Business Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood. - Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office.

Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Reis Thebault
2025-06-26 19:08:13GMT

ca01.webp
The wardrobe department from a feature film production titled “Patel” at SirReel Studio Services in Los Angeles this month. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

LOS ANGELES — P.J. Byrne has acted in films and television shows across the country and around the world in the past few years — from New York to New Mexico, Ireland to Australia. But there’s one place he hasn’t worked lately: Hollywood.

Byrne moved to Los Angeles more than 25 years ago, traveling west like so many others to chase a career in the entertainment industry. He’s been among the lucky ones, landing steady pay and critical acclaim for roles in movies like “The Wolf of Wall Street” and “Babylon.”

Yet more and more, his acting jobs are taking him far from Tinseltown. He’s got plenty of company, too, as a trend fretfully dubbed “runaway production” only accelerates. Left behind is a Hollywood in crisis.

“We are an industry town,” Byrne said. “When we are not working, that means California is really hurting.”

Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office. Both big-name blockbusters and experimental indies have fled to other states and countries, looking for cheaper labor and more attractive tax incentives given studios cutbacks and rising costs.

The economic impact of this exodus extends far beyond actors, writers and directors. Hit hardest are the behind-the-scenes blue-collar workers — the makeup artists and set decorators, the drivers and dry cleaners — who were already struggling to survive in one of the nation’s most expensive metropolises.

Just as dispiriting is the downturn’s psychic toll. Hollywood is California’s most iconic export, as synonymous with the state as sunshine. It made Los Angeles a worldwide hub for artists and dreamers. But America’s fantasy factory is offshoring. Evidence is found in empty soundstages, prop houses selling off their stock, dwindling job opportunities.

ca02.webp
Billboards advertise TV shows along Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

“The industry is on a cliff edge, clinging by its fingernails,” said George Huang, a screenwriter, director and film professor at UCLA. “It feels like one more blow, even just a tiny feather on our shoulder, is going to send us careening down to our rocky deaths.”

Hollywood has weathered upheaval before, starting with the emergence of “talkies” in the late 1920s. And other locales, whether they be Vancouver’s “Hollywood North” or Atlanta’s “Y’allywood,” have for decades been luring productions away.

Still, this moment feels more precarious than ever. The pandemic shutdown, a pair of protracted labor strikes and January’s catastrophic wildfires all battered an industry already experiencing extreme disruption — falling box office revenue, empty theaters — in the streaming era.

ca03.webp
A director and crew film a ballroom scene for a 1927 film starring Hollywood actress Renée Adorée. (John Kobal Foundation/Getty Images)

The dire situation has attracted bipartisan attention, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Donald Trump, despite their deepening hostilities, in rare agreement that something must be done. “Hollywood is being destroyed,” the president declared last month.

And the push to reverse the slump has united a diverse range of industry insiders and dependents. Byrne is one of many advocating for an overhaul of the state’s tax credit program, which now lags far behind competitors.

“We’re not competing on an even playing field,” noted Byrne, who studied finance as well as theater in college. “We’re fighting over scraps at the table.”

The Los Angeles fires were a wake-up call, he said. His family evacuated their home, and he felt powerless to help. He was filming at the time — in Dublin.

How different things were when the first filmmakers from out east came to Los Angeles in the early 1900s. The prime attraction then: weather. They fled disruptive winters and found a place where they could shoot Westerns outside year-round.

A rush of studios soon set up shop, many of them in the sleepy teetotaling suburb known as Hollywood. City and industry grew up together, massive movie company lots sprawling just as Los Angeles swelled. Eventually, all but one major studio, Paramount Pictures, relocated to other parts of the region.

ca04.webp
Wes Bailey, founder and CEO of SirReel Studio Services, speaks with location manager John Rizzi, left, at SirReel’s production studios. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

But the name and symbolism of Hollywood, of dazzling stars on the silver screen, endured. Look no further than the famous sign — a towering, nine-letter advertisement for the industry — that has loomed over the city for a century. Look no further than the Walk of Fame, the Academy Awards and all the celebrations that still mark Los Angeles as the capital of the entertainment world.

