KINKiwis - A thread for genuine kink/fetish information and discussion

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Bullet Kin said:
It didn't work then.
Click to expand...
I think this talk about fitness, hobbies, and motivation with the side tangent of food and breakfast has been the most productive part of this thread in all 67 pages of it.

Thank you @Ruined by the Rain thank you @Bullet Kin thank you santa

Ruined by the Rain said:
I live in a country where this is attractive
1000040505.jpg
and this is not
1000040506.jpg
Click to expand...
I think it's easily possible to get a medium between those instead of either extreme with it looking generally fine.

In fact, I'm certain of it!
 
Bullet Kin said:
67~ Speaking of 67 and maybe 89. What would a vore or cannibalism fetish look like in a relationship?
Click to expand...
look at any cannibal serial killer. it'd just be that but they're jerking off to it too.
 
Ruined by the Rain said:
Isn't that the lazy town guy?
Click to expand...
Yes lmao
Ruined by the Rain said:
I should go back to practicing calisthenics. I used to be really into it.
Click to expand...
I haven't done much of the holding hoops type shit since like grade school but yeah professional athlete types do some crazy shit with em,
Ironically my teacher in the one school I went to way back when that outsourced the gym class to like a local place that had the hoops and beams and shit was a n older guy named yuri too I think. A lot older than this guy though and I have no clue if he's even still alive. had a weird combo of scrawny yet kinda buff build I can't really describe for more than just it being over 20 years ago now lmao
 
Pat Mustard said:
Intriguing read to say the least but I would like to say if a teenage boy is far enough into the rabbit hole to know what blahaj or thigh highs are they probably will just buy it online. If you're mature enough to have a deviant sexual fetish you're probably smart enough to use amazon.
Click to expand...
I brought this beautiful girl a blahaj because she wanted one, then a couple years later she pooned out
 
Ruined by the Rain said:
I brought this beautiful girl a blahaj because she wanted one, then a couple years later she pooned out
Click to expand...
the shark itself is not the problem as it's kind of an iconic thing before troons decided to "claim it as trans culture" like they did with fallout new vegas which was also an iconic thing but a video game and not a generic ikea shark plushie.
 
My fetish is big, buff Team Fortress 2 mercenaries.
mge heavy.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ruined by the Rain said:
You need to make a tldr
Click to expand...
1.People who consume porn can be split into multiple categories, hence why there's differing given reasons for liking X, Y, Z
2.People who consume porn are likely to think it affects others but not themselves.
3.There's little variation in sex habits between heavy consumers and low-consumers, except heavy consumers correlates to younger "sexual debuts" i.e. having sex at younger ages—which correlates to bi/homosexuality in men
4. Women and men who consume porn converge on sexual experience, only men are more likely to "have sex with their friends" than women
5. Bisexual men were more likely to be higher porn consumers
6. High porn consumption did not noticeably correlate to lesbians or homosexuals (gays did not consume more porn than straights)
7. Bisexual and lesbian women make up 42-44% of porn consumers whereas bisexual and gay men make up 26%—this tracks with both the women porn consumption study and self-professed male high porn consumer study—62% of the women porn consumers sampled had a high endorsement of lesbian porn, 30% of the male porn consumers admitted to "high porn consumption"
DumbDude43 said:
the only places in the world where gigaroid physiques like that are attractive are ifbb pro bodybuilding competitions
Click to expand...
In The Homosexual Society, there's a term called "passive homosexual" for men who feel some sort of sexual attraction/titillation for their own sex, but don't act on these feelings.
1775754235786.png
Homosexual =/= only has sex with men, according to the book's terminology.
A homosexual was anyone who had some kind of sexual feeling towards their own sex, slight or major, acted upon or not.
1775755375770.png
1775755430993.png

It's a shame this stuff is just written off. Because everything is either healthy or degenerate—no in-between—it pretty much eliminates introspection. It's either:
1. "There's nothing wrong with what you're doing, so keep doing it. :)"
2. "What you're doing is wrong and awful and you should stop it. :("
The former lead to a lot of modern problems (no trait or habit can be seen as intrinsically bad unless it makes you feel sad) and the latter just pushes people into the arms of the other group. The questions of "how" and "why" are just left by the wayside, achieving nothing.
 
