Lionsgate Boss Says Studio Can Use AI to Adjust a Movie’s Rating and Create Kid-Friendly Cuts - Multi billionaire companies stop doing retarded shit and make good movie challenge (impossible)

https://www.yahoo.com/entertainment/articles/lionsgate-boss-says-studio-ai-153717081.html
Lionsgate announced last September it hadinked a deal with AI startup Runway to allow filmmakers the chance to “augment” their work and to help the studio “enhance and supplement” their operations. The pact was touted as Runway’s first deal with a Hollywood studio. So how exactly does Lionsgate plan to use AI? Vice chairman Michael Burns recently spoke to New York Magazine and said his studio is trying stuff to “see what sticks” when it comes to AI.

Burns said the driving force behind the Runway deal was to allow filmmakers to “make movies and television shows we’d otherwise never make. We can’t make it for $100 million, but we’d make it for $50 million because of AI… We’re banging around the art of the possible. Let’s try some stuff, see what sticks.”

ADVERTISEMENT

As reported by New York Magazine: “With a library as large as Lionsgate’s, they could use Runway to repackage and resell what the studio already owned, adjusting tone, format and rating to generate a softer cut for a younger audience or convert a live-action film into a cartoon.”

Burns said the studio can use AI to take one of their signature action franchises (the studio is behind the “John Wick” and “Hunger Games” movies, for instance) and “now we can say, ‘Do it in anime, make it PG-13.’ Three hours later, I’ll have the movie.” The executive stressed he would still have to pay the actors and all other rights participants, adding: “But I can do that, and now I can resell it.”

As for another example of how the studio can use AI, Burns said to consider this scenario: “We have this movie we’re trying to decide whether to green-light. There’s a 10-second shot — 10,000 soldiers on a hillside with a bunch of horses in a snowstorm.” Using Runaway’s AI technology, the studio can avoid a pricy film shoot that would cost millions and take a few days and use AI to create the shot for about $10,000.

“He wasn’t sure the film would be made at all, but the math was working,” New York Magazine notes.

ADVERTISEMENT

When the deal was first announced, Burns stressed that several filmmakers the studio works with were “already excited about its potential applications to their pre-production and post-production process.”

Runway, based in New York City, has raised $237 million in funding to date from investors including Google, Nvidia and Salesforce Ventures. The company says its AI research is “shaping the next era of art, entertainment and human creativity.”
 
honestly im really happy that ai is fucking over "artists" more than anyone else
What do you mean by that? Do you mean the multibillion dollar companies like Disney that like to larp as the same studio they were? If so I agree.
they're gonna try to find a way to get around this and I really hope they succeed.
None of us are safe from the greed of corporations being cheap. Get this “yeah but the leopards won’t eat my face” mentality out of your head now because they can and most certainly will,
 
Last edited:
Sure thing buddy, I am sure the end result will be great and totally not a mess of hallucinations and fucked edits.

I'm surprised we haven't seen nigger-free remakes of some movies and TV shows already (not from the original studios of course). I was expecting those within 6 months of deepfake technology hitting the mainstream.

Because the tech is nowhere near as good as they are hyping it up to be. The longer a LLM generated video goes on the more likely it is to go completly off the rails. It's chaos theory on crack, the little things pile up and eventually it all goes fucky. Why do you think the google VEO advertisement video had shots that were at most 5 seconds each?

You need to babysit the fuck out of the LLMA to get it to do what you want. At that point it's less frustrating to just make it yourself.
 
Woah, I guess I can forgive all the (((anti-White propaganda))) if they're going to edit Saw and Get Out to allow my kids to consoom it! Here, let me go sprint to support hollyjew...
slow fucker.gif
 
You need to babysit the fuck out of the LLMA to get it to do what you want.
That's what I had in mind, yeah. But it wouldn't take that long for a small team of dedicated autists to swap an actor for another one in all their scenes one by one, make it as clean as possible, and insert those back in the movie. Imagine the recent Dune movies, but Zendaya is replaced by [insert your waifu here].
There are already mountains of shitposts doing similar stuff, I'm just surprised no one has done the high effort version of those yet (or I haven't heard of it).
 
Sure thing buddy, I am sure the end result will be great and totally not a mess of hallucinations and fucked edits.



