KINKiwis - A thread for genuine kink/fetish information and discussion

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
ilovecornsyrup said:
With a paypig or john you view them as beneath you.
Click to expand...
But the version of yourself who accepts the money is themselves beneath the version of yourself who wouldn't. To my mind, at least. I get that others could have wholly distinct values systems operating off completely different paradigms. I am a crazy person, so I'm not reflective of the normal viewpoint on these things.

ilovecornsyrup said:
I refuse to talk about the things I have done for $100
Click to expand...
Hey, let's not ask about your dirty whore past; let's ask about your dirty whore future!
 
ilovecornsyrup said:
I wouldn't call findominators narcissistic though ... There is no ego stroking or gratification behind it for the dom(me)
Click to expand...
I have seen a lot of findoms, admittedly biased because I only see shit when they get talked about and that's normally for something negative, but I have seen a lot that just are cunts. Not in a degrading sexual way, just a cunt. There are a lot of people that see paypigs as just easy marks. Not people with a fetish and a mutally sexual exchange but just a way to siphon easy money from people. There are certainly a lot of narcissists that feel entitled to the paypig money from what I've seen.

Not to mention there are a lot of findoms that are just fucking jeet scammers pretending to be women.
ilovecornsyrup said:
It's literally free money, like you would not turn down hundreds or thousands of dollars FOR FREE unless you're a stuck up retard
Click to expand...
I would not turn down a gift from a family member.

However this is not a gift. Paypigs aren't 'giving' money away. They are exchanging money for a specific service. Taking that money and giving them an inferior service simply because you do not like them is immoral. That is just a scam. It's not for free. The paypig is going to expect something in return. If you are not willing to provide that service then you are a scammer and should simply not advertise yourself as giving those services. It is literally not 'literally free money' in the same way that paying for a therapist isn't. You are paying for their time, their experience and the way they make you feel, things that only that type of person can provide thus why you have to pay them.
ilovecornsyrup said:
With a paypig or john you view them as beneath you
Click to expand...
They are not beneath you. They are sexually submissive. That does not make them a lesser person. Scamming someone because you believe you are 'better' or 'entitled' to their money is the exact logic jeets use. Whether you would personally pay for something or not does not change that a person paid for a service that they did not receive properly. They are not 'stupid' or 'losing' money. They are sending it to someone with the conscious expectation of a specific type of service to be provided.

You are conflating 'paypig' with 'john that has a saviour complex'. A paypig does not give money for his ego. He does so for his cock. A paypig expects something specific in return. A guy who pampers a whore because he has a saviour complex is entirely different and that is not a fetish, he does so because he is naive and wants to feel better about himself. He wants to gift money. The paypig is not gifting money, they are paying for a service. Even then taking money from naive people who just want to help is immoral if you are taking advantage of that fact.
 
This place used to have standards and now look its a bunch of ladyboys running around farting on each other's balls
 
femboy fart huffer said:
You are conflating 'paypig' with 'john that has a saviour complex'. A paypig does not give money for his ego. He does so for his cock. A paypig expects something specific in return. A guy who pampers a whore because he has a saviour complex is entirely different and that is not a fetish, he does so because he is naive and wants to feel better about himself. He wants to gift money. The paypig is not gifting money, they are paying for a service. Even then taking money from naive people who just want to help is immoral if you are taking advantage of that fact.
Click to expand...
There are two kinds of paypigs. While some paypigs want to be humiliated for the fact that they are gifting money (which is the service they are paying for), others don't want anything in return and just want to jerk off alone to the fact that they gave someone money afterwards. I was talking purely about the latter ones, that is what makes them "easy marks" in the eyes of others. As for the former ones there is an exchange of services that takes place and I respect that fact. I always believed that the latter were the majority but if that's not the case that's my bad.

femboy fart huffer said:
There are a lot of people that see paypigs as just easy marks. Not people with a fetish and a mutally sexual exchange but just a way to siphon easy money from people.
Click to expand...
Every prostitute/escort/camwhore/pornstar sees their clients as marks (at least at the start). It only feels sexual on the side of the john, but it feels purely clinical for the provider. I imagine it's just the same shit for findoms.
 
A-Stump said:
This place used to have standards and now look its a bunch of ladyboys running around farting on each other's balls
Click to expand...
Where? I don't see that.

