Kangz and Kweenz - Blacktivist/Black Nationalist Pseudohistorians trying to reclaim other nations' achievements and histories "WE WUZ KANGZ/KWEENZ N' SHIET"

[Salt_Merchant]

I have yet to hear a good argument for why Africa is the source of all civilization, culture, and technology but never invented the wheel.

the white devils stole all the wheels?

 

[tygressofaera]

Oh, I love my kangz and kweenz. Their claims could have made more sense before we were able to extract DNA from ancient skeletons, even though they were weak even then. Over the years I've heard many different places that according to the kangz were created by black people: Egypt, Rome, Greece, Sumeria, Judea, Northern and Southern America, the British Empire (No, this isn't a joke. Shakespeare actually stole his play from a strong black woman, they say), China (yes, really), Northern African Muslim empires (Kangz brought the civilization to Iberia, of course) and also semi-civilized cultures that predated Greece or Egypt, but collapsed: Those are Vinča (Neolihthic culture in modern Serbia and in parts of Modern Bosnia, Romania, Greece, Macedonia and Albania) and Cucuteni (Neolithic culture in Modern Romania, Moldavia and Southern Ukraine).


Some old paintings of Minoans (modern Crete)

View attachment 1909864View attachment 1909865View attachment 1909866View attachment 1909867

Don't look very black to me

This reminds me of someone on tumblr who claimed that Internet Personality Sargon of Akkad was racist on the basis of IRL Sargon of Akkad being black. So, a white guy claiming the name of a black guy, and contributing to the erasure of black people in history.

Can't find the post, but did find a blogpost from someone who claims that these people were black based on the fact that they called themselves the "black heads." Oh, hair color? No, they couldn't mean that.

The whole blog is delusional, but this is the icing on the cake:

He's apparently quite infamous and has a rationalwiki page.

I think this must be the guy mentioned a few pages back who thinks the Olmecs were black, as well.

Apparently dyke is black people speak. They must've invented every slur known to mankind with their logic View attachment 1961917

This whole thing keeps popping up even in the insular almost-normie lesbian groups I'm in. This was the earliest twitter thread I saw about it. It's all based on an encyclopedia.com entry about the word dyke that says the first time the word "bulldyke" entered the language was in a book written by a white guy who "stole" the word from slang that he overheard.

Keep in mind that the article later gives examples of the word "bulldyke" used earlier than that, which contradicts this whole thing.

Edit: I decided to look up the person who wrote the encyclopedia.com article that set this in motion.

Spoiler: Whoops

Do you think she knows what horror her writing has wrought?
[\SPOILER]

 

[Trianon]

A few years ago, there was a very popular blog on tumblr called medievalpoc. It was supposed to draw attention to black people in medieval Europe to combat people complaining about racebending in fictional shows. But even tumblr sniffed out a rat and turned on medievalpoc for constantly making up stuff.

This reddit thread goes into the controversy.

Most spectacularly, medievalpoc claimed to have cred because they were Roma. Turned out to be white.

The popularity of the blog dovetailed with the release of Disney's Frozen, which medievalpoc took issue with for "whitewashing Sami culture" (Kristoff, the blond love interest, wears Sami clothing, an ethnic group in Scandinavia).

medievalpoc could not handle the blowback

For those who still believe that somehow that emotional investment in white supremacy can be “fixed” by education, or that those who shriek death threats at bloggers who post their fan art online are “just ignorant” and need to be “educated”, here are some resources documenting the presence of people of color, mostly Black people because that is where the most research has so far been done, in the visual arts of Europe and Denmark itself. I, however, am pretty sure that this post will not change anything at all for most of the people who have a huge problem with even asking, “why was everyone in Frozen white?”

 

[tygressofaera]

A few years ago, there was a very popular blog on tumblr called medievalpoc. It was supposed to draw attention to black people in medieval Europe to combat people complaining about racebending in fictional shows. But even tumblr sniffed out a rat and turned on medievalpoc for constantly making up stuff.

This reddit thread goes into the controversy.

