KINKiwis - A thread for genuine kink/fetish information and discussion

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I really want to know if something is within the range of social and relational acceptability but I don’t wanna powerlevel
 
gagabobo1997 said:
It can't be worse than the talk about chastity cages and sissygasms earlier
Click to expand...
It’s absolutely not, but it’s still not ordinary sexual behavior and y’all (I’m Southern I can say it) will pounce on anything. However, it has come to my recollection that if I shared this I would be able to effectively dunk on Jeets for doing it wrong, and expose more of their degeneracy to the world, so it may actually be beneficial to mildly humiliate myself to deal a crushing blow to their izzat.
 
With all due respect, dude, either shit or get off the pot. (Hopefully not literally shit, but since you mentioned jeets, I have my concerns.) Odds are decent that at least some people will laugh at you a bit, just like we laughed at chastity cage guy and sissy hypno guy, and gay eugenics guy in the otp thread (and what a faggot he was). And then we'll move on quickly after. There could very well be laughter and derision, sure, but it's only temporary and I'm pretty confident at least someone can give you some insight since, at least recently, this thread is pretty analytical and objective. If you're trying to get someone to say "it's okay, we won't judge you, we all have our quirks," or otherwise receive clearance to open up judgement-free, you're not gonna get that. But like gagabobo said, there's tons of funny shit to point and laugh at both in this thread and on the side as a whole, whatever weird fetish stuff you have it'll really just be a drop in a Olympic swimming pool-sized bucket. I wouldn't worry about it.
 
AndSothisIsChristmas said:
I really want to know if something is within the range of social and relational acceptability but I don’t wanna powerlevel
Click to expand...
Saying that you do something embarrassing enough that saying it would be powerlevelling is in and of itself powerlevelling and will only ever lead to people assuming the worst. No one will remember or care that your penis is smaller than an indian's and you get off on sph it's ok.
 
AndSothisIsChristmas said:
It’s absolutely not, but it’s still not ordinary sexual behavior and y’all (I’m Southern I can say it) will pounce on anything. However, it has come to my recollection that if I shared this I would be able to effectively dunk on Jeets for doing it wrong, and expose more of their degeneracy to the world, so it may actually be beneficial to mildly humiliate myself to deal a crushing blow to their izzat.
Click to expand...
Is it consent accident related, or something?
 
Harm said:
Can you do an effortpost on face sitting next?
Click to expand...
1775489889310.png
1775489900323.png
1775490214416.png

In all seriousness, similar to any kink/fetish, there's a wide range of factors that could explain it.
How intense or escalated it is could tie in to any number of things.
It could come from simple foreplay--simplest
It could come from Partialism--intense fetish/kink for the buttocks or anus
It could come from Olfactophilia--fetish for presence of body odour or smells.
It could come from Bromidrophilia--fetish for stenches/strong pungent odours (foul-smelling or simply very strong smells—this is a minor but significant difference from Olfatophilia)
If it's rooted in masochism then that's another rabbit hole. Some of the findom stuff can also apply in that context because the individual might be doing it for self-degrading reasons that are rooted in narcissism. Or the person being sat on likes the idea of giving but not receiving.
I could effortpost more but I think this post is long enough (I began with the stuff below before coming back up here to write this reply).
femboy fart huffer said:
I wonder how aphantasia factors into that. I can't picture an apple in my head so I need to gape my asshole to cum? Also is this some official shit saying that actually a decent amount of '''''''gay'''''''' people are just straight men with a cock fetish?
Click to expand...
That's an interesting idea (aphantasia), but you could argue the opposite as being true e.g. because I'm capable of picturing certain scenarios/images I feel the need to make that fantasy a reality. It might have a ton of merit, but it'd depend strongly on how someone interacts with their imagination or lack thereof.

Someone with a vivid imagination could use their mind as an outlet for some particularly deviant ideas or the fact they can imagine them and want them might result in them trying to make it real.

Similarly someone who can't picture the apple won't even consider X because they can't see themselves doing it, or conversely because they can't use their imagination as an outlet, they try to bring it into reality.

