Business Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood. - Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office.

Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Reis Thebault
2025-06-26 19:08:13GMT

ca01.webp
The wardrobe department from a feature film production titled “Patel” at SirReel Studio Services in Los Angeles this month. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

LOS ANGELES — P.J. Byrne has acted in films and television shows across the country and around the world in the past few years — from New York to New Mexico, Ireland to Australia. But there’s one place he hasn’t worked lately: Hollywood.

Byrne moved to Los Angeles more than 25 years ago, traveling west like so many others to chase a career in the entertainment industry. He’s been among the lucky ones, landing steady pay and critical acclaim for roles in movies like “The Wolf of Wall Street” and “Babylon.”

Yet more and more, his acting jobs are taking him far from Tinseltown. He’s got plenty of company, too, as a trend fretfully dubbed “runaway production” only accelerates. Left behind is a Hollywood in crisis.

“We are an industry town,” Byrne said. “When we are not working, that means California is really hurting.”

Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office. Both big-name blockbusters and experimental indies have fled to other states and countries, looking for cheaper labor and more attractive tax incentives given studios cutbacks and rising costs.

The economic impact of this exodus extends far beyond actors, writers and directors. Hit hardest are the behind-the-scenes blue-collar workers — the makeup artists and set decorators, the drivers and dry cleaners — who were already struggling to survive in one of the nation’s most expensive metropolises.

Just as dispiriting is the downturn’s psychic toll. Hollywood is California’s most iconic export, as synonymous with the state as sunshine. It made Los Angeles a worldwide hub for artists and dreamers. But America’s fantasy factory is offshoring. Evidence is found in empty soundstages, prop houses selling off their stock, dwindling job opportunities.

ca02.webp
Billboards advertise TV shows along Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

“The industry is on a cliff edge, clinging by its fingernails,” said George Huang, a screenwriter, director and film professor at UCLA. “It feels like one more blow, even just a tiny feather on our shoulder, is going to send us careening down to our rocky deaths.”

Hollywood has weathered upheaval before, starting with the emergence of “talkies” in the late 1920s. And other locales, whether they be Vancouver’s “Hollywood North” or Atlanta’s “Y’allywood,” have for decades been luring productions away.

Still, this moment feels more precarious than ever. The pandemic shutdown, a pair of protracted labor strikes and January’s catastrophic wildfires all battered an industry already experiencing extreme disruption — falling box office revenue, empty theaters — in the streaming era.

ca03.webp
A director and crew film a ballroom scene for a 1927 film starring Hollywood actress Renée Adorée. (John Kobal Foundation/Getty Images)

The dire situation has attracted bipartisan attention, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Donald Trump, despite their deepening hostilities, in rare agreement that something must be done. “Hollywood is being destroyed,” the president declared last month.

And the push to reverse the slump has united a diverse range of industry insiders and dependents. Byrne is one of many advocating for an overhaul of the state’s tax credit program, which now lags far behind competitors.

“We’re not competing on an even playing field,” noted Byrne, who studied finance as well as theater in college. “We’re fighting over scraps at the table.”

The Los Angeles fires were a wake-up call, he said. His family evacuated their home, and he felt powerless to help. He was filming at the time — in Dublin.

How different things were when the first filmmakers from out east came to Los Angeles in the early 1900s. The prime attraction then: weather. They fled disruptive winters and found a place where they could shoot Westerns outside year-round.

A rush of studios soon set up shop, many of them in the sleepy teetotaling suburb known as Hollywood. City and industry grew up together, massive movie company lots sprawling just as Los Angeles swelled. Eventually, all but one major studio, Paramount Pictures, relocated to other parts of the region.

ca04.webp
Wes Bailey, founder and CEO of SirReel Studio Services, speaks with location manager John Rizzi, left, at SirReel’s production studios. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

But the name and symbolism of Hollywood, of dazzling stars on the silver screen, endured. Look no further than the famous sign — a towering, nine-letter advertisement for the industry — that has loomed over the city for a century. Look no further than the Walk of Fame, the Academy Awards and all the celebrations that still mark Los Angeles as the capital of the entertainment world.

