Business Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood. - Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office.

Lights! Camera! But not enough action in a fading, worried Hollywood.
The Washington Post (archive.ph)
By Reis Thebault
2025-06-26 19:08:13GMT

ca01.webp
The wardrobe department from a feature film production titled “Patel” at SirReel Studio Services in Los Angeles this month. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

LOS ANGELES — P.J. Byrne has acted in films and television shows across the country and around the world in the past few years — from New York to New Mexico, Ireland to Australia. But there’s one place he hasn’t worked lately: Hollywood.

Byrne moved to Los Angeles more than 25 years ago, traveling west like so many others to chase a career in the entertainment industry. He’s been among the lucky ones, landing steady pay and critical acclaim for roles in movies like “The Wolf of Wall Street” and “Babylon.”

Yet more and more, his acting jobs are taking him far from Tinseltown. He’s got plenty of company, too, as a trend fretfully dubbed “runaway production” only accelerates. Left behind is a Hollywood in crisis.

“We are an industry town,” Byrne said. “When we are not working, that means California is really hurting.”

Over the past decade, total film and TV production in Los Angeles has plummeted by nearly 40 percent, according to data from the region’s official film office. Both big-name blockbusters and experimental indies have fled to other states and countries, looking for cheaper labor and more attractive tax incentives given studios cutbacks and rising costs.

The economic impact of this exodus extends far beyond actors, writers and directors. Hit hardest are the behind-the-scenes blue-collar workers — the makeup artists and set decorators, the drivers and dry cleaners — who were already struggling to survive in one of the nation’s most expensive metropolises.

Just as dispiriting is the downturn’s psychic toll. Hollywood is California’s most iconic export, as synonymous with the state as sunshine. It made Los Angeles a worldwide hub for artists and dreamers. But America’s fantasy factory is offshoring. Evidence is found in empty soundstages, prop houses selling off their stock, dwindling job opportunities.

ca02.webp
Billboards advertise TV shows along Sunset Boulevard in West Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

“The industry is on a cliff edge, clinging by its fingernails,” said George Huang, a screenwriter, director and film professor at UCLA. “It feels like one more blow, even just a tiny feather on our shoulder, is going to send us careening down to our rocky deaths.”

Hollywood has weathered upheaval before, starting with the emergence of “talkies” in the late 1920s. And other locales, whether they be Vancouver’s “Hollywood North” or Atlanta’s “Y’allywood,” have for decades been luring productions away.

Still, this moment feels more precarious than ever. The pandemic shutdown, a pair of protracted labor strikes and January’s catastrophic wildfires all battered an industry already experiencing extreme disruption — falling box office revenue, empty theaters — in the streaming era.

ca03.webp
A director and crew film a ballroom scene for a 1927 film starring Hollywood actress Renée Adorée. (John Kobal Foundation/Getty Images)

The dire situation has attracted bipartisan attention, with California Gov. Gavin Newsom and President Donald Trump, despite their deepening hostilities, in rare agreement that something must be done. “Hollywood is being destroyed,” the president declared last month.

And the push to reverse the slump has united a diverse range of industry insiders and dependents. Byrne is one of many advocating for an overhaul of the state’s tax credit program, which now lags far behind competitors.

“We’re not competing on an even playing field,” noted Byrne, who studied finance as well as theater in college. “We’re fighting over scraps at the table.”

The Los Angeles fires were a wake-up call, he said. His family evacuated their home, and he felt powerless to help. He was filming at the time — in Dublin.

How different things were when the first filmmakers from out east came to Los Angeles in the early 1900s. The prime attraction then: weather. They fled disruptive winters and found a place where they could shoot Westerns outside year-round.

A rush of studios soon set up shop, many of them in the sleepy teetotaling suburb known as Hollywood. City and industry grew up together, massive movie company lots sprawling just as Los Angeles swelled. Eventually, all but one major studio, Paramount Pictures, relocated to other parts of the region.

ca04.webp
Wes Bailey, founder and CEO of SirReel Studio Services, speaks with location manager John Rizzi, left, at SirReel’s production studios. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

But the name and symbolism of Hollywood, of dazzling stars on the silver screen, endured. Look no further than the famous sign — a towering, nine-letter advertisement for the industry — that has loomed over the city for a century. Look no further than the Walk of Fame, the Academy Awards and all the celebrations that still mark Los Angeles as the capital of the entertainment world.

