Lolcow Leonard F. Shaner Jr. - Autistic Pedophile / Foamer / Shitlord

Do you prefer Shaner to get permabanned?

  • Yes

    Votes: 63 36.6%
  • No

    Votes: 109 63.4%

  • Total voters
    172
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Someone mentioned ordering them. How much are they?

Edit: May have messed that up, looking again now. Nope had it right the first time.

Pennsylvania Code (2012).
The transcript rate is $1.25 per page of original typescript; except where a court or county provides all the copies, then the rate shall be not in excess of $2.00 per page of original typescript. The transcript copy rate is $0.30 per page for any complete and legible copy, if made at the reporter’s own expense. A reporter who uses an electronic audio recording device from which the transcript is made shall be paid at a rate of $0.25 per page of original typescript.

Just as a note, it does say on the order form that sharing the information isn't legal, unless one has consent.
 
Last edited:
Let's wait for the Kiwi legal team to weigh in before we open champagne corks, I'm not totally sure if this means he's actually locked up now.

Docket still lists Hy as his counsel, this is rather mysterious.
Oh, I know someone who will be drinking like a fish regardless.
grog.png

P.P., Esq. sez "why did you go with the crusty old senile ambulance chaser instead of me you dumb cunt"

Trust me, I'm a professional blowfish whisperer.
 
Hopefully someone was able to make it today, if no one could, I suppose I'll order a transcript to giggle over in private. maybe I'll get it Leatherbound as "The Adventures of Leonard The Dank Engine and Legal Eagle In Space Part 1: They're Not In Space Yet"
If you do order it, you gotta share with the rest of the thread. I doubt anything interesting actually happened, but you never know.
 
Ok, since it appears that Hy is actually representing Len, maybe the first thing Hy told him was to STFU and stop posting on the internet. I wonder if the conditions of his bail were to stop harassing people online and not talk about the case. Can a judge even order that? That would explain why Len hasn't shown up to gloat. I am curious that our Kiwi team hasn't reported in.

EDIT: @AN/ALR-56 If @Pocket_Sand! did choose to press charges against Len, it would be a separate hearing with its own dates and such. If Len does anything between now and September 30th to Curt, he risks not only trouble for that charge, but also having his bail invoked which means he's on the hook for at least $500 (the cost of a bail bond for $5000) or the whole amount, if the judge orders it paid in cash.
 
Ok, since it appears that Hy is actually representing Len, maybe the first thing Hy told him was to STFU and stop posting on the internet. I wonder if the conditions of his bail were to stop harassing people online and not talk about the case. Can a judge even order that? That would explain why Len hasn't shown up to gloat. I am curious that our Kiwi team hasn't reported in.

Hy should've just said bye.
 
Again, I'm not a lawyer, but something must have happened to turn what should have been a slap on the wrist pre-trial situation into full a full blown trial.

Either:
1) The Reckless endangerment charges were worse than we thought.
2) New information came out/all his police visits caught up with him
3) He went full rage mode in front of a judge
4) He represented himself pleading not guilty/his lawyer thinks he can win.

One, a combination, or all of those things likely happened.

What we know: He plead not guilty.

Edit: I assume any lawyer would tell him to STFU. Poor Pufferton.
 
Ok, since it appears that Hy is actually representing Len, maybe the first thing Hy told him was to STFU and stop posting on the internet. I wonder if the conditions of his bail were to stop harassing people online and not talk about the case. Can a judge even order that? That would explain why Len hasn't shown up to gloat. I am curious that our Kiwi team hasn't reported in.

A judge can put whatever conditions on bail he wants that aren't otherwise illegal for some reason. You don't have to agree with them, but they don't have to let you out on bail, either.

The default is you're supposed to get bail if there's no reason to think you won't show up for trial, but nobody is going to question "quit committing crimes" and "leave the victims alone" as conditions of bail.

We don't even know there are any conditions, but those two are generally implied.

Again, I'm not a lawyer, but something must have happened to turn what should have been a slap on the wrist pre-trial situation into full a full blown trial.

No, binding it over for trial is exactly what was supposed to happen at this hearing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back