Kangz and Kweenz - Blacktivist/Black Nationalist Pseudohistorians trying to reclaim other nations' achievements and histories "WE WUZ KANGZ/KWEENZ N' SHIET"

All the separatist movements in the British Isles are like that, wanting to break apart the United Kingdom to “save their distinctive cultures” and then shipping in as many Third-Worlders as humanely possible because “at least we’re not part of Great Britain!”
Microstate nationalism movements exist solely to weaken nations, never to preserve ethnicities or cultures.
Actually, Irish culture (and Celtic culture in general) descends from ancient African culture thanks to the black people who lived there and the Phoenicians (also black people) who settled there. Educate yourself, whitey.
You know what's funny is that the Phoenician Ireland theory is often called racist against nonwhites because its main proponent posits that Phoenicians (a known genetically Caucasian group) also settled in America. So to see black supremacists parroting that to call Ireland black is funny as fuck.
 
Every fucking Saint Patrick's day there's black nationalists claiming that leprechauns were actually African Pygmy's that had migrated to Ireland and that St. Patrick led a military campaign to exterminate them all in the name of Christendom. This of course despite there being zero archaeological or anthropological evidence to support it. Despite pygmy's being native to central Africa, not coastal Africa, therefore being highly unlikely to have developed sea vessels worthy of transcontinental voyages. Despite pygmys often being confined to smaller territories due to warring with other African populations and even frequently ending up on the dinner plates of enemy tribes because they're superstitiously believed to be magic. Despite the fact that is highly unlikely that St. Patrick commanded any such military force, and that Ireland was still largely pagan after his departure. And despite the fact, that leprechauns aren't fucking real.
This became enough of a prevalent meme that Snopes ran a fact check on it. Archived link below.
 
Last edited:
It's been half a year since anyone posted, but HOLY FUCK THIS FUCKING TWEET!
1641849270022.png
 
It's been half a year since anyone posted, but HOLY FUCK THIS FUCKING TWEET!
View attachment 2876260
They had African Slaves into the Gladiatorial fights, @MattyBoySwag143

They had immigrants, yes due to the expanding empire.
This delusional Twitter user is confusing this with Nubian Black Pharaohs, right?! :c
 
Last edited:
Eithiopians aren't part of the same language or ethnic group as any 'bantus'.
Going into the ethnonational weeds really shows how pointless all this shit is.

The idea that an Ethiopian Jew, a Muslim Moroccan, and a Christian Zimbabwean are all magically part of a bloc together because they moved to New Jersey is fucking laughable.
 
Eithiopians aren't part of the same language or ethnic group as any 'bantus'
The Horn honestly pushes a very fine line to being considered "Black," seeing as how much of the population possesses many traits unlike those seen in the West African Bantus; some racial grouping methods even marked them as Caucasoid. Mark it down for more "Everything in Africa is black" BS if you want.
 
The Horn honestly pushes a very fine line to being considered "Black," seeing as how much of the population possesses many traits unlike those seen in the West African Bantus; some racial grouping methods even marked them as Caucasoid. Mark it down for more "Everything in Africa is black" BS if you want.
That's because the original population is highly mixed with Arabs ethnically, culturally, and religiously and has been for over 2,000 years. The Sabaean (BC-era Arabic) culture dominated the Red Sea and brought trade and culture across to D'mt and Kush, and the relationship continued until Aksum controlled land on both sides of the Red Sea.

Sidenote: the prevalence of Judaism and Christianity there is due to those same cosmopolitan coastal cities and their extensive cultural exchanges with the Levant.
 
Every fucking Saint Patrick's day there's black nationalists claiming that leprechauns were actually African Pygmy's that had migrated to Ireland and that St. Patrick led a military campaign to exterminate them all in the name of Christendom. This of course despite there being zero archaeological or anthropological evidence to support it. Despite pygmy's being native to central Africa, not coastal Africa, therefore being highly unlikely to have developed sea vessels worthy of transcontinental voyages. Despite pygmys often being confined to smaller territories due to warring with other African populations and even frequently ending up on the dinner plates of enemy tribes because they're superstitiously believed to be magic. Despite the fact that is highly unlikely that St. Patrick commanded any such military force, and that Ireland was still largely pagan after his departure. And despite the fact, that leprechauns aren't fucking real.
This became enough of a prevalent meme that Snopes ran a fact check on it. Archived link below.
Is this love for leprechauns and wanting them to be a lost tribe of africans due to the "hood" leprechaun movies?
1643030996702.jpeg
 
The Horn honestly pushes a very fine line to being considered "Black," seeing as how much of the population possesses many traits unlike those seen in the West African Bantus; some racial grouping methods even marked them as Caucasoid. Mark it down for more "Everything in Africa is black" BS if you want.
Notice the Caucasoid features in not just Habesha Ethiopians (the ruling ethnic group) but pretty much every Ethiopian group like the Oromo. And of course the Somalis, they aren't typical negroids either. Their language is Afroasiatic and distantly related to Semitic, except the Habesha who actually do speak a Semitic language. However, this may be further proof that other Afroasiatic-speaking people like the Ancient Egyptians, Hebrews, or Babylonians were black African civilizations.