“I don’t care what country you’re from or what language you speak, there’s one word that everybody understands, and that’s ‘Hollywood,’” said Donelle Dadigan, founder of the Hollywood Museum, an archive showcasing more than a hundred years of history.

For many, Los Angeles was long a default filming location, home to the most experienced crews and a vast industry infrastructure.

“When I started, I was only shooting in L.A.,” said Ram Bergman, a producer whose credits include “Knives Out” and “Star Wars: The Last Jedi.”

Around the time Bergman arrived here in 1991, though, lawmakers elsewhere were rolling out plans to woo productions. By the early 2000s, the competition was in full swing, with states and countries trying to one-up each other.

For producers on tight budgets, California began making less financial sense.

“The studios, the streamers, the networks, they have less money to spend, but they still need shows, they still need movies, so how do you maximize the money?” said Bergman, who hasn’t filmed in Los Angeles for more than a decade. “It’s not even crossed my mind to film in L.A.”

Film tax credits, which production companies can sell or use to offset their tax liability, have a mixed track record, and some researchers have criticized them as a poor use of taxpayer money. They remain popular among legislatures, however, and have proved effective at pulling productions away from Los Angeles.

ca05.webp
Bailey, standing on a morgue set at his production studios, is part of a campaign to help reinvigorate the entertainment industry in Hollywood. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Other states are stepping up their pursuits. In the past two months, lawmakers in New York and Texas earmarked hundreds of millions of additional dollars for their tax credit programs. Other countries, where labor costs are often lower, are doing the same, enticing a growing number of productions overseas.

Bill Mechanic, a former top executive at Paramount, Disney and Fox, is preparing to produce a film noir set in Los Angeles. He wants to shoot it locally — the genre has a rich history in L. A.— but he fears high costs may force him to go to Australia.

“You have a choice,” he said. “Do you want to make the movie, or do you not want to make the movie?”

Mechanic, a Michigan native, watched the decline of auto manufacturing in Detroit. He sees echoes in Los Angeles today.

California has its own tax credit program, but demand far exceeds the funding available. Newsom and state lawmakers are poised to raise that to $750 million annually, more than double the current level. Separately, the legislature is considering bills that would increase the tax credit’s base rate and allow more types of productions to be eligible for the program.

ca06.webp
Rizzi signs a wall of support for the #StayinLA campaign. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Some officials have criticized the proposals as Hollywood handouts, which come as the state tries to close a daunting budget deficit. Supporters argue the film industry is a boon for all of California, not just Los Angeles.

“We must meet this moment,” said Colleen Bell, a former TV producer and the executive director of the California Film Commission, a state agency. “If California lost the entertainment industry, we’d lose more than jobs. We’d lose a big part of who we are.”

In response to the ever more frantic calls from Hollywood, Newsom appealed last month to the White House for a federal tax credit that would help the United States remain competitive with other countries.

Trump has floated a very different solution: 100 percent tariffs on movies made overseas. The proposal blindsided many, who said it could send Hollywood into a death spiral. A White House spokesperson appeared to walk the idea back one day later, saying “no final decisions” had been made, and by this month the president was instead threatening the state with massive funding cuts and sending in National Guard troops and the Marines as protests erupted here over federal immigration detentions.

ca07.webp
Nancy Haigh, a set decorator with Oscars for her work on “Bugsy” and “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood,” says California must overhaul its tax incentive program to entice movie productions back to the state. (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

These days, the mood in Los Angeles is sour.

“I’m not hopeful anymore, unfortunately,” said Nancy Haigh, who at 78 is one of the industry’s most decorated set decorators.

Haigh is a nine-time Oscar nominee and two-time winner. Her credits include “Once Upon a Time in Hollywood” and “Forrest Gump.” She’s never gone so long without being approached with work.

“I’ve never not had my phone ring,” she said. “I’ve been very fortunate. I’ve had a wonderful career. But my phone hasn’t rung in a year.”

Contrary to Hollywood’s glamorous reputation, most in the business are middle class at best. The sustained downturn has pushed many workers into increasingly desperate situations. With savings depleted during the pandemic and strike slowdowns, they’ve turned to part-time jobs at restaurants and retailers. Some are living paycheck to paycheck. Some have lost health insurance. Some have moved away.

“A good portion of our membership has been chronically unemployed,” said Malakhi Simmons, the vice president of the International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees Local 728, the union that represents lighting technicians.

January’s blazes, which tore through the communities of Pacific Palisades and Altadena, made matters worse. More than 1,000 entertainment union members lost their homes, Simmons said.

The devastation felt especially cruel given the many hopes that this would be a turnaround year. “Stay alive until ’25” had been a mantra in Hollywood; instead, barely one week in, the industry was dealt yet another blow as flames consumed entire neighborhoods.

“From a morale standpoint, it was just devastating,” Pamala Buzick Kim, a small-business owner and former talent representative who co-founded the #StayinLA campaign this spring.

In the aftermath, thousands signed the campaign’s petition calling on lawmakers to revamp the state tax incentive program and on studios to commit to increased production in Los Angeles over the next three years. Doing so, they argued, would be a crucial part of disaster recovery.

ca08.webp
“We are an industry town,” says actor P.J. Byrne, a longtime Angeleno who last year had a featured role in the Bob Dylan biopic “A Complete Unknown.” (Jay L. Clendenin/For The Washington Post)

Byrne believes that bringing back productions would help offset the economic turmoil triggered by the wildfires. Rebuilding Los Angeles should extend to rebuilding the entertainment industry, the actor said. “This is the way to help heal our city.”

He wants to film in his adopted home, and he wants officials to make the process more affordable and less complex. In between jobs, he has appeared at rallies to promote changes to the tax credit program.

But he recently was back on set. In Toronto.
 
Honestly I believe all these problems though it's an industry in decline in Hollywood could mitigate the losses if there were actually mid budget films left to fill the gap. I know consumer tastes are partially to blame but when Godzilla Minus 1 has a budget of 12 million and looks as good as a 200 million dollar film, there's no excuse.

Perhaps if the above the line costs weren't so brutally high, there'd be money to make a film at a budget that would make a solid profit.
Part of that is because Japanese actors aren't ridiculously greedy cunts.

There are actors in Hollywood that demand $25 MILLION a movie..... For ~3-6 weeks or work maybe.

Fuck, even TV roles can be insane. Jeremy Allen White is reported to get $900,000 an EPISODE for the Bear.

The top tier of American actors are retardedly overpaid, to the point that they literally fuck up movie budgets.
 
Part of that is because Japanese actors aren't ridiculously greedy cunts.

There are actors in Hollywood that demand $25 MILLION a movie..... For ~3-6 weeks or work maybe.

Fuck, even TV roles can be insane. Jeremy Allen White is reported to get $900,000 an EPISODE for the Bear.

The top tier of American actors are retardedly overpaid, to the point that they literally fuck up movie budgets.
Again my point about above the line costs rings true. The days of excess are winding down and if the costs of actors, directors, writers, etc doesn't go down along with poor investments with overblown CG, then we'll likely see Hollywood go through another major crash.
 
There's a lot of good and bad ideas here about what hollywood should and shouldn't do, but I'm glad to see there's a key element we do all agree on. All the bitching and whining the last two to three years about hollywood productions have always come down to "Pay us more to do the same thing and lower your expectations for what you'll get". They don't want to change, they want to be more comfortable as the ship sinks.

In the last ten to fifteen years, budgets have exploded and quality has cratered. Those two things are pretty measurable factors. How the money should be spent is debatable, but its pretty damned clear that "Give us more money to do the same thing" is actively crippling the industry. Worse, its a wound that's going to be extremely hard to recover from, because the unpaid debts from it don't just vanish. Every production from here on out needs a higher return in absolute dollar value, not merely percentage over invested, to cover the untold billions borrowed to product the prior flops.