“I don’t care what country you’re from or what language you speak, there’s one word that everybody understands, and that’s ‘Hollywood,’” said Donelle Dadigan, founder of the Hollywood Museum, an archive showcasing more than a hundred years of history.

For many, Los Angeles was long a default filming location, home to the most experienced crews and a vast industry infrastructure.

“When I started, I was only shooting in L.A.,” said Ram Bergman, a producer whose credits include “Knives Out” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi.”

Around the time Bergman arrived here in 1991, though, lawmakers elsewhere were rolling out plans to woo productions. By the early 2000s, the competition was in full swing, with states and countries trying to one-up each other.

For producers on tight budgets, California began making less financial sense.

“The studios, the streamers, the networks, they have less money to spend, but they still need shows, they still need movies, so how do you maximize the money?” said Bergman, who hasn’t filmed in Los Angeles for more than a decade. “It’s not even crossed my mind to film in L.A.”

Film tax credits, which production companies can sell or use to offset their tax liability, have a mixed track record, and some researchers have criticized them as a poor use of taxpayer money. They remain popular among legislatures, however, and have proved effective at pulling productions away from Los Angeles.

ca05.webp
Bailey, standing on a morgue set at his production studios, is part of a campaign to help reinvigorate the entertainment industry in Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Other states are stepping up their pursuits. In the past two months, lawmakers in New York and Texas earmarked hundreds of millions of additional dollars for their tax credit programs. Other countries, where labor costs are often lower, are doing the same, enticing a growing number of productions overseas.

Bill Mechanic, a former top executive at Paramount, Disney and Fox, is preparing to produce a film noir set in Los Angeles. He wants to shoot it locally — the genre has a rich history in L. A.— but he fears high costs may force him to go to Australia.

“You have a choice,” he said. “Do you want to make the movie, or do you not want to make the movie?”

Mechanic, a Michigan native, watched the decline of auto manufacturing in Detroit. He sees echoes in Los Angeles today.

California has its own tax credit program, but demand far exceeds the funding available. Newsom and state lawmakers are poised to raise that to $750 million annually, more than double the current level. Separately, the legislature is considering bills that would increase the tax credit’s base rate and allow more types of productions to be eligible for the program.

ca06.webp
Rizzi signs a wall of support for the #StayinLA campaign. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Some officials have criticized the proposals as Hollywood handouts, which come as the state tries to close a daunting budget deficit. Supporters argue the film industry is a boon for all of California, not just Los Angeles.

“We must meet this moment,” said Colleen Bell, a former TV producer and the executive director of the California Film Commission, a state agency. “If California lost the entertainment industry, we’d lose more than jobs. We’d lose a big part of who we are.”

In response to the ever more frantic calls from Hollywood, Newsom appealed last month to the White House for a federal tax credit that would help the United States remain competitive with other countries.

Trump has floated a very different solution: 100 percent tariffs on movies made overseas. The proposal blindsided many, who said it could send Hollywood into a death spiral. A White House spokesperson appeared to walk the idea back one day later, saying “no final decisions” had been made, and by this month the president was instead threatening the state with massive funding cuts and sending in National Guard troops and the Marines as protests erupted here over federal immigration detentions.

ca07.webp
Nancy Haigh, a set decorator with Oscars for her work on “Bugsy” and “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” says California must overhaul its tax incentive program to entice movie productions back to the state. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

These days, the mood in Los Angeles is sour.

“I’m not hopeful anymore, unfortunately,” said Nancy Haigh, who at 78 is one of the industry’s most decorated set decorators.

Haigh is a nine-time Oscar nominee and two-time winner. Her credits include “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” and “Forrest Gump.” She’s never gone so long without being approached with work.

“I’ve never not had my phone ring,” she said. “I’ve been very fortunate. I’ve had a wonderful career. But my phone hasn’t rung in a year.”

Contrary to Hollywood’s glamorous reputation, most in the business are middle class at best. The sustained downturn has pushed many workers into increasingly desperate situations. With savings depleted during the pandemic and strike slowdowns, they’ve turned to part-time jobs at restaurants and retailers. Some are living paycheck to paycheck. Some have lost health insurance. Some have moved away.