Regarding the question: yes, possibly.
The book is old (1962) but it doesn't get demerited because of it. The actual content within (supporting testimony) does lose its merit because of time.
1775524947476.png
Some bisexuals and some homosexuals are men with a "kink" for the same sex—passing interest in X—with homos being same-sex fetishists—X is mandatory for arousal/stimulation.*

The most extreme variation of this view might be to say homosexuality is entirely self-reinforced and without said reinforcement the homosexual would cease being homosexual. Some homosexuals might "act the part" because it's all ultimately rooted in fetishist reinforcement. Stuff like the "gay voice," and other such mannerisms, might be a way for the homosexual to reinforce their identity and if they simply stopped acting then they'd stop being homosexual, basically. I think there's a fair number of bisexuals and homosexuals who'd probably stop being bi or homosexual if they stopped reinforcement, though it's probably more true of bisexuals than strict homosexuals.

This might be true of some, not all, which might get annoying but I think the clarification is necessary.
*(Some political activist-types try to argue this is a universal rule, that men are nurtured into finding the opposite sex attractive and vice versa--same with gender-identity--which has lead to them indirectly stating bi/homosexuality is also the result of nurture)
femboy fart huffer said:
The more you post the more I think you could very easily chart every fetish on some sort of 3d graph or one of those jrpg octagon area graphs. It seems that almost every fetish in some way falls into a broader category and is just expressing itself in a different way. Obviously partialism and material fetishes, masochistic and sadistic, then you have loss of control stuff, there's idk if you'd call it a subgroup of material fetishism or the other way around but like tactile fetishism that's about the physical feeling of anything like mud and that sort of shit not just specific types of tailoring. There's some sort of fantasy fetishism stuff like giantess or vore where it's just aphantasiaphobic for the most part. Then there's something like personality removal where the fetish is to become someone/thing else like furries or abdl or drones and kigus. There's already olfactorphilias I think it's called and I'd say that in some ways bodily fluid fetishism is somewhat in the same broader grouping as that like yea I like smelling feet so I also like sweat and I like the smell of piss and so I like drinking it too.

Basically you know how life is split into 5 groups that are then split into hundreds of subgroups beyond that. You could do that for fetishes instead of having trees and fish in the same group. Like how likely is someone who has some sort of tactile fetishism going to suddenly decide that they want to be pegged? Kinda like how giantess stuff always leads to vore or foot stuff but hardly ever leads to wanting to piss yourself.
Click to expand...
I think you could, it'd just require a lot of effort and considering tons of different factors.
Like with homosexuality/bisexuality, there's not a clear-cut, one-size fits all explanation, bur broadly speaking that might be groups and them sub-groups within those groups, and varying degrees of overlap.

You could narrow down all the possibilities and then associate it with sub-groups of every given kink. Like I just did with Findom, you can find differing motives behind all the participants, with some tied more closely to narcissism. and within that group, specific kinds of narcissism. However there would also be those who aren't narcissistic at all, and are more victims of brain chemistry if anything.

I'd also posit many fetishes may contain covert/sub-conscious causes. The issue with finding those is that they can serve as camouflage for those with less scrupulous causes i.e. more narcissistic/outright pleasure-seeking and hedonistic. The former group could desist from a particular kink/fetish if they consider it harmful, whereas the latter are likely aware or sceptical and will associate their interest in a given kink to ultimately positive roots and will simply be enabled as a result.

In a private message I proposed there were 3 major classes of homosexuality with a multitude of sub-groups within, but it'd be so extensive it'd take forever to cover every single possibility.
I think there's various shades of homosexual. Like any kink/fetish (paraphilia), there's likely an underlining origin and/or reason for their sexual orientation that can explain different in-group behaviours. It's why there's "good" homosexuals just like there's "bad" homosexuals—the origin of why they are the way they are affects their demeanour in the a big way.

There's a possibly infinite number of factors involved, and all those factors can lead to groups, and even then many of them can be further broken down into sub-groups—and hybrids exist, because falling into one group may result in merging into another. But I'd point to there being a big 3.

1. Resentment/revulsion-based - Perhaps more common in lesbians*, this is when their sexual orientation comes more from a place of resentment—either for themselves, or for the opposite sex.

They might associate them with negative emotions and this has climbed to such intensity it can overcome their lack of physical attraction to the same sex and, in a way, have sex with the same sex out of a sort of spite for the opposite.

Sometimes molested/raped men/boys, in order to make sense of what happened to them, re-enact their traumatic experience with other men. This might come from a place of "deserving" what happened to them, or repeating what was done to them on other men/boys as a sort of revenge or self-punishment.

Men can loathe or be disgusted by women to such a degree that they are more inclined to the same sex over the opposite. This can apply to straight men not wanting to share spaces with women in general, but can be to such a degree it applies to sexual and emotional attraction. In a way this'd make some homosexuals a result of irrational fear towards the opposite sex and so only feel comfortable around the same sex. Might not escalate to sexual activity, but doesn't prevent it.

