KINKiwis - A thread for genuine kink/fetish information and discussion

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
I'm confused in the OP why you lumped actual shit that adults do with fantasy shit that's only on /d/.

For example, your partner could be into pegging but "giantess/vore" is not realistic in any environment. I suppose that there might be someone out there that would love it if you brought an air compressor into the bedroom and stuck the nozzle in a hole, but realistically that's not something what people do.
 
Ruined by the Rain said:
I'm into watching retarded moids doing retarded things. I don't have hybristophilia but seeing a male junkie do brain meltingly stupid things and then getting arrested got me going and the amount of said content to watch is endless. It's so pathetic that it strokes both my shaft and my ego when I watch something of the sort.
Click to expand...
I didn't think people here would look at lolcows with their pants around their ankles, but here we are.
 
Xarpho's Return said:
I'm confused in the OP why you lumped actual shit that adults do with fantasy shit that's only on /d/.

For example, your partner could be into pegging but "giantess/vore" is not realistic in any environment. I suppose that there might be someone out there that would love it if you brought an air compressor into the bedroom and stuck the nozzle in a hole, but realistically that's not something what people do.
Click to expand...
Because the guy is from /d/ and only had gay sex with his tranny boyfriend
 
LarpBait said:
@grok summarize ts
Click to expand...
The actual Grok summary of my post:
The post argues that heavy or repeated exposure to certain porn — especially hypnosis/sissy hypno videos — can create or escalate fetishes through simple psychological reinforcement. These videos put the viewer at the centre of the fantasy, making masturbation more intense and “rewarding” via dopamine. Over time, this can turn fleeting curiosities (like bicuriosity) into stronger, more fixed preferences (e.g. full bisexuality) by repeatedly pairing arousing images of women with images of men, tricking the brain into equating both as equally arousing.

It claims this process is not mystical — it’s just classical conditioning and positive reinforcement. Some people keep the fantasy purely mental; others try to make it “real,” which the author says can lead to irreversible real-life changes (e.g. extreme feminisation from sissy content potentially leading to transition, or “trooning out”).

The author then maps this to a study on women’s porn preferences, dividing them into four classes and applying the same framework to gay or bisexual men (with gender flips: vaginas → penises, etc.):
  • Class 1 (Heterogeneous / Mixed): Likes variety, more kinky, higher real-life sexual experience, confident.
  • Class 2 (Traditionally Feminine / Romantic): Prefers gentle, intimate, idealised, romantic content; lower kink, more “conservative” in tone, often lower sexual confidence/experience. The author thinks you (@awoo) are most likely this class.
  • Class 3 (Female Pleasure / Sensual): Focused on pleasure and self-insertion; very averse to harm/degradation; can also come from hypersexuality.
  • Class 4 (Rough/Violent): Likes aggressive content; strongly linked to prior sexual victimisation (the author assumes this doesn’t apply to you).
Additional points the text makes:
  • Gay/bi men’s fantasy style (highly self-insertive) overlaps more with how most women experience autoeroticism.
  • Some homosexuality/bisexuality can be induced or escalated by adolescent porn exposure rather than being purely innate, leading people to retroactively claim “I was always gay.”
  • Brains are somewhat plastic (nurture matters), and there’s overlap between “feminine-brained” thinking and certain porn/sexual patterns.
  • The study also found links to real-life factors: belief in “rape myths,” sexual self-esteem, amount of varied sexual experience, and history of victimisation.
Overall thesis: Porn isn’t neutral — especially immersive hypno content — and can reshape kinks, orientation, and even real-life behaviour through reinforcement loops. The author presents this as straightforward psychology rather than conspiracy, while acknowledging it’s armchair analysis based on limited data.
 
AndSothisIsChristmas said:
Okay, after reading some of the stuff y’all are sharing I’m actually feeling pretty normal. Thank you all for your enhanced degeneracy.
Click to expand...
It's ok man we are all totally normal here and all the people posting retarded porn from deviantart and furaffinity and keeping up with scat fetish furries are all just doing it for the content and totally no other reason and everyone on this site is totally normal.