Most spectacularly, medievalpoc claimed to have cred because they were Roma. Turned out to be white.

The popularity of the blog dovetailed with the release of Disney's Frozen, which medievalpoc took issue with for "whitewashing Sami culture" (Kristoff, the blond love interest, wears Sami clothing, an ethnic group in Scandinavia).

medievalpoc could not handle the blowback

Wow, I completely forgot about this blog. I don't remember at the time anyone on tumblr actually giving this blog a hard time, but now that I'm looking for it, I've found a few posts.

The links go here, which detail MedievalPoc's personal info and has a picture.

It was also archived 5 years ago, so this scam's been running for a decent amount of time. This blog had an entire tag dedicated to discussing this scam. The other link goes here, which isn't as interesting, but just someone bloviating about race theory and how Mpoc doesn't do it right.

Anyway, she's apparently still pushing forward. She has a patreon here with 388 patrons giving her $1,320 a month. She links to her twitter, facebook, and a defunct wordpress site. On her tumblr, she has an entire tag dedicated to Frozen.

Here's the main flavor of response to people who are pointing out that Mpoc is lying about almost everything:

 

[Troonwhisperer]

This reminds me of someone on tumblr who claimed that Internet Personality Sargon of Akkad was racist on the basis of IRL Sargon of Akkad being black. So, a white guy claiming the name of a black guy, and contributing to the erasure of black people in history.

No joke, even an Englishman like Snoregon has a better claim for Sumeria than almost any African (except North Africa) person.
I of course know that ancient Sumerians/Mesopotamians weren't black, but I was interested how similar modern Iraqis and Sumerians were.
So I made some graphs and looked at autosomal DNA. Unfortunately I wasn't able to find any ancient Sumerian autosomal DNA, so I used neighbour regions, since neighbouring regions have almost always similar autosomal DNA admixture.

I used the calculator with the following categories:

Gedrosia: Was very prevalent in central Asia/Middle East, especially Iranians. It was, however, also a very high component in the Yamnaya. Yamnaya tribes lived in what is modern day Ukraine and some neighbouring regions. Today it's mainstream to assume that the Yamnaya spread the Proto-Indo-European language, which then diversified over several Millenia in modern day Indo-European languages like English, Russian, Hindi, Punjabi, Farsi, French etc.


The other high component of the Yamnaya was a North European one. Hence they were a mix of European Hunter and Gatheres and Middle Eastern Hunter Gatheres (either form the Caucasus or Iran).

The other high component of the Yamnaya was a North European one. Hence they were a mix of European Hunter and Gatheres and Middle Eastern Hunter Gatheres (either form the Caucasus or Iran).

Siberian: Should be clear.

Northwest Africa: Should be clear.

Southeast Asian: Should be clear

North European: Corresponds to Mesolithic European Hunter and Gatherers. The name is a bit confusing, since this ancestral line was found everywhere around Europe. Middle Eastern migrants, however, highly reduced this ancestry in Europe and almost entirely killed it off in South Europe. Today it's most common in North Europeans and much lesser in South Europe, even though it's much higher in South Europe today than 8'000 years ago. So it's basically "North" European because it's the most prevalent there today. Blue eyes probably originated from this ancestral line. It's also possible that they were dark skinned, since most mesolithic European Hunter and Gatherers seems to lack gene alleles for pale skin.

Atlantic Mediterranean: Also a European ancestral line. Here it is itself a mixture of European Hunter and Gatheres and Neolithic Middle Eastern farmers. This line probably emerged somwhere in Western Turkey and then spread to Europe +- 10'000 years ago. So it's a little bit similar to the aforementioned North European ancestral line, but has signifiant Middle Eastern ancestry. I don't knwo why it was added in this caulculator like this and how they separate it from other Middle Eastern and North European ancestral lines.