Whilst disgust/revulsion can also come from traumatic events, it can also come from overexposure to the opposite sex in general in negative or mundane contexts, or their relationship with their parents. African Americans are more likely to be homosexual than white men in the USA, but they also have a higher rate of single mothers, pointing to there being some truth to this—as always though, not universal.

Tying to that last paragraph, the revulsion can be so mild that the levels of sexual revulsion to the opposite sex are identical to those felt towards the same sex. This could result in in apathetics who either become bisexuals or "asexuals" due to an identical level of disgust towards the sexes.

2. Emotion-based - this is either the best one or the worst one, depending on the type. It is often the idealised depiction seen in stories/media but does form the basis for many gays. For someone personally, they may be the example of a positive male experience for a relatively isolated individual that pushes them into being gay. I've known 2 examples of such homosexuals (not that I was the friend but still).

This is when their sexual orientation is dictated by their emotional intensity towards members of the same sex. This has some overlap towards (1) but resentment doesn't have to play a part whatsoever, just physical apathy towards the opposite sex after having obtained emotional preferences towards the same sex.

It can come from having primarily positive experiences with the same sex and little to no interaction with the opposite. This could result in early sexual contact that reinforces this sort of emotional tethering, or similar to the last point made in (1), they can view emotional affection towards men the same as they do women, or totally absent of female contact whatsoever, they assume such emotional experiences are only possible with men.

Due to the ultimately nebulous sensation of "love"—it can translate into loyalty, affection, care—and sometimes people cannot understand where or why they feel a particular way, it's not uncommon to tie physicality into it. Sometimes a persons way of translating their love to another person can be physical whereas in other people it can result in intense loyalty. Homosexuals can sometimes be the result of having translated their platonic love for a friend into something deeper, arriving at a presumption of homosexuality over anything else. This is also observed in idealised depictions of homosexuality where the conclusion of intense feelings is one of lust/attraction. That's not to discount an organic, non-mistranslated one, but we see all the time how people misconstrue one translation of "love"—loyalty—into something it isn't. A notable example is the loyalty between 2 male friends gets depicted as homosexual by people with no understanding of the emotion itself, or how strong friendships can be.

The potential "bad" variant of this is the retrospective homo, which'd be a sub-group. You see this with the older men who "come out of the closet" at older ages. Kevin Spacy, Phillip Schofield (UK), Stephen Fry (to a lesser but still impactful extent—I'd call Fry an emotional-fetishist). They reinterpret past memories/sensations as having a different meaning than they had in reality. If they remember being happiest with "the boys," then take into account everything they recall, then they'll reinterpret innocent touching into something more. Then to pursue that feeling again, they'll go after men/boys who resemble or have similar traits to those that occupy their memories—young men, primarily, similar to the ones in their memories. This leads to them sort of "retconning" their life up until the moment they "came out" and paint their entire life under this veneer or having always been homosexual but not realising it yet.

Stephen Fry would be someone whose homosexuality came about via that youth-based overexposure and affection with the same sex, but apply retrospect when it comes to their particular preferences. He's someone who pursued physically the same sort of males who were the source of his positive emotions but it might not escalate to fetishist levels i.e. the only men they feel any sort of connection/attraction to are those who formed his positive youth experiences with the same sex.

Emotional-fetishists could also fetishize that one male they have a sexual experience with or intense emotional connection to, and then turn that male into into their ideal and only pursue facsimiles of that male sexually. A heterosexual parallel would be a man who only pursues older women because of an early sexual experience with a woman of similar description, or uses relationships with said women as a means of fulfilling a connection they're otherwise lacking i.e. a man may yearn for an older woman so she can be a surrogate for a lack of connection to his mother. A homosexual man may pursue young blonde men because they can't have an actual physical relationship with their non-homosexual friend.

These ones can also veer into (1). If Stephen Fry is an emotional-fetishist, then emotional-revulsives would be homosexuals who recognise their own same-sex attraction, hate themselves for it, and end up as wilful celibates or "asexuals".

3. Fetish-based - This is really the simplest group and doesn't need too much explanation since I explained it in the thread and touched on it above.

There's a subgroup I'd call the aesthetic homosexual though. Someone whose attraction is rooted in associating "beauty"/appreciation with sexual attraction and love. It'd be if a man's ability to recognise another man as handsome then translated into you believing that recognition possessed a sexual undertone. This also applies to the emergence of some kinks/fetishes out there. Recognition is then reinforced into something sexual, almost a form of self-gaslighting. You maybe see this moreso in conservative/traditional/right-leaning homosexuals.