“A good portion of our membership has been chronically unemployed,” said Malakhi Simmons, the vice president of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 728, the union that represents lighting technicians.

January’s blazes, which tore through the communities of Pacific Palisades and Altadena, made matters worse. More than 1,000 entertainment union members lost their homes, Simmons said.

The devastation felt especially cruel given the many hopes that this would be a turnaround year. “Stay alive until ’25” had been a mantra in Hollywood; instead, barely one week in, the industry was dealt yet another blow as flames consumed entire neighborhoods.

“From a morale standpoint, it was just devastating,” Pamala Buzick Kim, a small-business owner and former talent representative who co-founded the #StayinLA campaign this spring.

In the aftermath, thousands signed the campaign’s petition calling on lawmakers to revamp the state tax incentive program and on studios to commit to increased production in Los Angeles over the next three years. Doing so, they argued, would be a crucial part of disaster recovery.

ca08.webp
“We are an industry town,” says actor P.J. Byrne, a longtime Angeleno who last year had a featured role in the Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown.” (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Byrne believes that bringing back productions would help offset the economic turmoil triggered by the wildfires. Rebuilding Los Angeles should extend to rebuilding the entertainment industry, the actor said. “This is the way to help heal our city.”

He wants to film in his adopted home, and he wants officials to make the process more affordable and less complex. In between jobs, he has appeared at rallies to promote changes to the tax credit program.

But he recently was back on set. In Toronto.
 
Byrne is one of many advocating for an overhaul of the state’s tax credit program, which now lags far behind competitors.
> "You have to bring back more Hollywood productions, or the economy will suffer!
> "You have to give us tax payer money, or Hollywood can't afford to make all these unprofitable movies!

Try to making profitable movies people actually want to watch, and don't spend 500 percent more money than you need to. Or learn to code.
Look no further than the famous sign — a towering, nine-letter advertisement for the industry — that has loomed over the city for a century.
Remember all the people online hoping to see that sign to burn in the fires? That ought to be a clue.
 
- The "glamour" mystique of hollywood is over, being an actor isnt the invious position it once was as now, with social media, we can see 95% of actors, producers,writers and directors are all cunts. They say "never meet your heroes" and most of people met them.
You sound like me. Hollywood has long lost its glamour since it transitioned from monochrome to color. Actors and actresses love to preach to you rather than perform an escape into storytelling. What new can you do with cinema that hasn't been done since?
 
It's more then that. Hollywood been loosing it's cinematography skills. Practical effect skill's and even CGI has become lousier. Choreography, etc. Never mind directors and actors.
Fun fact, a LARGE % of modern action scenes in Hollywood (especially Netflix) productions are directed by the same exact 10-12 second unit directors now because they're cheap.....

This is why so many action movies feel the EXACT same.

So new talent isn't cultivated and existing talent is flogged.
It's not about no one watching hollywood slop, it's that hollywood slop is increasingly no longer being produced in hollywood. California essentially priced themselves out of the industry that made any fucking money aside from Silicon Valley and they're leaving too.

Problem is that calishit actors then move to the states where production is growing and have started to turn them into blue shitholes i,e Georgia
This. Most of what Hollywood makes is literally unwatchable SHIT.

Meanwhile you can make the exact same shit elsewhere for cheaper ....
Maybe they'd still have money if they didn't do everything in the most expensive and redundant way possible.

I saw a review of the Minecraft Movie side by side with a earlier draft version that had been leaked, and while that film made it's money back the petty little things that they reshoot, reedit or dub over actually make the released version of the film slightly worse in the most pointless ways. Everything is extravagant, insecure, over consulted, nobody knows what they're doing, or keeping track of anything. It's not really the front-line workers that are the problem, it's just a wave of mass incompetence from the top.
That's because everyone wants a piece of the pie eg to be a "producer" or "executive producer". Those are literally make work "jobs" for friends and family of studio executives and A and B list actors.
It's shocking how much worse everything has gotten.