Interesting side note, the Bantu arrived in East Africa like 2,000 years ago (after Buddha died) and mostly displaced/absorbed a population that spoke Afroasiatic languages. There's this one group in Tanzania called the Iraqw whose ancestors left strange ruins around, today they're fairly pale skinned if you look at some pictures compared to the more typical Bantu-infused East Africans.

Africa is a really diverse place, many anthropologists would argue southern black Africans are their own race they're so distinct (Capoid). They too used to be more widespread until the Bantu tribes diluted them, but racially still exist. Nelson Mandela for instance did not look like a typical West African. I think Black Americans/these kang types do a real disservice to the continent with their strange obsessions.
 
Kushites conquered Egypt for about 100 years before the Assyrians kicked them out and took it.

Sub-Saharan Africans were styling in unbelievably rich, civilised and technologically advanced empires when white people were still living in caves and raping their sisters, so it's weird as fuck that hoteps don't seem to know the first thing about them.
The Kushite conquest of Egypt took place around 700 B. C. during that time the dominant culture in central Europe was the Hallstatt culture. They produced much art and culture. They were capable of metal working and had tools of bronze and iron. They dug giant mineshafts into the mountains to mine salt.
image (2).jpg
Here we have a reconstruction of houses found at digsites close to Hallstatt.

Dominic_Groebner_Hans_Reschreiter_NHM_Wien_Abb_Salz-Reich_2008_Seite_67_1.tif.png
This is a drawing of what one of the salt mines looked like. Some of the chambers were up to 20x50x10 meters large.

Hallstatt_culture_Kleinklein_-_muscle_cuirasses_&_double_ridge_helmet.jpg
This set of armor is from the later Hallstatt period.

Hochdorf_golden_shoes_ornaments.jpg
These golden plates were accessories made by Hallstatt people.

This is just tip of the iceberg Wikipedia images. Europe during that time had culture, art, trade and industry. When we take into account that Europeans are a very young race, only coming into existance with the invasion and the settlement of the PIE people 3500-1500 B. C. while niggos had hundreds of thousands of years to develop beyond tribal monkey level, we start to see a very clear picture. I kbow you are just trolling, but I see this as a great opportunity to maybe educate some people on this largely ignored but interesting period of European history.
 
while niggos had hundreds of thousands of years to develop beyond tribal monkey level,
Maybe it's because the weather in Africa is more or less the same year-round and there's an abundance of wildlife to hunt. Europe is essentially the opposite, which encourages an demand to go beyond the hunter-gathering lifestyle because something went extinct in the British Isles.
 
It's been half a year since anyone posted, but HOLY FUCK THIS FUCKING TWEET!
View attachment 2876260
That's a really round about way to say Italians are a bunch of niggers but ok.
Maybe it's because the weather in Africa is more or less the same year-round and there's an abundance of wildlife to hunt. Europe is essentially the opposite, which encourages an demand to go beyond the hunter-gathering lifestyle because something went extinct in the British Isles.
Can't remember exactly what it was but something in the soil composition didn't lend itself to farming quite as easily as well. That could just be coincidental. Reading through this thread reminds me that Bulgarians do this shit with the greeks.
 
That's a really round about way to say Italians are a bunch of niggers but ok.

Can't remember exactly what it was but something in the soil composition didn't lend itself to farming quite as easily as well. That could just be coincidental.
Depends where you are, but yeah, most of Africa is desert or steppe or rainforest which are terrible for farming. It's easier to just garden what you can, raise some animals, and gather shit from the forest.
Reading through this thread reminds me that Bulgarians do this shit with the greeks.
Protochronism is even better since it was state ideology in communist Romania, which wasn't your ordinary Eastern Bloc country since dictator Nicolae Ceausescu devised an ideology similar to Juche. Basically it says the ancient Dacians are the same as the modern Romanians and they invented the entire Western world. Also, the Dacians were communists of the sort Karl Marx would praise, and also the Romans were an offshoot of the Dacians too.

But this is very common in the Balkans, although the Romanians seem to be the best at it. I've never heard much of the Bulgarians vs Greeks in archaeology (usually it's the "Macedonians", although they're basically Bulgarians), but I know some Bulgarian archaeologists are/were obsessed with proving they were the real Turks, real Russians, real Huns etc. based on the fact the original Bulgars were Turks/similar.
 
Back