However there are strict fetishists who, through porn exposure, childhood molestation/EPI (hypersexuality), or some other unknown and constant reinforcement find themselves sexually aroused by the same sex and only the same sex.

A kink can get reinforced by an individual into a fetish. Would-be bisexuals or bicurious or one-off instances of same-sex intimacy or masturbation can end up becoming homosexual this way. One group may then feed into another, and I think that's common with fetishists as hybridising with another group can strengthen a kink into a fetish—it's probably rare to see a homosexual who is strictly revulsive/resentful, emotional, or fetishist.

*I think women are greater or more capable at empathy than men are but are also more susceptible to it and other emotions. Whether this is wholly intrinsic to the sex or learned behaviour I'm not certain. Women are better able to separate appearance from attraction to a certain extent. Resentment-based lesbians are unable to separate negative characteristics associated with men from men as a whole. Overlap between male and female attributes can lead to them shunning women outright if said woman has a male characteristic, or one they associate with men. They could feel visceral levels of disgust for someone displaying "masculine" traits. Short hair, or 'macho'ness. Like homosexual men who act under the psychological frame of getting "revenge," certain lesbians may embody masculine attributes themselves despite hating men, either because they're trying to imitate their abuser (assuming abuse-based sexuality) or hope it'll deter other men from approaching them. Like I keep emphasising: possibly infinite factors.

The system could be re-used for fetishes/kinks, though:
Group 1) Revulsion/Resentment-based = possibly Serotonin-based (Serotonin handles disgust/negative mood) meaning certain things are done to avoid a negative mood i.e. doing X to reduce Y-feeling or avoiding X to reduce Y-feeling*.
Group 2) Emotion-based = possibly Oxytocin-based (Oxytocin handles bonding/connections) meaning certain things are done to avoid feeling lonely
Group 3) Addict/Fetish-based = possibly Dopamine-based (Dopamine handles pleasure) possibly alongside Endorphins-based (Endorphins help reduce stress and pain—Group 1 and Group 2 can overlap with 3 as a result of this) meaning things are done because they cause pleasure and reduce stress/pain.
Alternatively, all the groups have an associate chemical, but endorphins in all instances since stress reduction can occur in all.

Applied to fetishes and kinks—Findom in this instance—you could fit a variation of it into all 3 (which is possibly true of all kinks/fetishes)
Group 1) Findom is primarily motivated by a participants resentment towards themselves, and would most likely have a narcissistic root for both "pig" and "paid". "Pigs" give money to help lessen their feelings of self-resentment but are simultaneously vindicated (satisfying ego) by having their "dom" validate them. Leaning hard on self-resentment, depression could be an underlying factor where the person's self-resentment leads to them being satisfied via this sort of self-flagellation. It'd be difficult to separate a narcissistic root from a depressive root in this instance.

Group 2) Findom is primarily caused by the "paypig's" emotional connection to the recipient of their money, which was tethered via a combination of oxytocin and dopamine when factoring in a sexual component, giving it significant overlap with Group 3. This could be psychologically congruent with BPD.

Group 3) Findom is primarily motivated by the "pig's" sexual gratification from their dom's degradation (this would mean the "pig's" reason for why they like being dominated would need its own exploration) over some pseudo-intimacy connection or narcissism. Though depending on the style of narcissism, their ego is indirectly fed through their satisfaction in this manner.

1 would be the easiest to desist from, 2 has the potential to be the least or most individually harmful, 3 would be the most hardest to desist from. Overlap exists between them all given some sex or masturbation component is involved, but the root cause differs. The only strict group that's least likely to overlap at all is group 3, but I'd posit someone who is only in group 3 for findom probably has an associated fetish/kink which is the foundation for the between 2 and 3 would great a stronger, more unbreakable bond with a given fetish or kink than purely 1 and 2 would because you're combing intense emotional attachment with intense sexual satisfaction.

Another, important factor is hypersexuality, and the blanket-list of associated disorders and compulsions that come with it. Someone doesn't just enter Group 3 out of the blue, it's typically after someone has been afflicted with some form of hypersexuality. The hypersexual disorder can go on its own (some places say it lasts 3-6 months until desisting) but the person can remain in group 3 and subsequently hybridise with group 2 or 1 if the kink veers more into a fetishist territory. I.E. during a period of hypersexuality, you acclimated to x-content, internalised it as a kink, but reinforced it into a fetish through repeat action.