The key element we all agree on is they need to change something, but articles like this are just confirmation that they have no interest in changing anything outside of their own personal lines going up. Very few of them seem interested in producing entertainment, only art. Which is a problem, because while entertainment is generally art, art is by and far not always entertaining - An artistically impressive deviation from norms might impress other artists, but will only confuse those looking to enjoy the moment and understand what they're seeing. They're here to produce for their ego to put a mark on their field, not for their audience to put an entertaining product on the shelf. The Star wars guy who loves to subvert expectations is a great example - from an artistic perspective, violating narrative norms by killing your big bad halfway through the second part of a trilogy has merit, inspiring one to reconsider what a narrative is and means. From the perspective of an entertaining narrative for the audience, its horrible.

They're not going to change though, because the same egos that have them prioritizing 'art' over 'entertainment' also mean they cannot admit to that mistake. None of them want to acknowledge that their money comes from serving a customer. Trying to do so now would probably feel like a rejection of everything they've been telling themselves for the last decade about how important they are.
 
Again my point about above the line costs rings true. The days of excess are winding down and if the costs of actors, directors, writers, etc doesn't go down along with poor investments with overblown CG, then we'll likely see Hollywood go through another major crash.
They've already crashed, they're currently burning. The question now is: how many survivors there will be?

My worry (at least for American entertainment, the hollywood companies and people can all die in a fire for all i care) is that Hollywood will further consolidate rather than decentralize. Decentralization is what is needed so that production houses will be willing to make riskier movies and for cheaper. As I said earlier, it's better to make 25 $20 million movies than 1 $500 million dollar movie. As the Wu Tang Financial once eloquently put it, you've got to diversify your holdings, nigga.

I can absolutely see a future where hollywood's output is a couple of films, whose production costs run in the billions. I can absolutely see that retard Iger running this play, because it's gotten him this far. The problem is when, not if, it backfires, hollywood closes permanently. That's not necessarily a bad thing given how things are, but the total collapse of any industry has unpleasant shockwaves.
 
Last edited:
Hollywood (the industry) mainly produces CGI slop, and on top of that Hollywood (the physical real life city) is so expensive that the only people able to live there are big time top of the heap A-Listers and the illegals who are their slaves/servants. Nobody wants to watch what Hollywood puts out, and since Los Angeles is so expensive that makes shooting there expensive too, to the point where it's cheaper to shoot in some random shithole and then haul out the computers to make it look like a big city. And don't forget California's love for taxes, especially taxing "the rich", which of course leads to rich the move elsewhere.
Celebrities do not live in Hollywood. Homeless, scientologists, and dregs live there. Celebrities live in other parts of la.
 
This is definitely a good and often overlooked point. Casting my mind back, I remember when Twitter was launched one of the major selling points of it was the fact that all the 'stars' were on there and you could interact with them. I think it's fair to say that this has done absolutely no favours for the reputation of celebrities and how they are perceived whatsoever.

This is just one example among many, but I remember as a kid always being a fan of Seth Rogan (like a lot of other people here, most likely)- but seeing just what a holier-than-thou smug cunt he actually is quickly made me see the error of my ways. I wont watch another film with him in now as a matter of principle. Any mystique that came with the title of 'celebrity' is long gone, giving way to the realisation that they are all just normal people but with extreme narcissism, coke addictions, tranny children and insufferable political views. All that shit was assumed before, but before there was a degree of separation that allowed it to be mostly astroturfed and overlooked. That's no longer the case.

It may not be the main reason why Hollywood is dying, but it's certainly a significant factor.
this is how i have always felt, too. i hate invoking gamergate just because it feels cliché, but that was the cultural breakpoint where everything went so wrong, especially online. i used to have quite a few people i looked up to, felt inspired by, and then they all slowly took their masks off and revealed the demons inside. i ran out of heroes over my teenage years very fast, and it was very alarming. people i thought i could be inspired by said Trump supporters (kids, no less, ala that Covington fiasco) should be thrown into woodchippers.

all the good guys are nearly gone. there will never be another Sean Connery or Alan Rickman. there won't be any more Robbie Coltranes. everyone's language is constricted and all the work being done is inherently negative. it's pretty sad to me that kids these days only have their retarded socmed influences and no magic in theaters.
 
