- Joined
- Feb 25, 2015
Unfortunately in our society there are many underaged people who break the law. This raise the question of what response should be to such offenses and whether it should differ from the responses to adults. I think that because juvenile offenders are still forming they should be given smaller sentences because a sentence is far more significant to them due to them still being in formative years. As a result I might say that a 5 year sentence to a 15 year old may be the equivalent of a 15 year sentence to a 25 year old in life damage and thus it is unfair to give both the same sentence. Additionally one could argue that deterrence doesn't apply to minors due to their brains not being developed enough and that incapacitation doesn't apply because they could easily grow out of delinquency in a few years without harsh punishments. What do other kiwis think on this issue
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incapacitation_(penology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterrence_(legal)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incapacitation_(penology)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deterrence_(legal)