Please provide video proof.
ilovecornsyrup said:
I always believed that the latter were the majority but if that's not the case that's my bad.
Click to expand...
Someone wanking over randomly sending money isn't findom though. Maybe it is more prevalent than findom but it's entirely personal so it'd be hard to say. But findom and as a result paypigs rely on the dom part, findom without domination isn't findom and you cannot have domination without some sort of interaction and so the person isn't a paypig. The person wanking over gifting money is simply just not a paypig. I don't know the name and admittedly have never heard of it before but paypig is specifically a findom term.
 
femboy fart huffer said:
Someone wanking over randomly sending money isn't findom though. Maybe it is more prevalent than findom but it's entirely personal so it'd be hard to say. But findom and as a result paypigs rely on the dom part, findom without domination isn't findom and you cannot have domination without some sort of interaction and so the person isn't a paypig. The person wanking over gifting money is simply just not a paypig. I don't know the name and admittedly have never heard of it before but paypig is specifically a findom term.
Click to expand...
I've just seen more people wanking over gifting money than "real findom" (while being called paypigs) and and that was my impression of the entire fetish. I had no idea they were separate things, mb.
 
Ruined by the Rain said:
1000040506.jpg
Click to expand...
Why would that ever be attractive, nigga looks like an ogre.
AndSothisIsChristmas said:
I really want to know if something is within the range of social and relational acceptability but I don’t wanna powerlevel
Click to expand...
I'm going to tell it to you as straight as possible, it really doesn't matter. Quite literally anything not illegal is in the range of social and relational acceptability, there's someone out there who likes the same thing as you. The only time I could see you genuinely getting ostracized for a fetish is if it was pedophilia or beastiality, as much as people like to mock and chant "Total (blank)fag death" and call anything outside of appreciation of boobs and abs "degen", deep down. Deep DEEP down. No one actually cares.
There's no need to powerlevel and embarass youself, I can assure you, you're fine.
 
Getmeout said:
Why would that ever be attractive, nigga looks like an ogre.

I'm going to tell it to you as straight as possible, it really doesn't matter. Quite literally anything not illegal is in the range of social and relational acceptability, there's someone out there who likes the same thing as you. The only time I could see you genuinely getting ostracized for a fetish is if it was pedophilia or beastiality, as much as people like to mock and chant "Total (blank)fag death" and call anything outside of appreciation of boobs and abs "degen", deep down. Deep DEEP down. No one actually cares.
There's no need to powerlevel and embarass youself, I can assure you, you're fine.
Click to expand...
He posted about it elsewhere; it was a haircutting fetish.
 
AbbaZabba said:
He posted about it elsewhere; it was a haircutting fetish.
Click to expand...
Honestly I am just confused. What an interesting fetish. Kinda funny to see that seemingly every fucking fetish there is has the same dogshit indian memes about it. I have seen the exact same sort of nonsensical memes about some other shit ages ago that I can't remember. And it was also some wack shit that I'd never heard of before too.
 
femboy fart huffer said:
Honestly I am just confused. What an interesting fetish. Kinda funny to see that seemingly every fucking fetish there is has the same dogshit indian memes about it. I have seen the exact same sort of nonsensical memes about some other shit ages ago that I can't remember. And it was also some wack shit that I'd never heard of before too.
Click to expand...

When there's a billion and a half streetshitting perverts that suddenly get internet access, odds will rise that they are able to delve deep into their fetishes! I honestly think (and hope) that internet porn and AI will cause a population collapse hitherto unseen in the subcontinental subhuman species.
 
AbbaZabba said:
When there's a billion and a half streetshitting perverts that suddenly get internet access, odds will rise that they are able to delve deep into their fetishes! I honestly think (and hope) that internet porn and AI will cause a population collapse hitherto unseen in the subcontinental subhuman species.
Click to expand...
That's already a thing. Indians were given Internet by the people at Google, Facebook, and Apple to access all of the pornography their rapey heart desires.
 
AbbaZabba said:
odds will rise that they are able to delve deep into their fetishes
Click to expand...
Nah it's not that. It's that they have the exact same style of 'meme'. It's like how the deviantart mspaint type shit 'evolved' several times for different things. The specific type of 'random image of a woman with a completely unrelated expression and situation with some random caption slapped on top' type meme. It's like the old impact memes but without understanding the part where the image is meant to relate to the caption and then made with one hand. I wish I could find the shit I saved when I first saw it now but it was years ago. It was some equally retarded shit like cooking as well as a massive amount of incest of course.

The indian is drawn to the impact 'meme' in the same way the autist is drawn to mspaint.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom