- Joined
- Aug 19, 2013
And I thought Chris-chan would have the most one-sided court case of 2015. At least one fat retard will atone for his crimes against common sence this year. 
Lolcow Leonard F. Shaner Jr. - Autistic Pedophile / Foamer / Shitlord
- Thread starter Zim
- Start date
- Status
I would love to join you, but sadly, I'm all the way on the other side of the country.
If you're able to allow train rides at CRR, know that us Kiwis that can't make it will be in spirit.Len why do you save your chimp outs for after I fall asleep? This is the last thing you should be saying to people. We genuinely want to know what your defense is and see the way you think. This is giving us some insight, but it's more fun to see the actual explanation itself.
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
Bring recording devices so you can capture the post trial chimp out after he follows you all there!
He'll be looking for more photographic proof of the Lenspiracy.
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2014
- Joined
- Feb 5, 2015
And now I feel a brief bout of legal clarification is in order:
No one gets charged with perjury. Basically ever. Unless the testimony was in a *major* criminal case, which the prosecution lost and the perjury can be conclusively proven.
In theory, yes. In practice, people never get time for these things. They get stern warnings and probation.
That said, if Len goes hog wild on the Lenspiracy the judge might make an exception and give him a month or two in lockup to straighten him out.
Won't be relevant for a preliminary hearing (see, e.g., the Nick Bate thread). And normally this wouldn't get to trial. Prosecution would offer a deal of probation and his attorney would take it.
That said, if Shaner is representing himself (as many people here seem to think), I could definitely see him forcing it to trial: "I wasn't trespassing! That train was speeding! I'll prove it! You're being paid off by Bob Lowe! No deals!"
And in that case -- depending on a host of factors -- it very well could become relevant. Normally, I'd say it still wouldn't be an issue because no one would actually be this stupid, but after 430 pages of this thread . . .
This was my initial reaction exactly. I don't see anything that could possibly be a property line in that photo, which means that Len had to be on CRR property when he took it.
Yep. Although, Len, you might as well give it a shot -- the judge might very well conclude that you ranting about speeding trains after he tells you to stop does in fact prove your innocence and isn't grounds for contempt.
It would be fun if judges cared about such things, but unless he says it in open court, it won't really matter.
I've seen a lot of batshit insane pro se litigants in my time, and it is extremely rare for them to be held in contempt. The gravity of the proceedings usually reins them in and the judge usually cuts them a good deal of slack because they're nuts. That said, after the past 430 pages, I'm not going to bet against the Shane Train making an unscheduled stop in the Montgomery County lockup.
It would be an honor to buy you a drink, @Pocket_Sand!
No one gets charged with perjury. Basically ever. Unless the testimony was in a *major* criminal case, which the prosecution lost and the perjury can be conclusively proven.
In theory, yes. In practice, people never get time for these things. They get stern warnings and probation.
That said, if Len goes hog wild on the Lenspiracy the judge might make an exception and give him a month or two in lockup to straighten him out.
Won't be relevant for a preliminary hearing (see, e.g., the Nick Bate thread). And normally this wouldn't get to trial. Prosecution would offer a deal of probation and his attorney would take it.
That said, if Shaner is representing himself (as many people here seem to think), I could definitely see him forcing it to trial: "I wasn't trespassing! That train was speeding! I'll prove it! You're being paid off by Bob Lowe! No deals!"
And in that case -- depending on a host of factors -- it very well could become relevant. Normally, I'd say it still wouldn't be an issue because no one would actually be this stupid, but after 430 pages of this thread . . .
This was my initial reaction exactly. I don't see anything that could possibly be a property line in that photo, which means that Len had to be on CRR property when he took it.
Yep. Although, Len, you might as well give it a shot -- the judge might very well conclude that you ranting about speeding trains after he tells you to stop does in fact prove your innocence and isn't grounds for contempt.
It would be fun if judges cared about such things, but unless he says it in open court, it won't really matter.
I've seen a lot of batshit insane pro se litigants in my time, and it is extremely rare for them to be held in contempt. The gravity of the proceedings usually reins them in and the judge usually cuts them a good deal of slack because they're nuts. That said, after the past 430 pages, I'm not going to bet against the Shane Train making an unscheduled stop in the Montgomery County lockup.
It would be an honor to buy you a drink, @Pocket_Sand!
- Joined
- Mar 25, 2015
This thread is probably a textbook example of how not to conduct yourself and what not to do prior to a court hearing. In about 400 pages, Len has:
Provided damning evidence proving him guilty.
Added several new charges to his initial accusation.
Associated his defense with evidence involving outside sources, namely us, that have absolutely nothing to do with the case at hand.
Acted like a total fucking idiot.