Celebrities do not live in Hollywood. Homeless, scientologists, and dregs live there. Celebrities live in other parts of la.
Don't confuse "Hollywood Hills" with "Hollywood", the latter meaning the flatlands along Hollywood and Sunset Boulevards west of Vermont Street, the former meaning the mansions in the foothills of the Santa Monica Mountains between the end of the flatlands and the Hollywood Sign. That said, the Hollywood Hills were built out in the 50s and getting a mansion there either means you are at the top of the celeb social pyramid or you are a nepobaby who inherited it. The lower part of the A List lives in places like Los Feliz, with the singers and reality TV stars living in Calabasas or Thousand Oaks, with some in Encino. As for the Hollywood flatlands, you're right except for maybe the Scientologists, who aren't nearly as numerous as in their 90s heyday when you had to join the cult to get anywhere in acting. Don't forget the flood of young faggots and troons who get kicked out of their homes and sent to Los Angeles on one way Greyhound tickets.

Edit: fucking typos, I'm going blind ffs...
 
Hollywood was at its best when people just made stuff that were fun to watch.
Westerns where pure slop they pumped out weekly, but people loved them because they where fun and simple. They didn't try and shove some political agenda down your throat. Simple Good Guy vs Bad Guy type plots that let you escape reality for a bit.
1751321252157.webp

Or better, go full practical. May cost more but people do enjoy watching something that they know is real.
I have become something of a luddite, and I am convinced that after a certain point, digital aids make doing something too "easy", and the creativity that is needed to fuel making entertainment is lost since "anyone" can now do it with digital aids.
Hollysoy directors will never feel the accomplishment of pulling a real steamship up a mountain for a scene
1751320587344.webp1751320657112.webp
And having their work be so memorable it still gets referenced randomly 40 years later.
 
Last edited:
Don't confuse "Hollywood Hills" with "Hollywood", the latter meaning the flatlands along Hollywood and Sunset Boulevards west of Vermont Street, the former meaning the mansions in the foothills of the Santa Monica Mountains between the end of the flatlands and the Hollywood Sign. That said, the Hollywood Hills were built out in the 50s and getting a mansion there either means you are at the top of the celeb social pyramid or you are a nepobaby who inherited it. The lower part of the A List lives in places like Los Feliz, with the singers and reality TV stars living in Calabasas or Thousand Oaks, with some in Encino. As for the Hollywood flatlands, you're right except for maybe the Scientologists, who aren't nearly as numerous as in their 90s heyday when you had to join the cult to get anywhere in acting. Don't forget the flood of young faggots and troons who get kicked out of their homes and sent to Los Angeles on one way Greyhound tickets.

Edit: fucking typos, I'm going blind ffs...
I wasn't in just didn't feel like explaining all the different areas hence the general they don't live in Hollywood. As for scientologists they still have the big ass eye sore on Hollywood Boulevard last i was there a couple of months ago where they have a peon barracks set up. The others are covered by dregs lol. Otherwise thanks for fleshing out my other areas.
 
I just wonder, if the cost and ability to film allows for more projects independent of Hollywood, then why am I not watching that instead? Why am I still watching old Hollywood movies for the hundredth time and still being impressed? Might be the comfortability of nostalgia, or is it something else?
 
There are actors in Hollywood that demand $25 MILLION a movie..... For ~3-6 weeks or work maybe.

It's crazy. The crew has to work their asses off while the actors just make bank on their name and likeness. Say a few lines and go back to your air conditioned trailer until your next scene.

Also, are the kids really even into big Hollywood productions anymore? They have TikTok. The scene has changed a lot. If Hollywood can't adapt then they are going to have to get into a new industry.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Lil Yappy
I just wonder, if the cost and ability to film allows for more projects independent of Hollywood, then why am I not watching that instead? Why am I still watching old Hollywood movies for the hundredth time and still being impressed? Might be the comfortability of nostalgia, or is it something else?
I do the same thing, I too used to chalk it up to rose-tinted nostalgia glasses, but?

In the last 10 years in particular? I've come to see it as a conscious choice to avoid bad movies, and all modern movies really ARE bad.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Lady Bizness
Also, are the kids really even into big Hollywood productions anymore? They have TikTok. The scene has changed a lot. If Hollywood can't adapt then they are going to have to get into a new industry.
I didn't even think of this. When I used to teach, at the beginning of my career kids loved a movie day. Right before I quit they could not sit through a whole movie and couldn't follow the plot either.
 
  • Horrifying
Reactions: KiwiFuzz2
Back