“I don’t care what country you’re from or what language you speak, there’s one word that everybody understands, and that’s ‘Hollywood,’” said Donelle Dadigan, founder of the Hollywood Museum, an archive showcasing more than a hundred years of history.

For many, Los Angeles was long a default filming location, home to the most experienced crews and a vast industry infrastructure.

“When I started, I was only shooting in L.A.,” said Ram Bergman, a producer whose credits include “Knives Out” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi.”

Around the time Bergman arrived here in 1991, though, lawmakers elsewhere were rolling out plans to woo productions. By the early 2000s, the competition was in full swing, with states and countries trying to one-up each other.

For producers on tight budgets, California began making less financial sense.

“The studios, the streamers, the networks, they have less money to spend, but they still need shows, they still need movies, so how do you maximize the money?” said Bergman, who hasn’t filmed in Los Angeles for more than a decade. “It’s not even crossed my mind to film in L.A.”

Film tax credits, which production companies can sell or use to offset their tax liability, have a mixed track record, and some researchers have criticized them as a poor use of taxpayer money. They remain popular among legislatures, however, and have proved effective at pulling productions away from Los Angeles.

ca05.webp
Bailey, standing on a morgue set at his production studios, is part of a campaign to help reinvigorate the entertainment industry in Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Other states are stepping up their pursuits. In the past two months, lawmakers in New York and Texas earmarked hundreds of millions of additional dollars for their tax credit programs. Other countries, where labor costs are often lower, are doing the same, enticing a growing number of productions overseas.

Bill Mechanic, a former top executive at Paramount, Disney and Fox, is preparing to produce a film noir set in Los Angeles. He wants to shoot it locally — the genre has a rich history in L. A.— but he fears high costs may force him to go to Australia.

“You have a choice,” he said. “Do you want to make the movie, or do you not want to make the movie?”

Mechanic, a Michigan native, watched the decline of auto manufacturing in Detroit. He sees echoes in Los Angeles today.

California has its own tax credit program, but demand far exceeds the funding available. Newsom and state lawmakers are poised to raise that to $750 million annually, more than double the current level. Separately, the legislature is considering bills that would increase the tax credit’s base rate and allow more types of productions to be eligible for the program.

ca06.webp
Rizzi signs a wall of support for the #StayinLA campaign. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Some officials have criticized the proposals as Hollywood handouts, which come as the state tries to close a daunting budget deficit. Supporters argue the film industry is a boon for all of California, not just Los Angeles.

“We must meet this moment,” said Colleen Bell, a former TV producer and the executive director of the California Film Commission, a state agency. “If California lost the entertainment industry, we’d lose more than jobs. We’d lose a big part of who we are.”

In response to the ever more frantic calls from Hollywood, Newsom appealed last month to the White House for a federal tax credit that would help the United States remain competitive with other countries.

Trump has floated a very different solution: 100 percent tariffs on movies made overseas. The proposal blindsided many, who said it could send Hollywood into a death spiral. A White House spokesperson appeared to walk the idea back one day later, saying “no final decisions” had been made, and by this month the president was instead threatening the state with massive funding cuts and sending in National Guard troops and the Marines as protests erupted here over federal immigration detentions.

ca07.webp
Nancy Haigh, a set decorator with Oscars for her work on “Bugsy” and “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” says California must overhaul its tax incentive program to entice movie productions back to the state. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

These days, the mood in Los Angeles is sour.

“I’m not hopeful anymore, unfortunately,” said Nancy Haigh, who at 78 is one of the industry’s most decorated set decorators.

Haigh is a nine-time Oscar nominee and two-time winner. Her credits include “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” and “Forrest Gump.” She’s never gone so long without being approached with work.

“I’ve never not had my phone ring,” she said. “I’ve been very fortunate. I’ve had a wonderful career. But my phone hasn’t rung in a year.”