Provided damning evidence proving him guilty.
Added several new charges to his initial accusation.
Associated his defense with evidence involving outside sources, namely us, that have absolutely nothing to do with the case at hand.
Acted like a total fucking idiot.
The Red Baron
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2015
Oh, I see August 10 is a Monday. I have Mondays off. I may just have to make the drive.
@Pocket_Sand! - Your summation was beautiful, I can't add anything to it. It's funny how you could swap "Colebrookdale" for "Steamtown" or "WK&S". We've all seen this scenario play out before, but finally someone has the balls to take it to court.
Lenny Boy: The conspirators are everywhere. We could be the guy serving you fries at the drive through, the cop that drives by your house or the guy who picks up your trash. Be afraid.
@Pocket_Sand! - Your summation was beautiful, I can't add anything to it. It's funny how you could swap "Colebrookdale" for "Steamtown" or "WK&S". We've all seen this scenario play out before, but finally someone has the balls to take it to court.
Lenny Boy: The conspirators are everywhere. We could be the guy serving you fries at the drive through, the cop that drives by your house or the guy who picks up your trash. Be afraid.
- Joined
- Oct 13, 2014
Kiwi agents leaked all the trial info days ago. It's normally bad form to let the cat out of the bag, but the fix is in so solidly that there's nothing you can really do about it even when you know it's coming.
- Joined
- May 27, 2013
And now I feel a brief bout of legal clarification is in order:
No one gets charged with perjury. Basically ever. Unless the testimony was in a *major* criminal case, which the prosecution lost and the perjury can be conclusively proven.
In theory, yes. In practice, people never get time for these things. They get stern warnings and probation.
That said, if Len goes hog wild on the Lenspiracy the judge might make an exception and give him a month or two in lockup to straighten him out.
Won't be relevant for a preliminary hearing (see, e.g., the Nick Bate thread). And normally this wouldn't get to trial. Prosecution would offer a deal of probation and his attorney would take it.
That said, if Shaner is representing himself (as many people here seem to think), I could definitely see him forcing it to trial: "I wasn't trespassing! That train was speeding! I'll prove it! You're being paid off by Bob Lowe! No deals!"
And in that case -- depending on a host of factors -- it very well could become relevant. Normally, I'd say it still wouldn't be an issue because no one would actually be this stupid, but after 430 pages of this thread . . .
This was my initial reaction exactly. I don't see anything that could possibly be a property line in that photo, which means that Len had to be on CRR property when he took it.
Yep. Although, Len, you might as well give it a shot -- the judge might very well conclude that you ranting about speeding trains after he tells you to stop does in fact prove your innocence and isn't grounds for contempt.
It would be fun if judges cared about such things, but unless he says it in open court, it won't really matter.
I've seen a lot of batshit insane pro se litigants in my time, and it is extremely rare for them to be held in contempt. The gravity of the proceedings usually reins them in and the judge usually cuts them a good deal of slack because they're nuts. That said, after the past 430 pages, I'm not going to bet against the Shane Train making an unscheduled stop in the Montgomery County lockup.
It would be an honor to buy you a drink, @Pocket_Sand!
As much fun as it would be to see Leonard Shaner go off the rails (heh heh) I think he probably got himself a nice public defender and he'll just sit there like a good little autistic individual with his head down and take the plea bargain. He'll get some fine and probation and then probably just get mad again. Then we'll make fun of his criminal record and the thread will continue forever.
Last edited:
- Joined
- Jun 10, 2015
Ha he will get mad at his own stupidity, Is he ever going to realize that he brought this to himself. We are milking the LOL's from him.
- Joined
- Jun 7, 2014
Oh Len I can't wait to record your trail and drink your tears
Leonard F. Shaner Jr.
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2015
Frank Rizzo
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Nov 2, 2014
It's In The Bag!
The McDonald's you bought for lunch?
- Joined
- Jun 16, 2015
It's In The Bag!
Don't talk about Gloria like that.
- Joined
- Sep 17, 2014
I agree with this. Shaner is only a tough guy OTI. He's a pussy IRL.
Kirby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
It's In The Bag!
No, Lenny boy
The bag is empty.
As a matter of fact, there never even was a bag.
Just a dragon dildo.
Leonard F. Shaner Jr.
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2015
Kirby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 11, 2015
It's in the Bag !
It's in the Bag !
No, Lenny boy
The bag is empty.
As a matter of fact, there never even was a bag.
Just a pair of shit stained jorts and tube socks.
SonChu's Oil Change
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2014
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2015
Yeah, and if wishes were horses, we'd all be eating steak. Things do not become more true the more you repeat them, Len.It's in the Bag !
- Status