Was watching a clip from Terminator the other day and it struck me just how bloated with bad CGI every single movie has become.

Film makers would rather just film all their scenes in a dark green-painted warehouse with just the live actors, and then digitally create everything else from the props to the background to the sky to the explosions to the panning shot and blur instead of lugging a camera 500' feet outside into the street and doing it there.

Resulting in an uncanny valley feel where everything looks like a video game cutscene because it comes off as supremely artificial and washed-out color palate everyone uses so CGI integrates better just makes every film feel like it's got clinical depression too. With the colorful bits standing out even more as the CGI fakery they are.
Yep. In camera effects will always look good.

I rewatched RoboCop recently and that shit looked outstanding.
 
There hasn't been anything put out by Hollywood in the last decade that made me go out and spend money to go to the theatres. It's all remake and PC feelgood slop.
I sometimes think I should go see the new [Insert CGI Heavy Franchise Installation Here], but then I remember that Theaters are fine charging people $20 for a fountain drink and stale popcorn. Then I remember I have a VPN, a Plex server and a small amount of patience to just wait a few weeks for a good rip of it to appear.

I still to this day point to The Phantom Menace as the beginning of the end of Hollywood. It's been a hard, 25 year downhill slide since Jar Jar Binks brought merchandising ebonics speak to our big screens.
 
I saw a review of the Minecraft Movie side by side with a earlier draft version that had been leaked, and while that film made it's money back the petty little things that they reshoot, reedit or dub over actually make the released version of the film slightly worse in the most pointless ways.
Can you elaborate?
 
a once vibrant city that produced high quality goods going through a death spiral caused by competition overseas and quickly decreasing quality of their product, leading to businesses and the middle class fleeing for better opportunities? i can't imagine what they must be going through. this must be the first time this has happened in American history
 
. Unfortunately for Hollywood, this is effectively lost technology -
Convincing miniatures and models are truly a lost art, infuriating to me because I've done model railroads, I know how hard it is to make it work.

But now that you mentioned Cameron - the dropship crash in Aliens? Or the destruction of LA by nuke in T2? Jaw-dropping, and still hold up.

Because they were tightly-shot and only in view for seconds and were all extensive miniatures, that obeyed physics and didn't trip your minds' 'something isn't' right here" alarm.

The modern day urge to show too much CGI for too long? Completely ruins the effect.

And it's not just models, there are plenty of full-scale practical effects rendered obsolete because "we can just use CGI for that".

Nobody would ever attempt this scene today with an actual trained animal:


They'd try to use a fake one. And despite all our tech? And even with millions spent on post production erasing of wires and whatnot? It'd come out like shit.
 
In response to the ever more frantic calls from Hollywood, Newsom appealed last month to the White House for a federal tax credit that would help the United States remain competitive with other countries.
oh nooo what's the matter California??? is that $40bn economy you keep bragging about built on smoke and mirrors??? I don't think you need a tax break, I think you need to have more wealth redistributed to poorer states like Mississippi and North Dakota, since you're all in favour of that shit.

This must be accelerating lately because we've had at least two articles about it, yet it's been going on since the 70s. I remember Ahhnuld The Governator being pissed about the number of movies using Toronto as a stand-in for NYC.
I still to this day point to The Phantom Menace as the beginning of the end of Hollywood. It's been a hard, 25 year downhill slide since Jar Jar Binks brought merchandising ebonics speak to our big screens.
Technically it would be Sorcerer, if you want the beginning. It's not a bad movie (Friedkin definitely should've cut some scenes and extended others) but it flopped for a variety of reasons (advertising problems and being released just ahead of the first Star Wars). It marks the death of auteur-driven big tentpole movies and the beginning of studios starting to push the director aside and focus-group the shit out of movies.
 
Technically it would be Sorcerer, if you want the beginning. It's not a bad movie (Friedkin definitely should've cut some scenes and extended others) but it flopped for a variety of reasons (advertising problems and being released just ahead of the first Star Wars). It marks the death of auteur-driven big tentpole movies and the beginning of studios starting to push the director aside and focus-group the shit out of movies.
To be fair? There were a LOT of bombs in that period by auteur excess..... Critical Drinker just did a little piece on the disaster that was Heaven's Gate, which is another film that frequently gets the blame for "ruining the Director-led era of Hollywood".