Contrary to Hollywood’s glamorous reputation, most in the business are middle class at best. The sustained downturn has pushed many workers into increasingly desperate situations. With savings depleted during the pandemic and strike slowdowns, they’ve turned to part-time jobs at restaurants and retailers. Some are living paycheck to paycheck. Some have lost health insurance. Some have moved away.

“A good portion of our membership has been chronically unemployed,” said Malakhi Simmons, the vice president of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 728, the union that represents lighting technicians.

January’s blazes, which tore through the communities of Pacific Palisades and Altadena, made matters worse. More than 1,000 entertainment union members lost their homes, Simmons said.

The devastation felt especially cruel given the many hopes that this would be a turnaround year. “Stay alive until ’25” had been a mantra in Hollywood; instead, barely one week in, the industry was dealt yet another blow as flames consumed entire neighborhoods.

“From a morale standpoint, it was just devastating,” Pamala Buzick Kim, a small-business owner and former talent representative who co-founded the #StayinLA campaign this spring.

In the aftermath, thousands signed the campaign’s petition calling on lawmakers to revamp the state tax incentive program and on studios to commit to increased production in Los Angeles over the next three years. Doing so, they argued, would be a crucial part of disaster recovery.

ca08.webp
“We are an industry town,” says actor P.J. Byrne, a longtime Angeleno who last year had a featured role in the Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown.” (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Byrne believes that bringing back productions would help offset the economic turmoil triggered by the wildfires. Rebuilding Los Angeles should extend to rebuilding the entertainment industry, the actor said. “This is the way to help heal our city.”

He wants to film in his adopted home, and he wants officials to make the process more affordable and less complex. In between jobs, he has appeared at rallies to promote changes to the tax credit program.

But he recently was back on set. In Toronto.
 
1- The "glamour" mystique of hollywood is over, being an actor isnt the invious position it once was as now, with social media, we can see 95% of actors, producers,writers and directors are all cunts. They say "never meet your heroes" and most of people met them.
This is definitely a good and often overlooked point. Casting my mind back, I remember when Twitter was launched one of the major selling points of it was the fact that all the 'stars' were on there and you could interact with them. I think it's fair to say that this has done absolutely no favours for the reputation of celebrities and how they are perceived whatsoever.

This is just one example among many, but I remember as a kid always being a fan of Seth Rogan (like a lot of other people here, most likely)- but seeing just what a holier-than-thou smug cunt he actually is quickly made me see the error of my ways. I wont watch another film with him in now as a matter of principle. Any mystique that came with the title of 'celebrity' is long gone, giving way to the realisation that they are all just normal people but with extreme narcissism, coke addictions, tranny children and insufferable political views. All that shit was assumed before, but before there was a degree of separation that allowed it to be mostly astroturfed and overlooked. That's no longer the case.

It may not be the main reason why Hollywood is dying, but it's certainly a significant factor.
 
Last edited:
It may not be the main reason why Hollywood is dying, but it's certainly a significant factor.
I think it's also the reason why there are no new stars....... and every name you associate with stardom today is getting old and grey.

The rise of social media has not only opened a very ugly window onto everyone who was a celebrity pre, say, 2008?

But it fundamentally unplugged the ability to make new ones.

You just can't be "special", or have your popularity rationed out to the public in drips and drabs a few times a year when the firehose of social media runs 24/7.
 
Davy Jones was made with CGI and it looks amazing even after 20 years. Hell, it looks better than most of the garbage we get today but Hollycrap rarely invests time and money into good looking CGI nowadays. They could but they won't.
They invest giant amounts of time and money in CGI. their issue is that they are so full of DEI hires that they just cant produce decent looking cgi anymore.
 
I've been rewatching Breaking Bad and just read this piece of trivia that really says it all
- Breaking Bad (2008 ) was originally set in Riverside, California. It was moved to Albuquerque to take advantage of a tax rebate on production.