Caucasian: Here it doesn't mean the same thing as when Americans talk about Caucasians (= white people). It's a Middle Eastern line that probably originated somewhere around the Caucasus and spread very far: The entire Middle East, North Africa, South East Europe and even India. This ancestral line makes up more or less 50% of all Middle Eastern ancestry. In Europe it's most prevalent in the Balkans, but only marginally existing in Western Europe. So it seems that this line only started to expand quite recently (5000 - 8000 years ago) and didn't influence Europe as much as Neolithic Middle Eastern farmers (= Atlantic Mediterranean that I've mentioned before).

Southwest Asian: Also a significant ancestral line in the Middle East, and somewhat in South Europe and India. It probably originated in the Southern Levant and spread from there.

Northwest African: Should be clear. It seems that this lineage is indigenous to Africa. It's found as a minority ancestal lines in many adjacent regions, but highest in modern day North Africans. It is, however, not a predominant one. So it seems that Middle Eastern people started to replace a lot of indigenous North Africans a long time ago and marginally mixed with them.

South Asian: Should be clear.

East African: Should be clear.

East Asian: Should be clear.

Sub Saharan: Should be clear.

Mind that this category are just constructs and not necessarily populations that really existed. Other geneticists and hobby geneticists can use totally different categories. This is just one I like and one that tries to categorize different migration patterns.
The categories here are more or less mainstream science, though. Even though they might be used by a different time. Some people are really bothered by the Gedrosian category and think that this population never existed, but this isn't now important for us. At the end it doesn't really matter how you classify if you're only interested in how closely related two or more different populations are. Using different categories will change the categories for two popualations equally.

To make a things a bit easier to read, I combined some categories together.

Sub Saharan + East African = African

Gedrosian + Southwest Asian + Caucasus = Middle Eastern. I didn't include Atlantic Mediterranean, because it contains indigenous European ancestry as well.

Neanderthal ancestry will just be ignored here.



So here now a graph I made:

I = Individual.

Unfortunately I only found several Individuals for each region. Since most of them were very similar, I often included only one of them. This isn't that problematic, since people in a given population tend to quite similar. The only exception is when there are extreme demographic shifts happening at the moment or you're living in a place like the USA, where people normally don't mix with other populations and we never got a new average American population. I didn't find any ancient African samples. So I included for a comparison some modern African ethnic group averages.

So what does this graph mean? It shows some ancient individuals that lived either before the introduction of farming (Chalcolithic) or during/after (Neotlihic + and Bronze Age). We clearly see that those individuals from the Levant, Natufia (was a culture in the Levant as well), Balkan, Armenia, Greece, Iran and Anatolia show predominant Middle Eastern ancestral lines. It shouldn't be surprising that we find them in Europe as well. Middle Eastern farmers started to spread towards Europe 10'000 years ago and replaced often the indigenous populations. With the Spread of the Yamnaya a lot of North European ancestry was reintroduced in most parts of Europe, even though modern day Europeans are nothing like the people before those Middle Eastern invaders.
The one Iranian individual seemed to have some South Asian ancestry. Not too surprising, since Iran is quite close to South Asia.
So what about the African group averages? I think it should be quite clear that all the Africans look much more different than anyone else. Even the Chalcolithic Swede here is much closer to the other individuals. An exception are modern day Ethiopians. They are clearly a mix of African and Middle Eastern populations. Now I don't have Sumeria here, but I think we can assume that it won't be that different from the Levantine, Anatolian and Iranian samples.


Now, how do modern day Middle Eastern populations look like?

Actually not that different. Arabs, Plaestinians and Armenians seem to be quite similar and not that different from ancient populations. A glaring difference is that the Atlantic Mediterranean ancestry has shrinked. Even Egyptians look much more similar to Middle Eastern populations than Africans. Another difference is that modern day Iraqi Arabs and Palestinians actually have much more African ancestry than those ancient individuals. This is probably a legacy of the Arab slave trade. Don't forget, the first slave plantations weren't in the USA, but in modern day Iraq: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zanj_Rebellion
So we could assume that Sumerians were even less closely related to Africans than the modern populations. And archaeogenetics also backs this up, I just don't have any access to ancient Mesopotamian DNA. Mainland Greece has much more North European ancestry than the Mycenean Greek individual from the graph before. In general South Europeans have become more "Nordic" due to German and Slavic invasions. But even the Greeks aren't a totally different population than some thousand years ago. So the idea that Greeks were black also seems rather dubious.