>IMPLYING said:
The system could be re-used for fetishes/kinks
Click to expand...
Nah I meant less the type of feeling it gives and more sort of category of what it involves. Every fetish will fall into one of idk how many categories and the type of person that is predisposed to that category is more likely to then go on to find the rest of that category hot.

Like for example say there are two types of fetishist. There is the person that fetishises tactile experiences and another that just has an active imagination. Maybe they both like vore. The first guy gets off on simply just the idea of what the inside of a stomach would feel like, the (imagined) feeling of being vored is erotic. The second person instead gets off on imagining something impossible and likes the fantasy. They both like the same thing and to some extent wank over the idea of being inside someone's stomach. But is the first guy more or less likely to develop a giantess fetish? Is the second guy more or less likely to develop a sock fetish? Or in a bdsm setting, one dom has two subs, they both like being spanked and tied up, one of them is a masochist and gets off on the pain, the other is a submissive and gets off on the degradation of it, the masochist is probably going to want to be kicked in the balls more and the submissive is probably more likely to want to get pissed on. They might have the same starting point of being spanked but the type of person they are kinda dictates where that leads and I would be willing to bet that the type of fetish category person you are is a lot more immutable and based in childhood than the specific fetish.

I don't fully buy the entire 'fetishes are dictated by childhood experiences' shit, I simply do not think that seeing something as a kid will result in you being into that as an adult. I think that a lot of it is retroactive revisionism. Yea ok I got turned on by the giant asteroid worm voring the Millennium Falcon in Star Wars or whatever. But what about all the other things? Maybe that was a formational moment for you sexually but why aren't you also a furry because Chewbacca is sexy? Why is it that one specific thing? I see it all the time with furries. Are you a furry because you watched Space Jam or are you just falsely attributing your current sexual feelings onto something historic? Did you start to wank over furries as a 6 year old because you watched Lion King or was it just that you liked the film as a kid and retroactively say that simple enjoyment was erotic? My favourite film as a kid was Shark Tale, I don't get a boner at the aquarium though despite the level of enjoyment that furries say they got from Lion King being similar to how much I liked Shark Tale. Unless it is repeated exposure to something explicitly pornographic like Schneider's feet or kphoria's vore or elsegate's everything I don't buy it as a general explanation, there's certainly a lot of examples where watching something as a kid is directly the cause of a fetish but I do not buy that as a blanket explanation. I mean personally I cannot remember being exposed to anything as a kid that would relate to what I like now. I think it's much more likely that there's broader groups and that certain things in childhood will push you to those broader groups. Like the depersonalisation fetishes. Why do they have such a large overlap with transgenders? Why is it that the people who hate their body so much that they want to mutilate it and lobotomise themselves to the point that they start to live their fantasy also fetishise having their brain wiped and body remade to become a drone or an abdl or whatever? Though there is certainly a level of social contagion there. I don't think that there's some single thing you can point to that would cause all of that. I don't think that watching Chuckee Cheese dot exe at 3am on Nickelodeon while wearing blue socks will make you want to cut your cock off. But I think that certain people are more likely to gravitate to certain fetish groups based on their childhood and formational years. And I think that for example not living up to expectations or being bullied about being a poof might lead to that kid's brain developing a depersonality idk complex, that might lead to being trans, it might lead to drone fetishism, it might lead to both. I guess a more easily pointoutable example would be autism fetishes. There is something about how their brain works that drives them to be more likely to develop certain fetishes. That, aside from within normal people and things that don't have such obvious outward symptoms.

