Business Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood. - Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office.

Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Reis Thebault
2025-06-26 19:08:13GMT

ca01.webp
The wardrobe department from a feature film production titled “Patel” at SirReel Studio Services in Los Angeles this month. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

LOS ANGELES — P.J. Byrne has acted in films and television shows across the country and around the world in the past few years — from New York to New Mexico, Ireland to Australia. But there’s one place he hasn’t worked lately: Hollywood.

Byrne moved to Los Angeles more than 25 years ago, traveling west like so many others to chase a career in the entertainment industry. He’s been among the lucky ones, landing steady pay and critical acclaim for roles in movies like “The Wolf of Wall Street” and “Babylon.”

Yet more and more, his acting jobs are taking him far from Tinseltown. He’s got plenty of company, too, as a trend fretfully dubbed “runaway production” only accelerates. Left behind is a Hollywood in crisis.

“We are an industry town,” Byrne said. “When we are not working, that means California is really hurting.”

Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office. Both big-name blockbusters and experimental indies have fled to other states and countries, looking for cheaper labor and more attractive tax incentives given studios cutbacks and rising costs.

The economic impact of this exodus extends far beyond actors, writers and directors. Hit hardest are the behind-the-scenes blue-collar workers — the makeup artists and set decorators, the drivers and dry cleaners — who were already struggling to survive in one of the nation’s most expensive metropolises.

Just as dispiriting is the downturn’s psychic toll. Hollywood is California’s most iconic export, as synonymous with the state as sunshine. It made Los Angeles a worldwide hub for artists and dreamers. But America’s fantasy factory is offshoring. Evidence is found in empty soundstages, prop houses selling off their stock, dwindling job opportunities.

ca02.webp
Billboards advertise TV shows along Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

“The industry is on a cliff edge, clinging by its fingernails,” said George Huang, a screenwriter, director and film professor at UCLA. “It feels like one more blow, even just a tiny feather on our shoulder, is going to send us careening down to our rocky deaths.”

Hollywood has weathered upheaval before, starting with the emergence of “talkies” in the late 1920s. And other locales, whether they be Vancouver’s “Hollywood North” or Atlanta’s “Y’allywood,” have for decades been luring productions away.

Still, this moment feels more precarious than ever. The pandemic shutdown, a pair of protracted labor strikes and January’s catastrophic wildfires all battered an industry already experiencing extreme disruption — falling box office revenue, empty theaters — in the streaming era.

ca03.webp
A director and crew film a ballroom scene for a 1927 film starring Hollywood actress Renée Adorée. (John Kobal Foundation/Getty Images)

The dire situation has attracted bipartisan attention, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Donald Trump, despite their deepening hostilities, in rare agreement that something must be done. “Hollywood is being destroyed,” the president declared last month.

And the push to reverse the slump has united a diverse range of industry insiders and dependents. Byrne is one of many advocating for an overhaul of the state’s tax credit program, which now lags far behind competitors.

“We’re not competing on an even playing field,” noted Byrne, who studied finance as well as theater in college. “We’re fighting over scraps at the table.”

The Los Angeles fires were a wake-up call, he said. His family evacuated their home, and he felt powerless to help. He was filming at the time — in Dublin.

How different things were when the first filmmakers from out east came to Los Angeles in the early 1900s. The prime attraction then: weather. They fled disruptive winters and found a place where they could shoot Westerns outside year-round.

A rush of studios soon set up shop, many of them in the sleepy teetotaling suburb known as Hollywood. City and industry grew up together, massive movie company lots sprawling just as Los Angeles swelled. Eventually, all but one major studio, Paramount Pictures, relocated to other parts of the region.

ca04.webp
Wes Bailey, founder and CEO of SirReel Studio Services, speaks with location manager John Rizzi, left, at SirReel’s production studios. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

But the name and symbolism of Hollywood, of dazzling stars on the silver screen, endured. Look no further than the famous sign — a towering, nine-letter advertisement for the industry — that has loomed over the city for a century. Look no further than the Walk of Fame, the Academy Awards and all the celebrations that still mark Los Angeles as the capital of the entertainment world.

“I don’t care what country you’re from or what language you speak, there’s one word that everybody understands, and that’s ‘Hollywood,’” said Donelle Dadigan, founder of the Hollywood Museum, an archive showcasing more than a hundred years of history.

For many, Los Angeles was long a default filming location, home to the most experienced crews and a vast industry infrastructure.

“When I started, I was only shooting in L.A.,” said Ram Bergman, a producer whose credits include “Knives Out” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi.”

Around the time Bergman arrived here in 1991, though, lawmakers elsewhere were rolling out plans to woo productions. By the early 2000s, the competition was in full swing, with states and countries trying to one-up each other.

For producers on tight budgets, California began making less financial sense.

“The studios, the streamers, the networks, they have less money to spend, but they still need shows, they still need movies, so how do you maximize the money?” said Bergman, who hasn’t filmed in Los Angeles for more than a decade. “It’s not even crossed my mind to film in L.A.”

Film tax credits, which production companies can sell or use to offset their tax liability, have a mixed track record, and some researchers have criticized them as a poor use of taxpayer money. They remain popular among legislatures, however, and have proved effective at pulling productions away from Los Angeles.

ca05.webp
Bailey, standing on a morgue set at his production studios, is part of a campaign to help reinvigorate the entertainment industry in Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Other states are stepping up their pursuits. In the past two months, lawmakers in New York and Texas earmarked hundreds of millions of additional dollars for their tax credit programs. Other countries, where labor costs are often lower, are doing the same, enticing a growing number of productions overseas.

Bill Mechanic, a former top executive at Paramount, Disney and Fox, is preparing to produce a film noir set in Los Angeles. He wants to shoot it locally — the genre has a rich history in L. A.— but he fears high costs may force him to go to Australia.

“You have a choice,” he said. “Do you want to make the movie, or do you not want to make the movie?”

Mechanic, a Michigan native, watched the decline of auto manufacturing in Detroit. He sees echoes in Los Angeles today.

California has its own tax credit program, but demand far exceeds the funding available. Newsom and state lawmakers are poised to raise that to $750 million annually, more than double the current level. Separately, the legislature is considering bills that would increase the tax credit’s base rate and allow more types of productions to be eligible for the program.

ca06.webp
Rizzi signs a wall of support for the #StayinLA campaign. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Some officials have criticized the proposals as Hollywood handouts, which come as the state tries to close a daunting budget deficit. Supporters argue the film industry is a boon for all of California, not just Los Angeles.

“We must meet this moment,” said Colleen Bell, a former TV producer and the executive director of the California Film Commission, a state agency. “If California lost the entertainment industry, we’d lose more than jobs. We’d lose a big part of who we are.”

In response to the ever more frantic calls from Hollywood, Newsom appealed last month to the White House for a federal tax credit that would help the United States remain competitive with other countries.

Trump has floated a very different solution: 100 percent tariffs on movies made overseas. The proposal blindsided many, who said it could send Hollywood into a death spiral. A White House spokesperson appeared to walk the idea back one day later, saying “no final decisions” had been made, and by this month the president was instead threatening the state with massive funding cuts and sending in National Guard troops and the Marines as protests erupted here over federal immigration detentions.

ca07.webp
Nancy Haigh, a set decorator with Oscars for her work on “Bugsy” and “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” says California must overhaul its tax incentive program to entice movie productions back to the state. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

These days, the mood in Los Angeles is sour.

“I’m not hopeful anymore, unfortunately,” said Nancy Haigh, who at 78 is one of the industry’s most decorated set decorators.

Haigh is a nine-time Oscar nominee and two-time winner. Her credits include “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” and “Forrest Gump.” She’s never gone so long without being approached with work.

“I’ve never not had my phone ring,” she said. “I’ve been very fortunate. I’ve had a wonderful career. But my phone hasn’t rung in a year.”

Contrary to Hollywood’s glamorous reputation, most in the business are middle class at best. The sustained downturn has pushed many workers into increasingly desperate situations. With savings depleted during the pandemic and strike slowdowns, they’ve turned to part-time jobs at restaurants and retailers. Some are living paycheck to paycheck. Some have lost health insurance. Some have moved away.

“A good portion of our membership has been chronically unemployed,” said Malakhi Simmons, the vice president of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 728, the union that represents lighting technicians.

January’s blazes, which tore through the communities of Pacific Palisades and Altadena, made matters worse. More than 1,000 entertainment union members lost their homes, Simmons said.

The devastation felt especially cruel given the many hopes that this would be a turnaround year. “Stay alive until ’25” had been a mantra in Hollywood; instead, barely one week in, the industry was dealt yet another blow as flames consumed entire neighborhoods.

“From a morale standpoint, it was just devastating,” Pamala Buzick Kim, a small-business owner and former talent representative who co-founded the #StayinLA campaign this spring.

In the aftermath, thousands signed the campaign’s petition calling on lawmakers to revamp the state tax incentive program and on studios to commit to increased production in Los Angeles over the next three years. Doing so, they argued, would be a crucial part of disaster recovery.

ca08.webp
“We are an industry town,” says actor P.J. Byrne, a longtime Angeleno who last year had a featured role in the Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown.” (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Byrne believes that bringing back productions would help offset the economic turmoil triggered by the wildfires. Rebuilding Los Angeles should extend to rebuilding the entertainment industry, the actor said. “This is the way to help heal our city.”

He wants to film in his adopted home, and he wants officials to make the process more affordable and less complex. In between jobs, he has appeared at rallies to promote changes to the tax credit program.

But he recently was back on set. In Toronto.
 
Expensive hot boring city that is a hollow shell of what it once was. Not surprising they're moving to other states (which they should have done from the getgo).

It's more then that. Hollywood been loosing it's cinematography skills. Practical effect skill's and even CGI has become lousier. Choreography, etc. Never mind directors and actors.
 
>make shit nobody wants to watch
>nobody watches it

Wow!
It's not about no one watching hollywood slop, it's that hollywood slop is increasingly no longer being produced in hollywood. California essentially priced themselves out of the industry that made any fucking money aside from Silicon Valley and they're leaving too.

Problem is that calishit actors then move to the states where production is growing and have started to turn them into blue shitholes i,e Georgia
 
Maybe they'd still have money if they didn't do everything in the most expensive and redundant way possible.

I saw a review of the Minecraft Movie side by side with a earlier draft version that had been leaked, and while that film made it's money back the petty little things that they reshoot, reedit or dub over actually make the released version of the film slightly worse in the most pointless ways. Everything is extravagant, insecure, over consulted, nobody knows what they're doing, or keeping track of anything. It's not really the front-line workers that are the problem, it's just a wave of mass incompetence from the top.
 
This has been a long time coming. When your visionary creators pull the ladder up after themselves, when you insult half of your audience to the point they are now openly cheering your demise, when you spend 20 years sloppily remaking your greatest hits and destroying them in the process, and when you demand every production be made with the most hated ideology in the country mixed in from the start, well, your industry is doomed. You have chosen death. There’s nothing you can do to stop it.

Watching Hollywood self-felt themselves is incredibly satisfying.
 
Last edited:
Weird. You mean a flood of recursive content that is algorithmically chosen and aggressively preys on nostalgia through reboots, franchise expansion and live action remakes maybe wasn't a sustainable business model? That maybe Hollywood could only squeeze that out of a single generation at best before the market became saturated and exhausted with seeing the same formulaic approach to IP and franchise universes? While simultaneously entertaining outrageous expense levels of operating costs in Cali and the absolute fucking RAPE of unions that lead to situations where entire productions can grind to a halt for hours because no one on set is allowed to move a fucking pin spot? And no one can find anyone to move that pin spot because the Union hand authorized to do so was a blue hair DEI who had a gender dysmorphia attack and is hiding in a dumpster behind the studio screeching about their penis?

Good. Much like the gaming industry, it needs to implode under its own weight and allow the next generation of studios to rise.
 
It's more then that. Hollywood been loosing it's cinematography skills. Practical effect skill's and even CGI has become lousier. Choreography, etc. Never mind directors and actors.
It's shocking how much worse everything has gotten.

Was watching a clip from Terminator the other day and it struck me just how bloated with bad CGI every single movie has become.

Film makers would rather just film all their scenes in a dark green-painted warehouse with just the live actors, and then digitally create everything else from the props to the background to the sky to the explosions to the panning shot and blur instead of lugging a camera 500' feet outside into the street and doing it there.

Resulting in an uncanny valley feel where everything looks like a video game cutscene because it comes off as supremely artificial and that washed-out color palate everyone uses so CGI integrates better? Just makes every film feel like it's got clinical depression too. With the colorful bits standing out even more as the CGI fakery they are.
 
Last edited:
Anything "fresh" they make is garbage, the endless remakes are all garbage. Hollywood can't die fast enough. Sail the high seas, don't give them a dime.
There hasn't been anything put out by Hollywood in the last decade that made me go out and spend money to go to the theatres. It's all remake and PC feelgood slop.
 
It's shocking how much worse everything has gotten.

Was watching a clip from Terminator the other day and it struck me just how bloated with bad CGI every single movie has become.

Film makers would rather just film all their scenes in a dark green-painted warehouse with just the live actors, and then digitally create everything else from the props to the background to the sky to the explosions to the panning shot and blur instead of lugging a camera 500' feet outside into the street and doing it there.

Resulting in an uncanny valley feel where everything looks like a video game cutscene because it comes off as supremely artificial and washed-out color palate everyone uses so CGI integrates better just makes every film feel like it's got clinical depression too. With the colorful bits standing out even more as the CGI fakery they are.
I was lucky enough to catch the 40th anniversary showing of The Terminator in a real movie theatre (it came out before I was born, so I never got to see it the way it was intended to be viewed until last year), and I have to say the stop motion effects at the end look WAY better on the big screen. I would go so far as to say that while it looks cheesy on a TV screen, it’s downright terrifying when viewed on the Big Screen. It was spectacular.

Practical effects and James Cameron from back when he gave a fuck are a formidable combination. Unfortunately for Hollywood, this is effectively lost technology - they won’t straighten up and fly right before the guys that know how to do it the old way die and take their expertise with them. Even if they wanted to go back to the old ways, they can’t hire them, because most of them are white.

It’s a shame, I enjoy the movies as an art form, but the last new American movie I went to was John Wick 4. It was… disappointing.
 
Last edited:
Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent
Bro they learned their lesson, c'mon bro the "woke" stuff is overblown, these are just normal working people trying to feed they famblies bro...

Also, the Iron Man replacement that just came out (brilliant Muh'Kwanzaa/MIT-educated female blacktivist is better than Tony Stark in every way, and the only Huwite-ish male in the show is the villain with a gaggle of dysgenic AIDS-enthusiasts):

1751033547444.webp
1751033757084.webp
tenor.gif
 
It's not coming back.

I think the article (and the people in it) are discounting modern technology, which I am admittedly not an expert in. I am of the understanding that cameras have gotten a lot smaller and lighter, allowing people to make movies in places that were prohibitive before.

It's so damn easy these days to film stuff on location with the occasional "let's plop in a background" scene.

It's so damn easy to use a drone and not a helicopter for an aerial shot.

I'm probably the only person here who saw "Tangerine" but it was made with an iPhone 10 years ago.

I think AI is gross but it's already being used for editing porn, among other uses.

Like I said, not an expert, but I can see how a hundred years ago, "The Wizard of Oz" required elaborate set creation, everything had to be edited by hand, all the effects had to be done with actual physical STUFF, the makeup was elaborate... thousands of people with really specialized skills needed to be on hand, and the whole thing had to be done in a cavernous indoor space. It's a classic for a reason, but everything looks like a set.

"LOST" was made 20 years ago on a beach in Hawaii and the filmmakers were like "Okay, you're in the middle of the jungle and that green sheet is a slave ship. React to it!" I'm sure there were a hundred people involved with every episode, but it feels a lot lighter than, say, "Wizard of Oz."

The Hollywood ship has sailed. The only reason to make a movie in LA is to make a movie set in LA.
 
2001: A Space Odyssey had a total development and production period of well over three years. That's a long time, even taking Kubrick's storied perfectionism into account. But it was clear that they gave a damn. They had to, because of the technological limitations. You produce overbudgeted, utterly forgettable garbage with paper thin characterization in a matter of months. The condescending, hamfisted political messaging is a whole other thing I don't feel like getting into. The garish, ugly CGI is the real star of your "films". When a movie nearly 60 years old looks better than just about everything today, well, that's pretty damning isn't it?
 
Last edited:
Many reasons why this is but I pin mostly two things

1- The "glamour" mystique of hollywood is over, being an actor isnt the invious position it once was as now, with social media, we can see 95% of actors, producers,writers and directors are all cunts. They say "never meet your heroes" and most of people met them.
2- Hollywood's power decreases as tech improves and people are being able to achieve things that couldnt be done years ago with "just" their phones and one or two specialized digital cameras. Im not a fan of AI but it also is a reminder of the tools people have at their disposal. Therefore, hollywood isnt the only dog in the game for the attention of the public anymore. Fan projects are being able to achieve near hollywood like results.

It's more then that. Hollywood been loosing it's cinematography skills. Practical effect skill's and even CGI has become lousier. Choreography, etc. Never mind directors and actors.

Practical effects are "practically" dead and comparing modern CG with the top ones from the late 90's and early 2000's really makes you wonder what the fuck went wrong because it aint a lack of tech now.
It's shocking how much worse everything has gotten.

Was watching a clip from Terminator the other day and it struck me just how bloated with bad CGI every single movie has become.

Film makers would rather just film all their scenes in a dark green-painted warehouse with just the live actors, and then digitally create everything else from the props to the background to the sky to the explosions to the panning shot and blur instead of lugging a camera 500' feet outside into the street and doing it there.

Resulting in an uncanny valley feel where everything looks like a video game cutscene because it comes off as supremely artificial and washed-out color palate everyone uses so CGI integrates better just makes every film feel like it's got clinical depression too. With the colorful bits standing out even more as the CGI fakery they are.

Practical effect always had a healthy effect on both the crew and audience because it is something THERE that everyone is suppose to project a personality onto.

I remember a story where Mark Hamill was going through some bad times on the set of Empire Strikes Back and Frank Oz actually started to use the Yoda puppet to "talk" to him, tell him jokes and cheer him up. Its small things like that.

With CG, they just gotta put a green stick there and say "thats the character, pretend its there". There is something just ugly about it all.

Then again, modern hollywood is a mockery of the art of cinema so its par for the course.
 
Back