Lake v Hobbs - Arizona Governor Race turns to Court (Stolen Election Electric Boogaloo 2)

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
gaystoner

gaystoner

Little People Big World
True & Honest Fan
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 27, 2020
So I'm sure I'm giving a 'biased' outlook but Day 1 Trial was yesterday and man some bombshells were dropped. Judge previously ruled 2 of the 10 Claims could go to trial and there would be 2 days of testimony.

1671718865931.png
1671718885782.png
1671718911694.png
1671718930765.png
1671718951520.png
1671718984552.png
1671719002118.png

1671719066987.png


General Gist: Judge heard from expert testimony that the defense (Hobbs) was unable to get removed from testifying showing there were issues with Chain of Custody and Tabulation along with Ballot making. They were all coherent and spoke softly on major problems they saw and essentially made Maricopa county look ridiculous/incapable.
 
Back me up! said:
What the end result through? What CAN the judge rule? That they have to do all the voting in Maricopa County again?
Click to expand...

That's what I'm seeing as well. I'm not sure because we haven't seen so many follow ups to 'they stole the election' in a legal sense. It's always been trial by media with the media being owned by globalist interest.

Kari Lake is a problem for the establishment because she's a known public face in Arizona alongside having intelligence/grace for public appearances. She doesn't need the establishment to coach her which is what makes what she's doing fascinating.
 
‘I mean yes we did all that and it obviously favored us but can you prove we meant to do it with intent to harm you? Even though us unfairly willing would be harm.’
- The Defence
 
Last edited:
Back me up! said:
What the end result through? What CAN the judge rule? That they have to do all the voting in Maricopa County again?
Click to expand...
Assuming it’s favorable to Lake, the judge could:
Declare that Lake won the election
Defer the election outcome to the state legislature (it’s Republican isn’t it? So Lake should win)
Redo the election entirely
Restrict or require certain election procedures in the future
 
Judge will do nothing. People in positions of power, like judges, hate rocking the boat. Everything must stay as it currently is.
God knows I wish it were different.
 
George Lucas said:
Assuming it’s favorable to Lake, the judge could:
Declare that Lake won the election
Defer the election outcome to the state legislature (it’s Republican isn’t it? So Lake should win)
Redo the election entirely
Restrict or require certain election procedures in the future
Click to expand...
It could be option 1 and 4 combined.
 
George Lucas said:
Assuming it’s favorable to Lake, the judge could:
Declare that Lake won the election
Defer the election outcome to the state legislature (it’s Republican isn’t it? So Lake should win)
Redo the election entirely
Restrict or require certain election procedures in the future
Click to expand...
If you expect anything other than 4 you're a fool. 3 is such a long shot that you would have better luck winning the powerball. 1 and 2 are totally out of the question. Kari Lake has to prove intent which is almost impossible with police powers that can do things like wiretap, its entirely impossible for a civilian to pull this off.
 
attractive_pneumonia said:
If you expect anything other than 4 you're a fool. 3 is such a long shot that you would have better luck winning the powerball. 1 and 2 are totally out of the question. Kari Lake has to prove intent which is almost impossible with police powers that can do things like wiretap, its entirely impossible for a civilian to pull this off.
Click to expand...
All four of these outcomes have happened in cases before. They’re all possibilities.
 
After the grifter free for all in maricopa county, why should anyone give a damn about this?
 
The dems will never EVER allow the possibility that the election being clearly stolen could be televised. Even a small election (compared to 2020 that is) being proven to be fraudulent would ruin the US's reputation officially. The DNC has beaten the term "Completely true and honest elections" to death and seeing the right proven correct would open pandora's box.
I predict the judge will be threatened persuaded to drop the case, even if damning evidence is found. Lake being allowed to win was never an option.
 
Tsukasa Kayoda said:
The dems will never EVER allow the possibility that the election being clearly stolen could be televised. Even a small election (compared to 2020 that is) being proven to be fraudulent would ruin the US's reputation officially.
Click to expand...
Unless they want to Throw a Republican out of office.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom