Business Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood. - Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office.

Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Reis Thebault
2025-06-26 19:08:13GMT

ca01.webp
The wardrobe department from a feature film production titled “Patel” at SirReel Studio Services in Los Angeles this month. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

LOS ANGELES — P.J. Byrne has acted in films and television shows across the country and around the world in the past few years — from New York to New Mexico, Ireland to Australia. But there’s one place he hasn’t worked lately: Hollywood.

Byrne moved to Los Angeles more than 25 years ago, traveling west like so many others to chase a career in the entertainment industry. He’s been among the lucky ones, landing steady pay and critical acclaim for roles in movies like “The Wolf of Wall Street” and “Babylon.”

Yet more and more, his acting jobs are taking him far from Tinseltown. He’s got plenty of company, too, as a trend fretfully dubbed “runaway production” only accelerates. Left behind is a Hollywood in crisis.

“We are an industry town,” Byrne said. “When we are not working, that means California is really hurting.”

Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office. Both big-name blockbusters and experimental indies have fled to other states and countries, looking for cheaper labor and more attractive tax incentives given studios cutbacks and rising costs.

The economic impact of this exodus extends far beyond actors, writers and directors. Hit hardest are the behind-the-scenes blue-collar workers — the makeup artists and set decorators, the drivers and dry cleaners — who were already struggling to survive in one of the nation’s most expensive metropolises.

Just as dispiriting is the downturn’s psychic toll. Hollywood is California’s most iconic export, as synonymous with the state as sunshine. It made Los Angeles a worldwide hub for artists and dreamers. But America’s fantasy factory is offshoring. Evidence is found in empty soundstages, prop houses selling off their stock, dwindling job opportunities.

ca02.webp
Billboards advertise TV shows along Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

“The industry is on a cliff edge, clinging by its fingernails,” said George Huang, a screenwriter, director and film professor at UCLA. “It feels like one more blow, even just a tiny feather on our shoulder, is going to send us careening down to our rocky deaths.”

Hollywood has weathered upheaval before, starting with the emergence of “talkies” in the late 1920s. And other locales, whether they be Vancouver’s “Hollywood North” or Atlanta’s “Y’allywood,” have for decades been luring productions away.

Still, this moment feels more precarious than ever. The pandemic shutdown, a pair of protracted labor strikes and January’s catastrophic wildfires all battered an industry already experiencing extreme disruption — falling box office revenue, empty theaters — in the streaming era.

ca03.webp
A director and crew film a ballroom scene for a 1927 film starring Hollywood actress Renée Adorée. (John Kobal Foundation/Getty Images)

The dire situation has attracted bipartisan attention, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Donald Trump, despite their deepening hostilities, in rare agreement that something must be done. “Hollywood is being destroyed,” the president declared last month.

And the push to reverse the slump has united a diverse range of industry insiders and dependents. Byrne is one of many advocating for an overhaul of the state’s tax credit program, which now lags far behind competitors.

“We’re not competing on an even playing field,” noted Byrne, who studied finance as well as theater in college. “We’re fighting over scraps at the table.”

The Los Angeles fires were a wake-up call, he said. His family evacuated their home, and he felt powerless to help. He was filming at the time — in Dublin.

How different things were when the first filmmakers from out east came to Los Angeles in the early 1900s. The prime attraction then: weather. They fled disruptive winters and found a place where they could shoot Westerns outside year-round.

A rush of studios soon set up shop, many of them in the sleepy teetotaling suburb known as Hollywood. City and industry grew up together, massive movie company lots sprawling just as Los Angeles swelled. Eventually, all but one major studio, Paramount Pictures, relocated to other parts of the region.

ca04.webp
Wes Bailey, founder and CEO of SirReel Studio Services, speaks with location manager John Rizzi, left, at SirReel’s production studios. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

But the name and symbolism of Hollywood, of dazzling stars on the silver screen, endured. Look no further than the famous sign — a towering, nine-letter advertisement for the industry — that has loomed over the city for a century. Look no further than the Walk of Fame, the Academy Awards and all the celebrations that still mark Los Angeles as the capital of the entertainment world.

“I don’t care what country you’re from or what language you speak, there’s one word that everybody understands, and that’s ‘Hollywood,’” said Donelle Dadigan, founder of the Hollywood Museum, an archive showcasing more than a hundred years of history.

For many, Los Angeles was long a default filming location, home to the most experienced crews and a vast industry infrastructure.

“When I started, I was only shooting in L.A.,” said Ram Bergman, a producer whose credits include “Knives Out” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi.”

Around the time Bergman arrived here in 1991, though, lawmakers elsewhere were rolling out plans to woo productions. By the early 2000s, the competition was in full swing, with states and countries trying to one-up each other.

For producers on tight budgets, California began making less financial sense.

“The studios, the streamers, the networks, they have less money to spend, but they still need shows, they still need movies, so how do you maximize the money?” said Bergman, who hasn’t filmed in Los Angeles for more than a decade. “It’s not even crossed my mind to film in L.A.”

Film tax credits, which production companies can sell or use to offset their tax liability, have a mixed track record, and some researchers have criticized them as a poor use of taxpayer money. They remain popular among legislatures, however, and have proved effective at pulling productions away from Los Angeles.

ca05.webp
Bailey, standing on a morgue set at his production studios, is part of a campaign to help reinvigorate the entertainment industry in Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Other states are stepping up their pursuits. In the past two months, lawmakers in New York and Texas earmarked hundreds of millions of additional dollars for their tax credit programs. Other countries, where labor costs are often lower, are doing the same, enticing a growing number of productions overseas.

Bill Mechanic, a former top executive at Paramount, Disney and Fox, is preparing to produce a film noir set in Los Angeles. He wants to shoot it locally — the genre has a rich history in L. A.— but he fears high costs may force him to go to Australia.

“You have a choice,” he said. “Do you want to make the movie, or do you not want to make the movie?”

Mechanic, a Michigan native, watched the decline of auto manufacturing in Detroit. He sees echoes in Los Angeles today.

California has its own tax credit program, but demand far exceeds the funding available. Newsom and state lawmakers are poised to raise that to $750 million annually, more than double the current level. Separately, the legislature is considering bills that would increase the tax credit’s base rate and allow more types of productions to be eligible for the program.

ca06.webp
Rizzi signs a wall of support for the #StayinLA campaign. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Some officials have criticized the proposals as Hollywood handouts, which come as the state tries to close a daunting budget deficit. Supporters argue the film industry is a boon for all of California, not just Los Angeles.

“We must meet this moment,” said Colleen Bell, a former TV producer and the executive director of the California Film Commission, a state agency. “If California lost the entertainment industry, we’d lose more than jobs. We’d lose a big part of who we are.”

In response to the ever more frantic calls from Hollywood, Newsom appealed last month to the White House for a federal tax credit that would help the United States remain competitive with other countries.

Trump has floated a very different solution: 100 percent tariffs on movies made overseas. The proposal blindsided many, who said it could send Hollywood into a death spiral. A White House spokesperson appeared to walk the idea back one day later, saying “no final decisions” had been made, and by this month the president was instead threatening the state with massive funding cuts and sending in National Guard troops and the Marines as protests erupted here over federal immigration detentions.

ca07.webp
Nancy Haigh, a set decorator with Oscars for her work on “Bugsy” and “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” says California must overhaul its tax incentive program to entice movie productions back to the state. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

These days, the mood in Los Angeles is sour.

“I’m not hopeful anymore, unfortunately,” said Nancy Haigh, who at 78 is one of the industry’s most decorated set decorators.

Haigh is a nine-time Oscar nominee and two-time winner. Her credits include “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” and “Forrest Gump.” She’s never gone so long without being approached with work.

“I’ve never not had my phone ring,” she said. “I’ve been very fortunate. I’ve had a wonderful career. But my phone hasn’t rung in a year.”

Contrary to Hollywood’s glamorous reputation, most in the business are middle class at best. The sustained downturn has pushed many workers into increasingly desperate situations. With savings depleted during the pandemic and strike slowdowns, they’ve turned to part-time jobs at restaurants and retailers. Some are living paycheck to paycheck. Some have lost health insurance. Some have moved away.

“A good portion of our membership has been chronically unemployed,” said Malakhi Simmons, the vice president of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 728, the union that represents lighting technicians.

January’s blazes, which tore through the communities of Pacific Palisades and Altadena, made matters worse. More than 1,000 entertainment union members lost their homes, Simmons said.

The devastation felt especially cruel given the many hopes that this would be a turnaround year. “Stay alive until ’25” had been a mantra in Hollywood; instead, barely one week in, the industry was dealt yet another blow as flames consumed entire neighborhoods.

“From a morale standpoint, it was just devastating,” Pamala Buzick Kim, a small-business owner and former talent representative who co-founded the #StayinLA campaign this spring.

In the aftermath, thousands signed the campaign’s petition calling on lawmakers to revamp the state tax incentive program and on studios to commit to increased production in Los Angeles over the next three years. Doing so, they argued, would be a crucial part of disaster recovery.

ca08.webp
“We are an industry town,” says actor P.J. Byrne, a longtime Angeleno who last year had a featured role in the Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown.” (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Byrne believes that bringing back productions would help offset the economic turmoil triggered by the wildfires. Rebuilding Los Angeles should extend to rebuilding the entertainment industry, the actor said. “This is the way to help heal our city.”

He wants to film in his adopted home, and he wants officials to make the process more affordable and less complex. In between jobs, he has appeared at rallies to promote changes to the tax credit program.

But he recently was back on set. In Toronto.
 
The "glamour" mystique of hollywood is over, being an actor isnt the invious position it once was as now, with social media, we can see 95% of actors, producers,writers and directors are all cunts. They say "never meet your heroes" and most of people met them.
This can't be understated. Before Twitter, movie stars were these mysterious beautiful people you only saw on the silver screen and in glossy magazine interviews. Then they got online and started seeming a lot less like beguiling glamorous figures and much more like your annoying coworker who won't shut up about Drumpf. Rob Perlman is now famous for being the guy who pisses on himself and eats his shit to own Lil' Donnie. I don't know why the Hollywood publicists didn't take a much stronger stance against their clients using social media.
 
I have become something of a luddite, and I am convinced that after a certain point, digital aids make doing something too "easy", and the creativity that is needed to fuel making entertainment is lost since "anyone" can now do it with digital aids. This filters out the actually passionate people willing to struggle and learn the tools of the trade, since some nobody (usually a diversity or nepo hire) can do the "same thing" without having to struggle through the difficult learning curve to create something. This is a big part of why I do not think AI will lead to some sort of entertainment revolution, and I think is a big part of why Hollywood, and American entertainment in general, is failing.

Set designs are shit because it isn't some autistic man spending months designing everything on a set down to the smallest detail, but is rather some cut rate Indian CG outfit that makes a few blurry smudges as quickly as possible. Composition and framing is shit, because everything is in front of a green screen, and some CGI smudges are added in post months after the actors are off "set", so it is impossible to have any idea what the final scene will look like while filming. There's no prosthetics, minimal make-up, minimal props, and sometimes the actors don't even bother showing up for filming like Pedo Pascal in the Mandalorian, because digital aids make all of it supposedly not matter anymore. And don't even get me started on the abyssmal sound mixing that everything has nowadays. The thing is, I think we are seeing that all of these and more matter immensely to making quality movies and television, and without the practical skills acting as a normalfaggot barrier to stop losers from fucking up the job with minimal effort by over relying on digital tools as a crutch, there's just shit going in and shit going out.

There are people with actual talent out there, just most of them are independent and/or doing it as a hobby. If Hollywood wasn't retarded, ideologically subverted, and up its own ass, then it would be approaching these talented people, offering them a modest budget of 10 million (for reference, they blow 300 million on universally hated flops), and putting them in charge of small projects. Minor buy in, but having actual creatives at the helm again would mean that there would likely be more hits than misses, even if some of it would end up too avant garde or self indulgent; just look at that recent Godzilla movie selling like hot cakes off of a budget of 30ish million. Imagine if Sam Hyde or Jontron got a budget for a comedy show? Or Forgotten Weapons got the budget and resources for a military arms history show, maybe with a team up with some of the other historical arms youtubers? Or maybe amateur animators on youtube got a budget to make a miniseries, just to sample the waters and see what they could make?

It wouldn't even be expensive for Hollywood to pull out of the death spiral, it would just require them admitting that they are wrong, and that digital tools are not a replacement for talent and creativity. I know that won't happen, but it is somewhat frustrating seeing an entire industry tie a noose around their neck while standing on a stool.
 
1- The "glamour" mystique of hollywood is over, being an actor isnt the invious position it once was as now,
Nah, plenty of people still want to act. It's just that everyone knows Hollywood hires on nepotism now, and also you can get famous sitting in your own living room via YouTube.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: supremeautismo
If all of Hollywoods writers became homeless maybe they could produce decent film again.
On a side, it's not all about how shitty the writing and film has been. As the internet expands there is less and less need for a centralized structure like Hollywood. It is cheaper to work else elsewhere and you can reach the same level of connection on a phone, even if you fix California you don't really save the old Hollywood.
 
Can you elaborate?
I'll give 2 examples from both cuts.

1. In the theatrical release, the line about "yearning for the mines" replaces a scene from the draft cut where Steve is shown to have dreams of building a fantasy resort and trying to sell it to his colleges, but is restrained by their dullness and his mundane job that drives him mad. This single scene does about 4 things - it starts Steve's character arc as somebody who seeks the Minecraft world to indulge in his creative freedom at the cost of his real life obligations and responsibilities, it both brings him in line and with the aspirations of the other characters while also establishing differences (Garret plans to use the Minecraft world for his real world needs), and it sets up two payoffs - one where he shows them his completed resort, demonstrating the potential of the Minecraft world, and at the end when he has a change of heart and goes back to the real world. As the most consequential character and representative of the game, it means Steve reinforces the message of the movie as I read it, to embrace your creativity but not to the point of escapism - which, funnily enough, directly implies that playing Minecraft the game is a waste of time.

For many other reasons, this is still completely broken, but that single scene would have made Steve a more sympathetic and relatable character and lined up his otherwise competing priorities of saving the Minecraft world and finding his blockdog. This is emblematic of Hollywood's tendency when dealing with IPs to neglect basic characters or story in favour of cultural references that are often badly understood or out of date - in this case, a throwaway and not particularly timely joke that could have been put literally anywhere else in the film.

2. The reverse is also true. In the draft cut, Steve and Henry are rescued from the pigs by Natalie and the black lady who's name I've forgotten, and Steve admires the hut they've built. In the theatrical release, the line is ADRed with Steve nonchalantly acknowledging that Garret had sacrificed himself in an explosion to save the pair literally seconds earlier. At best, it was just a production hiccup; more likely, a main character played by their most expensive high profile actor died a heroic death and they forgot to make anyone give a shit.

But here's the thing: it didn't matter. It's not even a manufactured dramatic lowpoint - they forget about him until the final battle when Garret magically turns up, with no explanation as to how he survived being blown up by TNT that also took out the bridge he was on. They Holocaust the pigs and go home. He hasn't lost anything, he hasn't learnt anything, none of his motives or decision making has changed, and combined with other circumstances in the film, the characters end up finishing their adventure having learned or sacrificed absolutely nothing. They get their dreams fulfilled despite nothing having changed. It's a film with no story, no characters, and nothing to say. Compare that to the Lego Movie made by the same company a decade ago.

Now that's just the Minecraft movie, but these aren't nitpicks or routine oversights, these are the basic things that make a movie fun and enjoyable being constantly neglected and deprioritised, and it's both endemic and more direct evidence of bad management and interference in all these big studio films. Bad writing, no characters and huge gaps in reason and logic can and was overlooked in a fun or high production film, but the audience will leave unsatisfied because subconsciously they'll pick up that something wasn't right, that the story is unfinished, and and combined with the general apathy around modern films, they get trained to expect disappointment. The horrid irony of Minecraft is that it's the particularly empty and incoherent mess even for current year movies that literally everyone expected it to be, but the only lesson Warner Brothers will learn is it switched the money printer on.
 
Hollywood (the industry) mainly produces CGI slop, and on top of that Hollywood (the physical real life city) is so expensive that the only people able to live there are big time top of the heap A-Listers and the illegals who are their slaves/servants. Nobody wants to watch what Hollywood puts out, and since Los Angeles is so expensive that makes shooting there expensive too, to the point where it's cheaper to shoot in some random shithole and then haul out the computers to make it look like a big city. And don't forget California's love for taxes, especially taxing "the rich", which of course leads to rich the move elsewhere.
 
No fucking shit. The problem with Hollywood isn't the materials and equipment. Its the actors and the scripts. The former gets too big of an ego and started getting into politics (despite the fact that alienates half the fandom immediately) and the latter got sanitized to levels of woke Blackrock enjoys.

I've seen fanmade movies that hit far harder than any 'official' work in the endless Current Year we're stuck in. Of course, there is also the overuse of CGI. We've already reached the point where people are sick of it. Go back to a healthy level of CGI and practical effects. Or better, go full practical. May cost more but people do enjoy watching something that they know is real.


Hollywood was at its best when people just made stuff that were fun to watch.
 
Davy Jones was made with CGI and it looks amazing even after 20 years. Hell, it looks better than most of the garbage we get today but Hollycrap rarely invests time and money into good looking CGI nowadays. They could but they won't.

And yet they still expect their shitty movies to make a gazillian dollars. That's like a car company producing a car with no doors, no tires, no roof and no windows but thinking costumers will throw money at them. And then when no one buys their car they blame the customers while working on the next hideous car.
 
Last edited:
Los Angeles is a concrete toilet and it was a great offence to God that man stopped His cleansing fire from reducing it all to ash during the last blaze. Anyone in LA who could produce an active kiwifarms account should have been airlifted to safety before the firefighting planes started dropping accelerant on the fires.
 
Hollywood was at its best when people just made stuff that were fun to watch.
You are not supposed to have fun. You are supposed to support "current thing". You are supposed to update on the "current thing" regularly. That is what Hollywood has become, a slop machine for "current thing"-analogues.
 
Back