Imagine rejecting the literal Citizen Kane of TV shows because of taxes. And that was in 2008! Literal penny wise pound foolish behavior. Not to mention, Breaking Bad has elevated ABQ exponentially. People visit to this day to see the filming locations. There are bus tours and themed stores and they are all PACKED. I imagine the show has generated 100 million in tourist revenue minimum. The towns people have so much pride and gratitude for the BB legacy. The show itself is an ode to the beauty of New Mexico and ABQ gets better as a city every year. Riverside could have been such a place. I swear, so many stories today feel like Aesops fables.
 
Last edited:
oh nooo what's the matter California??? is that $40bn economy you keep bragging about built on smoke and mirrors??? I don't think you need a tax break, I think you need to have more wealth redistributed to poorer states like Mississippi and North Dakota, since you're all in favour of that shit.

This must be accelerating lately because we've had at least two articles about it, yet it's been going on since the 70s. I remember Ahhnuld The Governator being pissed about the number of movies using Toronto as a stand-in for NYC.

Technically it would be Sorcerer, if you want the beginning. It's not a bad movie (Friedkin definitely should've cut some scenes and extended others) but it flopped for a variety of reasons (advertising problems and being released just ahead of the first Star Wars). It marks the death of auteur-driven big tentpole movies and the beginning of studios starting to push the director aside and focus-group the shit out of movies.
Friedrich fucked over Friedrich with Sorcerer starting with that stupid god damn title.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
This is definitely a good and often overlooked point. Casting my mind back, I remember when Twitter was launched one of the major selling points of it was the fact that all the 'stars' were on there and you could interact with them. I think it's fair to say that this has done absolutely no favours for the reputation of celebrities and how they are perceived whatsoever.

This is just one example among many, but I remember as a kid always being a fan of Seth Rogan (like a lot of other people here, most likely)- but seeing just what a holier-than-thou smug cunt he actually is quickly made me see the error of my ways. I wont watch another film with him in now as a matter of principle. Any mystique that came with the title of 'celebrity' is long gone, giving way to the realisation that they are all just normal people but with extreme narcissism, coke addictions, tranny children and insufferable political views. All that shit was assumed before, but before there was a degree of separation that allowed it to be mostly astroturfed and overlooked. That's no longer the case.

It may not be the main reason why Hollywood is dying, but it's certainly a significant factor.
Personally, I'm willing to separate art from artists. Seth Rogan is a dipshit, but I’m fine with having him dance like a monkey for my amusement.

I like classic rock, can’t swing a cat without hitting a dude who fucked a teenager in that genre. Music still rocks.

The problem is, the sort of dipshittery Hollywood has right now is guaranteed to show up in the movie itself.
 
Honestly I believe all these problems though it's an industry in decline in Hollywood could mitigate the losses if there were actually mid budget films left to fill the gap. I know consumer tastes are partially to blame but when Godzilla Minus 1 has a budget of 12 million and looks as good as a 200 million dollar film, there's no excuse.

Perhaps if the above the line costs weren't so brutally high, there'd be money to make a film at a budget that would make a solid profit.
 
My understanding is that Hollywood is suffering, but the industry is fine. Lots of people are starting studios elsewhere and doing production elsewhere. COVID screwed a lot of production staff who did not have the financial security to sit back and jerk off the whole time, so they moved.

Mark Wahlberg is trying to make Boston a movie and film town, for example. Lots of companies moved to Georgia because the state offers tax incentives for companies to do business there. The list goes on.

If I'm wrong, though, someone please correct me.
 
But America’s fantasy factory is offshoring.
Hollywood was celebrating when factory workers in Ohio had their jobs offshored.

Hollywood was celebrating when the sons of those factory workers in Ohio were denied access to college in favor of illegals and blacks who can't even read or speak properly.

Why should I give a shit about a "blue collar" set designer or dry cleaner? They should be met with the same hopelessness and hardship that they celebrated happening to middle American Whites.

May they suffer for the rest of their lives and may their children never climb out of that pit.
 
