VTuber Kirsche Verstahl - Host of Foxu News and anti-BRIDGE activist.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Vallens has changed his pinned tweet from a Kirsche callout to his Linktree.
Screenshot 2025-05-14 at 15-17-08 Ana Valens 🔞 on X WHERE TO FOLLOW OUTSIDE TWITTER https __t...webp
Archive
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Winner
Reactions: Hermann von Salsa, Knight of Utatanation, Charred Dinosaur and 30 others
Serbian Peacekeepers said:
I hope Kirsche has a Lawyer on the ready so the open letter isn't just a empty threat. I still think her going through with a lawsuit is a awful idea, but hopefully just the threat of one makes Vice issue a retraction.

Bint has been the first out of the 3 (Bint, Vallens, and Vice) to respond.
View attachment 7360588
Archive
Click to expand...
Not so tough now are you faggot?

Lol.webp
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chadikus Maximus, Charred Dinosaur, Knight of Utatanation and 17 others
Serbian Peacekeepers said:
Vallens has changed his pinned tweet from a Kirsche callout to his Linktree.
View attachment 7362045
Archive
Click to expand...
Serbian Peacekeepers said:
Given the fact Bint also changed his pin? I think we are seeing a total Foxu victory.
As always, expect bullshit and don't get too excited, but both Bint and Vallens have went radio silent about Kirsche and every article was pulled. Someone is scared.
Click to expand...
I'll note that the tweet wasn't deleted, just unpinned.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur, Knight of Utatanation, deerbeer and 10 others
Not your Buddy Holly said:
holy shit, it could actually be habbening. Either they're cutting bait cause the troon shit or realized they fucked up with faking the evidence... or the lawsuit threat actually worked.
Click to expand...
People have been running their mouths about how hard it is to prove defamation, and it is, but the faked screenshots would go a looooong way towards meeting that burden. Also keep in mind that in litigation, that Reddit screenshot could be use as a beachhead to subpoena Reddit for the account details of the poster, that information could be used to subpoena the ISP/device data of the poster, revealing who made the post.

I know we're down on lolsuits around here, but win or lose, that revelation would be an extinction level event for Vice's remaining shreds of credibility.

The current owners have absolutely not budgeted the brand managers for that kind of shit.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur, Knight of Utatanation, Gorton Colu and 6 others
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Chadikus Maximus, Charred Dinosaur, Knight of Utatanation and 14 others
Vibralldo said:
It's crazy that all that Kirsche needed to do was push back and the fags at vice bent the knee like the bitches they are

Fuck journoscum, fuck pedo trannies
Click to expand...
Now that most of these outlets have changed ownership like three or four times, the economics of defending litigation like this just don't work out for the current owners.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur, Knight of Utatanation, FlappyBat and 6 others
the_hidden_one said:
Looks like whoever is running Vice has no appetite for even a whiff of a potential lawsuit. I don't think I've seen them go into DFE mode this fast before.
Click to expand...
They are still fucked. She lost sponsors. She lost a substantial chunk of revenue. Easily provable. No apology. No admission of fault. No settlement offer. Vice has only partially cured the defamation going forward. They've done nothing to resolve the tortuous interference.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Charred Dinosaur, not william stenchever, Gorton Colu and 10 others
RodgerDodger said:
They are still fucked. She lost sponsors. She lost a substantial chunk of revenue. Easily provable. No apology. No admission of fault. No settlement offer. Vice has only partially cured the defamation going forward. They've done nothing to resolve the tortuous interference.
Click to expand...
The articles being pulled might help solve some of the problems. Maybe not. But lawsuits should be a last resort and can always go badly for the plaintiff.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Chadikus Maximus, Charred Dinosaur, Knight of Utatanation and 3 others
RodgerDodger said:
They've done nothing to resolve the tortuous interference.
Click to expand...
Tortious interference is for when someone fucks with a contract that they are not a party to, Kirsche didn't have a contract with CB. The only avenue she has is defamation and that, again, is not a good one in the US. Speech and expression have A LOT of legal protections, specifically against people trying to stifle it with litigation. You could strike defamation from the American lawbooks completely, and the amount of cases won by the person suing would barely change.

>then why is that appallachian wannabe-jew woman suing kiwifarms such a menace?
She did it all 'pro se' and 'in forma pauperis'
Pro Se: She represents herself, no lawyer involved. That means she doesn't have to pay a lawyer to represent her or do legal work for her.
In forma Pauperis: A special exemption where people don't have to pay court fees if they can prove they are poor enough. She is poor enough, as is Russell Greer.
If you combine both - which confusingly, US law does permit - then you can just file infinite bogus lawsuits 100% for free no matter how silly they sound, the courts HAVE to take it seriously and the other party HAS to legally respond to it or else you win by default. And because she sues lolcow llc and not Josh himself, he can't respond pro se to her pro se lawsuits, he HAS to pay a lawyer to do it every single time.

In theory, a single neet could single-handedly bankrupt Disney just by abusing this loophole.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: UnFuNnYmEmE, FlappyBat, Rotollo 2 and 7 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back