Because the tech is nowhere near as good as they are hyping it up to be. The longer a LLM generated video goes on the more likely it is to go completly off the rails. It's chaos theory on crack, the little things pile up and eventually it all goes fucky. Why do you think the google VEO advertisement video had shots that were at most 5 seconds each?

You need to babysit the fuck out of the LLMA to get it to do what you want. At that point it's less frustrating to just make it yourself.
Not to bring up the Saw franchise again, but maybe it going off the rails might actually make that con deluded story make sense for once.
 
Woah, I guess I can forgive all the (((anti-White propaganda))) if they're going to edit Saw and Get Out to allow my kids to consoom it! Here, let me go sprint to support hollyjew...
View attachment 7470438
I'd watch Saw Kidz Bop edition. Would be funny to see how they make that kid friendly. Do they turn the blood into confetti?
 
Let's take advice from the vice chairman of Lionsgate a proven expert with an established track record of consistent success having been in that role since 2000. Well apart from the run of 13 under-performers and outright flops they had last year. 'Member Borderlands, the Crow reboot, Never Let Go, The Killer's Game, Megalopolis, White Bird, 1992? If you do it's not for good reasons.

Not saying AI doesn't have value/uses but the hypetrain isn't so much off the tracks as was never on tracks. Want to apply a dose of reality to the AI hype industry? Hold those who create and use it responsible for the output.
 
Just make a goddamn kids' movie if you want a child audience, not all stories can be edited down for a kid to safely watch.

Anyone else remember VidAngel, where this was actually what they advertised (filtering out naughty scenes of nudity and violence like the V-chip), but they got sued by companies over copyright? Interesting how Lionsgate wants to do the same thing with their movies, now.
 
Sure thing buddy, I am sure the end result will be great and totally not a mess of hallucinations and fucked edits.



Because the tech is nowhere near as good as they are hyping it up to be. The longer a LLM generated video goes on the more likely it is to go completly off the rails. It's chaos theory on crack, the little things pile up and eventually it all goes fucky. Why do you think the google VEO advertisement video had shots that were at most 5 seconds each?

You need to babysit the fuck out of the LLMA to get it to do what you want. At that point it's less frustrating to just make it yourself.
There is something I have commented about the video gaming industry, but pretty much entertainment in general and that is the over usages of technology when other less expensive aspects can be used.

Through out the years, (as it is shown by the absolute bullshit that is thrown for viewing) you can see how large and bloated with fucking useless Faggots (and yes I am stating the USELESS faggots) getting dirty hands into a piece of entertainment.

Andor is a perfect example of GENERATION FAIL AND THEIR WOKE, DEI, MIND VIRUS, just ooozing into themselves into that failed production. Overall, a bloated 650+ million dollar slop of shit not even made for the silver screen. 650+ million for that bloated piece of shit???
Come on man...


650+ million dollars of D-E-I-faggotry. Alot of this expense comes from the use of CGI/High Tech.

The woke mind virsus from Generation Fail has so damned infected the creative aspect of todays industry, I don't think they can recover from it.

AI is a tool and currently it is a tool being implemented to cut costs. It will be used to reduce employment in the ranks. But right now AI is in it's infancy and it needs years to really be succcessful.

How it is being used now by the current entertainment industry? A lot of Faggotry currently.

And with the fucking years knowing this sector of the market, the Faggotry will continue.
 
BS marketing fluffpiece disguising itself as a legitimate news article.
Burns said the studio can use AI to take one of their signature action franchises (the studio is behind the “John Wick” and “Hunger Games” movies, for instance) and “now we can say, ‘Do it in anime, make it PG-13.’ Three hours later, I’ll have the movie.” The executive stressed he would still have to pay the actors and all other rights participants, adding: “But I can do that, and now I can resell it.”
Okay, so how are you going to make John Wick PG-13? The violence is intrinsic to the movie and its appeal. In what way by changing the movie (through AI or otherwise) will you have something that in any way resembles the same movie? Are we just talking about making cuts to specific scenes (which is hardly a new concept), or are we talking about removing it entirely? Because you either don't need AI to do that or you're asking AI to make an entirely new movie.
 
Last edited:
Back