My understanding is that Hollywood is suffering, but the industry is fine. Lots of people are starting studios elsewhere and doing production elsewhere. COVID screwed a lot of production staff who did not have the financial security to sit back and jerk off the whole time, so they moved.

Mark Wahlberg is trying to make Boston a movie and film town, for example. Lots of companies moved to Georgia because the state offers tax incentives for companies to do business there. The list goes on.

If I'm wrong, though, someone please correct me.
Broadly correct, although the increasing budgets are turning filmmaking into an incredibly high-stakes blackjack game where you can go from boom to bust instantly. There are also a lot of questions about the value of streaming, since viewership often plummets after the first season of a show and AFAIK the financial info is being hidden by the streaming companies.
 
Broadly correct, although the increasing budgets are turning filmmaking into an incredibly high-stakes blackjack game where you can go from boom to bust instantly. There are also a lot of questions about the value of streaming, since viewership often plummets after the first season of a show and AFAIK the financial info is being hidden by the streaming companies.
You are right about the insane budgets, the questionable value of streaming, and how companies hide streaming metrics... although many entertainment companies hide metrics, even from talent, as a matter of course. Opie & Anthony used to bitch constantly that XM (and later SiriusXM) never shared metrics with them.
 
Broadly correct, although the increasing budgets are turning filmmaking into an incredibly high-stakes blackjack game where you can go from boom to bust instantly. There are also a lot of questions about the value of streaming, since viewership often plummets after the first season of a show and AFAIK the financial info is being hidden by the streaming companies.
The solution is obvoiusly lower budgets.

Cheaper shows would lead to cheaper streaming, possibly even a model where a few paid ads would pay for the costs like traditional TV...

The problem is? The modern CA-based Hollywood infrastructure is all built around the assumption that they'd have a monopoly on the industry forever and saw no reason to trim the union and legalized grievance placating costs that keep raising the floor of what you have to spend to film there that only a billion-dollar blockbuster can make money. So what if the bare bones costs to get all your permits in order and satisfy all the regulators alone is $300 million? Surely you'll make 10 times that amount with Shrek 59....... and that model just doesn't work anymore when customers have more options and increasingly hate the product.

Same reason why their feel-good government has effectively priced out building anything but luxury homes for housing. Builders can't turn a profit on single-family homes on a modest lot when they're pushed millions in the hole just getting a sewer permit.
 
The solution is obvoiusly lower budgets.

Cheaper shows would lead to cheaper streaming, possibly even a model where a few paid ads would pay for the costs like traditional TV...

The problem is? The modern CA-based Hollywood infrastructure is all built around the assumption that they'd have a monopoly on the industry forever and saw no reason to trim the union and legalized grievance placating costs that keep raising the floor of what you have to spend to film there that only a billion-dollar blockbuster can make money. So what if the bare bones costs to get all your permits in order and satisfy all the regulators alone is $300 million? Surely you'll make 10 times that amount with Shrek 59....... and that model just doesn't work anymore when customers have more options and increasingly hate the product.

Same reason why their feel-good government has effectively priced out building anything but luxury homes for housing. Builders can't turn a profit on single-family homes on a modest lot when they're pushed millions in the hole just getting a sewer permit.
Some of the best shows ever were done on shoestring budgets. Here, am talking the original Star Trek, Outer Limits, and Twilight Zone series. The follow-on series, while done with larger budgets, don't measure up to the originals.
 
Hollywood robbed Dune Part 2 (I know it has its haters, and believe me, I get it, but it really did give you "moments you go to the movies for") from the Oscars, but gave 13 noms to Emilia Perez, a movie that I would 100% believe has a body count based on people laughing themselves to death over the "from penis to VAGINAAAAAAAAA" scene.

I'm almost certain current Hollywood writers don't look at the best-made movies in history for what makes them good because there aren't enough women, gays and blacks in them.

Fucking Hollywood needs to absolutely burn.
 
Back