Now it should be clear why I said that Snoregon has a better claim for Sumeria than almost any African:

The English are by no means the same as ancient people from the Levantine. But the English average is definitely closer to the Levantine individual than the Bantu average.



Now, keep in mind that we only looked at autosomal DNA. There were probably great migrations in the Middle East as well. The autosomal DNA only shows that if there were demographic shifts, it was mostly between different Middle Eastern nations. As an example: Let's imagine that the English invaded the USA and killed off almost all so called white Americans and became the new dominant group there. If somebody 2000 years after the genocide sequences the genome of those ancient individuals and compared it to the modern Americans (who all descend from the English who killed of the Americans) it would look like as if the modern Americans were the direct descendants of the ancient genocided Americans. This misunderstanding would of course be caused by the fact that Americans and English people are autosomally almost the same. That's why we also have to keep in mind other factors like y-DNA, mtDNA, culture + language etc. But autosomal DNA is the most important factor to determine ancestry. If we looked just at y-DNA, it would mean that a Englishman with a J-Haplogroup would be more closely related to a J-Haplogroup Arab man than a R-Haplogroup Englishman.

But even if we glance at something like y-DNA, we won't find any significant contribution from Africa in the Middle Eastern or European gene pool.
If we combine y-DNA, mtDNA and autosomal DNA, it could be said that Europeans and people from the Middle East are one population with the Scandinavians on the top with the least amount of Middle Eastern ancestry and most amount of indigenous European ancestry, and the Southern Middle East/Most Eastern part of the Middle East as the bottom with the most amount of Middle Eastern ancestry and least amount of European ancestry. So every European will be more closely related to a Middle Eastern person than a Subsaharan African or an East Asian and vice versa.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

Here's something for this thread. Used to work with a guy who claims black people are the true native Americans and therefore as a true native American he doesn't have to pay taxes and also you only need a driver license if you're driving for commercial purposes, if it's personal reasons it's "travelling" and you don't need a license. I saw his bullshit we wuz sovereign citizens ID and I tracked it down to this site. It's a good mix of we wuz and tax evasion. Example from image search (NOT the guy I worked with):
View attachment 2060479

Late bump to this because I literally only just remembered another thing about this guy. He printed, or had someone else print, a fake expiration date on his social security card, so that it would be "expired." I didn't hear from him his reasoning for this but I'm sure it's some sovereign citizen bullshit.

 

[Windows XP Home Edition]

we wuz drankin' guinness 'n shieeet

 

[Shaka Brah]

View attachment 2163032we wuz drinking guinness 'n shieeet

The one thing this does get right is that Africans drink a fuckton of Guinness. I looked this up to be sure and apparently most of the breweries are in Africa now.

I can't seem to figure out why they like Guinness this much though, over any of the other possible liquor choices they could make. Maybe marketing? Maybe preference for colonial imports?

https://www.guinness-storehouse.com/content/pdf/factsheets/factsheet_pdf_10.pdf

https://www.guinness-storehouse.com/content/pdf/factsheets/factsheet_…

archived 12 May 2021 08:31:19 UTC

archive.is

 

[ClownBrew]

we wuz drinking guinness 'n shieeet

*we wuz drankin guinness 'n shieeet FTFY

 

[Big Ruski]

Everyone knows malt liquor is a Kangly beverage.

 

[Radola Gajda]

It is funny how Kangz at one hand try to own White devils by calling them sisterfuckers. And at the other they are claiming to be descendants of ancient Egyptian royalty that was notorious for close kin mariages.

 

[Muh_Soggy_Knee]

the belief that they were the "original Israelite Jews"

It's funny that they claim that while being anti-sematic as well.

 

[Shaka Brah]

It's funny that they claim that while being anti-sematic as well.

Is it really anti-semitism if you don't think they're semites?