It's like the prisoner's dilemma but horny.
 
Ruined by the Rain said:
We should abolish art school. It's useless to society and only produce trannies and commies. If Hitler got into art school he would be just another loser instead of one of the GOAT we got in this timeline
Click to expand...
Outsider art is the truest form of art


"Those works created from solitude and from pure and authentic creative impulses – where the worries of competition, acclaim and social promotion do not interfere – are, because of these very facts, more precious than the productions of professionals. After a certain familiarity with these flourishings of an exalted feverishness, lived so fully and so intensely by their authors, we cannot avoid the feeling that in relation to these works, cultural art in its entirety appears to be the game of a futile society, a fallacious parade."

— Jean Dubuffet
 
Last edited:
>IMPLYING said:
Paypig explanation
Click to expand...
If you've ever been in or interacted with people in the adult industry you know there's a certain type of guy (captain save a hoe) who gives away money for nothing in return because he feels sorry and doing it kinda strokes his ego or whatever. This is the most common type of "paypig" I've seen. I wouldn't call findominators narcissistic though. It's literally free money, like you would not turn down hundreds or thousands of dollars FOR FREE unless you're a stuck up retard. There is no ego stroking or gratification behind it for the dom(me)

Ruined by the Rain said:
Alright here's the powerlevel: I'm into watching retarded moids doing retarded things. I don't have hybristophilia but seeing a male junkie do brain meltingly stupid things and then getting arrested got me going and the amount of said content to watch is endless. It's so pathetic that it strokes both my shaft and my ego when I watch something of the sort.
Click to expand...
Ruined by the Rain said:
I have a pic saved on my phone of a guy with a prison tattoo that said "I devote my life to the state prison" (translated) and I really like it. That's the kind of stuff I'm into. I think I'm into expression of recklessness, confidence, and stupidity in general. It's the opposite of sapiosexual thing, I like them retarded and entertaining but only in a specific way
Click to expand...
I never thought I'd see someone who I could relate to as much because this is my exact type in women and I am a former junkie so I have met a lot of them. We can be freaks together :lol:
 
ilovecornsyrup said:
you would not turn down hundreds or thousands of dollars FOR FREE unless you're a stuck up retard
Click to expand...
Removing the sexual aspect for a moment, it's absolutely unbecoming to accept handouts for plenty reasons, especially from a complete stranger. It's not about being "stuck up" or a "retard," it's self-respect and integrity. When someone tries to hand me money, it's telling me I'm not capable of acquiring on my own without their assistance. Even if you pay it back, you can't undo the fact you were given it. So yeah, if you have zero principles pertaining to strangers lording their money over you because they see you as such a pathetic person, then go ahead and take it.

I think there's a good reason you see a lot more women happy to freely accept someone's money than men. One generally has that principle, the other does not. To me, the person who mindlessly accepts a handout is no better than that black bitch who licked a dumpster for $100 in that viral clip.

Now, adding the sexual aspect back on? Paypigging/findomming is hot and sexy and based :blush: That's right, you pathetic little cunt, you're gonna take my money because daddy didn't teach you better. Lick my metaphorical dumpster, whore, and keep licking until I say to stop.
 
Harm said:
When someone tries to hand me money, it's telling me I'm not capable of acquiring on my own without their assistance. Even if you pay it back, you can't undo the fact you were given it. So yeah, if you have zero principles pertaining to strangers lording their money over you because they see you as such a pathetic person, then go ahead and take it.
Click to expand...
I would agree if this was a family member or a friend we were talking about. With a paypig or john you view them as beneath you. It's how a scammer would view their mark: they deserve to lose the money for being stupid. It's not narcissistic as much as a disdain for a certain type of person.

Harm said:
To me, the person who mindlessly accepts a handout is no better than that black bitch who licked a dumpster for $100 in that viral clip.
Click to expand...
I refuse to talk about the things I have done for $100
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom