Lena Dunham - Fat, Child Molesting Attention Whore and Her Trainwreck of a Family

Lena Dunham, Sex-Cult Victim!

The lovely Ms. Dunham was the executive producer for Orgasm, Inc. (2022), a recently-released Netflix documentary about One Taste, a San Francisco-based sex cult that was attracting the attention of people like Gwyneth Paltrow a few years' back. According to Crazy Days and Nights, she bankrolled the doc because she'd been traumatized by their "fifteen-minute orgasm" clitoral-massage technique, and wanted revenge.
I watched the first thirty minutes of that doc before I thought I was going to be sick—not because of the content, but because of the delivery.

Just when you think they MIGHT start addressing how bizarre and dangerous Nicole Daedone’s practices were and what a blatantly manipulative sex fiend she is…nope. You could be forgiven for thinking the film was shining a positive light on her, much like The Goop Lab you brought up by Gwyneth Paltrow. The main interviewee reminded me of Skippy the Virgin in the way he talks about women and sex, and the footage of Daedone’s freaky sex seminars was just shoved in there with no commentary at all, if not positive. The whole thing (of what I saw) was like listening to someone describe a sexual assault but they’re fervently jacking it the whole time.

In related news:

A8E40DDC-53E8-4805-950B-DC4668E7EB35.jpeg

I never realized it until I saw this book at Barnes and Noble (don’t @ me, I love Jennette but reading is hard), but peep the endorsement to the right:

“An important cultural document.” —Lena Dunham

I guess my question is, whose five-star idea was it to slap an incestuous child molester’s review on a memoir about incestuous child molestation?
 
I watched the first thirty minutes of that doc before I thought I was going to be sick—not because of the content, but because of the delivery.

Just when you think they MIGHT start addressing how bizarre and dangerous Nicole Daedone’s practices were and what a blatantly manipulative sex fiend she is…nope. You could be forgiven for thinking the film was shining a positive light on her, much like The Goop Lab you brought up by Gwyneth Paltrow. The main interviewee reminded me of Skippy the Virgin in the way he talks about women and sex, and the footage of Daedone’s freaky sex seminars was just shoved in there with no commentary at all, if not positive. The whole thing (of what I saw) was like listening to someone describe a sexual assault but they’re fervently jacking it the whole time.
I saw it, and had similar impressions. My best guess is that the documentarians wanted to take what they believed was a neutral tone about all the sex-cult shenanigans, and let viewers make their own judgments. If you watch it all the way through, you'll see the tone change as blatantly cultish ideas and practices come into play, and the sociopathy of Daedone and her ideology start to claim victims.
 
I never realized it until I saw this book at Barnes and Noble (don’t @ me, I love Jennette but reading is hard), but peep the endorsement to the right:

“An important cultural document.” —Lena Dunham

I guess my question is, whose five-star idea was it to slap an incestuous child molester’s review on a memoir about incestuous child molestation?
It was enough to cancel her book tour. Pedolena for the last five years or so has been on the periphery of pop culture. You know she’s desperate to get back in but the opportunity just doesn’t exist. She still has those powerful connections like Judd Apatow who has over the last 20 years moved from a guy creating stoner comedies to one of the Hollywood elite. This guarantees that she will get trickles of pity work, even if it’s an awkward endorsement on a book.
 
I'm not going to watch that documentary, would someone tell me if the history of One Taste is covered? Specifically Daedone's connections with Vic Baranco and Morehouse, and RJ Testerman and the Welcomed Consensus?

and if anyone wants me to sperg about Bay Area sex cult history I might be available for this
 
I saw it, and had similar impressions. My best guess is that the documentarians wanted to take what they believed was a neutral tone about all the sex-cult shenanigans, and let viewers make their own judgments. If you watch it all the way through, you'll see the tone change as blatantly cultish ideas and practices come into play, and the sociopathy of Daedone and her ideology start to claim victims.
It's a common way to structure a documentary about cults or groups/people who hurt others. It's meant to help you understand how people could get involved in the first place and why so many people defend such groups (they seem so normal, etc)
 
First you had my interest, now you've got my attention.

Short version: a man named Vic Baranco had some kind of enlightenment experience in the 60s and convinced a bunch of hippies to buy and renovate property for him while diddling each other and teaching courses in how to diddle and how to think about diddling correctly. These properties are called Morehouses, which makes it confusing to google because you get a lot of stuff about the college.

A man named RJ Testerman took some Morehouse courses in the 80s and used the diddling info to exert more control over the women he was already abusing and to get more women to abuse. His organization is called the Welcomed Consensus; it has recently closed up shop under that name, but his daughters, Mallie and Ginger/ Gia Lynne Testerman, have already tried to sell themselves as sexperts completely disconnected from the organization and this will probably continue.

I don't remember the exact timeline for Daedone's interactions with both organizations, but I'm pretty sure she lived with both groups, and there's a story about her getting close to Baranco at the end of his life and trying to use this position to take over, but I don't know if it's true. However, all the sexual material in One Taste comes ultimately from Baranco, either directly from Morehouse courses or indirectly from Welcomed Consensus courses, which are copies of Morehouse courses.

A woman who was groomed and turned out by Testerman starting at 12 has written an excellent blog ,covering mostly her personal experiences, and also featuring some of the general history; it's worth reading but it's not linear. I thnk she talks about Daedone's residence at a Welcomed Consensus house in here, she definitely talks about her.


These organizations have a lot of overlap with Landmark Forum although there is no formal relationship. Another organization with a lot of overlap, and which does similar creepy sex stuff, is the Human Awareness Institute, but again there's no formal relationship. There's also overlap with Harvey Jackins' organization Re-evaluation Counseling, and members of the spinoff co-counseling groups from that group tend to take Morehouse or Morehouse-style sex courses.

Most people selling any information on any kind of deliberate orgasmic practice, or who do any kind of pleasure centered life coaching or selfhelp, got their stuff either directly from Baranco, from his associates, or from people like Testerman who use the material without attribution. The most famous example is probably Tim Ferriss who I think does acknowledge the source but I haven't read any of his stuff so I don't know for sure.

There are a number of podcasts who have done one-off episodes interviewing ex-members of these groups but unfortunately even the most wellmeaning podcasters get a little distracted by the freak show elements and tend to miss the specific sexual mind control elements; I think this is partially because we have been conditioned to associate increased sexual pleasure with liberation and the good life and regular people have a lot of cognitive dissonance when presented with coercive organizations that control via sexual pleasure instead of via denying sexual pleasure.

In the early days of One Taste in SF it was very clear to me that everyone would recognize it as a cult if the sex element were removed, but that people were giving them a pass because there was sex stuff. This is, of course, exactly what goes on with violent imagery and treatment of women - unacceptable unless it's for cooming - and similar to drag queen story hour type stuff - creepy sex pests near your kids are unacceptable unless it's somehow about gay rights.

There's also a lot of overlap with early Scientology, and organizations created and run by people purged early on by Hubbard, like the Berkeley Psychic Institute.

The connection between this stuff and MK Ultra is something I have pondered since I was a small barleyrugsoap and is left as an exercise to the reader.
 
Last edited:
I finally watched Tiny Furniture aside from some random clips. It was on YT, but got removed.

Did I like it? I didn't hate it. It was "good" in the sense that the dialogue is good and the plot exists and it's consistent. The problem is that the plot, specifically, it's the typical millenial story of a dumb person who just graduated college and has no idea of what to do with their diploma.

That's how the movie starts. Aura (Lena) comes back from college after graduating in Film Theory and she has no idea what to do. Not that she hasn't yet found a job: she says she doesn't know what to do. Despite the mom is a famous photographer, apparently she can't help her to find someone needing what Aura knows to do. I guess that the question is that even if she could, that's not what she wants to do... why did she even study that? She ends up working in a small restaurant as a hostess.

Most millenial movies are One-Shots basically. The plot is Aura resenting her sister, hooking up with a chef, and allowing some artist to crash at her mom's house because he had nowhere else to go. It ends when Aura has sex with the chef and goes home and tells her mom. We don't know what's gonna happen with her. She also loses her job. The climax is that Aura has been reading her mom's diary from when she was her age and she sees that her mom still hadn't figured out her life, apparently. "Oh, you're gonna be ok, Aura." The movie could be a diary entry on itself.

The final part is what made me laugh because, this is a woman who has no job, no future, no self-esteem, no freaking idea of what her life's gonna be and decides to have sex with a guy who has a girlfriend, unprotected. She's proving that Lena -no Aura- supports abortion because she's just experimenting and doesn't want to suffer any consequence of her own stupid decisions. She even tells her mom and she's like "oh, no, you should be careful". WTF, I would have punched my daughter for being such an idiot. What if the stupid guy had aids?

Overall, it's an ok movie. Lena knows how to write, but she was very limited. It's the kind of movie for hipster festivals, that's it. Girls has more development, but that's because it lasted for about five years.
 
Lena is a one-note hack (and pedophile) and Tiny Furniture was that one note. Lena’s career consists repeating that same Tiny Furniture concept over and over again. Now that her fanbase is at or approaching middle age, it’s little wonder she just gets pity work these days. If it wasn’t for her connections to guys like Judd Apatow, she would have nothing.
 
pedophile?
Armless, legless, lobotomized rapist. Well...in as far as the old lady was able to bounce Lena's torso up and down on the male protagonist's dick.

BTW: Honeydew is up on Youtube free (unless they took it down) and Tubi has it as well if you don't mind ads even with adblocker.
 
I predict Lena Dunham's Polly Pocket will be an hour talking about her relationship with her sister, including her overshared shameless sex life. The title comes from how Lena's sister squirrelled rocks in her vagina when she was a little girl, and the film will feature other tales strange and hideous.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: TVB
I predict Lena Dunham's Polly Pocket will be an hour talking about her relationship with her sister, including her overshared shameless sex life. The title comes from how Lena's sister squirrelled rocks in her vagina when she was a little girl, and the film will feature other tales strange and hideous.
Wait, what? Who is this and why hasn't it been shot yet?

EDIT: Okay, I've endured enough. Thanks for that disgustingly helpful work in this thread. I ask again, How is this still alive? How does it have a career?
 
Last edited:
Back