Kyle Rittenhouse Legal Proceedings - Come for the trial, stay for….

What do you think will happen?

  • Guilty on all charges

    Votes: 282 8.8%
  • Full Acquittal

    Votes: 1,077 33.7%
  • Mistral

    Votes: 264 8.3%
  • Mixture of verdicts

    Votes: 479 15.0%
  • Minecraft

    Votes: 213 6.7%
  • Roblox

    Votes: 132 4.1%
  • Runescape

    Votes: 203 6.3%
  • Somehow Guilty Of Two Mutually Exclusive Actions

    Votes: 514 16.1%
  • KYLE WILL SUBMIT TO BBC

    Votes: 35 1.1%

  • Total voters
    3,199
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
it limits pross to sd as well. but again, not sure why lacking an hd version would cause difficulties as POSO insinuates.
IIRC, it's not just SD. It's SD and cropped. The FBI likely removed footage of their pet glowies running around.

Here's the video I'm seeing shared around. Around 1:10, maybe 1:20 you can see what I can only presume is the Prosecution's desperate ploy to call Kyle "chasing" the guy. Which is reality just all of them rushing up to the happening (windows being smashed) at the car lot.
 
Last edited:
This thread is giving me flashbacks to the Chauvin trial thread. Everyone is, once again, huffing that hopium after seeing how obviously correct the defense is. As if facts and procedure matter in any way any more.

It's like nobody learned anything. The media declares who is and is not guilty. No exceptions.
Something's gotta give.
 
This thread is giving me flashbacks to the Chauvin trial thread. Everyone is, once again, huffing that hopium after seeing how obviously correct the defense is. As if facts and procedure matter in any way any more.

It's like nobody learned anything. The media declares who is and is not guilty. No exceptions.
The difference between the Chauvin case the visual media depicts Chauvin as the aggressor and in this Rittenhouse is getting chased, clubbed and guns pulled on him. The emotional side of the story is more favorable to Rittenhouse. Sadly Chauvin's trial required the jury to pay attention to a lot of technical details which would determine guilt or innocence and Nelson fucked up by allowing the Jury to be heavily populated by women -- many of whom have gone on to state that they ignored all of the technical stuff in favor of emotion based evidence. Rittenhouse benefits greatly from the massive amount of visual evidence and also many people are willing to operate as expert witness for him. Chauvin had to deal with the inability of his defense team to get expert witness and the prosecution had expert witness commit wholesale perjury. Both the Cardiologist and the Police Chief committed perjury, the cardiologist said ridiculous things like the heart would suddenly pump better blood if your left anterior descending artery was 90% blocked and the Police Chief lied about the knee not being part of training. Rittenhouse on the other hand has the wider 2nd amendment community rallying around him and will gladly act as expert witness because there is a belief if Rittenhouse is convicted on these charges the entire idea of self defense is defunct because his case is such a text book example of a self defense case.

Mind you, this doesn't discount incompetency on the defense lawyer's part. They can easily botch this fucking case.
 
Something's gotta give.
Chauvin's trial was one of the biggest legal shams in the past century. No one, not even the people who defended him most RL or online, have said a word about it. Justice is dead the second political interests get involved, and there's absolutely nothing anyone can do about it. We can only hope they feel like Chauvin being scapegoated is enough, or that Kyle gets locked up in some place relatively safe.
The difference between the Chauvin case the visual media depicts Chauvin as the aggressor and in this Rittenhouse is getting chased, clubbed and guns pulled on him. The emotional side of the story is more favorable to Rittenhouse. Sadly Chauvin's trial required the jury to pay attention to a lot of technical details which would determine guilt or innocence and Nelson fucked up by allowing the Jury to be heavily populated by women -- many of whom have gone on to state that they ignored all of the technical stuff in favor of emotion based evidence. Rittenhouse benefits greatly from the massive amount of visual evidence and also many people are willing to operate as expert witness for him. Chauvin had to deal with the inability of his defense team to get expert witness and the prosecution had expert witness commit wholesale perjury. Both the Cardiologist and the Police Chief committed perjury, the cardiologist said ridiculous things like the heart would suddenly pump better blood if your left anterior descending artery was 90% blocked and the Police Chief lied about the knee not being part of training. Rittenhouse on the other hand has the wider 2nd amendment community rallying around him and will gladly act as expert witness because there is a belief if Rittenhouse is convicted on these charges the entire idea of self defense is defunct because his case is such a text book example of a self defense case.
The only thing currently saving Kyle is no one can bring out the race card as easily as they did on Chauvin. Had Kyle so much as injured a black guy he'd have gotten life already, or the death penalty. Dunno about his state's laws. That said the media is very clearly trying to do the same shit they did back then: ignore the evidence, because this trial's about race, and if you ask for facts or reasoning, you're racist, you don't wanna be racist do you? There is a chance Kyle will get rightfully acquitted, namely because the jury doesn't have a murderous mob outside who politicians are openly encouraging to riot and attack them if they don't convict, but the media still has an inordinate influence over this case because of the circumstances of the attack. It's going to be up to how rational and brave the jury is more than anything else.
 
Last edited:
There is a chance Kyle will get rightfully acquitted, namely because the jury doesn't have a murderous mob outside who politicians are openly encouraging to riot and attack them if they don't convict, but the media still has an inordinate influence over this case because of the circumstances of the attack. It's going to be up to how rational and brave the jury is more than anything else.
But there IS protestors outside of the courthouse. Also its almost a given that Rittenhouse is not getting away cleanly from this, possession of the rifle is going to get a Guilty verdict, and apparently they rung Rittenhouse up for curfew violations as well. Both of which there is no way for the defense to get an acquittal on. It would effectively require them to argue that all of the video evidence is fake and gay and that Rittenhouse isn't in them, while arguing that the video evidence exonerates their client. The murder charges are the focus of this trial, the rest is pocket change convictions.
 
Did the Feds really just withhold evidence from the defense when requested and claim that the "tape" no longer exists when I'm sure they've got backups of that file all over the place. Surely this isn't legal, but since when do glowies play by the rules?

Sadly, they've been doing this shit since Waco. And almost certainly before then too.
 
I'm thinking the prosecution is intentionally sandbagging so when the jury comes out with a guilty verdict in 30 seconds it'll be more demoralizing to anyone who thinks this is a real trial.
I mean while this is a media circus everything they have done has backfired by legal means. Sometimes show trials have to keep up appearances and unlike with chauvin I don't see them able to squeeze a guilty verdict especially when the jury has more or less stayed quiet.
 
Also its almost a given that Rittenhouse is not getting away cleanly from this, possession of the rifle is going to get a Guilty verdict, and apparently they rung Rittenhouse up for curfew violations as well.
Both misdemeanors, and the sentencing is done by the judge in Wisconsin. If somebody offered me a plea deal of those two charges versus a dice roll with multiple felonies and a lifetime in prison I'd take the deal happily. Those two charges are nothing at all, by comparison.

We all want him to get Not Guilty on all charges, but I'll still celebrate if the jury cucks and 'compromises' with a guilty on the misdemeanor charges.
 
Chauvin's trial was one of the biggest legal shams in the past century. No one, not even the people who defended him most RL or online, have said a word about it.
I certainly did. I don't even think he was completely innocent of any wrongdoing, but the trial was an absolute disgrace.
 
Is there evidence of a form 4473? Wisconsin is one of the few states that I know of which still has the gun show loophole for any firearm. This means as long as both parties are Wisconsin residents, they can sell guns to each other as easily as baseball cards.
>One of the few states
Nigga
laws+map.png
 
>One of the few states
Nigga
View attachment 2683199
That map is practically a map to "cucked state" to "uncucked state" guide, with the usual suspects (New York and its friends, Colorado, Illinois, and the Left Coast being the cucks).