The problem I think is less "they're focus-testing the film to a random test audience after it's made" and more "they're focus-testing the film to woke people predisposed to like it before they're even done with it"
 
The funny thing is any of the studios could probably start turning things around by shitcanning one $500 million boondoggle and instead making 50-100 $5-10 million movies. If you permit any creativity, at least a few of them will take off, and you can get some new directors into the system. You can cater to a niche audience, too. Hell, Godzilla minus one, the best film of the past 2 years, only cost like $12 million. (The Japanese made it, so production wasn’t fucked by the unions)

This won’t happen because the exorbitant price tag is for overpriced actors and rampant embezzlement by studio management and price gouging by unions.
 
Last edited:
The funny thing is any of the studios could probably start turning things around by shitcanning one $500 million boondoggle and instead making 50-100 $5-10 million movies. If you permit any creativity, at least a few of them will take off, and you can get some new directors into the system. You can cater to a niche audience, too. Hell, Godzilla minus one, the best film of the past 2 years, only cost like $12 million.

This won’t happen because the exorbitant price tag is for overpriced actors and rampant embezzlement by studio management.
$5 million won't even pay for the IATSE contract these days. Hope you don't mind being spit on and called a scab by a bunch of low talent blue hairs who get paid $50 an hour to stand in one spot until someone needs something taped to the floor and call themselves artists.
 
The funny thing is any of the studios could probably start turning things around by shitcanning one $500 million boondoggle and instead making 50-100 $5-10 million movies. If you permit any creativity, at least a few of them will take off, and you can get some new directors into the system. You can cater to a niche audience, too. Hell, Godzilla minus one, the best film of the past 2 years, only cost like $12 million.

This won’t happen because the exorbitant price tag is for overpriced actors and rampant embezzlement by studio management.
Oh God yes, the number of small movie genres that have gone extinct because they couldn't be blockbuster-ized and sequalized? Makes me sick sometimes.

Going down my internal list of favorite movies? And remembering when things like mid-tier-budget comedies ( think UHF or LiarLiar) would have a couple installments a year? But are completely gone today? It's depressing.

Hollywood's transition to the "Perpetual blockbuster-as-service" model has been a disaster for humanity.

$5 million won't even pay for the IATSE contract these days. Hope you don't mind being spit on and called a scab by a bunch of low talent blue hairs who get paid $50 an hour to stand in one spot until someone needs something taped to the floor and call themselves artists.
And sometimes they forget to unload the guns when acting as the official set armorer because they were too busy adjusting their nose rings.... and someone gets shot by a live round and dies.
 
$5 million won't even pay for the IATSE contract these days. Hope you don't mind being spit on and called a scab by a bunch of low talent blue hairs who get paid $50 an hour to stand in one spot until someone needs something taped to the floor and call themselves artists.
That’s true. IATSE, the screen writers guild and the film actors guild need to go away though, they have strangled America’s entertainment industries.

Given how there’s nobody left in Hollywood who is openly right wing and will tell the unions to eat shit, this problem can’t be solved either.

Studios are going for cheaper movies though, notice how many horror pictures there are recently.
 
That’s true. IATSE, the screen writers guild and the film actors guild need to go away though, they have strangled America’s entertainment industries.
This right here. Eliminate SAG and the writers guild and a large part of what's holding hollywood back disappears. It's an incestuous club and it stifles ideas and newcomers who don't toe the line. Indie films are only just now starting to take off and shift the narrative but the unions still have an iron grip on the industry
 
The economic impact of this exodus extends far beyond actors, writers and directors. Hit hardest are the behind-the-scenes blue-collar workers — the makeup artists and set decorators, the drivers and dry cleaners — who were already struggling to survive in one of the nation’s most expensive metropolises.
Allow me to extend them the same empathy they extended to the people Joe Biden fired on his first day by banning fracking in the bible belt.
 
Back