Something like partialism. A group of fetishes that all have the same rough idea and come from the same rough mindset. Or smell fetishes. Or material fetishes. They're all groups that I would assume have a higher overlap in those groups than outside them. Just that there's a load of other ways you could categorise shit and that every fetish will fall into one or more of those broader categories. Like depersonalisation fetishes or enclosure fetishes or loss/gain of control, dom/sub stuff, things rooted in a tactile desire or in a fantastical desire. That instead of trying to pick out one specific part of your upbringing that caused a certain desire it's instead more interesting to look at that upbringing as a whole and what type of general interests in might result in. I think that the brain is just too complex, I don't think you can point at a single thing and say it caused something completely unrelated in someone a decade later. I think that a lot of the actual cause is subconscious and multiparted so not something that can be easily explained, and that the desire to point at the sexy Star Wars vore worm isn't a genuine attempt to explain where the fetish came from but instead quickly answer the question in an easy way that is complete on the surface. Like would anyone watch that scene and wonder what it is like to be vored by the giant worm if they didn't already have something in their head that would point them to that thought? Is the worm the origin of that thought process, or was that thought process there for a lot longer than the person thinks and the first memory of it surfacing in an obvious way was in regards to the worm? I think I am advocating from vore eugenics. Admittedly that's a problem I have with a lot of psychology, the desire to have an answer when sometimes there just isn't one that can be explained or comprehended. I shit myself because I watched Rugrats as a kid and the apple falls down because the Earth is flat and moves upwards. Obviously. Some people are depressed because their dad died. Some people are depressed because their brain has always simply worked differently and no matter what they were always at a higher chance of becoming depressed.
>IMPLYING said:
interesting because there may be some interaction between our phobias and kinks
Click to expand...
I've said a few times but I am certain there is some overlap between them. I just don't have seemingly endless novels on how much guys loved sucking toes in the 60s to point to like you and all the search results I can get are just how to content for bdsm basically. But I have heard many times, maybe to the point of just repetition biasing myself, that certain fetish behaviours are a way of dealing with fear. I guess to bring it back to the above, if you are bullied and scared of that then maybe you'll develop a way to deal with that which manifests in being turned on by the idea. If something causes you a lot of anxiety and then you start to find it hot then you're not going to be scared of it anymore. But also is that actually a response to the fear or the object causing it? If someone is scared of the dark because a monster is going to appear from the dark to vore them and they fetishise that then have they actually turned the fear into a fetish, the fear was of the dark, not being vored. Some kinks are a way to cope with fear, some of them are ways to cope with self image issues, some of them are ways to cope with a lack of agency and so on.

I think there's certainly some merit to it. I mean cumming is the best thing you can feel without external substances. I'm also not really sure if it could happen in real life. Yea ok I'm going to go over to r/aeromorph and goon for weeks until the sight of a plane is hot and all that. Could I really then not find turbulence scary? Could I really goon myself into just thinking 'haha the plane has vored us and it's belly is rumbling teehee' or would the very real sensation override that thought? Or do I need to be on r34 actively wanking over plane vore during the turbulence to remain calm? And if I do then wouldn't literally anything work for that? Does it need to be plane themed or would it just be the act of wanking that helps? If the plane goes through turbulence do I need to specifically wank over aeromorph vore or can it be giantess feet instead?

And there's another dozen quotes to use in my eulogy when I die.
SteelPlatedHeart said:
So should the thread be locked in four more pages just for the lols?
Click to expand...
Be forewarned if you lock me in any way I will say something along the lines of 'mommy pwease unwock my wikkle clitty dick pwease :3' every 5 minutes until you give in. I have experience. Do not try me.
Ruined by the Rain said:
I have been summoned
Click to expand...
They scare me. Especially the ones that are entirely black. The entire thing is unsettling in a way no other fetish content else is. I can go through whatever furry art freakshow or the deviant art horrors threads and feel nothing but kigu stuff just unnerves me. It is firmly in that uncanny valley for me.
 
femboy fart huffer said:
They scare me. Especially the ones that are entirely black. The entire thing is unsettling in a way no other fetish content else is. I can go through whatever furry art freakshow or the deviant art horrors threads and feel nothing but kigu stuff just unnerves me. It is firmly in that uncanny valley for me.
Click to expand...
I find kigs fascinating, personally. Not particularly in a sexual way but I think they are kinda aesthetic.
 
Horrifying Ratedump Post!

I wonder what the mechanism for genital piercing fetishes is, regarding childhood traumas or learned experience. Chris Chan HAD to have had some kind of exposure to certain stimuli to go for a guiche without anything else there, right? Especially considering his hygiene habits, as that stuff takes a bit of hygienic care to work.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom