life is shit, you are shit, kill yourself you filthy gamer - sincerely visa

[Evil Peter Griffin]

Chuds got mad when they censored Stellar Blade but soys didn't care and laugh at them. Now that loli incest rape simulator is banned from steam soys care. So chuds like big titty anime waifus and soys like loli/furry/incest. The porn preferences of these people are interesting.

 

[ArgonianVoter]

Chuds got mad when they censored Stellar Blade but soys didn't care and laugh at them. Now that loli incest rape simulator is banned from steam soys care. So chuds like big titty anime waifus and soys like loli/furry/incest. The porn preferences of these people are interesting.

it's not about porn my dude, the social taboo is always where censorship begins but never where it ends. look at block beard, look at kosa, this was never about pornography.

 

[ZMOT]

it's not about porn my dude, the social taboo is always where censorship begins but never where it ends. look at block beard, look at kosa, this was never about pornography.

"bro, just think of the children" says the dude talking about loli is always peak irony tho.

 

[ArgonianVoter]

https://youtu.be/k6WNWVJfXP8 we are being noticed. it's working, we need to go farther. we absolutely must have the fair access to banking act enacted and for KOSA+thes screen act to fail

 

[Xenomorphs Are Cute]

https://youtu.be/k6WNWVJfXP8 we are being noticed. it's working, we need to go farther. we absolutely must have the fair access to banking act enacted and for KOSA+thes screen act to fail

It starts at 3:00 & just to summarise what Trump has done here:

The order is meant to prevent banks using "reputational risks" as an excuse to delete whatever content they deem, once again, a "reputational risk".

MasterCard & Visa stated that the NSFW (& non-NSFW) games were getting removed because they posed a risk for their reputation, & even using their own rules as an excuse too, thus mitigating a customer's rights for purchase, which was a legal loophole.

The White House stated that no customer should have their right to purchase a product be taken away for vague reasons like "reputation risk" or anything similar. Banks now should use ACTUAL financial reasons to even request the removal of content, meaning that now, they will have no reason to leverage to as an excuse, thus completely killing their strategy of removing games just because they want to and just because apparently the reason for removal was true in their books.

Now if only Trump suddenly finds out about Stop Killing Games.

 

[skykiii]

Now if only Trump suddenly finds out about Stop Killing Games.

Before we go getting too optimistic, its worth remembering Trump has a personal stake--I saw a news article a few days back saying part of why he did it was because companies had tried to debank him on similar B.S. grounds.

Though, it's always possible he would care about Stop Killing Games, either because some part of him honestly cares about customers, or if nothing else just because supporting it would increase his "good guy" image.

And maybe I'm too cynical.

 

[Kane Lives]

Before we go getting too optimistic, its worth remembering Trump has a personal stake--I saw a news article a few days back saying part of why he did it was because companies had tried to debank him on similar B.S. grounds.

Though, it's always possible he would care about Stop Killing Games, either because some part of him honestly cares about customers, or if nothing else just because supporting it would increase his "good guy" image.

And maybe I'm too cynical.

Even if it's a cynical move to protect himself on his part, the important thing is that he's doing the right thing still. Nobody, from Drumpf all the way to the furry gooners of the internet should be debanked because a payment processor said so.