🐱 “Libs of TikTok” repeatedly misgenders public figures and content creators in apparent violation of Twitter rules

CatParty


The viral Twitter account “Libs of TikTok” has misgendered at least 14 individuals in 15 of its tweets so far this year, in seeming violation of Twitter’s terms of service, according to a Media Matters review. As of April 13, the 15 tweets that misgendered individuals have received more than 113,000 total engagements.
Twitter’s Hateful Conduct Policy prohibits “targeted misgendering or deadnaming of transgender individuals.”
At least 11 of the individuals who were misgendered by “Libs of TikTok” list their pronouns directly on their TikTok or Twitter account or share their pronouns in their public content. And 3 individuals who were misgendered by the account are public figures whose pronouns have been identified both on public social media accounts and in the national press, including swimmer Lia Thomas and cyclist Emily Bridges. Of the 15 tweets, 11 are still live on the site; while 4 were taken down, 3 of them can be found on the Internet Archive. The 11 live tweets are still gaining interactions.
Of the tweets misgendering individuals, 7 were shared in March, an increase from the 5 posted between the beginning of January and end of February. The tweet with the least engagements (among those that were live for over 24 hours) still received over 1,500 likes, retweets, and replies.
The account also posts targeted attacks on transgender and gender-nonconforming social media users. This harassment includes claims that adults who teach children about LGBTQ identities are “abusive” and claims that being gender-nonconforming or an ally is a “mental illness,” at least one of which has been removed from Twitter for breaking terms of service. Libs of TikTok has also advocated for all openly LGBTQ teachers to be fired and called on its followers to contact schools that are allowing “boys in the girls bathrooms'' and “boys and girls sharing bedrooms on field trips” to express their hostility towards pro-LGBTQ rules.
 
Isn't Tucker one of the most popular tv shows at the moment? Because good job, twitter: now everybody's finding out what kind of freaks are not only allowed in the platform, but in their children's schools. Please, keep banning more people...

Is misgendering seriously listed in twitter's terms and conditions as a bannable offense?
imagen_2022-04-14_234318835.png
The whole TOS and Policy is retarded, childish, and anyone can tell these rules aren't equally enforced. It says "you can't say all [religious group] are terrorists" and we all know they mean Muslims because nobody's yet been banned for saying all Catholics are pedophiles.
 
The whole TOS and Policy is retarded, childish, and anyone can tell these rules aren't equally enforced. It says "you can't say all [religious group] are terrorists" and we all know they mean Muslims because nobody's yet been banned for saying all Catholics are pedophiles.

And Russophobia is not punished at all too, correct?
 
Vague keffals connection.
Alejandra should be kept on eye on. He's in Kate Strangio's circle and is in cahoots with Anthony Reed. He's gonna do something Keffals worthy that'll be farming a lot of content.

Also: Media Matters, IIRC, is owned by Soros or one of his multiple companies. It has a link to Open Society Foundation.
 
Not that exceptional. But it is a bit more deranged than the usual "fact check" groups. Yes, even that embezzler and hooker-fucker at Snopes.
It would be kind of funny for them to freak out. Snopes would be the first ones to collapse first then MMFA would be the last.
 
From groomer Daveneworld of either New York or Long Island
F2E06ADA-BB70-41C5-818D-8906369706A5.jpeg
And that cunt antifaoperativeCA310B4B-3A48-496B-8A1E-870F522AFC25.jpeg1A8E8C53-B8DB-44BF-B41F-B077CBD29B5F.jpeg

I know where you can shove that snickers beks and it’s up your pussy F8604B39-695E-4967-88DC-FA8D19DCA2A7.jpeg
 
Last edited:
They also don't bother to refute anything. They just seethe, cope, and dilate that other opinions exist.
Pretty much. Its more sad than anything, especially since David Brock is a shameless neocon grifter that hooked his fortunes to Hillary instead of pretending he was a Republican.
 
Pretty much. Its more sad than anything, especially since David Brock is a shameless neocon grifter that hooked his fortunes to Hillary instead of pretending he was a Republican.
In other word he was just as a bad the right
 
  • Like
Reactions: Nod Flenders
Back