- Joined
- Aug 8, 2020
So let's start with the basic foundational assumption that gender is a socially constructed phenomenon. Your gender is how society perceives you on a sexual basis. Most basic is that a man having sex with women is straight while a man having sex with men is gay (the inverse is obviously true for women). But what about children? If an adult has sex with a child, we don't really question the gender of the child. Instead we simply note that the child was fucked. A child fucker is not seen by society as either gay or straight, they are pedophiles. So I think it can be safely concluded that "child" is a gender in its own right. Though if we did care about the gender of the child, but still cared about the fact that they are children, then "male/female child" would be the socially assigned gender. Now we can get intersectional. "Gender" can now be seen as a combination of identities.
If you like to fuck fat people, you are a chubby chaser. So fatness is a gender as well. If you like fucking niggers, you are a coalburner/oildriller [or my preferred term: negrophile]. This makes blackness a gender in the context of sexual association. What about ugly people? Nobody wants to have sex with them. Perhaps ugliness can be seen as a sort of antigender where the association with sex is negative. Clearly there's a lot of fun to be had with such a simple assumption.
So... let's have some fun.
If you like to fuck fat people, you are a chubby chaser. So fatness is a gender as well. If you like fucking niggers, you are a coalburner/oildriller [or my preferred term: negrophile]. This makes blackness a gender in the context of sexual association. What about ugly people? Nobody wants to have sex with them. Perhaps ugliness can be seen as a sort of antigender where the association with sex is negative. Clearly there's a lot of fun to be had with such a simple assumption.
So... let's have some fun.
