOP lawmakers

Angry protesters have gathered outside homes owned by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to express their anger at the Republican senators’ support for moving forward with nominating and confirming a new Supreme Court...
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
 
  • Informative
  • Lunacy
  • Like
Reactions: Jackisnotaname, Useless Magost Berry, The Demon Pimp of Razgriz and 4 others
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Marchesa of the Vast, The Last Stand, Buttigieg2020 and 4 others
verissimus said:
You guys might have to do a triple take on this

www.theblaze.com

Chris Matthews calls Trump 'presidential' for his response to Ginsburg death, and liberals are melting down online

'You're such a pathetic suck-up!'
www.theblaze.com www.theblaze.com

Also, more peaceful protests here

www.foxnews.com

Protests over Supreme Court vacancy target homes of top GOP lawmakers

Angry protesters have gathered outside homes owned by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., and Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., to express their anger at the Republican senators’ support for moving forward with nominating and confirming a new Supreme Court...
www.foxnews.com www.foxnews.com
Click to expand...
I notice the liberals getting mad at the opposite party for doing what they supposed to do. And the reasons they give for opposing this like childish. Well reminds me of how the democrats in Virginia treated the 2A crowd so fuck them all.

This type of no self reflection fucked the democrats in the aftermath of 2016, which is why they doubled down in 2020.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Granola Grenadine, Syaoran Li and CarlosDanger
1600739172509.png
 
  • Like
  • Optimistic
  • DRINK!
Reactions: The Last Stand, heathercho, millais and 1 other person
When they confirm whomever Trump nominates, the collective screeching will be a great presage to the 2020 election results. I don't see how that won't depress turnout among certain demographics who now think there's no point, that the battle is lost. At worst, it turns motivation from positive (we need to do this to get our person in) to negative (we need to get rid of le cheeto man), and negative motivations don't tend to propel voting as much as positive ones.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Exterminatus, Useless Magost Berry and 8 others
Can Mitch just say "we vote immediately," or does he have to hold the formality of hearings, et cetera?
 
Garm said:
They should do it at night just to fuck with people. Liberals wake up to find a new supreme court justice.

Just accept and put on the act of being amoral fascists to drive liberals up the wall even more.
Click to expand...
Normally, NORMALLY, I'd disagree. Yet at this point there would be no reason not to.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Shield Breaker, DeadFish and Garm
X Prime said:
Can Mitch just say "we vote immediately," or does he have to hold the formality of hearings, et cetera?
Click to expand...
I'm pretty sure if he wanted to he could skip the Judiciary Committee and the actual hearing, since the point of the Judiciary Committee is just to give some kind of endorsement(or non endorsement) for the candidate when they head to the full Senate for the final confirmation vote. According to Lindsey Graham, it seems they are going to have some kind of formal process, but said all 11 Republicans in the Judiciary Committee will support the nominee.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Winner
Reactions: Kosher Salt, Jackisnotaname, DeadFish and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back