Now the final part could tie into what group the person fell into, and then there'd need to be a bunch of overlapping circles where something is strictly x-y-z but has potential to overlap into another circle. There could be a core-kink that a person has escalated from through reinforcement.

I might just reappear in the thread one day with a concrete system of classification with lots of individual breakdown and sub-groups. Breast partialism, for example, could be rooted in Group 3 from the outset because men's stress goes down when they stare at a voluptuous woman's breasts for 10 minutes.
1775681916961.png
The only place I can find the full article is some Facebook post.
The full story/study supports the idea of objective beauty and latent heterosexuality given the findings.
“Staring at women’s breasts is good for men’s health and makes them live longer, a new survey reveals. Researchers have discovered that a 10-minute ogle at women’s breasts is as healthy as half-an-hour in the gym. A five-year study of 200 men found that those who enjoyed a longing look at busty beauties had lower blood pressure, less heart disease and slower pulse rates compared to those who did not get their daily eyeful.
Dr Karen Weatherby, who carried out the German study, wrote in The New England Journal of Medicine: “Just 10 minutes of staring at the charms of a well-endowed female is roughly equivalent to a 30-minute aerobics workout. Sexual excitement gets the heart pumping and improves blood circulation. There is no question that gazing at breasts makes men healthier. Our study indicates that engaging in this activity a few minutes daily cuts the risk of a stroke and heart attack in half. We believe that by doing so consistently, the average man can extend his life 4 to 5 years.”
She added that sexy stars like Dolly Parton, Heather Locklear, Anna Nicole Smith and Demi Moore had proved to be especially good for the men’s health.” (Jonathan Hayter)
Pretty Faces Get Men’s Brains Going
“A beautiful woman’s face is like chocolate, cash or cocaine to a young man’s brain, according to Harvard University researchers. Their brain-imaging study revealed that while young heterosexual males are indeed capable of finding beauty in another man’s face, only a lovely female visage can set off the “reward centres” in their brains.
When men in the study were shown pictures of various faces, only the female faces deemed beautiful triggered activity in brain regions previously associated with food, drugs and money, according to findings published in the November 8th issue of Neuron. The unique effect of the comely female face occurred despite the fact that the men also rated some male faces as “beautiful.”
“It looks like there can be a difference between what the brain ‘likes,’ an image that is judged to be attractive, and what the brain ‘wants,’ something that is regarded as a reward in and of itself,” study author Dr Hans Breiter, of Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, said in a statement. In their experiments, the researchers first asked a group of men to rate how attractive they found the faces – which, unbeknownst to the participants, had already been placed into the categories “beautiful” or “average.” The men’s ratings, it turned out, fell in line with the categories, and attractive male faces garnered ratings similar to attractive female faces.
But in the next phase of the study, men in another group were allowed to control how long they viewed a particular face by pressing a key. Breiter’s team found that they “expended effort” to see the beautiful female faces for a longer time, but for all other faces they tried only to “make the faces disappear faster.” Finally, in a third group of men studied with brain imaging known as functional MRI, the investigators found that only the attractive female faces set off the brain’s “reward circuitry.”
“It’s particularly interesting that the attractive male faces actually produced what could be considered an aversion response, even though they had been recognised as attractive,” Breiter said. His co-author, Dr Nancy Etcoff, noted that this research echoes previous work suggesting the human perception of beauty may be “in-born.” “While we know that experience, learning and personal idiosyncrasies all have an impact on attraction between particular individuals, these results show that this basic reward response is deeply seated in human nature,” she said in a statement.
Source: New Zealand Herald November 10, 2001 via Reuters
Click to expand...
1775682437707.png

Your remark on aphasaphobia is interesting because there may be some interaction between our phobias and kinks. Would someone scopophobia be more likely than someone without to develop a kink/fetish for masks, which in turn splits off into a bunch of other fetishes/kinks? For instance, a scopophobe develops a kink for masks, and due to the overlap of masks with the medical profession, develops a kink for nurses/doctors?

TLDR: Fetishes/kinks might originate from 3 places depending on the person:
Revulsion/Resentment = comes from a place of resentment, either for themselves or others, possibly Serotonin-based (Serotonin handles disgust/negative mood) meaning certain things are done to avoid a negative mood i.e. doing X to reduce Y-feeling or avoiding X to reduce Y-feeling*.

Emotion = Dictated by a positive emotional intensity towards a specific thing, possibly through its association to someone/something positive, possibly Oxytocin-based (Oxytocin handles bonding/connections) meaning certain things are done to avoid feeling lonely or they emotionally satisfy you.