 

[Muh_Soggy_Knee]

Is it really anti-semitism if you don't think they're semites?

good point.

 

[Flaming Insignias]

A compilation of Kang shit by "Bishop" Talbert Swan

 

[Windows XP Home Edition]

Does anybody remember the Cheddar Man thing a few years back? Well, the Irish media is trying to claim that the first people who came to Ireland wuz bleg n' shiet.


TLDR; Irish media tries to pander to delusional Nigerians by using a Cheddar Man argument.

 

[Flaming Insignias]

View attachment 2238454View attachment 2238455
Does anybody remember the Cheddar Man thing a few years back? Well, the Irish media is trying to claim that the first people who came to Ireland wuz bleg n' shiet.


TLDR; Irish media tries to pander appease delusional Nigerians by using a Cheddar Man argument.View attachment 2238458View attachment 2238461View attachment 2238466

I don't know what's worse, this Kangshit, or the fact that the reconstructions suggest that Micks may once been "Aryan"

 

[Windows XP Home Edition]

I don't know what's worse, this Kangshit, or the fact that the reconstructions suggest that Micks may once been "Aryan"

When Irish woketards mention instances of other peoples migrating to Ireland, it's just used to brush aside any criticism or concern of how mass migration and multiculturalism may wipe out Irish culture and kill the language. Never mind the fact that Irish culture (including its language) is one of the oldest in the entire Western world.

 

[Flaming Insignias]

When Irish woketards mention instances of other peoples migrating to Ireland, it's just used to brush aside any criticism or concern of how mass migration and multiculturalism may wipe out Irish culture and kill the language. Never mind the fact that Irish culture (including its language) is one of the oldest in the entire Western world.

All the separatist movements in the British Isles are like that, wanting to break apart the United Kingdom to “save their distinctive cultures” and then shipping in as many Third-Worlders as humanly possible because “at least we’re not part of Great Britain!”

 

[Zbk3VmLfujjzjxBd43tL]

When Irish woketards mention instances of other peoples migrating to Ireland, it's just used to brush aside any criticism or concern of how mass migration and multiculturalism may wipe out Irish culture and kill the language. Never mind the fact that Irish culture (including its language) is one of the oldest in the entire Western world.

Actually, Irish culture (and Celtic culture in general) descends from ancient African culture thanks to the black people who lived there and the Phoenicians (also black people) who settled there. Educate yourself, whitey.

The original Celtic priesthood were Blacks. The White Druids had nothing to do with the construction of Stonehenge since it predated their emergence by several centuries.

The Scots are themselves of Black origin. Ireland was once known as Scotia Magna and Scotland was called Caledonia until about the third century A.D. when a tribe invaded Caledonia and the name was changed to Scotia. The Irish are said to have derived the name Scotia from the daughter of an Egyptian Pharaoh named Scota.

The original knights of Europe including the Knights of King Arthur's round table were Blacks. There was an African, Gormund who ruled Ireland at the time of the Anglo-Saxons. There were also Blacks among the Vikings. The first King to unite Norway was Black. He was known as Halfdan the Black. He was not called Black simply because of the color of his hair but because he was dark-skinned.

The Scottish historian David MacRitchie, further tells us that Alpin, the father of Kenneth MacAlpin (Mac means son of) was half Scottish Black and half Pictish Black. Kenneth (the son) was the first to unite the two primary branches of Blacks in Scotland.

In the African Origin of Civilization by Cheikh Anta Diop, we are told that �The King of Ghana was called Maga,� and that the word could have originated as far back as the Third Century B.C. like the Sarakole language. In the second volume of Ancient and Modern Britons, were are presented with �Maga Dubh,� which in the Scottish language of the time meant �Black King.�

Two British writers, Gerald Massey and Godfrey Higgins believe that Blacks built Stonehenge. Gerald Massey (In Volume I of his work, A Book of the Beginnings claims that Stonehenge was built by a Black architect known s Morien. He says, �Now, as a Negro is still known as a MORIEN in English, may not this indicate that MORIEN belonged to the black race, the Kushite builders?