The difference between the Chauvin case the visual media depicts Chauvin as the aggressor and in this Rittenhouse is getting chased, clubbed and guns pulled on him. The emotional side of the story is more favorable to Rittenhouse. Sadly Chauvin's trial required the jury to pay attention to a lot of technical details which would determine guilt or innocence and Nelson fucked up by allowing the Jury to be heavily populated by women -- many of whom have gone on to state that they ignored all of the technical stuff in favor of emotion based evidence. Rittenhouse benefits greatly from the massive amount of visual evidence and also many people are willing to operate as expert witness for him. Chauvin had to deal with the inability of his defense team to get expert witness and the prosecution had expert witness commit wholesale perjury. Both the Cardiologist and the Police Chief committed perjury, the cardiologist said ridiculous things like the heart would suddenly pump better blood if your left anterior descending artery was 90% blocked and the Police Chief lied about the knee not being part of training. Rittenhouse on the other hand has the wider 2nd amendment community rallying around him and will gladly act as expert witness because there is a belief if Rittenhouse is convicted on these charges the entire idea of self defense is defunct because his case is such a text book example of a self defense case.

Mind you, this doesn't discount incompetency on the defense lawyer's part. They can easily botch this fucking case.

Chauvin was definitely fucked from the start, especially since the jury already had it out for him, and they already had the FBI's backup plan in the wings. From the get-go Rittenhouse is in a far better position--he wasn't the aggressor, his "victims" weren't black, the judge doesn't seem to be a bloodthirsty maniac, etc. etc.

So assuming everything goes "right"...defense doesn't fuck up, jury's not paid off or a bunch of goons waiting to rubberstamp the guilty verdict, and the FBI won't play secret police and arrest him anyway on "domestic terrorism", I'm guessing Rittenhouse will still have to eat some sort of weapons charge (resulting in a suspended sentence and/or community service, probably) and probably still get sued in civil court.

I think the FBI is the biggest wildcard in this, personally.
 
Is there any good videos on YouTube or something detailing the actual timeline of what happened during the shooting?
I try and look it up and all I get are hundreds of NYT and ABC news outlets leaving shit out that's been brought up in court and I just started looking into this
 
Something's gotta give.
Nobody is going to riot if this kid goes to prison, I wouldnt even expect a protest in the hundreds.

This is why black people have the upper hand lately, they always go nuts no matter if the guy was a complete piece of shit but whites wont defend one of their own, ever.
 
This thread is giving me flashbacks to the Chauvin trial thread. Everyone is, once again, huffing that hopium after seeing how obviously correct the defense is. As if facts and procedure matter in any way any more.

It's like nobody learned anything. The media declares who is and is not guilty. No exceptions.
This isn't the chauvin trial. Remember everyone early on who saw the video of Derrick chauvin could see it was almost minutes of him kneeling on the guys neck and screaming help. Sure it would have helped if we saw the whole footage immediately. No amount of programming can really change the minds of what Americans were forced to see.

When it comes to Kyle rittenhouse they're hoping you don't look into the case yourself. They want you to assume a narrative that he's racist white supremacist milita guy.

I see the judge not playing into the political game and someone disgusted with the corporate media trying to make a media circus out of everything.
View attachment 2683388
Reminder that town militias are better than the police and glowies in every way. They are seething because someone did their job better than them.
I mean in town militas are good at enforcing martial law or being deputized as backup for the law. But beyond that they're not good with due process that is a bullet/noose. We saw a failed lefty milita with Chaz with a more competent right wing one they still would face issues. The Soviet Unions police forces were the closest definition of "milita", doing police work. It's not a good idea for general law enforcement. but militas are a good deterrence against looters especially when they're armed.
 
Is there any good videos on YouTube or something detailing the actual timeline of what happened during the shooting?
I try and look it up and all I get are hundreds of NYT and ABC news outlets leaving shit out that's been brought up in court and I just started looking into this

This video is censored by Youtube so it wont come up on searches, almost all favorable content to Rittenhouse is censored so don't expect much if you search for it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back