Fetish-based = possibly Dopamine-based (Dopamine handles pleasure) possibly alongside Endorphins-based (Endorphins help reduce stress and pain—Group 1 and Group 2 can overlap with 3 as a result of this) meaning things are done because they cause pleasure and reduce stress/pain.

Fetish-based might be the most common overall but it's broken down into kinks (passing, non-essential interest) or fetishes (mandatory, essential interest i.e. it's necessary just to feel arousal).

*There's a joke I've seen a few times over the years of someone being so bad at sex, the person they had sex with flipped orientation as a consequence. If you're a teen, and your first time having sex with the opposite sex is abysmal, it's not impossible you conclude you're gay—you can find anecdotal stories of this happening. "My first time having sex with a girl was so bad I just knew I was gay" and vice versa.

Though the grimmer example of this is having such an awful relationship with the member of the opposite sex (abusive, cruel, etc) you may shun the opposite sex altogether through association—which is also not uncommon as a root cause of homosexuality, given some homosexuals may be a product of awful upbringing with a single mother, though that particular theory requires more study.
African Americans act as evidence for the idea however lmao
1775524587605.png
1775524745884.png
Homosexual society extract on 'The Woman Hater'
example.png
 
synthetic_glazer said:
With all due respect, dude, either shit or get off the pot. (Hopefully not literally shit, but since you mentioned jeets, I have my concerns.) Odds are decent that at least some people will laugh at you a bit, just like we laughed at chastity cage guy and sissy hypno guy, and gay eugenics guy in the otp thread (and what a faggot he was). And then we'll move on quickly after. There could very well be laughter and derision, sure, but it's only temporary and I'm pretty confident at least someone can give you some insight since, at least recently, this thread is pretty analytical and objective. If you're trying to get someone to say "it's okay, we won't judge you, we all have our quirks," or otherwise receive clearance to open up judgement-free, you're not gonna get that. But like gagabobo said, there's tons of funny shit to point and laugh at both in this thread and on the side as a whole, whatever weird fetish stuff you have it'll really just be a drop in a Olympic swimming pool-sized bucket. I wouldn't worry about it.
Click to expand...
AndSothisIsChristmas said:
I really want to know if something is within the range of social and relational acceptability but I don’t wanna powerlevel
Click to expand...
TITS or GTFO!
SteelPlatedHeart said:
It’s the follow up to Rule34.

If it exists, there’s porn if it.
If there’s porn if it, it’s someone’s fetish.
Click to expand...
Omg you are going to lock this thread like a chastity cage, it is funny because omg funny sex thing funny!
 
awoo said:
I can't get into them. They're overwhelming, which is the point, but kinda distracting and too degrading for me. Doesn't leave room to focus and fantasize. Maybe autistic overstimulation. It's the same for me watching feature-length movies where afterwards it's just tiring for the mind.
Click to expand...
Harm said:
The "degrading" ones are just dumb imo. There's ones that focus on building you up and empowering you as a sissy rather than tearing you down, and I like those a lot more.

Still, they can def be a lot! Especially if you have sensory sensitivities from autism or other neurological issues.
Click to expand...
awoo said:
I try to keep myself open to new experiences, like skiing, beer-tasting, sissy hypno, coffee-making :)
Click to expand...
1775721148756.png
If Sodom and Gomorrah was nuked imagine what would happen to this thread.
synthetic_glazer said:
>words words words words
Click to expand...
You are a fag bro, just put the dicks in the bag lil nigga
 
Last edited:
femboy fart huffer said:
I also just want to talk about some of the fucking wack shit I have seen in my time.
Click to expand...
All of these teaser and none for us to see. Shit thread
femboy fart huffer said:
Japanese kigurumi
Click to expand...
I have been summoned

Alright here's the powerlevel: I'm into watching retarded moids doing retarded things. I don't have hybristophilia but seeing a male junkie do brain meltingly stupid things and then getting arrested got me going and the amount of said content to watch is endless. It's so pathetic that it strokes both my shaft and my ego when I watch something of the sort.
 
Ruined by the Rain said:
Alright here's the powerlevel: I'm into watching retarded moids doing retarded things. I don't have hybristophilia but seeing a male junkie do brain meltingly stupid things and then getting arrested got me going and the amount of said content to watch is endless. It's so pathetic that it strokes both my shaft and my ego when I watch something of the sort.
Click to expand...
Essentially Kiwifarms: The kink.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom